Preview

Roman Cavalry

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1547 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roman Cavalry
One battle that illustrates this issue is the battle of Heraclea, where the Romans faced Pyrrhus. The Romans outnumbered the Greeks significantly, but they suffered a critical defeat in which they lost thousands of soldiers. The Roman cavalry faced off against the greatly feared Thessalian heavy cavalry: "On the flanks, however, the Roman cavalry would face the famous Thessalian heavy cavalry and others modeled on Alexander's Companions, commanded by the king himself" (Sidnell, 165). They more than held their own against these elite warriors "Far from being overwhelmed by Pyrrhus' Epirot companions and Thessalians, the Roman horsemen actually held their own in a hard fought melee and eventually started to gain the upper hand" (Sidnell, 166). …show more content…
During the Battle of Magnesia, the Romans decisively defeated Antiochus III and his numerically superior army. Even though the Roman cavalry did not play a major role in this battle, their minor casualties were of great benefit to the army: "Many of the Romans were wounded, but there actually fell not more than 300 infantry, 24 cavalry and 25 of the army of Eumenes"; whereas their opponents lost many more soldiers: "50,000 infantry were killed on that day and 3000 of the cavalry" (Livy, 37.44). At the Battle of Zama, the Roman cavalry played a major role in the destruction of the Carthaginian army. First, part of the Carthaginian cavalry was chased from the field: "so clearing the Carthaginian left of its cavalry" (Livy, 30.33). Then Roman legions attacked the other wing of the cavalry: "The leading maniples also kept up a fusillade of missiles until these animals too were driven out of the Roman lines on to their own side and put the Carthaginian cavalry" (Livy, 30.33).This led to the total destruction of the Carthaginian army: "The enemy were routed, many were surrounded and killed in action, those who dispersed in flight over the open country were killed by the cavalry who were in possession of every part" (Livy, 30.35). The extreme success of the Roman citizen cavalry over the Carthaginian cavalry prevented the …show more content…
Some of the cavalry failures were due to superiority of the enemy cavalry, and some were due to poor leadership and battle planning in general. There is no evidence that the cavalry was replaced due to gross incompetence. If it was not a lack of cavalry skill that caused the Romans to remove the citizen cavalry, what was the cause. These reasons were cultural and practical, in addition to military in nature, and arose mostly from the upheavals caused by the Social

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Because of the recent movie, 300, most people are aware of the epic battle that occurred at Thermopylai were 300 odd Spartans supposedly held off an army of over one million led by Xerxes I. Now, there were many errors in the movie (the number of men on both sides being the chiefest of them). But it still leaves many people asking how a force so drastically outnumbered was able to hold a force nearly twenty times their number. The answer lies in the difference in their equipment, tactics and their training.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On thermopylea and platea

    • 1303 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Today I shall be arguing and elaborating upon the thesis that the battle at Thermopylae was instrumental in insuring the victory at Plataea against the Persian army as it allowed for Greece to build up its army’s in preparation for the upcoming battle. I shall attempt to prove this statement by discussing various aspects of the battle of Thermopylae and the battle of Plataea such as battle tactics, size of the Greek and Persian armies and the overall intent and outcome of both battles.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    From a snapshot of the Second Punic War, the Carthaginians defeated the Romans while under the consul of Gaius Flaminius. The battle is considered one of the largest and most successful ambushes in military history. The battle consisted of around 50,000 Carthaginian soldiers versus about 30,000 Roman soldiers. The aftermath of the battle produced well over 15,000+ lost soldiers for the Roman army while Hannibal only lost approximately 2,500 of his own. Despite the overview of the battle, much more can be examined when looking at the events leading up to the brilliant ambush set by…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 600 BCE and 600 CE, many empires throughout the world rose to power as a result of powerful military organizations that allowed them to defend themselves and conquer new land. Forceful armies were especially important in both Rome and Greece, where their dynamic military permitted them to dominate and expand their territories, thus increasing their empire’s power and influence. Most notably in the Roman Empire, the strong martial force led the state to victory in several battles, including the Battle of Zama. The empire’s powerful military obliterated Carthage and led to Rome subsequently taking control of the area. As a result of winning such battles, Rome took control of more land and expanded its territory to take over much of Southern…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though this would be the primary dominate force on the battlefield, Rome actually lost battles because they were primarily heavy infantry. Roman soldiers adopted fighting tactics of other forces and enemies to become the most elite force on the battle field. Starting out, soldiers fought like the Greek worriers known as hoplites. Hoplites were essentially an infantry man armed with a shield and spear, which were on reserve until called to battle. The tactics that were adopted from the Hoplites was a formation called the Phalanx. This formation consisted of soldiers lining up shoulder to shoulder with their weapon in one hand and shield in the opposite. Not only did this help with shields protecting one another, it made lines impenetrable for arrows, spears and enemy as long as they maintained a solid line side by side.2…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq Essay

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One reason why western Rome collapsed is because of the military as seen in documents 1 and 4. These documents show that Rome’s military was weak, drafted more people, had loyalty problems, and hired mercenaries. First, the lack of breastplates and helmets(document 1) made the Roman…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Empire DBQ

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page

    To begin with, military weakness was a big factor in the fall of Rome. According to Document B, “...armor began to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely ever wore it.” This shows that the soldiers were very lethargic and couldn’t protect the empire effectively. They stopped doing their ground drills and never wore the breastplates. When war came to Rome they weren’t prepared to wear the armor, so instead they fought with…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Western Roman Empire Dbq

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    conclusion. Use evidence from at least four documents in your essay. Support your response with relevant facts, examples, and details. Include outside information.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Hannibal Is To Blame

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rome sent us into battle with about 80,000 men. Hannibal on the other hand, arrived at the battlefield with about 40,000 infantry and 10,000 cavalry. Hannibal was very smart with how he planned out this battle. He managed to put us in a position where we were stuck, in a valley, with a river. We would not be able to escape, our mobility being restricted and especially because during the battle because Hannibal had his army lines facing north, while we faced the south and unfortunately in the valley, wind gusts blew our way resulting in dust and grit getting into many our men’s eyes.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From C.A. 300 CE to 476 CE Rome began a steady decline to its collapse. Some historians disagree with this and have other theories. One of the other theories is that the Roman Empire did not collapse as the Eastern Empire did not collapse until “Fall of Rome at Constantinople in 1453.” The base of this theory is that the Eastern Empire became the Byzantium Empire, however it was no longer the Roman Empire as there were no longer any Roman Emperors. Another theory by Peter Wells is “The Roman Empire “fell” only in the minds of people who had a particular and limited view of what the Roman Empire was and who understood events such as Alaric’s capture of Rome in A.D. 410 as marking its end.” Wells argues that the change was extremely gradual and continued well past 476 CE. While Wells theory is more valid, the empire still did not exist after 476 CE.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the third century C.E., Rome faced many problems and was weakened by barbaric invasions from 100-500 C.E. Around 476 C.E, most of the Eastern Roman Empire was still intact, but the Western Roman Empire was covered by barbarians. External enemies, such as the Saxons, Vandals, and Ostrogoths engaged with Rome, which enabled the empire to wear out slowly. On the other hand, this powerful empire was not only weakened by external rivals but by internal decay as well. The increase of enemies contributed to the problematic issue of recruiting soldiers. Rome had difficulty recruiting male boys from Rome into their military, which resulted in the government to promptly pay German foreigners to join the army. Low funding from citizens did not give the military supplies or resources they needed to protect Rome. Consequently, citizens rarely paid for the army, even though Rome kept on paying German foreigners for their army. This caused a major conflict. Lastly, many foolish decisions made by the emperors and government caused the aspects of the military to slowly…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book called "Concerning Military Matters" states that the soldiers got lazy and negligence and because of this the soldiers did not want to wear there breast plates and helmets. Because of this the Roman Fighters were prone to more wounds because of the lack of protective equipment. "Concerning Military Matters" says " Thus, it happens that troops in battle, exposed to wounds because they have no armor, think about running but not fighting." This statement is saying that the soldiers were exposed to the battle wounds and were more ready to run but not even think about fighting or that they might get hurt. The military problems contributes to the fall of Rome by showing that the army was getting weaker and dying off faster due to poor choices made by the…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Romans and Barbarians Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to the Romans nomads were considered to be barbarians, however over time Romans began to develop nomadic customs which were no longer considered barbaric but civilized. To the Romans a ‘barbarian’ was anyone who was an outsider of their land, and in that case nomads were considered to be barbaric. Nomads are known as a small group of people that don’t have a permanent settlement, and travel and migrate from place to place. Nomadic people also had a different type of lifestyle from the Romans, for example the nomads hunted and gathered their food, and which was considered cave man like. Before the fall of Rome the Romans were considered to be civilized people with a respectable religion and culture, and after the nomads took over it turned out to be the same thing.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is no lie that Alexander the Great was a great military leader. He studied battle strategies with military leaders before him, and it aided him in commanding his armies against empires like Persia. In this campaign particularly, it showed his…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Violence

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For some people violence isn’t the answer, but in the roman’s case it worked pretty well.The Romans, who were on ef the greatest groups of warriors, managed to keep their reign for 507 years. They didn’t do this by sitting around in a castle all day. Rome avoided being attacked by beating the enemy to the attack. One example of Roman violence in all three Punic wars, Rome declared rome on Carthage and didn’t leave them alone until 3 wars later when most of the Carthaginians were killed, and those that were not were sold to slavery. But I am getting ahead of myself, back to the beginning of the 1st punic war.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays