Preview

Ap Us History Dbq Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
654 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ap Us History Dbq Research Paper
J Fircha
Honors US History I
2 March 2012
Removal of Indians DBQ All presidents have a legacy; some good, some bad. Andrew Jackson’s legacy is the Indian Removal Act. This act was not supported by the Supreme Court, made Native Americans leave the places that they called home for countless years, and had a huge impact on Native Americans personally. In 1830, with consent and encouragement from President Andrew Jackson, many Indians were wrongly forced off of their native lands and onto foreign ones. To begin with, it was not the entire government that thought Native Americans should be relocated. In Worcester v. Georgia, a case where a Cherokee tribe appealed to the Supreme Court, the ruling was, in fact, in favor of the Cherokee Indians. Chief Justice John Marshall, in the majority opinion of the Court, wrote “The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community, occupying its own territory, with boundaries accurately described, in which the laws of Georgia can have no force.” He clearly stated that the Cherokee Indians have a right to their own land, are completely separate from the state of Georgia, and the whole
…show more content…
They were in a foreign place. The Seminoles, Creeks, Cherokees, Choctaws, and Chickasaws Indian tribes are just a few examples of the Indians removed from their homes (Doc 4). In document four you can see that they all came from very different and unique lands and were all simply grouped into one territory. Andrew Jackson had no sympathy for them. He called them savages and recognized them as an inferior race (Doc 3). He also said that they had “neither the intelligence, the industry, the moral habits, nor the desire of improvement” to change their condition. Andrew Jackson publically degraded Native Americans everywhere and made his hatred

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap Us History Dbq

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1.) American society wasn’t that democratic during the colonial days. Although it was much more democratic than England, it still wasn’t quite there yet. The constitution wasn’t signed and agreed upon until 1787, and before the turn of the 18th century, the colonies were a big mess. Most cities had an oligarchy, meaning a religious leader was in charge, making everyone abide by their rules, although it was often less religious and more on the tyrannical side. There wasn’t much separation of church and state. The only people who could vote were members of the church in most colonies, although some colonies allowed white men who owned property to have the right of franchise. People were hung, flogged, and exiled. Indentured servants had it bad,…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democracy DBQ

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Their beliefs verified to not apply to the Indians when Jackson, with the support of his administration, exiled them from their ancestral lands and drove them along the "Trail of Tears" to new "homelands" in Oklahoma. [Doc G] Jackson did this even after the Cherokee were established as an independent nation. After defing the Supreme Court by doing this, Jackson defended this horrendous decision by claiming that the Indians would be better off "out of the way" and that the occurrence was a "voluntary" migration west of the…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Peopl

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This movement to get rid of the Indians was aided by General Jackson, who set the Indian removal into effect in the war of 1812. He did this when he battled the great Tecumseh and conquered his allied Indian nation, then started to distribute their lands. Jackson became the leader of the distribution of Indian lands, and distributed them in unequal ways. In 1828 when Jackson was running for President, his platform was based upon Indian Removal, which was a popular issue. Jackson, who won a sweeping victory, began to formulate his strategies on how he would use an "Indian Removal campaign". In 1829, after seeing that his beloved Indian Removal Bill was not being followed, Jackson began dealing with the Indian tribes and offered them "untouchable" tracts of lands west of the Mississippi River if they would only cede their lands to the US and move themselves there.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While President Andrew Jackson is often made out to be a villain for his treatment of the Native Americans, he is not to blame for the massive loss of life the tribes experienced. Most of the non-natives in the South, especially Georgia, supported the Indian Removal Act, shaping the South’s political views and putting pressure on Congress, the Senate, and Jackson himself. Eager to take on Native American lands, appetites were large for the Native Americans to be removed.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Not many of the citizens in the public seemed to care about how the Indians were treated and nothing was done to stop treating them poorly. The people did not try and get rid of the main person who leads it all, Andrew Jackson, they kept him in office and did not speak out against anything he did over his eight years in office. As most can see, the Indian Removal Acts were completely unconstitutional and were a very bad time in the years of America. The government was corrupt under “King Andrew” and it lead to many innocent deaths. This time is looked down on but can not be forgotten. The government America has today ensures that nothing like this could ever happen again.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many families lost members along the way. Those who did survive were not in a good condition when they got to the “Indian Territory.” In addition to all of those problems, the Native Americans would have to relearn the land they are now forced to live in. Most of them, if not all, have lived in the same area for their whole life and knew the land very well. They also studied the habits of animals in the area to know the best situation for hunting. The Native Americans did not favor this action, but they were left with either moving to the new land, possibly dying along the way, or defying the demands of the white settlers and most likely being killed by them.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One man can have the ability to change history. Many leaders have come and gone but Americans have never seen a one like Andrew Jackson. Unafraid of his rivals, Jackson was a fierce individual that was not to be reckoned with. His upbringing had a lot to do with the person he developed into. A fire was lit within him after being taken by the British army and then assaulted. He then made it his mission to defeat the British for good. He created an army out of an untrained local militia, slaves, and Indians. After the demise of the British army, America was considering the expansion of its borders. And so, the talks of Indian removal began to rise. (notes)…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Native Americans fought in court to stay on their land and even though they won President Jackson still forced them to leave. In 1830 Congress passed the Indian Removal Act because white settlers didn’t want to live with the Native Americans. Andrew Jackson’s reasons for defending the Indian Removal Act were fraudulent and in the eyes of the Native Americans would be unfair and irrelevant. A few reasons would be the Trail of Tears, the Five Civilized Tribes, and the fact that the Cherokee Nation went to court.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cherokee Native Americans had to move to the west of the Mississippi River from where ever they were. They had to move from their original homes because they were “in the way” of the growing states. Document H2 is a graphic of where the Native Americans started and trail they took to Oklahoma. All of the Native American tribes were originally in one of the growing states. It was a problem for them to be in the states because they were not under the United States leadership, they were not officially apart of the United States, and they were in the way. They were relocated because they could not be civilized Americans, according to Andrew Jackson. He said, “My friends, circumstances render it impossible that you can…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Trail Of Tears

    • 2270 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The primary reason for the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was that the white settlers of this country discovered gold in the northern part of Georgia and became hungry for more land. This brought about a gold rush to most of the state and gave president Jackson a reason to push the Indians out of the area in order for more white Americans could come to Georgia (A Brief Histroy). President Jackson also felt a need to protect the United states from threats on the inside of our country in reference he was speaking about the Indians that lived in our country (Prucha, 528). After the American Revolution, the Americans wanted to act civilly toward the Indians and turn over a new leaf by trying to get along with and help the Indians. The Cherokee…

    • 2270 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was designed to remove all Indians east of the Mississippi River out west into what is now known as Oklahoma. There are several reasons why Indian removal occurred. Most importantly, expanding white settlements were inevitable as the population grew. Native Americans were harassed by these settlers because they wanted their land. For instance, gold was found in Georgia, thus making the Cherokee land more desirable. The Cherokee were forced out although the court case Cherokee Nation v. Georgia ruled that the Cherokee had a right to their land and that the Indian Removal Act was unconstitutional (“Native Americans”).…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cherokee Indian Removal

    • 4670 Words
    • 19 Pages

    The tragedy of the Cherokee nation has haunted the legacy of Andrew Jackson"'"s Presidency. The events that transpired after the implementation of his Indian policy are indeed heinous and continually pose questions of morality for all generations. Ancient Native American tribes were forced from their ancestral homes in an effort to increase the aggressive expansion of white settlers during the early years of the United States. The most notable removal came after the Indian Removal Act of 1830. The Cherokee, whose journey was known as the '"'Trail of Tears'"', and the four other civilized tribes, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek and Seminole, were forced to emigrate to lands west of the Mississippi River, to…

    • 4670 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    America had many treaties with the Cherokee and other Native Americans, and many people, Americans and Cherokee, believed that by ignoring those treaties would be immoral and unconstitutional. Jeremiah Evarts who was a strongly opposed to removal states how all attempts to force the Cherokee out of their land, “are acts of oppression” and “the United States are firmly bound by treaty to protect the Indians from force and encroachments on the part of a State”. Americans were deeply concerned about the stain it would put on America and by forcing the Cherokee out of their land, America is ignoring Indian rights. Similarly, a majority of the Cherokee were gravely opposed to removal and firmly stood their ground and stayed where they were until they were dragged out. Their reasons for this are very simple; their ancestors had been living on the land long before any white settlers and they believed that God had given them that land, and along with the treaties between them and America, clearly give them the rights to the land. In an address to the Cherokee Council in 1830, it is expressed to, “remain on the land of our fathers. We have a perfect and original right to claim this,...The treaties with us, and the laws of the United States,...guaranty our residence, and our privileges, and secure us against intruders”. To the Cherokee people and many Americans, it seemed unfathomable that America created a constitution based on freedom and rights, but now they are taking the rights away from the people who occupied the lands before them. To these people it was immoral and unconstitutional to ignore the treaties that had been made and force the Cherokee out of their…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cherokee Removal

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Cherokee people were forced out of their land because of the settler’s greed for everything and anything the land had to offer. Many Cherokee even embraced the “civilization program,” abandoning their own beliefs so that they may be accepted by white settlers. Unfortunately for the Cherokee though, the settlers would never accept them as an equal citizen. A quote from historian Richard White says it very well, “The Cherokee are probably the most tragic instance of what could have succeeded in American Indian policy and didn’t. All these things that Americans would proudly see as the hallmarks of civilization are going to the West by Indian people. They do everything they were asked except one thing. What the Cherokees ultimately are, they may be Christian, they may be literate, they may have a government like ours, but ultimately they are Indian. And in the end, being Indian is what killed them.”…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chief Justice John Marshall ruled in favor of the Cherokees, saying that they were a "domestic dependent nation" and as such could not be forced by a state to give up their lands unwillingly. “John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it,” (Jackson). But under the Constitution, the President enforces the laws, not the Supreme Court. Jackson essentially said that he would not enforce the Court's decision and he did not. Although this was specifically a blow to the Cherokee case against Georgia for passing laws arbitrarily, it cast doubt on the constitutionality of the Indian Removal Act. Jackson’s actions established a sense of racism in which he insisted to pass the act for the sake of expansion, no matter how the Court and some other Cabinet members defended those sovereigns of their own soil. This relative condition of the two races of men was a moral problem involved in much…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays