Preview

federalism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1701 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
federalism
Guide to Understanding the
Rights of the Accused under the Bill of Rights

AMENDMENT IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Terms and Tidbits
Unreasonable
Regulates government action, not action by private citizens.
In general, search or seizure without a warrant is unreasonable (with some exceptions). If unreasonable, 4th amendment is violated.
Evidence gathered in violation of the 4th amendment is not admissible in a criminal trial, known as the exclusionary rule. Any evidence derived from illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible (fruit of the poisonous tree).
In determining if a search or seizure is reasonable, the individual’s interest in privacy and security are weighed against society’s interest in conducting the search or seizure. (Two-hour surgery to remove a bullet ruled unreasonable; taking blood from DWI suspect ruled reasonable)
Search
Action by government that violates a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy is an illegal search, includes search of property and search of person
Situation with knowing exposure to public is not protected sometimes even if attempts are made to make it private (garbage, open fields abandoned property).
Also guests to home receive protection when they are overnight guests but not when short-term visitors.
Seizure
Substantial interference with possessions or with a person who believes that he or she is not free to leave or terminate encounter,
Usually involves some physical force to body or submission to authority,
Talking to police is not seizure; demand by police to go to station is seizure.
Warrant
Most searches require a warrant based on probable cause issued by a judge that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment, in the absence of probable cause that the…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution requires that no search or seizure shall be carried out unless a warrant has been issued. The exceptions are: searches with consent, frisks, plain feel/plain view, incident to arrest, automobile exceptions, exigent circumstances and open fields, abandoned property and public place exceptions (Harr, Hess, 2006, p. 219).…

    • 310 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most will agree that search or seizure that occurs within a home without a warrant is unreasonable. However, there are exceptions such as if the items are out and in sight, if an officer is given consent to search, if there is enough evidence, or if the search could potentially lead to a lawful arrest. I’ll begin with a hypothetical situation. You are throwing a house party and your neighbors decide to call the police because the party seems to be getting out of hand. The police show up at your door and demand to conduct a search of your house. I believe one is rightly allowed to deny a search and ask to see a warrant. Also important would be to mind your tone and remain courteous and…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fourth Amendment Exceptions

    • 2977 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution states that people have the right "to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures," but the issue at hand here is whether this also applies to the searches of open fields and of objects in plain view and whether the fourth amendment provides protection over these as well. In order to reaffirm the courts' decision on this matter I will be relating their decisions in the cases of Oliver v. United States (1984), and California v. Greenwood (1988) which deal directly with the question of whether a person can have reasonable expectations of privacy as provided for in the fourth amendment with regards to objects in an open field or in plain view.…

    • 2977 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The police searches are governed by the fourth amendment that provides protection against illegal search and seizure and requires that the issuing of warrants is based on probable cause. Gould and Mastrofski focus on warrant less searches. A legal search must be based on the concept of probable cause. As cited in our text book, The Police, probable cause is information that is "sufficient in themselves to warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that an offense has been or is being committed" (as cited, Brinegar v United States, 1949). A police officer must make a determination about probable cause based on the totality of the circumstances, in each and every situation. Without the existence of probable cause prior to a search, that search would be held unconstitutional and any evidence gained will usually be omitted from trial, with few exceptions.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional Policing

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment is clearly broken in the case of Weeks v. United States, it was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that the warrantless seizure of items from a private residence constitutes a violation of the Fourth Amendment. It also prevented local officers from securing evidence by means prohibited under the federal exclusionary rule and giving it to their federal colleagues. It was not until the case of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), that the exclusionary rule was deemed to apply to state courts as well. On December 21, 1911, Fremont Weeks, the plaintiff in error and defendant, was arrested by a police officer at the Union Station in Kansas City, Missouri where he was employed by an express company. Other officers entered the house of the defendant without a search warrant and took possession of papers and articles which were afterwards turned over to the US marshal. The officers returned later in the same day with the marshal, still without a warrant, and seized letters and envelopes they found in the drawer of a chiffonier. These papers were used to convict Weeks of transporting lottery tickets through the mail. Weeks petitioned against the police for the return of his private possessions.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Fourth Amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be seized (Lehman 471-476).” This amendment can be broken into 2 distinct parts the reasonableness clause and the warrant clause.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Fourth Amendment

    • 2793 Words
    • 12 Pages

    References: Arizona v. Gant. (2009). Retrieved November 22, 2012, from http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/556/07-542/ Calsyn, J. D., Hale, B. C., Kranz, H., Grossman, M. R., & Kim, N. E. (1998). Warrantless searches and seizures. Georgetown Law Journal, 86, 1214-1288.…

    • 2793 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Govt201 Unit 1 Amendment

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4th Amendment - Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause as determined by a neutral judge or magistrate…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government Surveillance

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Government Surveillance According to Article IV of the Constitution of the United States, The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated. (Declaration 83)…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Probable Cause Article Jason Martin CJA/364 October 13, 2014 A. Zimmer Probable Cause Article We have already gone over the exclusionary rules associated with unwarranted searches and seizures, now we need to look at warranted searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment requires that no warrants be issued unless based on probable cause by a sworn Affirmation, this applies to all warrants whether they are for search or seizure. In order to understand the concept behind warrants, we must also understand probable cause. The Supreme Court has defined probable cause as more than mere suspicion. The facts an officer is acting upon must be enough to convince the average person that the suspect committed or is committing the offense being investigated. (Worrall, 2012) In the academy they stressed this as less than beyond a reasonable doubt, but more than a hunch; which leaves a large area in between.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Felix Suhermanto Honors Am Gov. 2/22/13 period 3 white T.L.O vs. New Jersey The court’s decision in TLO vs. New jersey had a remarkable impact on the general public, to the extent that it is still cited today. The fourth amendment states that “ the right of the people o be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall be issued, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BASIC RULE: No searches without a warrant BUT the first question for analysis is “what is a search?”…

    • 4905 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Polygraph Testing

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Buren). Searches and seizures of someone’s home without a warrant are presumptively unreasonable.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays