Preview

Robinette Case Brief Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
295 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Robinette Case Brief Essay
Robinette

Facts: Defendant was speeding 30 miles over the speed limit in a construction zone. A police officer stopped him, asked for the Defendant’s driver’s license which he produced. The officer ran a computer check which showed that the Def. didn’t have any previous violations. The officer asked the Defendant to step out of the car, turned on his video camera mounted on the officer’s vehicle and verbally warned the defendant for speeding, and then returned his license. After returning his license the officer asked the D whether he had any illegal contraband in his car such as drugs or weapons which he denied. police officer asked

Procedure: D was arrested and charged with knowing possession of an illegal controlled substance. US SC affirmed
…show more content…
Holding: yes

Reasoning: The court measures reasonableness in an objective basis, examining totality of the circumstances. TOC looks at the officer’s state of mind testing whether, under the circumstances, the officer reasonably believed that the defendant consented to the search voluntarily. When applying the test the court has to abstain the bright line rules and instead must emphasize the fact based reasonableness inquiry.

Rule:
In schneckloth, the argument that voluntary consent could not be valid unless the D knew that he/she had a right to refuse the request to being searched was rejected because the court believes that the gov. does not need to establish the reasonableness of effective consent. Just as it wouldn’t be practical to enforce the consent search the requirement’s details of an effective warning it would also be unreasonable for officers to always inform the people they are detaining that they are able to leave before the consent to search was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    1. The officer’s observation of the evidence must be lawful, meaning the officer had a legal right to be at the location, or the suspect did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the location,…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The legal issue of this case is whether or not the detective was unreasonable search and seize a persons' belongings without probable cause for an arrest.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Horton v California

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In California a police officer decided to search petitioner Horton’s home because he felt there was probable cause, the officer was searching for the stolen goods and the weapons used during the crime. The warrant given to the officer only authorized him to search for the stolen goods. As he made his way into the home of petitioner Horton he did not recover the stolen items, but found the weapons used during the crime and recovered them. When it got to the court the recovered weapons were allowed to be used against Horton, and Horton was later convicted of the crime. Since the officer testified that he did have intentions of looking for other evidence while looking for the stolen goods, the California court of appealed the conviction and then granted certiorari.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dereona

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The ruling was in a 5 to 3 decision, the Supreme Court held that when two co-occupants are present and one consents to a search while the other refuses, the search is not constitutional.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first person to claim not guilty was charged with speeding. I tried to get as many of the details of the case as possible. The facts of the case were as follows: While driving on Bogus Avenue, the defendant was stopped by an Officer and was charged with violating CVC 22350. The charge was driving 40mph in a 25mph zone based on laser evidence. The defendant stated he believed he was driving approximately 35 mph at the time of the stop.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The criminal justice system works in such a way that certain behavior or actions are legislated as a criminal offense wherein the state or the federal government can prosecute an offender even if only being suspected. In this case, there exists rules or limits into which protection are of highest concerns. It does not only apply to civilian suspects but also extends to actual prisoners, and to those who are on parole and under probation. But in reality, it has become a worldwide issue in terms of illegal searches. It has even been stipulated in the U.S. Constitution 's Bill of Rights stating that these restrictions start on the premises of the rights to refuse to testify against oneself, the right to confront one 's accuser and the right to a trial by jury for people charged with crimes. But these federal protections may not always seem to hold especially when police enforcers are dealing with prisoners, people on parole and on probation status. This happens because the jurisdictions regarding these matters depend on the ruling court. The court regulates and decides whether the legislative rule, court practice or police action is permissible under the federal and state constitutional law. From here, we can say during the course of searches, we should be aware and vigilant of possible violations by the apprehending police officers. In such cases, knowledge of the legality, technicality and the law should at least be required or at least explained to the person being searched. As mentioned a while ago, the case becomes quite sensitive for people who are imprisoned, on parole and under probation. The situation for them is very difficult in the sense that they are…

    • 2812 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One does not expect to leave their house and have a stranger barge into their home and rummage through their belongings. This is the situation that Petitioner David Fallsbauer found himself in with not a stranger, but a highly esteemed officer of the law, whom unreasonably dissected his possessions. Under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, citizens are protected against the unbridled and unreasonable searches and seizures. One exception is through consent to the search. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219 (9th Cir. 1973). Petitioner David Fallsbauer can demonstrate through established case law that the consent his mother gave was ambiguous. Because his mother’s consent was ambiguous, the consent was not…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the early morning hours of September 18, 1992, a police officer employed by defendant Town of Cheektowaga pulled over an automobile owned by plaintiff's decedent, Jacqueline Walsh. An acquaintance of Walsh was driving and she was a passenger. As the result of the traffic stop, the acquaintance was placed under arrest for driving while intoxicated. Based upon his observations of Walsh, the officer determined that Walsh was also intoxicated and unable to drive safely. The officer testified that he offered to call a cab or give Walsh a ride to any destination she chose, but Walsh…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Based on my understanding, even though providing financial education programs in company is not mandatory by law, the company still have an high degree of obligation to alleviate employees’ stress. The company is mainly running by human beings who can be positively or negatively affected by stress. By protecting health work of the business, the company is better of taking care of employee’s stress, which may be affected both emotional and physical. The financial issues of loan of debt will directly affect employees’ credit in the long-term in the bank, so it’s easy to understanding how nervous they are when the financial issues are coming up. They can be having too many personal things to do instead of completing a job in the work period, lack the ability needed to complete their jobs of decreasing performance, or even can cause biochemical changes in the body. Moreover, persons interpretation of financial issue stressors is different form another’s, so the outcome can’t be accurately predicted. By facing the negative outcomes from financial stress, I believe setting up a financial education programs in the company will provide an wide range of helping tools in handling financial issues and employees’ stress; therefore, loss of company can be reduced and even having some extra returns.…

    • 756 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Use

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To be punishable under Article 112a, possession, use, distribution, introduction, or manufacture of a controlled substance must be wrongful. Possession, use, distribution, introduction, or manufacture of a controlled substance is wrongful if it is without legal justification or authorization. Possession, distribution, introduction, or manufacture of a controlled substance is not wrongful if such act or acts are: (A) done pursuant to legitimate law enforcement activities (for example, an informant who receives drugs as part of an undercover operation is not in wrongful possession), (B) done by authorized personnel in the performance of medical duties; or (C) without knowledge of the contraband nature of the substance (for example, a person who possesses cocaine, but actually believes it to be sugar, is not guilty of wrongful possession of cocaine). Possession, use, distribution, introduction, or manufacture of a controlled substance may be inferred to be wrongful in the absence of evidence to the contrary. The burden of going forward with evidence with respect to any such exception in any court-martial or other proceeding under the code shall be upon the person claiming its benefit. If such an issue is raised by the evidence presented, then the burden of proof is upon the United States to establish that the use, possession, distribution, manufacture, or introduction was…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Violation 2: On 02/21/2009 Mr. Machjokowski was found to be in possession of drug paraphernalia when Parole Officer Thomas made a home call, due to Mr. Machjokowski not showing up for a weekly meeting. No drugs were found on the subject; however we did find a device used for smoking marijuana on the subject. Officer Pasztor of the Orange County Police has entered this into their evidence room, awaiting any trial, and is willing to testify to this.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In answer to the defendant's assertion in his affidavit of errors that his constitutional right to a speedy trial had been violated, the return of the court merely asserted that the right to a speedy trial did not apply to a traffic infraction. This assertion is incorrect, since the constitutional right to a speedy trial applies to all prosecutions (People v Wertheimer, NYLJ, June 5, 1986, at 15, col 5 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists]). Although a constitutional speedy trial claim is not waived by a guilty plea, it must be asserted in the court below in order to preserve the issue for appellate review as a matter of law (People v Jordan, 62 N.Y.2d 825; People v Blakely, 34 N.Y.2d 311). In view of the failure of the return to give any factual data regarding defendant's claim, it cannot be known for certain whether defendant made any motion to dismiss on this ground. Even it he did not, however, it is our opinion, in view of his pro se status, that the matter should be reviewed in the interests of justice (CPL 170.40; People v Williams, 151 A.D.2d 795, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 744; People v Walker, 141 A.D.2d 991, 992, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 962). In doing so, we conclude that an unexplained delay of over two years in bringing a simple traffic…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief People V Green

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Reasoning: The testimony of a series of victims to the events that led up to the defendant’s arrests infer that the defendant was aware of what he was doing, and had the ability to make and carry out a plan for his crimes. There was substantial evidence to find that the defendant planned to, intended to, and in fact did rob and kidnap the victims as alleged, and intended to take and keep their property permanently from them. The defendant committed a series of robberies and kidnappings was arrested, was then released on bail then proceeded to commit another…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carl Robins Case

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A number of underlying problems rose to the surface when Carl Robins faced his current situation. Procedures that either were in place but not followed or never defined require attention to avoid this problem in the future. The problems span over several departments. The lack of communication between the parties involved is the main problem. New hires need to know what paperwork is required and when the paperwork is due. Monica Carrolls needs to know about any problems that surface that have to do with the current hiring process. The human resource department must make sure that adequate materials are available and up-to-date. The various departments must put forth a concentrated effort in order to handle this situation.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dc Vs Blake Case Essay

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    INTRODUCTION OF THE ISSUES: Police officers were called to Mr. Smith’s residency regarding a noise violation on February 4th, 2007. Officers observed the occupants, including Mr. Jonathon Blake, through the large front window of the dwelling engaged in activity that appeared to the officers as smoking marijuana. They also witnessed Mr. Blake hand over a small plastic baggie filled with suspected cocaine to another occupant. The officers were granted access to the home by Mr. Smith and noticed what appeared to be a shotgun between the couch cushions. Further inspection of the residence revealed three additional guns. Mr. Blake had a large amount of suspected marijuana and cocaine and $400 on his person. Mr. Blake is being charged with Possession of a Controlled Substance, Distribution of a Controlled Substance, and Possession of an Unregistered Firearm. It is in my professional opinion that the seized drugs are admissible to the court as evidence but the guns however, are not.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays