Preview

Henry V and Machiavelli

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
669 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Henry V and Machiavelli
Henry V and Machiavelli are different in many ways. The main reason why they are different is because they are the leaders from different epochs. Henry V is a leader from medieval times. Machiavelli “The Prince” is a leader from renaissance times. These leaders have different thoughts of a lot of things. For example, religion and government but if you really think about they could have the same views. Let’s further on your knowledge this both incredible leaders. To begin, Henry V is represented as a medieval leader. This is so because he is very religious. He seeks what he thinks god wants him to do. Henry is very serious when it comes down to defending his country. Henry states that the English are in gods hands. Also, when they are getting ready to go fight the war between themselves and the French Henry gave the Englishmen a speech and was very brave a lead them from the front what a great leader. After the war this is when Henry gets religious and he states that god won the war not him but god. That was very medieval of him. “He gives all glory and honor to god (Shakespeare v, prologue, 21-28). This Quote shows that Henry gave the honour of winning the war against the French to god.
In Addition, Machiavelli is a leader from renaissance time. He believes that religion isn’t that important but government and politics are. It is appropriate to call Machiavelli’s work political science because he wanted to understand how political leaders could obtain and hold power. Machiavelli wasn’t only different from Henry or people from different time periods. He was even different from people of his own time period because different writers of his time tried to describe perfect governments. When Machiavelli believed that nothing was perfect. Also Machiavelli believed that you had to listen to yourself no one else. Henry V believed only god gave you the correct answers. Machiavelli’s view of human nature was that it is better to be feared then to be loved and this reveals



Cited: Ellis, Elisabeth Gaynor, Anthony Elser. World History: Connections to Today. Boston, MA; Pearson Pretence Hall. 2005 Shakespeare, William. Henry V. Edited by Barbara A. Mowat and Paul Westine. New York; Washington Press, 2002. Huxley, Alfred. Niccolo Machiavelli: Inventor of Political Science. New York; Washington Press, 2002. Machiavelli, Niccolo. The Prince. Reprinted in Robert Maynard Hutchins, ed., Great Books of the Western World. New York Paragon Press, 1952

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Nutt1

    • 1342 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The true Henry the Fifth was son of King Henry the Fourth, and he was born September 1387 in Monmouth, Monmouthshire, Whales. He was the “first English King who could both read and write with ease in the vernacular tongue” (Encyclopedia), at that time illiteracy was the norm. The ability to read, write and speak another language was astounding. Henry the Fifth,” succeeded his father on March 21, 1413. This was the turning point for the play boy Prince; he made a 360 “life change and began to take his divine duties as the King of England seriously. As king [his] personality was hard domineering, he was intolerant of opposition and could be ruthless and cruel in pursuit of his policy” (Encyclopedia). However, he also obtained the “[capacity] to inspire devotion in others, and he possessed high qualities of leadership” (Encyclopedia). He only reigned for a short time, and was very young when he passed. His dying wish was to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem and start a whole new crusade. He passed August 1422 in Bois de Vincennes, France, and he reigned from 1413-1422(Encyclopedia). The true Henry the Fifths reign and character was mirrored in Shakespeare’s impression of his life in Henry V.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli suggested in The Prince that a ruler should behave as both a fox and a lion, being both loved and feared. There are clever rulers who were strategic, courageous rulers who were effective, and successful rulers who possessed both qualities. Elizabeth I of England and Henery IV of France were two great rulers from Europe that were able to personify Machiavelli 's advice.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike Machiavelli, Henry V was a devout Catholic man, which shows in how he ruled. Particularly in war, Henry called upon God several times during…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Besides ruling with considerable power, he was also an author and a composer. His desire to provide England with a male heir lead to two things, one being his sox marriages and two hos break with the pope. As King Henry the 8th aged he became severely obese and his health suffered, contributing to his death in 1547. Later in his life on the throne he was thought to be egoistical, harsh, and an insecure king. King Henry the 8th will go down as one of England’s best rulers but also will go down in history as being irrational and unfit at some points on his time as King of…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli believed in the idea of a strong leader. The leader should be feared more than he is loved, if he is even loved at all. A leader shouldn 't be hated, a hated leader will be rebelled and possibly killed, but a leader can not be loved at all. He believes that if a leader is loved, he wouldn 't be feared and no one will listen to him or what he wants to do. Machiavelli believed that war was needed and a nation should keep a strong military at all times. War shouldn 't be high on taxes though, because taxes have a possibility to cause a rebellion. A rebellion is an act of hatred and could possibly lead to death of the…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believed that there were two ways of becoming a prince which was ability or good fortune. Also, Machiavelli believed that if it was good fortune, it was only the arbiter of half our actions and we still had control of the other half. “A prince who relies entirely upon fortune will fail when his fortune changes” (92).This here was true for Cesare Borgia who acquired power through his father’s fortune and lost it once his father died. Despite the fact that Cesare tried to exercise every effort as a leader in pursuit of power should in the sense of Machiavelli’s methods, Cesare was granted fortunes by others and therefore had no control over it.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Henry II

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One key person of the Middle Ages that I have studied or know of is, King Henry II. He was born on March 5, 1133 in Le Mans, France and died on July 6, 1189. Throughout his lifetime, his was, Count of Anjou, Count of Maine, Duke of Normandy, Duke of Aquitaine, Lord of Ireland and King of England. King Henry was related to Eleanor of Aquitaine and King Richard I. Three of his achievements that were significant to the Middle Ages are; improving economics and legal system of England. Being the first ever Angevin king and having power over territories that stretched of Ireland to the Pyrenees.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli, N. (2013). The prince. In J. T. Wren (Ed.), Companion: insights on leadership through the ages [Kindle Edition], New York: The Free Press.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry V Prince Hal Essay

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    People during the Elizabethan times, being devout Roman Catholics, were more religious and spiritual. Therefore Henry in his speeches refers God to gain support and trust of his people, like in Act four Scene three when he is persuading his army to fight before the battle of Agincourt. It makes him sound so confident of himself, that God is on his side and hence he is not wrong and is only doing which was meant to happen. This is also what King Charles did when persuading the people that he has been rightly chosen as their King.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry V

    • 1362 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How do two of the set speeches represent Henry V's unique qualities that make him the ideal king?…

    • 1362 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lead with Example

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stability in a ruler’s morals and ethics are a vital asset to have when ruling a group of people. With similarities shared between the ruler and the common person the ruler will then be able to relate and be more respected amongst the population, as opposed to a ruler who rules with his own self interest at hand. In the piece, The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli argues the many principles of how a prince should and should not rule. In order to rule successfully he states a prince must possess some of the following characteristics; morality, a strong army, strict rule, common ground with his people and also to be widely respected. Machiavelli laid the ground work for many rulers in the future with his modern view in a time where rulers were primitive and ruled through fear and terror. The Prince and its ideas can even be seen today in our modern day presidents and kings proving that Machiavelli had compelling ideas and arguments for how leaders can obtain and hold a position of power successfully.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Both St. Augustine and Machiavelli believed that in order to understand the true nature of society you must see men for what they truly were. Augustine and Machiavelli are similar in their pessimistic views toward human nature, looking at human self-love and self-interest and believed it to be full of evil, cruelty, betrayal, violence and tied that relationship into the creation of war. For both philosophers a good society is actually something that for almost all men is an unreachable attribute that can only be written about and not actually fully experienced in my view. For Augustine I feel it is a truly heavenly earth where all men are divine and are as close to the city of Heaven as you can be on earth. For Machiavelli it is a state of complete acceptance of each man’s role and how that role fits into society like a puzzle piece. In order to examine each philosopher’s view further, we must break their thoughts into three separate categories which are: human nature, political authority, and religious beliefs. This essay will take an in-depth look at both St. Augustine and Machiavelli, compare and contrast their views, and provide evidence that on some level the two thinkers were very similar in their ideology.…

    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I found this essay quite radical but very interesting. I think that although I wish it weren’t true, that most politicians today have this sort of mindset. I believe this piece of literary work to be the most contradicting of Machiavelli’s…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Renaissance is known for being a rebirth of ancient Greek and Roman ideas. Many historians believe it is filled with literature similar to previous works simply retelling the same story. Niccolò Machiavelli took various ideas from ancient political literature, mainly drawing from Plato’s Republic. Next, he set out to write his own political work known as The Prince. This piece of literature is considered a handbook for political leadership. He wanted to be in politics, although could not, thus writing with regards to politics was a close second. The Prince is the uttermost influential work in the Renaissance era as it advocated for a shift in leader’s virtues such as being ethical when needed and putting others before oneself.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics