Preview

Illegal Searches of Prisoners and Those on Parole and Probation

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2812 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Illegal Searches of Prisoners and Those on Parole and Probation
Illegal Searches of Prisoners and those on Parole and Probation

Outline

I. Introduction
II. On Imprisonment, Parole and Probation
III. Purpose and Legality of Searches
IV. Illegal Searches in the Case of Prisoners, Parolees and Probationers
V. Conclusion
VI. References

I. Introduction The criminal justice system works in such a way that certain behavior or actions are legislated as a criminal offense wherein the state or the federal government can prosecute an offender even if only being suspected. In this case, there exists rules or limits into which protection are of highest concerns. It does not only apply to civilian suspects but also extends to actual prisoners, and to those who are on parole and under probation. But in reality, it has become a worldwide issue in terms of illegal searches. It has even been stipulated in the U.S. Constitution 's Bill of Rights stating that these restrictions start on the premises of the rights to refuse to testify against oneself, the right to confront one 's accuser and the right to a trial by jury for people charged with crimes. But these federal protections may not always seem to hold especially when police enforcers are dealing with prisoners, people on parole and on probation status. This happens because the jurisdictions regarding these matters depend on the ruling court. The court regulates and decides whether the legislative rule, court practice or police action is permissible under the federal and state constitutional law. From here, we can say during the course of searches, we should be aware and vigilant of possible violations by the apprehending police officers. In such cases, knowledge of the legality, technicality and the law should at least be required or at least explained to the person being searched. As mentioned a while ago, the case becomes quite sensitive for people who are imprisoned, on parole and under probation. The situation for them is very difficult in the sense that they are



References: Adelman, Stanley E. (2006). U.S. V Knights: Supreme Court Rules on Searches of Probation by Policies. American Probation and Parole Association. [Online]. Available:http://www.appa-net.org/PSN/pdfs/USv_Knights.pdf Avitan, Galit and Concepcion, Theresa.(2006, February). Supreme Court Oral Arrangements Preview: Samson v California. [Online]. Available: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/04-9728.html Flex Your Rights Foundation. (2005). Illegal Police Searches. [Online]. Available: http://www.flexyourrights.org/illegal_police_searches Illegal Strip Search 's San Francisco Jails. [Online]. Available: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi- bin/articl....DTL&type=news Lectric Law Library 's Legal Lexicon. (2006). Fourth Amendment. [Online]. Available: http://www.lectlaw.com/def/f081.htm Leicht, Justus. (2006, November). CagePrisoners. [Online]. Available: http://www.cageprisoners.com/articles.php?id=17697 [Online]. Available: http://www.bartleylawfirm.com/criminal.htm [Online]. Available: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/printer_friendly.pl?page =us/000/97- 581.html Roberts, Thomas H. (2006). Fourth Amendment Law. [Online]. Available: http://www.robertslaw.org/4thamend.htm What is an Illegal Search? [Online]. Available: http://www.legalmatch.com/law- library/article/illegal-searches.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It is common for a search to be defined as any action by government officials, which involves seeking for indication of a violation of law. Nonetheless, according to the Court’s cases, a search ensues when there is a physical invasion into one of the “constitutionally protected areas” which can be associated with the Fourth Amendment: persons, papers and effects (Whitebread and Slobogin, 120). Silverman vs United States (1961) exemplify how searches have conditions. Evidence officers gathered by eavesdropping on…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In an effort to maximize an individuals rights during search and seizures along with stop-and-frisks, the United States government has developed numerous laws and amendments. The Fourth Amendment states, The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized (U.S. Constitution). This amendment was first used in the court system in the case of Terry vs. Ohio (1968). This case was the case that shaped the stop-and-frisk laws that are found in our country today. In 1942 legislators started to authorize stops-and-frisks on less than probable cause under the Uniform Arrest Act. This act gave an officer the right stop a person in public based upon reasonable ground to suspect that the person is committing has committed, or is about to commit a crime, and then search him for a dangerous weapon if the officer has reasonable ground to believe that he is in danger (Whitebread, 2000). In 1968 the Supreme Court addressed the issue in terry v. ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889. In Terry an experienced plainclothes officer observed three men acting suspiciously; they were walking back and forth on a street and peering into a particular store window. The officer concluded that the men were preparing to rob a nearby store and approached them. He identified himself as a police officer and asked for their names. Unsatisfied with their responses, he then subjected one of the men to a frisk, which produced a gun for which the suspect…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Over time, technology has impacted the police and other law enforcement agencies with new devices for gathering evidence. These new tools have caused constitutional questions to surface. One particular case in Oregon of an individual (DLK) aroused such question. DLK was suspected of growing marijuana inside of his home. Agents used a thermal imager to scan DLK’s residence form the outside. The results indicated heat, just like the kind that is generated by special lights used for growing marijuana indoors. Constructed by the scan, a judge issued a search warrant. A warrant – a legal paper authorizing a search – cannot be issued unless there is a cause, and a probable cause must be sworn to by the police officer or prosecutor and approved by a judge. A warrant must describe what is being searched and what will be seized. 100 marijuana plants were found finalizing the arrest of DLK; however, did the scan violate DLK’s Fourth Amendment rights? The Fourth Amendment states, “The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall be issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Constitution). This amendment touches on the expectation of privacy in your home and person. The government is not unable to search you, your home, your belongings, or take your belongings, also known as a seizure, without a good reason. A person’s Fourth Amendment rights may at times seem to delay the world of law enforcement. If the police feel that they have…

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Probable Cause

    • 2409 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This paper discusses the underlying circumstances to obtaining a warrant, and proving probable cause. Certain exceptions are made by law in some situations, such as searching vehicles. All officers of the law, and court officials are legally obligated to follow all rights reserved by the Fourth Amendment, and without doing so they could jeopardize their case. Investigation must take place before an officer can prove probable cause to a judge, and obtain a warrant. Warrants are necessary documents in apprehending suspects, conducting searches, and seizures. Without warrants, in most cases, evidence will be ruled as inadmissible. There are several ways to prove probable cause to obtain warrants. Without sufficient probable cause a warrant can not be issued to officers.…

    • 2409 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 624 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fourth amendment guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, along with requiring any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause. The interpretation and execution of the Fourth amendment in the courtroom however, is decided by the Supreme Court in an attempt to find a fair balance between individual and community interests. The exclusionary rule for example, is a Supreme Court precedent that holds police departments responsible for seizing incriminating information according to constitutional specifications of due process, or the information will not be allowed as evidence in a criminal trial. The question that arises in turn, is whether the exclusionary rule has handcuffed the abilities to effectively protect the community by the police, or if it has actually resulted in a positive police reform which needs to be expanded upon.…

    • 624 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution states: Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause. This amendment impacts law enforcement because police need a warrant to make arrests and searches. This is not applicable if the officer has first-hand knowledge of an event and the evidence is likely to be destroyed or the subject will abscond if time is taken to get a warrant. If a warrantless search is made by the police that should have been made only after a warrant was issued, then all knowledge gained by that evidence is not allowed in testimony.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop and Frisk

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects people against unreasonable searches and seizures. Modern officials have granted police officers in New York City an incentive to respect the amendment. The Stop and Frisk program employed by the New York Police Department, gives police officers the right to initiate a stop of an individual on the street allegedly and do a quick search of their outer clothes for weapons based on if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that a crime has or is about to take place and the person stopped is armed or dangerous. This reasonable suspicion is not based with specific facts but from the hunches from New York Police officers.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The lawful arrest search incident is not restrictive to the issuance of a warrant. This means that if a person gets lawfully arrested, then the police have every right to search the person’s surrounding which is reach of the police.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On 4th Amendment

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, if there was a probable cause to search that person because they were somehow involved, or an eyewitness identified their involvement while the crime was happening, a police officer could search them. If law enforcement came upon a scene where a crime was in progress, they could enter and search a location or person within the location of the crime in progress without violating that person’s fourth amendment rights.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures; however, it does not guarantee against all searches and seizures if there is reasonable doubt. Searches are determined on two important interests. The first is the intrusion on the individual’s Fourth Amendment Rights; the second includes legitimate government interests such as national security. What constitutes a reasonable suspicion? Where must a public official draw the line? How should one address any “gray area” that might arise?…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dlk Case Analysis

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Document A provides an overview of a precedent case, Carroll v. United States, where it was decided that in the situation that evidence could be destroyed or hidden, it is constitutional to conduct a search without a warrant. The overview described the case saying “federal agents believed Carroll was selling liquor...they saw him driving...and pulled him over…they searched his car finding liquor and arrested him.” Although this case is in fact different from DLK v. United States, it mirrors one idea, law enforcement took action without a warrant. In DLK v. United States, the federal agents suspected DLK was growing marijuana in his home. However, because there was not sufficient evidence to obtain a warrant “the imager [was a reasonable way] for law enforcement to gather information without … a search warrant” (Document E). Using thermal imaging in this case was a permitted means of collecting information and is summarized well with Justice John Paul Stevens’s statement in Document F, “[t]he officers’ conduct did not amount to a search and was perfectly…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the police use searches or surveillance techniques that raises Fourth Amendment concerns and initial question that must be answered is: Did the person claiming the protection of the Fourth Amendment have a reasonable expectation of privacy that was invaded by the police actions? Consider the following examples and explain whether you think the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fourth Amendment Essay

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Due to the Fourth Amendment we have come to think that we will never feel violated and that we are secure enough in our society that we are protected by the Constitution. The only problem with those thoughts is that people are violated everyday because of probable cause. Unfortunately, if someone thinks that you’re up to something, they can search and seize whatever they want if it comes out that you’re a criminal, and what you are doing isn’t justified by the laws.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Authorities such as the police should be punished for searching a person with no possibility of being guilty, each case investigated at a later date. I believe if a police officer has any doubt no matter what it is, that a certain person is suspicious of a criminal act he or she should be able to search the individual. People should understand that they have to give up some rights for their own safety. The thought of someone getting away for the mere fact that an authority could not find an adequate legal reason to search; even though there could be doubt enough to catch the criminal should be enough for every innocent individual to consent search upon themselves.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With the understanding that police officers need a warrant to search for information that can be related to criminal activity by an individual, most people feel as this is the only way an police officer can search you or your property. They know that according to the exclusionary rule, evidence gained in an illegal search cannot be used to convict them of a crime. However, there are several circumstances the police do not need a warrant for a search, or for the evidence found from that search, to be able to use in court. Those exceptions to that rule are Search Incident to a Lawful Arrest, Hot Pursuit of a…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays