Preview

Indian Removal Act

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1002 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Indian Removal Act
Who should move? The Cherokee or Americans? The Indian Removal Act was created by the former President Andrew Jackson in 1830. The Americans wanted to settle land in Georgia, but most of the Cherokee tribes refused. The Indian Removal act of 1830 was not justified and the Cherokees should not move because they fought for the U.S., Cherokees were cheated in trade by the U.S., and the supreme court ruled in favor for the Cherokees.
The Cherokees should not move because they fought for the United States during the War of 1812. Two Native Americans helped the U.S. Their names were Red Jacket and Farmer’s Brother. They helped the U.S. lead a group of Native Americans, one of the five nations. The group of Native Americans helped and fought at Fort
…show more content…
The Native Americans were treated horribly, when they trusted the Americans. The U.S., stole their horses and many died from diseases. This information was gotten from the article called “Allow the Cherokee to Stay,” it stated “Their horses were stolen and hundreds died from disease and malnutrition on the journey.” This quote means that they agreed to move nicely and calmly, but the U.S., still did not treat them fair. That’s not all, when one tribe called the Lakota Nation agreed to move westward because there would be food, water, and land. The U.S., tricked them and they went to imprisonment camps. This was in the article called “ The Betrayal of Native Americans”, it said, “Instead, many Lakota live on reservations (or prisoner of war camps, as they might be called) like Pine Ridge, which is annually one of the most impoverished places in the United States.” This states that Native Americans agree to move where it would be better, but the U.S. still treated them horribly. It was not only the U.S., it was also Canda. The Canadians agreed to help the native groups with money because the U.S. and Canada were the richest nations back then. Instead, the Canadians poisoned their water, soil, and air. Some of the native groups were from the first nations. They were the Inuit, Métis tribe, and others . This was in the article called, “The Betrayal of Native Americans”. The quote stated, “Instead of honoring its …show more content…
Supreme court supported the Cherokee in favor to not let Georgia force them off their land. The Cherokee were tired of fighting and learned to compromise, instead of resulting to scalping and burning people alive. The Cherokee decided to educate themselves. Their leaders were well educated. They even had a constitution, schools, and a newspaper. They went to the president to show him that they were civilized, and that they could hopefully stay. The Cherokee nation were shocked when he said there was nothing he can do. This information was from the article called, “Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Act”, it stated in quote, “Many of their leaders were well educated; many more could read and write; they had their own written language, thanks to Sequoyah, a constitution, schools, and their own newspaper.” This means that instead of leaving their homeland, they can compromise and become more civilized. The Cherokee did not stop because they wanted their freedom. The Cherokee went to William Wirt to take their situation to the Supreme Court. William Wirt took it to court and argued that the independent nation was regarded by the U.S. and its many treaties with them. Then it went to John Marshall, but it was rejected. Until they read John Marshall’s decision, and knew they were going to win. The final decision came and the Cherokee stayed. They were also encouraged by missionaries. This was gotten from the article called “Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Act.”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The idea of getting the Indians to moves elsewhere came about on May 30, 1830. The government which was Andrew Jackson and his fellow workers came up with a movement called the Indian Removal Act. This act evicted 46,000 Indians from their property and to move west. Nobody liked the Indians and the government never took them serious. The Indian act was great move to the whites because it left 25 million acres of land. Socially the white seen this as a gain because they needed more land to produce food and slavery. Racism played a big part in the Indian Removal Act. This act helps us understand how landscape played a big part in forming the culture and environment people back then had to adopt to. The Indian Act affected us today because we are treated second to white any…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The U.S got the Louisiana Territory in 1803. Then during his presidency, Andrew Jackson got Congress to pass the Indian Removal Act. This act stated that all Indians that wished to follow their own tradition must move to the Indian Territory where they would have more than 70,000 square miles of free land. When this act was passed, all Indians but the Cherokee signed the Treaty of Echota agreeing to move. Jackson thought it was necessary to take action against them to enforce the law. But the question is was the U.S justified in passing the Indian Removal Act forcing all Indians to move. I say no, the U.S was not justified in passing the act. The Indians have had a right to this land way before we did.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971 the Cherokee tribe was in the process of making treaties with United States. The state of Georgia recognized the Cherokee tribe as a nation allowing them to make their own laws and follow their native customs. In the late 1700’s their land started to be invaded by the white man. The Cherokee Indians began to move to Arkansas. (Historical Context) I believe the Indians were taken advantage of and had no option but to move when their land was taken away from them. Georgia and the United States had no regard for the treaties that were put in place. The treaties changed depending on who was in office at the time, the Indians had no choice but to move and give up their land. United States v. Georgia, Chief Justice John Marshall, stated “the Cherokee nation was a domestic independent nation, and therefore Georgia state law applied to them.” When Georgia continued to press the tribe for their land the “Treaty Party” began to make treaties with the federal government to give up their land. The majority of the tribe disagreed with the New Echota treaty where their land was sold for $5 million dollars and the tribe had to move beyond the Mississippi River. Due to corrupt government and the demands of President Andrew Jackson and President Martin Van Buren in 1838, the Indians were “rounded up” and forced off their land and moved to other states.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cherokees had lived in the interior southeast, for hundreds of years in the nineteenth century. But in the early eighteenth century setters from the European ancestry started moving into the Cherokees territory. From then on the colonial governments in the area began demanding that the Cherokees give up their territory. By the end of the Revolutionary War, the Cherokees had surrendered more than half of their original territory to the state and federal government.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cherokee Removal

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Cherokee people were forced out of their land because of the settler’s greed for everything and anything the land had to offer. Many Cherokee even embraced the “civilization program,” abandoning their own beliefs so that they may be accepted by white settlers. Unfortunately for the Cherokee though, the settlers would never accept them as an equal citizen. A quote from historian Richard White says it very well, “The Cherokee are probably the most tragic instance of what could have succeeded in American Indian policy and didn’t. All these things that Americans would proudly see as the hallmarks of civilization are going to the West by Indian people. They do everything they were asked except one thing. What the Cherokees ultimately are, they may be Christian, they may be literate, they may have a government like ours, but ultimately they are Indian. And in the end, being Indian is what killed them.”…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ever since we settled here on this land, we have pushed aside the Native Americans to make room for expansion. The Native Americans have been forced to deal with this new culture moving in by embracing the heritage, combining the two, or fighting back with violence. In 1830, President Andrew Jackson began his Removal Policy and attempted to force all Native Americans from their homes, to west of the Mississippi River. In an attempt to prevent the state of Georgia from taking their land from them, the Cherokee tribe went to court. In Worcester vs Georgia, the court ruled that the state of Georgia had no authority over the territory but Georgia ignored the ruling. The United States Army rounded up the Cherokee and forced them to march west in a movement called the Trail of Tears. The Trail of Tears is a movement that limited the rights of the Native Americans. The Declaration of Independence clearly states that every man has the right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Forcing the entire tribe to relocate to a new land is denying the Native Americans of their rights of all three of these things; therefore limited their rights.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But unfortunately, President Andrew Jackson ignored this ruling. He sent federal troops to remove the Cherokee. With the harsh winter conditions in 1838 the troops succeeded in removing the Cherokee form Georgia, and forced them to march to Oklahoma.…

    • 569 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mississippi River; this relocation was meant to be voluntary, but it was not. In 1832, the…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, it was not the entire government that thought Native Americans should be relocated. In Worcester v. Georgia, a case where a Cherokee tribe appealed to the Supreme Court, the ruling was, in fact, in favor of the Cherokee Indians. Chief Justice John Marshall, in the majority opinion of the Court, wrote “The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community, occupying its own territory, with boundaries accurately described, in which the laws of Georgia can have no force.” He clearly stated that the Cherokee Indians have a right to their own land, are completely separate from the state of Georgia, and the whole…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many events that led up to the removal of the Eastern Cherokee in the early-to-mid 19th century. However, it all really begins in 1830. Major Ridge was discussing treaties regarding selling land to the U.S. Government. The Cherokee believed that lived in their own sanctuary, their paradise, and that their ancestors had always lived here. Major Ridge felt if he could die to preserve his people land’s he would gladly do so. The Cherokee picked the wrong side during the American Revolution which caused American soldiers to desecrate Cherokee lands. He did not wish that same tragedy amongst his people. President Jefferson believed that eventually through cultural assimilation the Indian people and Americans would become one and we would…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act DBQ

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was a passage brought into play in the mid-1830s. At the time, Andrew Jackson was the President of the U.S. who was responsible for signing the law into action. After a mere two days of discussion, Jackson signed the law. In Layman's terms, Jackson was about to go into the territory controlled by the Indian tribes in the south and essentially force them to vacate and transition to land that was located near the Mississippi River. One must understand that they territory controlled by these Indian tribes as aforementioned was their ancestral homeland. This was not an area that was recently occupied. It was in the control of the Indian tribes for decades upon decades. This is the land that they had grown up on and had called…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were some reasons why the Cherokees moved in the first place. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 justified because the Indians did things that are very uncalled for. They did things like, scalping men, women, and children alive. and They also burned them on stakes. Also the Cherokees agree to move because they signed a treaty that if they sign it they agreed to move. Plus when they move they get to receive five million dollars and they also get a lot of land. So the Cherokees agree to move and get land and five million dollars and the Americans don’t want to die.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Move the Cherokee to Indian Territory” by Jack Andrews, it states, “We should also remember that these Indians have waged war on America since 1775.” This quote shows that the Americans and the Indians have been enemies since 1775. The article also says, “In 1776 the Cherokees ravaged American settlements in North and South Carolina, killing men, women and children. In many cases their victims were scalped alive and even burned at the stake.” This shows that the Americans are justified for the seeing the Indians as enemies because of the way that the Indians have treated them in the past. It would be madness to invite someone who had kidnapped and murdered a friend to stay at one’s home. The opposing side might argue that Americans have treated the Indians badly as well by cheating them during trading and breaking agreements. However, if the Indians were to move away to the Indian Territory, they would be free to govern themselves and would not have to deal with any or all Americans ever…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a policy established through congress, that allowed the federal government to move the Native Americans out of their lands further west. When white Georgians discovered gold in western Georgia, they requested that the Cherokee Natives be removed so a gold mine could be established. In the Cherokee v. Georgia case, the Cherokee were found, by the Supreme Court, to have their own sovereignty and that the U.S state could not interfere with their land without permission. However, president Jackson disregarded the Supreme Courts decision and revoked the the Cherokee's rights to their land and began their removal. The Nation was forced to travel one thousand miles, leaving Georgia for Oklahoma on a grueling walk…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cherokee White Settlers

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As the White settlement expand west, the Cherokees were threatened that their land will 8be taken away from them. To the Cherokees, the land has been passed down from their forefathers. If Cherokees leave their territory it would means that they would have to get use to a new environment, and leave where their ancestors have lived there for years since anyone can remember. However, if they stay and resist, they might be forced to follow the rules of the…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays