Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

comparing and contrasting Imperial Rome and Han China

Good Essays
644 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
comparing and contrasting Imperial Rome and Han China
Han China (206 B.C.E. – 220 C.E.) and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E.) have some similarities and differences such as in foundation, governmental control, and collapse. These factors either helped their empire or weakened them influencing their fall. Imperial Rome and Han China had some similarities and differences in their foundation. In the eight century B.C.E., Rome began as a small city-state on the western side of Italy. Originally they were a monarchy but in 509 B.C.E. they knocked off the monarchy and made themselves republic. In their republic system, the wealthy class, known as patricians, dominated. The lower class was called plebeians. The Romans had laws that protected the lower class form abuse. The Romans took great pride in their system, believing it gave them more freedom. With this political system, the Romans launched their empire, a process that took more than 500 years. The Chinese were not building a new empire yet they were restoring the old. The Chinese empire started as early as 2200 B.C.E. By 5oo B.C.E. the Chinese state was in shambles which they considered as the warring states, which were seven kingdoms within the Chinese government fighting against each other. China finally reunified in 221 B.C.E. Han China and Imperial Rome are similar because they both flourished at about the same time (200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E.), conquered about the same amount of land (about 1.5 million square miles), and had about the same population (50 to 60 million). The reason for the similarities and differences in the foundation in both of the empires was because Rome was a new empire while the Han dynasty was just restoring the old but they were still the dame due to their similarity in the time era both empires flourished, they occupied a similar area, and they contained a similar population.
Both empires established effective centralized governmental control over their vast regions and huge populations. But the Chinese, in opposition to the Romans, developed an elaborate bureaucracy to hold their empire together. Han emperor Wudi established an imperial academy for training officials for an emerging bureaucracy with a curriculum based on writings of Confucius. The major difference is that Roman administration was very dilapidated affair, relying on regional aristocratic elites and an army to provide cohesion. Romans developed an elaborate body of law, dealing with matters such as justice, property, business, and family life. The definition of a “good government” differed for the Romans and the Chinese. The Romans thought that you’d have a good government if you had “good laws” while the Chinese government thought that “good men” meant a good government. The reason for the similarities and differences in the governmental control over both empires was because they had different emperors and laws and were ruled differently. Han China and Imperial Rome collapsed for some similar and different reasons. A similarity between the collapse between Han China and Imperial Rome was that they both had rivalry in elite factions that weakened the system. In China, tension between court officials that were loyal to the emperor and Confucian-educated scholar-bureaucrats weakened the state. In Rome, 26 individuals claimed that they were emperor. Only 2 died of natural causes. The population of Rome declined by 25% in 250 C.E. which meant less revenue for Rome. Another similarity in the collapse of both empires was that they were both threatened by nomadic people. China was threatened by the Xiongnu and other nomadic people in the north. Rome was threatened by Germanic-speaking people that also lived on their northern frontiers.
The biggest similarity for their collapse was that they both got overextended and too expensive into where they were not able to be sustained by their available resources. The reason for the similarities in the collapse in both empires was because they both witnessed similar events that weakened their empire.

listen

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Even though Imperial Rome and Han had very similar political structures their militaries were very different. Rome's military was used to reinforce laws, and was very strong and powerful, unlike Han china. In Han China, their military is mainly used for less important issues. The emperor in Imperial Rome headed the military, and in Han China, the emperor was not the only one heading the military.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China during the time 200 bce. through 200 ce. and Imperial Rome during the time of 31 bce. though 476 ce. had many similarities and differences. Some of the similarities between the two are their religious policies, the significance of their armies, rebelliations from the people, and the role of the emperor. These empires had many differences as well such as the acceptance of outsiders, their influences on other regions, and their philosophies.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Around 200 B.C.E. to 200 C.E. the empires of Rome and Han China flourished in the 1.5 million square miles. Each of their societies developed in vastly different lands. Separated from each other, Rome and China’s empires grew individually. Although separated by thousands of miles and differences of language, each society developed their own individual yet similar aspects. The societies of Ancient Rome and Han China were similar because of their patriarchal values which shaped their families and the status of their wealthy classes. Rome and China were different in their societies because of their individual uses of slavery and language.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China had many differences involving religion, technology, and women in society, but the similarities in these three subjects outnumber the amount of differences. Women in Rome and China had many of the same responsibilities. Technology in China was more advanced, but Rome was on top of advancing the field of architecture. Religion allowed these two empires to be alike but also different over the course of their reign. Differences make an empire unique, but similarities connect empires throughout the world.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Similarities between Rome and Han China included gender roles, method of economical production, and architecture. Differences included family structure, class structure, and religious practice.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The ancient civilizations of Rome and Han China shared both similarities and differences in their social, political and economical views.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While imperial administration in Han China from 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E. and Imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E. had their similarities like the family roles that the government encourages, living under one ruler who gives the people some control, and the general idea of equalization, they also had their differences. One of these differences being in how each ruler gave their empire control and where they put themselves according to the rest of their empire.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Han China and Imperial Rome were controlled under one central leader. The leader of the Han Dynasty had the overall power, but set up administrative districts governed by officials. The emperor also used Confucianism as a means to train people to become educated bureaucrats, who would then enforce his policies. However, the ruler of Imperial Rome set up a monarchy, disguised as a Republic, so that he could maintain complete control over his citizens. This allowed the citizens to feel as if they were contributing to government, and also allow the emperor to maintain control over his empire. Both societies also created more centralized governments by developing vast expanses of roads to promote trade, as well as levying taxes to stimulate economic prosperity.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most societies that developed in ancient civilizations were centered around some form of imperial administration and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.-476 C.E.) and Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 C.E.) were no different in this sense. Both civilizations had a network of cities and roads, with similar technologies that catalyzed cultural amalgamation and upgraded the standard of living, along with comparable organizational structures. Additionally, both civilizations had problems managing their borders and used similar tactics for defense. However, the Chinese Emperor was interpreted as a God while the Roman Emperor was a lugal, or big man, who had to fight not only to gain power, but to push through his initiatives. The similarities and differences of the control and management of both regions may be attributed to the philosophical ideas and belief systems that existed at the time, influencing political structure in similar ways with only a few minor differences that set the two cultures apart.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China (206 B.C.E.- 220 C.E.) and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. - 476 C.E.) were each amazing civilizations in their own ways. Each dynasty made many great ecological and technological advancements. Additionally, the governments of these civilizations each had ways of maintaining the political control over their subjects. The Han Dynasty of China and Imperial Rome’s methods of political control were similar in many ways (including their use of centralized governments and their uses of their military) and many differences (including the roles of citizens in the government and the governments techniques for keeping the lower classes happy) but I believe the similarities outweigh the differences because while the differences are definite ways to control the people, the similarities listed have been much more long-lasting and are also much more essential to this type of control.…

    • 775 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty both have many similarities and differences. The Roman Empire lasted from 27 BC - 476 CE. The Han Dynasty lasted from 206 - 220 BCE. The Roman Empire included parts of northern Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East. Throughout ancient history, this was known as the largest empire ever. On the other hand, the Han Dynasty included only the southeastern and northeastern parts of present-day China. Even though both Rome and Han were settled in different areas at different times, they were very similar in the way they chose their government officials & their duties and architectural accomplishments, but they had different thoughts on religion. Both civilizations have been shown to have many similarities and differences, whether it was politically, architecturally, or religiously.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two classical empires were taking shape – the Roman Empire on the far western side of Eurasia and china’s imperial state on the far eastern end. They flourished at roughly the same time (200BCE to 200CE); they occupied a similar area (about 1.5 million square miles); they encompassed populations of a similar size (50 to60 million).The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were both giant empires of their time, shaping the lives of close to half the world’s population. From 300BCE to 400AD the history of the Han Dynasty of East Asia and the Roman Empire of the Mediterranean basin both had comparable and diverse political methods of control by using the military force of the legions while the Han Dynasty used the merit system through examinations to hold government office.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty in China are two kingdoms that, despite the geographical difference between them, managed to achieve great success and failure in equal measure. Both were characterized by imperial dynasties that were headed by the emperors and they held large territories. Both of these kingdoms faced various challenges after their formation that became a major stabling block, but due to good leadership, they both managed to overcome and achieve success. Nevertheless, due to different reasons, both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty declined and fell. This paper analyzes the similarities and differences between the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty taking into consideration their achievements and causes of their decline.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Empires

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Roman and Han Empires both had their differences and similarities. However their similarities out-weighed their differences by a large amount. Their governments, economies, traditions, even their ways of agriculture made them very similar but at the same time very different. A couple of things that made them similar are The Han and the Roman Empires was two of the most powerful empires to rule their respective parts of the world, however they both declined and failed. Another thing was that agriculture was the fundamental economic activity for wealth. A couple of differences were in The Han Empire; the merchant class in china was frequently disparaged and constrained by the government. The Romans were sort of a republic, where they got to choose their leader. Whereas to the Han Dynasty, power was passed down the family.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome and Han China shared similar techniques in their methods of military conquest in relation to their imperial administration. Both Rome and Han China established control of their territory though fighting and defending land. Testaments of this can be seen when Rome used legions that consisted of heavy infantry. Each legion had thousands of soldiers and was sent to the battlefield head first to fight. These legions were considered standing units and a professional army that were sent out wherever war came about. Rome also had numerous soldiers along all the borders as a means of defense. Similarly, Han China also had regiments consisting of thousands of soldiers that were sent out for military conquest. These regiments correspondingly were considered as well, professional armies known as standing units. Han China in the same way had an abundant number of soldiers along their borders even with the defense added on by the Great Wall of China. These similarities were key as each empire brought the provinces of their domains together though military conquest into regimes of unprecedented scale and thereby enhanced the integration of local worlds into a common legal and cultural framework. Rome conquered the Mediterranean using legions and forcing other regions and new lands to join them. Correspondingly they defended by putting out soldiers on all the borders in case of any attackers. In comparison, Han China conquered East Asia by taking over territories and using their regiments of thousands of soldiers to make the people join the empire as well. Using similar actions, Han China also followed by defending their borders through stationed soldiers and by even expanding the Great Wall of China to…

    • 756 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays