Preview

History Of Events That Led To The Battle Of Mylae

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1817 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
History Of Events That Led To The Battle Of Mylae
THE BATTLE OF MYLAE

Introduction Three hundred years Before the Common Era, there were two superpowers who controlled the Mediterranean Sea and its adjacent nations. Rome held a great empire to the north, with a vast, experienced army reknown for its discipline and legendary exploits. Carthage occupied modern day northern Africa to the south and was the undisputed master of the seas. As both empires strived to expand their territories, they were eventually to engage each other in a series of three wars. These three wars spanned from the occupation of Messina in 264 B.C.E. until the burning of Carthage in 146 B.C.E. 1
This paper will discuss the history of events leading to the battle of Mylae, examine the battle
…show more content…
As the centuries-old uncontested masters of the sea, they stood on their massive, elegant ships and watched their enemy strain to maintain their order and discipline on their new, untested, barely sailable vessels. The Roman navy struggled to maintain a semblance of formation, much to the amusement of the Carthaginian sailors. Hannibal’s sailors sounded off loudly with laughter and cries of derision as they watched the Roman fleet sway back and forth in an attempt to stay in an orderly pattern. The contempt Hannibal and his sailors felt for the inept Roman fleet caused him to break formation and sail in for the kill. Hannibal took an echelon of thirty vessels and drove straight for the Romans. As they got closer, they could see their enemy trying to maneuver into fighting positions, and, curiously enough, strange devices were attached to the fronts of their …show more content…
It upset the centuries-old notion that the Phoenicians (Carthage) ruled the seas and that Rome couldn’t compete with them for naval supremacy. The Romans proved the sea worthiness of their fleet and learned they could negate the Phoenicians skill at seafaring, by drawing the enemy in and engaging in direct, hand-to-hand combat. Lessons Learned Surprise is one of the most ancient and effective techniques of waging war against an enemy. Surprise can turn the tables on an opponent with a significant advantage. In the Battle of Mylae, the overconfidence of the Carthaginians caused them to underestimate the power of the corvus. Once deployed, it proved to be so devastatingly effective that the Carthaginians ran for their lives. Dulius used the Carthaginians pride against them. Whether the Roman fleet’s ineptitude at assembling before the Carthaginians was staged or genuine, it made the shock of being dominated that much more powerful. Another effective lesson to take from this battle is to learn to minimize your enemy’s strengths and capitalize on yours. Rome could not match Carthage toe-to-toe in sea tactics. Dulius chose to bypass them and focus on framing the battle on his terms. By doing so, he helped the Romans turn the tide on the Carthaginians, and became a celebrated hero to the empire forever

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The reasons for the Greek victory against the Persians in 490 to 480/479 BC was a mixture of exceptional leadership, skilful tactics and strategy, superior weapons and soldiers, and Greek unity. Strong leadership was the most important aspect of the Greek defence, as without the intelligence and bravery of the leaders, the Greeks would have been easily defeated. As a result of the excellent leadership; Greek tactics, strategy, and unity were greatly strengthened. Combined with their better weapons and soldiers, the Greeks held the advantage and seized opportunities at the perfect moment. Also, with each victory the Greeks grew more confident of success and defiant of the Persian attempts to invade. The poor organisation and disarray of their enemy led to an undermining of the Persian might and further improved Greece's chances of success.…

    • 2672 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Punic Wars were three conflicts between Carthage and Rome. The first conflict was from 264-241 B.C. It grew out of an altercation between Messana and Syracuse. The Messanians asked Carthage for help and Syracuse asked Rome for help. The Strait of Messana, which separated the Italian Peninsula from Sicily, was important strategically, and both Carthage and Rome responded. The Punic army (Carthaginians) arrived in Sicily and mediated peace between the two and established a military base. When the Roman army arrived, they drove off the Punic army from the military base and war ensued (Columbia…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal Barca was one of the few military geniuses back in the time of 220 B.C. Hannibal’s efforts almost brought the Carthaginians victory over the immense Roman empire. With the Carthaginian army at his side, Hannibal brought a massive army to try and annihilate the forces of Rome. Hannibal did many things that made him one of the greatest generals of all time. Hannibal brought a massive army over the Alps and Pyrenees to surprise the Romans, he won many battles against the Roman Empire, and then took command of a Greek fleet.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal’s overall war strategy in Italy, or lack thereof, can be seen as a strong contributing factor to Carthage’s ultimate defeat in the Second Punic War. Livy describes, “Hannibal…without orders from the senate, crossed both the Alps and the Ebro.” Demonstrating his defiance of Carthaginian Government’s ambitions against Rome. Ultimately, Hannibal sought not to destroy Rome but to “create a balance of power with [her]” according to Fronda. This is to suggest that rather than conquer Rome, Hannibal wanted to be on the same playing field in order to deny them the opportunity to claim hegemony over the Mediterranean. The content of the Macedonian–Carthaginian Treaty further evidences Hannibal’s lack of intention to destroy Rome as, in multiple sections, it discusses how Rome will be treated and acknowledges their…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper the overview, prelude, and battle of Lake Trasimene will be analyzed and discussed to understand the brilliance behind one of the greatest military tactical attacks in history. The Battle of Lake Trasimene was waged by one of the most charismatic, smart, and cunning generals of all time in Hannibal. Hannibal, the son of Hamilcar Barca of Carthage, was raised to eat, breath, and hate Rome from the beginning of his childhood. Livy states that, “From the day when he was proclaimed commander in chief, he seemed to regard Italy as his assigned field of action, and war with Rome as a duty imposed upon him.”(Livy 21.5, Line 1-3.) This inner rage that was instilled in him as a child is a driving force that can be seen throughout this battle as well as his remaining campaigns against the Romans.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Boudicca Newspaper

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Yesterday Boudicca, the queen of the Iceni tribe was defeated by the Romans led by Suetonius Paulinus. The great Roman army with only 10,000 soldiers defeated the disorganised men of Boudicca who had 100,000 warriors. The Romans used well - drilled battle techniques such as the wedge formation unlike the shambles that were used by Boudicca’s army. Also the Romans had lots of armour and weapons of choice but the Celts had only body paint as armour and farm equipment as weapons. So inevitably the Romans, who were better prepared than the Celts, won.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 600 BCE and 600 CE, many empires throughout the world rose to power as a result of powerful military organizations that allowed them to defend themselves and conquer new land. Forceful armies were especially important in both Rome and Greece, where their dynamic military permitted them to dominate and expand their territories, thus increasing their empire’s power and influence. Most notably in the Roman Empire, the strong martial force led the state to victory in several battles, including the Battle of Zama. The empire’s powerful military obliterated Carthage and led to Rome subsequently taking control of the area. As a result of winning such battles, Rome took control of more land and expanded its territory to take over much of Southern…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome rule its people in a very organize and civil manner, which draws loyalty among its citizens. Rome has an effective and distinct way in managing people, particularly to the inhabitants of their newly acquired lands and territories. One of the best example was the Latins in Latium, whose devotion and loyalty were exceedingly commendable, especially during the Second Punic War, where they fought valiantly--along with the Romans --against the forces of Hannibal. On other hand, Carthage "great advantage" was they have a "permanent able leader," that command its military forces. Unlike Rome, the order of its military resides in the hands of its civil magistrates, who were constantly replaced…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Then for some years Carthage was the most successful who was commanded by Hamilcar. However, at the battle at the Aegates Islands in 241, the Carthaginians were beaten so badly that they requested peace. This agreement involved leaving Sicily and paying a huge tax. Rome now had complete control of Sicily.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, indeed throughout history, Rome ultimately exhibited a readiness to adapt its military tactics and strategy to successfully confront particular challenges. The Roman military was a highly organized institution. There was a straightforward system of rank, and a number of different splitting up of the basic unit. The entire basis of Roman infantry tactics was the idea that by keeping troops in arranges, one could fight more successfully. Most military commanders of the day simply had their troops rush passionately at the enemy, relying on better numbers, better soldiers, or luck to hold the day. The Romans realized that they could not always rely on these, so they turned to strategy. Each situation was wrapped up differently, taking into account land, the type and strength of the opponent's troops, and the type and strength of the Roman's troops. The Romans also thought that the best tactic would be the one that had the most effect without exposing the troops to unnecessary risk. One of them was to cut off their opponent from his resources. Armies run on their stomachs and equipment, and both require regular supplies. Without a stable supply of food and water, an army will starve or dehydrate killing or uncomforting the troops and they would fall apart. The Roman Soldiers would attack the resources themselves. When they conquered territory, they took as much as they could. This not only gave them more food, it prevented it from falling into their opponent's hands and they would also try to cut off the transportation so the amount of supplies that could reach the enemy was severely reduced. One of the most famous tactics that the Romans used was called “siege”. Siege was a military operation in which troops surround a place and cut off all outside access to force surrender. The Romans would typically build a wall around the existing city to help control the enemy. This wall would be built to prevent the enemy from escaping. The ongoing siege would eventually…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome by direct assault; but when they saw the enemy drawn up in battle formation… they…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal Qualities

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this battle, Hannibal has the advantage of choosing his battle ground and sends a message to the others by using his enemy. Hannibal moved his soldiers behind the hill leaving his tents where the Romans can see. The night before Hannibal had instructed his men to light fires on the hills, so that the Romans would believe that his forces were farther away than they actually were. Hannibal’s men were laid out in such way as to surround their enemies from all sides. All at once Hannibal gave orders for an attack. From the surrounding hills the Carthaginian cavalry and infantry came down with an impact, coming at the enemy army from all sides. The Romans did not even have time to draw up in their usual battle array, and were forced to fight in open order. The Carthaginians drove them on to the lake, where there was no escape.Many were driven to drown in the lake. An ancient tradition says that because of the blood, which for over three days filled the area, the name of the stream which crosses it was changed to Sanguineto - Blood River. And of course Hannibal's military genius leads him to victory. The battle of Trasimene was between Rome and…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian and Greek empires are known to have fought against each other during several occurrences. Located by the Mediterranean Sea, both empires c…

    • 409 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Defensive Imperialism’ is one of the oldest and most closely related theories adopted by the Romans in their reasoning behind imperialism and expansion, proposed by Theodor Mommsen and later Tenney Frank. As Rome felt threatened by powerful neighbouring cities subsequently she often responded with offensive action, maintaining control over the enemy’s territory ‘to prevent a revanche’. The Fetial law states that war was only fought for res repetitae (obtain compensation for wrongs suffered), as Polybius argues that Romans needed a pre-text that would appeal to foreign opinion. This is also supported by the critic Harris, stating that Romans were unwilling to go to war unless it was seen as defensive.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Cavalry

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages

    During the Battle of Magnesia, the Romans decisively defeated Antiochus III and his numerically superior army. Even though the Roman cavalry did not play a major role in this battle, their minor casualties were of great benefit to the army: "Many of the Romans were wounded, but there actually fell not more than 300 infantry, 24 cavalry and 25 of the army of Eumenes"; whereas their opponents lost many more soldiers: "50,000 infantry were killed on that day and 3000 of the cavalry" (Livy, 37.44). At the Battle of Zama, the Roman cavalry played a major role in the destruction of the Carthaginian army. First, part of the Carthaginian cavalry was chased from the field: "so clearing the Carthaginian left of its cavalry" (Livy, 30.33). Then Roman legions attacked the other wing of the cavalry: "The leading maniples also kept up a fusillade of missiles until these animals too were driven out of the Roman lines on to their own side and put the Carthaginian cavalry" (Livy, 30.33).This led to the total destruction of the Carthaginian army: "The enemy were routed, many were surrounded and killed in action, those who dispersed in flight over the open country were killed by the cavalry who were in possession of every part" (Livy, 30.35). The extreme success of the Roman citizen cavalry over the Carthaginian cavalry prevented the…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays