Han China during the time 200 bce. through 200 ce. and Imperial Rome during the time of 31 bce. though 476 ce. had many similarities and differences. Some of the similarities between the two are their religious policies, the significance of their armies, rebelliations from the people, and the role of the emperor. These empires had many differences as well such as the acceptance of outsiders, their influences on other regions, and their philosophies.
A similarity between Han China and Imperial Rome was their religious policies. Both China and Rome blocked the spread of other religions from nearby empires to come into their nations such as Hinduism from India or Stoicism from the Greeks. The religion that was practiced in Rome (after being legalized in 312) was Christianity by the Emperor Constantine while the religious practice of Buddhism was incorporated with Confucianism and Daoism. Another similarity between the two empires was the significance of their army. Both China and Rome were ruled by generals and the armies were a crucial part in maintaining political stability against their enemies. Han China and Imperial Rome were often threatened by surrounding opponents who frequently attempted to assert their authority upon them. Also, the high cost of the armies often caused for bankruptcy in the empires and forced the taxes of the people to go up. Both of these empires also struggled from retaliations from the people because of these high taxes and poor treatments to the less fortunate. In both China and Rome, the emperor received many revolts against his policies. The revolts were mostly from the people of lower status such as the slaves in Rome and the peasants in China. Finally, the role of the emperor was very similar in these two empires as well. Both Han China and Imperial Rome believed that not one single imperial family should rule forever. The Romans chose their emperors based of whoever was their best general while China chose a man who could control the imperial family and court. Both empires felt the the ruler should have divine attributes but they often had difficulty in establishing rules for imperial succession.
A difference between Han China and Imperial Rome is the way the empires accepted foreigners. As China conquered more and more nations, they accepted the people and spread their views and ideas upon them. Rome was also conquering other nations but the people they conquered did not take on the views and beliefs of the Romans. They remained “other” and intermarriages between Romans and foreigners were usually forbidden. The empire was held together by the practice of Buddhism and Confucianism while Rome was held together by law and military power. In China, Confucianism was the belief that the welfare of the people should come first while as in Rome, the belief was that the power of the nation came before the people. Another difference between the two empires was their influence on their neighbors. The Imperial Roman Empire influenced only the people within their boundaries while Han China’s influence spread to other areas such as Japan and Korea. Their influence consisted mainly of their religious and cultural views. Also, Rome and China had different philosophies regarding their empires. China practiced Confucianism and instead of looking to the past for ways to govern that they should keep moving forward. They believed that the only possible government was a well-ordered empire. Rome, on the other hand, always looked back to the past for advice on how to govern and considered it to be a golden age.
In conclusion, Han China and Imperial Rome had many similarities and differences. They had many of the same views on their views of outside religions, the importance of their armies, the retaliations from the people, and the high role of the emperor. They also had a few differences between them such as their policy of accepting the people they conquered, the influence they had on other regions surrounding them, and their views of governing their empires. Both Han China and Imperial Rome were very powerful nations and made a large imprint on the history of the ancient world.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Han China and Imperial Rome had some Similarities. Both Han China and Imperial Rome had very large empires that it was difficult to manage their boarders and often faced threats. Both Empires were patriarchal societies and kept women in low status with no say in political affairs. Both Han China and Imperial Rome were ruled by one centralized ruler. Both empires had standardized coins to promote…
- 287 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Whereas Han China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 B.C.E. and the imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E. had shared similarities on the territorial boundaries issues, the two empires had different political over the huge amount of land. Known as most powerful empires in history, Han China and Rome utilized idiosyncractic policy to maintain the sovereignty. However, the two states both suffered from the border disputes.…
- 503 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were two very large empires. Both of these empires were considered golden ages in one form or another. Han was considered a Golden Age in general because of its length and prosperity, while Rome also promoted prosperity it was mainly the Golden Age of Latin Literature. These empires were similar technologically while different politically.…
- 382 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
When Han China and Imperial Rome are compared, one can find both similarities and differences in terms of techniques of imperial administration. A similarity would be that both are bureaucracies. However, both are also different. One major difference is that Han China had the civil service exams. They also differed because Han China had a much greater emphasis on religion than the Romans. These differences led to very different futures for the two empires, both of which were among the strongest in the world at the time.…
- 568 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Han Dynasty and The Western Roman Empire are two of the greatest empires that have ever lived but that all comes to an end when disasters start occurring left and right. However, the methods of achieving greatness varied immensely their actions had helped them in the long run but soon failed miserably.…
- 407 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Rome did not develop a mostly unified religion until much later in the empire. From the beginning of Han China, the emperor was seen as having divine approval. The Mandate of Heaven gave the emperor this divine approval, and it could be taken away. Chinese emperors also often ruled with philosophical values, the most common of which was Confucianism. The philosophical value of legalism is what actually got China out of the warring states period and began Han China. Han China continued to rule according to the philosophical value of legalism, just their precursor, Qin China. Rome didn’t have a constant religion until late in the empire when Constantine made it legal to practice Christianity and endorsed it. Theodosius later made Christianity the official religion of Rome, but this occurred years after the empire was founded. Because the empires were ruled with different philosophies and religions, administrative techniques were…
- 795 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Imperial Rome and Han China are both well recognized empires, known as strong and fairly successful. Although the empires had some differences they also had similarities in their methods of political control. Similarities between these empires include the belief that leaders had connections to God, religious tolerance, and public works provided to citizens. Along with the similarities in political control the differences include Rome having a democracy while China had a centralized bureaucracy, Rome had lesser domestic repercussions while China had harsh punishments, and Rome offered assimilation to become a citizen while China did not need to offer assimilation because it conquered states that were already chinese.…
- 640 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were very common in the aspect of their downfall and collapse. Han China had a well-organized bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideas and education. In addition, they also had emphasis on family ancestors (patriarchal), reliance on landed gentry, and accomplishments in engineering; which includes roads, canals, and the Great Wall. The Roman Empire contained a well-organized bureaucracy as well which was founded on Roman law and classical learning. They also implied emphasis on family (pater familias), had reliance on patricians, and had engineering accomplishments; including roads, aqueducts, amphitheaters, domes, sewage systems, and central heating. Although, unfortunately the two become even more common…
- 286 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han and the Romans both had very passive views when it came to technology, both sharing the "good is good enough" mindset. This appears through people of high class wanting higher quality materials and laborers, the Han enjoying a superb invention but not outwardly seeking to improve it, as well as the Romans appreciated fantastic inventions without searching for ways to improve…
- 64 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Bureaucracy was founded on roman law and classical learning local officials. The Roman Army was considered the best trained and best fed, and Augustus was their set model for emperor established principate. Their laws were established by the “Twelve Tables” and they believed in citizenship. The Rome empire government believed in slave labor, while Han China’s emperor was considered the “son of heaven”. Their bureaucracy was founded on Confucian ideas and traditions used by local officials. The Han China Emperor proclaimed laws, as well as military and civilian conscription, and they used confucian scholars as government officials. The Han China empire had no idea of what citizenship was, and their laws were proclaimed by their emperor. While there were quite a few differences between the empires when it came to their government systems, the similarities included both having extensive road systems for the military which doubled as the spread of commerce and culture, due to enemies on their borders, while also emphasizing territorial…
- 1002 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Han China and Rome were two of the most powerful and popular empires of their time, but they fell like any other empire before them. Han China and Rome’s Empires had the same causes for their declines, but their effects are different.…
- 282 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Imperial Rome’s political method is centered around polytheism. Han China’s political method is centered around Confucianism during the beginning of the dynasty, and then around Daoism after political changes were made. . Confucianism is defined as more of a philosophy than a religion. Confucius taught philosophical and ethical ideas, that shaped the traditional Chinese culture. Han China, after change in authority, transformed from Confucianism to Daoism. Imperial Rome was centered around polytheism, the worship of many Gods. It is very different than Daoism. Daoism is based upon philosophy and nature, but polytheism is based upon gods. Han China and Imperial Rome express different political methods of control through religion. Imperial Rome and Han China had different ways in which their leaders were chosen. In Han China, rule was gained through ancestors into a centralized bureaucratic authority. In Imperial Rome authority began through certain elements of democracy, not through ancestral…
- 386 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Around 200 B.C.E. to 200 C.E. the empires of Rome and Han China flourished in the 1.5 million square miles. Each of their societies developed in vastly different lands. Separated from each other, Rome and China’s empires grew individually. Although separated by thousands of miles and differences of language, each society developed their own individual yet similar aspects. The societies of Ancient Rome and Han China were similar because of their patriarchal values which shaped their families and the status of their wealthy classes. Rome and China were different in their societies because of their individual uses of slavery and language.…
- 843 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
While the Roman and the Han empires were similar, they also differed. The households within both empires were run very differently. In the Roman households, they enforced a concept of pater familias, meaning the eldest male in the house would rule, this is also passed down through generations. Where as in the Han, they followed a Confucian quality,…
- 459 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Imperial Rome and Han China formed distinctive methods of social and political control. To Chine, the centerpiece that supervised everything was knows as Confucianism. With all dependability focused on the emperor and society serving as a family unit, Han China's political system was known for a centralized, closed unit. It was ruled by an emperor who took the Mandate of Heaven in deep consideration. The Han developed a supply of soilders, which kept their borders secured and made them capable to exchange with others from time to time. On the other hand, Rome had a centralized, mingled structure. The main focus points of the Roman Society were operated by a Roman Monarchy, which was disguised as a Republic, who controlled their complex structure. The Roman Society had more residents and rights than the Hans, Roman's political control lay in the hands of the wealthy, which then they were elected to a political seat. The govenors were picked from family networks. The only way Romans could accomplish anything big in a certain time span was to make strong changes in their community. It was an enormous weight on Rome's resources and power, when they had to stress over big wins. For example, when there was barely any food to support the developing empire. The Romans and the Hans both had their wealthiest people control over their peasants, which caused a social distribution to each and every one, and could-of leaded to outbrakes in little battles, wars between the communities, and what not. This was enitrely not beneficial on each empire's part and especially their social…
- 327 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays