Preview

How Did Indigenous People Get Their Rights In Australia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1245 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Indigenous People Get Their Rights In Australia
Since European colonisation in 1788, Indigenous people have been treated as second class citizens by the Australian Government. Furthermore, Indigenous Australians have struggled with land rights and in numerous other ways in Australian history. The lack of Indigenous rights was most evident before Federation in 1901.They slowly began to gain rights after Federation. The most significant changes were after the 1967 referendum, which aimed to increase indigenous equality, following. Historical evidence indicates that such changes were only possible due to the remarkable courage of a few. Indigenous Australians have struggled with their rights in many ways throughout Australian history. This occurred from 1788, upon arrival of the First …show more content…
As a result of the Act, white Australians used Indigenous people for cheap labor and even as slaves. In 1871, the beginning of the catastrophic ‘assimilation policy,’ began, where an entire generation of were stolen from their families. The idea of the Assimilation Act was that children of Indigenous or Torres Strait Islander descent, were forcibly removed from their homes and taught to reject their heritage and adopt a white culture. This was done in an attempt to ‘breed out’ Indigenous Australians, through natural elimination. At this stage,Indigenous people had lost all freedoms, with the reintroduction of the Assimilation Act and a new ‘Half-cast Act.’ Despite all of the protests,the Government did nothing to give Aboriginals basic …show more content…
The Mabo Case, which was finalised in 1992, was one event that had a large impact on indigenous rights. The case recognised the land rights of the Meriam people, the traditional owners of the Murray Islands. The case challenged two existing Australian legal systems; the assumption that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders peoples had no concept of land ownership before the arrival of the British colonists in 1788 (terra nullius) and that sovereignty gave complete ownership of the land to the Crown. Another major event is the Gurindji Land Strike or Walk-off in 1966. The strike was by the Gurindji Tribe, directed by tribe leader Vincent Lingiari, who led 200 Indigenous Workers off their jobs at Wave Hill Cattle station, which lasted several years. Their complaints included, low wages and poor conditions but the main focus was land rights, which had been in action before in the 1946 Pilbara Walk-off. The ultimately successful Gurindji Strike is a significant moment in Aboriginal Land Rights movements. After the strike, land right activists rallied through the 1970’s, leading to the Aboriginal Land rights Act in 1976. Another momentous event for Indigenous Australians was the 2008 apology to the Stolen Generations. The speech was read by Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, as he apologised to the families affected by this atrocity. The apology was the biggest broadcasted event in Indigenous history.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Loss of land: The impact on indigenous Australians was immense once the settlers arrived in 1977 and claimed the land as their own, stocking it with cattle & sheep. This left no food resources for them & many perished .The indigenous tribes of Australia began to starve and their numbers rapidly declined. This also resulted in loss of connection to their land, & broken kinship ties which impacted immensely on the mental & spiritual wellbeing of the indigenous people; these issues are still being felt today. The loss of the land has contributed to a loss of language, stories, & sacred places vital to the ongoing culture of the indigenous people. The effects are still strong to this day & present themselves as lack of…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Mabo

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout Australian history, there have been men and women who fought for the entitlements of the indigenous people. The most respected and recognised of these is Eddie Mabo, a Torres Strait Islander. Mabo stood up for the rights of his people from a very young age all the way to his death, in order to generate changes in the policies and laws of the government. Mabo battled for his right to own the land which he had inherited from his adoptive father, a fight which was resolved only after his demise. Despite this, Eddie Mabo became one of the key influential figures in the Aboriginal rights movement, as his strong will, determination, and intelligence allowed him to bring about change.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the back of the recent landslide referendum on the recognition of Aboriginal people in the national census, the Whitlam government greatly increased the social and political rights of first nation Australians. The government instituted a policy of ‘self-determination’ which decentralised decision making powers to indigenous communities. They allowed Aboriginals to claim land and brought more Indigenous voices into the policy making process. From the outset, Whitlam made Indigenous affairs a top priority for his government and indicated that justice had to be served in order for Australia to move forward as a country. The subsequent Fraser Government committed to continue these reforms. A powerful example Whitlam’s loyalty to this issue was in his remarks to an Aboriginal tribe where he declared Indigenous ownership of a Victorian river. Whitlam in his speech to the Gurindji people stated “these lands belong to the Gurindji people and I put into your hands this piece of the earth itself as a sign that we restore them to you and your children…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The mistreatment of indigenous people started when the European’s took over Australia, and escalated over time. They were considered to be second class citizens. By the time of federation, in 1901, aboriginal people were not included in the constitution or the census and were excluded from society which was known as protectionism. The white Australians believed that they were helping the Aborigines by using the protection policies. But in reality these policies isolated them from their families, traditional land and removed them from their natural heritage and culture. The Aborigines were taught to live like the white Australians so the could assimilate into the white society and were often trained to be slaves for White People. Charles Perkins was an aborigine who like many was taken from his family and land. He was however treated well compared to what most Indigenous…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 27th 1967, the Holt Liberal government held a referendum to determine whether or not two sections of the Constitution should be removed, as it discriminated against Aboriginal people. As a result, almost ninety-one percent of Australians voted ‘yes’ to alter these constitutional references. This significant event permitted the Commonwealth Government to…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This argument analysis examines the article Recognise What? Problems with the campaign for constitutional recognition (Maddison, 2017). Published in the May/June issue of the Indigenous Law Bulletin, Maddison describes the process to recognise Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders as the first people of Australia in the constitution. The article explains this process through several accounts, resistance to the campaign and the role of the ‘Recognise’ campaign. Throughout the article, Maddison argues that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders should be recognised as the first people of Australia while acknowledging the problems with the campaign. The analysis will identify the main claims, evidence used to support these claims and the assumptions made by the author. Maddison uses several forms of evidence to support her 3 main claims and the underlying assumptions.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Mabo Decision

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, the initial announcement of the apology caused a split in the Liberal party, as some believed that it would create a guilty culture in Australia. Yet, Judi Moylan, who was the former Liberal Minister, said “I think as a nation we owe an apology. We shouldn't be thinking about it as an individual apology — it's an apology that is coming from the nation state because it was governments that did these things.” The apology was then considered necessary. At 9:30 on the day of the speech, Kevin Rudd began the apology. “...The time has now come for the nation to turn a new page in Australia's history by righting the wrongs of the past and so moving forward with confidence to the future. We apologise for the laws and policies of successive parliaments and governments that have inflicted profound grief, suffering and loss on these our fellow Australians. We apologise especially for the removal of ATSI children from their families, their communities and their country...We the parliament of Australia respectfully request that this apology be received in the spirit in which it is offered as part of the healing of the nation….” The speech was a significant moment in ATSI peoples lives, as, according the to The Bringing Them Home Report, this was the first step to healing and was largely symbolic and important in ATSI…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For the panel, constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians means removing provisions in the Constitution that contemplate racial discrimination. Whether intended or not, the five proposals address the broader issues of racial discrimination and equality before the law within the Commonwealth Constitution.…

    • 4379 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The main enemies to the movement were the mining and pastoral industry who wanted to use the Australian land to make profit from mining or farming and therefore due to their strong power the government wasn’t able to help the movement. “What happened to land rights was that the mining industry was too powerful, the pastoral industry was too powerful and the Commonwealth government didn’t have the will to stand up to those vested interest group.” (Korff & Spirits, 2016). The government of the time was the Hawke government and they were back up by the mining and pastoral industries and they proposed a new preferred National Land Rights Model. The new model had these new principles. “Required no Aboriginal consent for mining on Aboriginal land, prevented land claims over stock routes, reserves and Aboriginal-owned pastoral leases and Restricted eligibility for excisions.” (Korff & Spirits, 2016). This was against everything the Aboriginal Activists were fighting for. This however did not come to pass due to the Western Australian Labor Party withdrawing and the scare campaign by the mining industry. The Aboriginal land rights faced many hardships but in the end they succeeded and they took back their right land and inheritance.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 1967 Referendum

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page

    However, it was not until 1972 that the benefits of the referendum were felt by Indigenous Australians. In January of 1972 the erection of the Aboriginal Tent Embassy on the lawns of federal parliament drew attention to the lack of progress on land rights and racial discrimination issues that included the existing lack of equal pay for Aboriginals in employment. These demands became a political issue, and almost immediately after the federal election later in that year, and a consequent change in government for the first time in 23 years, the move for reforms began in earnest.…

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Pearson’s speech was delivered at an academic gathering, Bandler had a more mixed audience including mainly Indigenous peoples and politicians, both supporting and opposing additional rights for aboriginal people. Pearson’s and Bandler’s speeches were both written in the 1990s, a contentious and heated time in relation ind issues. Pearson’s speech, in particular, was a response to the changing attitudes of the newly elected Howard government in 1996, who took the view that present day Australians shouldn’t feel responsible for the past injustices done to the aborigines- a different view from the previous Keating government. Bandler’s speech was a response to the entire Australian population’s inability to accept the guilt of the past, which she felt was hindering the progress of reconciliation between Aborigines and Europeans. Both Pearson, a high profile indigenous activist, and Bandler, a highly respected civil rights activist, gave their speeches in an attempt to take a step forward in the quest to conquer the differences between aborigines and other Australians and explore the ways the country as a whole could move forward from the horrible past.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The treatment of Indigenous Australians by the government has been an issue of controversy since White Europeans settled in Australia. Throughout history Aboriginals have developed and hosted many protests, sometimes with the help of the White Europeans that wanted to make a difference to get back rights and freedoms of Aboriginals.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Day of Mourning

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After this, Aboriginal organisations in Sydney disagreed with the participation in the Government's re-enactment of events for January 1788. The Government brought groups…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Self determination is a principle of International Law and it must be the basis of social and political organisation” (Mazel, 2009, 150). This is an important principle in the acknowledging of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples' rights. Self determination allows Indigenous peoples to independently determine their political status and gives them the freedom to economically, socially and culturally develop as according to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Maguire, 2009, 2). Acknowledging this fundamental right is essential for Indigenous Australians to be able to preserve their culture, dignity and independence. Therefore, political, social, cultural and economical independence and freedom need to be granted to the Indigenous peoples.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beginning in 1910 and ending in the 1970s, Australians Federal and State government agencies and church missions made a policy to forcibly take many aboriginal and Torres Strait children away from their families in an attempt to destroy the Aboriginal race and culture. There was an impact on the aboriginals with a particular policy the Australian Government had introduced, which was the policy of ‘Assimilation’. This policy was to encourage many Aboriginal people to give up their culture, language, tradition, knowledge and spirituality to basically become white Australians. Unfortunately this policy didn’t give the Aboriginals the same rights as white Australians, as a result of discrimination, aboriginals were moved to live in special housing…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays