Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

hht yt utu

Good Essays
1763 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
hht yt utu
Name ___________________________________________
Ms. K. Demircanli
Global 9S
20 January 2012

China
The Rise and Fall of the Han Dynasty compared to Rome

Size and Location of Han and Rome In the second century CE, China controlled about 1.5 million square miles of territory. Meanwhile, at the same time, the Roman Empire controlled about 1.7 million square miles of territory. China’s first recorded census around 2 CE gives a figure of about 58 million people, while Rome’s population was about the same. Rome’s heartland was confined to Italy, with a population of around 3 million people. Ethnically speaking, the rest of the empire was largely non-Roman. During the Han Dynasty most of the population lived on the North China Plain.

Roman and Han Culture The Han Dynasty was heir to the Qin state that had unified China in 221 BCE. The first ruler of the Qin established the title of “emperor.” The power of a Chinese emperor was absolute; however, he was subject to various checks on his authority by both high officials and imperial family members. The Romans practiced emperor worship solely in the case of dead emperors. In addition, only certain emperors were accorded divine honors, and always after death. In other parts of the Empire, however, local customs merged with Roman ones. In Egypt, for instance, emperor worship was practiced more widely. This was because the Roman office of emperor combined with the Egyptian notion as Pharaoh-as-sun-god. Chinese emperors were not considered divine beings. The emperor was called the “Son of Heaven” and was responsible for conducting sacrifices to both Heaven and Earth. The word “Heaven” referred more or less to what we would call “nature”: the succession of day and night, and the motions of the stars and planets. During the first millennium BCE, the concept of the “Mandate of Heaven” was applied. If an emperor oppressed the people, Heaven could withdraw a dynasty’s right to govern.

Expansion and Empire By the early second century CE, Rome controlled the entire Mediterranean coastline. In the west, Roman rule extended northwards to “barbarian” territory, mostly using prominent geographic features to establish boundaries. The Roman frontier along the Danube River in northern Europe was an important example. The Danube enabled Roman ships to supply border garrisons along the river. In the east, client kingdoms such as Armenia were interspersed between Roman provinces and barbarian territory. During the Han, colonies were established in Korea. There was also a Chinese military presence in the Red River valley of northern Vietnam. In addition, the Han set up military outposts along China’s northern frontiers and in central Asia. The Han Empire’s greatest adversaries were the nomadic Hun people living in the north. During the second century BCE, expensive military campaigns were mounted in order to control the Huns. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers were involved. The Germanic tribes that attacked Rome never united, but their great numbers made them difficult to assimilate into the Empire.

Agriculture Chinese agriculture was based on the production of crops such as wheat and rice. In Han times, state-sponsored irrigation and plows with features that would be unknown in Europe until the Middle Ages increased output. The wheelbarrow first came into use during the Han, unknown in Europe until after 1000 CE. In order to escape heavy tax burdens, small farmers often gave their land to powerful magnates and became tenants on their estates. This happened with even greater frequency during the last century of Han rule, when famine, floods, and warfare disrupted the lives of the people. The Romans produced crops in Italy, but a majority of their food came from the outer regions of the Roman Empire.

Trade Trade was always considered a second-rate occupation compared to landholding, although it was practiced in all periods of Roman history. Senators were strictly forbidden from participating in commerce, but devised ways to get around the prohibition. Some provinces specialized in the production of certain goods but most of the Empire was independent, divided into self-sufficient agricultural units. Trade in luxuries such as silk and spices were mainly confined to providing for the elite. Silk imported across Central Asia from China was coveted by the Roman upper classes. The government’s interest in the movement of goods was confined to grain and other supplies for the city of Rome and for army units stationed throughout the Empire. The “grain dole” for the common people was an essential element of domestic policy. In China, agriculture was called the “fundamental occupation.” Trade, by contrast, was officially disparaged. Merchants amassed fortunes but were looked upon as people whose wealth enabled them to transgress social boundaries. The Han government instituted monopolies on key products such as salt and iron that impeded the growth of private enterprise.

Religion and Philosophy The Han Dynasty adopted Confucianism as state orthodoxy. Its values, particularly the importance attached to filial piety, helped link central government to both local elites and the common people. In addition, the idea that human beings were part of an orderly, interconnected universe, and that good government echoed the regular workings of such a universe, cemented the notion of a single shared world—what the Chinese called “All-Under-Heaven.” Although these values became widespread, they never totally replaced local beliefs based on folklore, magic, and age-old custom. Rome was culturally pluralistic. The diverse societies that Rome colonized would eventually take part in creating the map of early medieval Europe.

Social Classes The Roman elite were a landed gentry living on the income provided by their estates. They dominated society and staffed the government of the Empire. Roman society placed a great value on loyalty both to family and to the state. A member of the elite was constantly exhorted to be mindful of his father’s and grandfather’s achievements and, if possible, to exceed them. At a Roman funeral, ancestors’ masks were displayed and their deeds described and praised. Individuals could win honor only in the context of public service. During the second and first centuries BCE, most of the magistrates and members of the Senate came from the same core of noble families who controlled it. Early Chinese thinkers divided society into four social classes: the literate elite who served as government bureaucrats, farmers, merchants, and craftsmen. The vast majority of the population was farmers. During the Han, social prestige and political power became closely associated with Confucian values and learning. The Confucian classics became the standard for public and private behavior. Filial piety—the respect and obedience owed to parents by their children—was at the core of the Confucian value system. These values remained unchallenged until the early twentieth century. The Han was a large empire and required a bureaucracy to govern it. Official posts were filled in a variety of ways. Although people in government service could recommend relatives for office, it was also possible for those who didn’t come from official families to obtain posts. In Confucian terms, the ideals governing class was based on merit rather than birth or wealth.

The Han Dynasty Declines The Emperor Wu Ti’s conquests led to a fiscal crisis. As costs increased, taxes increased, and the peasants’ burdens led to revolt. The end result was that the central government had to rely more on local military commanders and great landowners for control of the population, giving them great power and prestige as its own expense. The cycle of decline after an initial period of increasing prosperity and power has been the pattern of all Chinese dynasties. During the Han, this “dynastic cycle” as Western historians of China call it, led to a succession of mediocre rulers after Wu Ti’s death and a temporary user action of the throne (9-23 CE), which divided the Earlier from the Later Han. Wang Mang, united Confucian humanitarianism with Legalist practice. Like his contemporary in the West, the Roman Emperor Augustus, his goal was the rejuvenation of society. By Wang Mang’s day the number of large tax-free estates had greatly increased while the number of tax-paying peasant holdings had declined. This was a byproduct of the private landownership that, under the Qin, had replaced the old communal use of land. Rich officials and merchants were able to acquire the lands of small peasant-owners, who became tenants paying exorbitant rents. The conflict of landownership and tenancy, along with the concentration of power of great families, became a major problem in Chinese history. More and more peasants fell behind in their rents and were forced to sell themselves or their children into debt slavery. To remedy this situation and increase the government’s tax income, Wang Mang decreed that the land was the property of the nation and should be portioned out to peasant families, who would pay taxes on their allotments. Wang Mang sought to solve the long-standing problem of inflation, which had greatly increased since Wu Ti first began debasing the coinage when he found himself in financial difficulties, by setting maximum prices on basic commodities. He also sought to stabilize prices by instituting “leveling” the government bought surplus commodities when prices fell and sold them when scarcity caused prices to rise. Wang Mang’s remarkable reform program failed, however, officials bungled the difficult administrative task, and the powerful landowners rebelled against the ruler who proposed to confiscate their land. Although Wang Mang rescinded his reforms, he was killed by rebels in 23 CE.

The Final Fall of the Han The Later Han Dynasty never reached the heights of its predecessor. Warlords who were members of the rich landowner classes seized more and more power, and widespread peasant rebellions sapped the state’s resources. Surviving in name only during its last thirty years, the Han Dynasty ended in 220 CE, when the throne was usurped by the son of a famous warlord. Three and a half centuries of disunity and turbulence followed- the longest in China’s long history and often called China’s “Middle Ages”—as it did in Europe after the fall of the Roman Empire. But China eventually succeeded where Europe failed, in 589 CE China was once again united by the Sui Dynasty. With minor exceptions, it has remained united until this day. The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire are commonly compared for many reasons. In the chart below discuss the most valuable similarities and differences between Han and Rome.

Han Dynasty
Roman Empire
1. Size and
Location

2. Culture

3. Expansion and Empire

4. Agriculture

5. Trade

6. Religion and Phil
Philosophy

7. Social
Classes

8. Decline and
Fall

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Whereas Han China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 B.C.E. and the imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E. had shared similarities on the territorial boundaries issues, the two empires had different political over the huge amount of land. Known as most powerful empires in history, Han China and Rome utilized idiosyncractic policy to maintain the sovereignty. However, the two states both suffered from the border disputes.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China had some similarities and differences in their foundation. In the eight century B.C.E., Rome began as a small city-state on the western side of Italy. Originally they were a monarchy but in 509 B.C.E. they knocked off the monarchy and made themselves republic. In their republic system, the wealthy class, known as patricians, dominated. The lower class was called plebeians. The Romans had laws that protected the lower class form abuse. The Romans took great pride in their system, believing it gave them more freedom. With this political system, the Romans launched their empire, a process that took more than 500 years. The Chinese were not building a new empire yet they were restoring the old. The Chinese empire started as early as 2200 B.C.E. By 5oo B.C.E. the Chinese state was in shambles which they considered as the warring states, which were seven kingdoms within the Chinese government fighting against each other. China finally reunified in 221 B.C.E. Han China and Imperial Rome are similar because they both flourished at about the same time (200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E.), conquered about the same amount of land (about 1.5 million square miles), and had about the same population (50 to 60 million). The reason for the similarities and differences in the foundation in both of the empires was because Rome was a new empire while the Han dynasty was just restoring the old but they were still the dame due to their similarity in the time era both empires flourished, they occupied a similar area, and they contained a similar population.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major similarity between the administration policies of Han China and Imperial Rome was that both empires had very centralized governments. In China, the emperor had all the power. While there were smaller units of government, the emperor controlled everything within the empire. Han China’s government structure was modeled after its precursor, the Qin dynasty. The Han elaborated on the original structure, perfecting it. In Rome, the emperor was also the most powerful; however the Roman people had an illusion of power not seen in Han China. Although the emperor held the…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    China put their trust in the mandate of heaven, which is a Chinese political theory that gave those in power the right to rule from a divine authority. Imperial Rome relied on a monarchy system, which…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome and Han China had both similar and different characteristics about their empires, while existing at the same time. While thousands of miles separated Rome and Han China, neither influenced the other. They both lasted approximately 400 years, with populations of about 50 million. The Roman Empire encompassed all the land that surrounded the Mediterranean Sea, as well as large portions of Continental Europe and the Middle East. The Han Empire however, stretched from the Pacific ocean to the oases of Central Asia.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial administration in Imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E and Han China from 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E. had both their similarities and differences. Similarities include general idea of equality, living under one ruler who gives the people some control, and the roles of families. One major difference is the method of political control with religion, and the way their leaders were selected.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though Imperial Rome and Han had very similar political structures their militaries were very different. Rome's military was used to reinforce laws, and was very strong and powerful, unlike Han china. In Han China, their military is mainly used for less important issues. The emperor in Imperial Rome headed the military, and in Han China, the emperor was not the only one heading the military.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China was one of the longest dynasties in Chinese history, however, the Imperial Roman empire lasted even longer. Han China and Imperial Rome share many similarities as well as many differences. Although Han China and Imperial Rome had many similarities (patriarchy, expansion), the differences (recruitment, system of who is in authority) in methods of political control outweigh the similarities because of they had little interaction with each other.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The religion in Rome was much more thorough than the Han religion. Roman rulers organized the state religion while the Han emperors were more earthly. The Han emperors acknowledged the existence of the gods and participated in ceremonies, but didn’t really have much concern for them. Both Empires focused on rituals that would bring loyalty to the empire, but neither of them were extremely spiritual. The Han Empire used Confucian thought as their primary ideology.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The massively extensive classical empires of Imperial Rome (31BCE-476CE) and Han China (206BCE-220CE) were extremely influential when it came to the world around them. In essence, the two empires were virtually the same in terms of political structure and military protocols, yet greatly different in the area of religious tolerance.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George....

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Early China’s cities, Shang and Zhou, have very distinctive features in the ideology of kingship. In the Shang dynasty, the king and his administration were the controllers, where the king was the intermediary between the people and the gods. However, in the Zhou dynasty, the ruler was chosen by gods to justify power, and if he/she misbehaved or acted inappropriately, they would be kicked off the throne; this was called the Mandate of Heaven.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The period circa 600 B.C.E. to 600 C.E. can be seen as a time dominated by the imperial expansion and consolidation of power of several empires. Across the world, empires popped up, and existing empires were given the capability of expanding greatly. Of these, the two preeminent empires at this time were the Roman Empire and those located in China (e.g. the Han). While not close to each other geographically, both the Chinese Empires and the Roman Empire successfully created their powerful empires through themes of a strong central government, the use of technology, and the success of cultural unity.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, ancient Rome and Han China both shared social views. Male dominance was a big thing for both, as they only cared to produce male offspring and didn't really care much about the women. In Han China it was a bit of a disgrace to produce women offspring; in Rome women were in the same social level as all of the children, everybody under seven-teen years of age. Even-though they both had sort of a sexism society, their paterfamilias were very loyal and respectful. Rome had a lot more slaves then Han China, however they led to an economical downfall in both ancient Rome and Han China.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter Study Outline I. China and Rome: How empires are built A. Unprecedented power: Roman and Han characteristics 1. Size, quality, and lasting worldwide impact 2. Cultural, economic, and administrative control B. Empire and cultural identity 1. Han a. Civilian magistrates and bureaucrats were public servants b. Emulated past models for empire's ideals c. Elites shared common language d. Belief in ancestor worship 2.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics