Preview

Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1192 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership
Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership
March 9, 2014
University of Phoenix

Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership This paper evaluates the leadership views of Plato, Aristotle, Lao-Tzu, and Machiavelli from the point of view of the modern military leader. The process of evaluation includes an examination of the commonalities and disparities between these views of leadership. The paper explores a definition of modern military leadership. The paper includes an assessment of the suitability of each of the aforementioned leadership views to be models for modern military leadership.
Modern Military Leadership The stereotype of the drill sergeant in basic training is not the leadership described in this section. Military leadership is more comprehensive in scope as seen in the movies. The surprise is the value of morality in military leadership. Holding the moral high ground is the most important weapon in breaking the will of the enemy (Stallard, 2013). Sun Tzu (1994) in his work, The Art of War, began his discussion with the value of the moral law (as cited in Stallard, 2013). George Washington (1796) stated in his farewell address as President that religion and morality are indispensable in supporting patriotism (as cited in Stallard, 2013). The guiding principle of military leadership is the respect for human dignity (Mann, 2000). Military leadership involves many other traits. Military leadership involves the rigorous application of a system of orders and obedience resulting in a hierarchy (Mann, 2000). Within this system of orders and hierarchy, the military leader recognizes the value of the method of delivery of orders (Mann, 2000). This certainly stems from the respect for human dignity. The quality of performance is better when providing orders in a good atmosphere (Mann, 2000). A military leader must develop trust between him and the troops; the leader must possess an adequate degree of self-confidence (Mann, 2000). The



References: Aristotle (2013). A treatise on government. In J. T. Wren (Ed.), Companion: insights on leadership through the ages [Kindle Edition], New York: The Free Press. Heider, J. (2013). The tao of leadership. In J. T. Wren (Ed.), Companion: insights on leadership through the ages [Kindle Edition], New York: The Free Press. Machiavelli, N. (2013). The prince. In J. T. Wren (Ed.), Companion: insights on leadership through the ages [Kindle Edition], New York: The Free Press. Mann, H. J. (2000). Leadership. Naval Forces, 21(5), 28-30. Plato (2013). The republic of Plato: an ideal commonwealth. In J. T. Wren (Ed.), Companion: insights on leadership through the ages [Kindle Edition], New York: The Free Press. Stallard, W. D. C. H. C. U. S. N. (2013). Strategic Military Leadership. Marine Corps Gazette, 97(1), 20-24. Tzu, S. (2013). The art of war. In W. D. Stallard, Strategic Military Leadership. Marine Corps Gazette, 97(1), 20-24. Washington, G. (2013). Washington’s farewell address to the people of the united states [farewell address]. In W. D. Stallard, Strategic Military Leadership. Marine Corps Gazette, 97(1), 20-24.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    first to fight

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Our actions as Marines every day must embody the legacy of those who went before us. Their memorial to us—their teaching, compassion, courage, sacrifices, optimism, humor, humility, commitment, perseverance, love, guts, and glory—is the pattern for our daily lives. This manual attempts to capture those heritages of the Marine Corps' approach to leading. It is not prescriptive because there is no formula for leadership. It is not all-inclusive because to capture all that it is to be a Marine or to lead Marines defies pen and paper. Instead, it is intended to provide those charged with leading Marines a sense of the legacy they have inherited, and to help them come to terms with their own personal leadership style. The indispensable condition of Marine Corps leadership is action and attitude, not words. As one Marine leader said, "Don't tell me how good you are. Show me!"…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to professionally analyze a leader in order to identify how their attributes and competencies impacted their organization and affected my own leadership philosophy. Master Sergeant Retired Roy Benavidez is a leader whose actions positively influenced the United States Army and greatly influenced my leadership philosophy. Benavidez influenced the United States Army by aligning his core attributes, character, presence, and intellect and his core competencies, leads, develops, and achieves with Army doctrine before it existed. Benavidez’s leadership style and personal sacrifices…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: A military general’s leadership lessons. (2009, January 8). Gallup Management Journal. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/businessjournal/113629/military-generals-leadership-lessons.aspx…

    • 1351 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ReferencesArmy Study Guide. (2008). NCO Creed. Retrieved from http://www.armystudyguide.com/content/army_board_study_guide_topics/nco_history/nco-creed-3.shtmlArmy Study Guide. (2008). The Soldier 's Creed. Retrieved from http://www.armystudyguide.com/content/Prep_For_Basic_Training/Prep_for_basic_general_information/the-soldiers-creed.shtmlBateman, T. S., & Snell, S. A. (2009). Management: Leading and Collaborating in the Competitive World (8th ed.). New York, NY:…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Csm Command Philosophy

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Leadership is an art, not a science. Therefore, we as senior leaders must professionally develop our junior soldiers through experience, counseling and mentoring. We must mentor our soldiers to be ethical standard bearers and to live up to and enforce Army valves. 1. The following statements represent my Leadership Philosophy that we must ensure as Non-Commissioned Officers and leaders of soldiers that we are working as one team to produce the best trained soldiers in the Army. a. Proficient caring leaders: I expect proficient Leaders to demonstrate caring attitudes toward the soldiers in their charge. We must lead from the front and set the example at all times. Caring for soldiers is the foundation of the Army. The most precious asset we have is each other and above all our soldiers in the organization must truly know we care for them and their families. b. Teamwork: As leaders we must work as a team in every aspect of training. Soldiers need to cooperate with each other and become one. A well-disciplined caring team will build cohesiveness, which is a bond that no force can break. Soldiers will not play the Officer against the NCO if they truly understand you are one. I will personally be involved in individual training and will insist we are trained. c. Communication: Along with teamwork, communication is what soldiers normally see as a command failure. Soldiers must be able to use the chain of command and chain of support, both formal and informal. I expect every soldier to utilize communication to its fullest extent. As soon as a leader gives directives to soldiers, I expect the details to be worked out and soldiers to receive the information rapidly. d. Leadership: This is in no way a zero defects business. I expect soldiers to make honest mistakes and learn from the experience… you can expect me to make honest mistakes as well… we will learn together. Leaders are positive, proactive, and look for problems and…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The aim of this paper is to analyze the ideas, theory, command, leadership and management style of Brigadier General William Billy Mitchell and draw a lesson in the context of present and future challenges.…

    • 2970 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The greatest leaders are nothing without competent followers. The military depends heavily on leadership-followership dynamics. The very nature of the military chain-of-command means that virtually everyone in the chain must execute both leadership and followership capabilities to ensure mission success. Unique to the armed services, we agreed to support and defend the US Constitution. I believe the most valuable lesson principle to maximize leadership and followership was the Profession of Arms. Those leaders and followers who demonstrate a high level of commitment towards the Profession of Arms exhibit heighten levels of professionalism that enhance mission effectiveness.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Adaptive Leadership Essay

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Due to its purpose, the military has always been known to produce quality leaders. From George Washington to John F. Kennedy, the list goes on and on. The military’s rich history has afforded scholars the opportunity to dissect how leadership is developed in the military. People can look to the military for guidance on effective leadership because officers “… are trained for high-stakes positions at a young age and are sometimes thrown into those roles with no warming.” (The Different Ways Military Experience Prepares Managers for Leadership, p. 82) According to Professor Michael Useem author of “Four Lessons in Adaptive Leadership,” leadership development is best derived from the military as the “environment creates a culture of readiness and commitment.” (p. 86) Professor Useem believes there is something to be learned from this world to apply in the corporate sector since corporations are facing more uncertainty and continuous new types of competitors. From this belief the author has reached a conclusion that adaptive leadership should be used utilizing four precepts; they are, “meeting the troops,” making decisions, focusing on a mission, and conveying strategic intent.…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MGT Case

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Leaders in military contexts don’t have same qualities as organizational leaders. Based on what we learned last week, we knew the Traits associated with successfully leaders. For example energy and adjustment or stress tolerance means Physical vitality and emotional resilience. Flexibility means ability to respond appropriately to changes in the setting. However, according to the fact in Case 4, ‘Military leaders are used to having to make due in less than optimal conditions , negotiate across culture, and operate under extreme stress’. All these fact show leaders in military have different qualities compare to Organizational leaders. And also, Leaders in military are more focusing on employees’ performance which is a production-centered supervisors. Unlike leaders in military, the organizational leaders concern more about relationships with employees which is employee-centered supervisors.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato's Republic

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Plato. Plato: Republic-Oxford World 's Classic. Waterfield, Robin, trans. New York, New York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 1993.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assuming command of any Army organization presents a number of challenges a commander must be prepared to confront. Leaders must be cognizant of the “mental shift” required when moving into the position, and how he may execute the principles of mission command. Furthermore, commanders must fully appreciate the need to accurately assess the organization he’s been charged to lead. It so happens, history provides numerous examples of senior officers succeeding and failing in these endeavors. A critical analysis of LTG Matthew Ridgway’s command of the Eight Army and their success during the Korean War highlights these two concepts.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Wren, J. T. (1995). The leader’s companion: Insights on leadership through the ages. New York, NY: The Free Press.…

    • 2042 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States Army is a complex organization made up of several commands and managed by different command levels. The U.S. Army is an organization different from that of a business in many unique ways. Specific examples of these differences include: financial reporting, disciplinary review procedures, and tactical operations. Although different in many ways, the Army shares many similar characteristics of a normal profit business. Army personnel are managed by supervisors arranged in a command structure similar to that of a business hierarchy. The Army will also encounter internal and external factors that could impede or enhance operations. As such, planning, organizing, leading, and controlling must be used by managers appropriately to supervise the soldiers and operate the organization in a successful manner. This paper will discuss how internal and external factors could affect the command level's ability to plan, organize, lead, and control. In addition, it will explain how globalization, technology, innovation, diversity, and ethics impact the functions of the command levels.…

    • 1698 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Professor Thomas P. Galvin had identified several competencies that describes altitude, behavior, values and ethics specifically associated with senior military leadership. Four of these competencies are “persistent”, or which does every day a “mid-career” officer. The rest four mission-specific roles for senior leaders that require skills and knowledge taught at the highest levels of professional military education, experiences and abilities…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Resources Sergeants

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Army’s way of balancing leader’s roles is by having a rank structure. The rank structure denotes the leader’s role and level of authority and responsibility. With that role comes expert knowledge and work. Leader development is crucial in maintaining a balanced profession. This allows the Army to conduct business in a more organized way. When the leader’s roles are not balanced it makes it difficult for the Army to conduct operations productively. Equally important, such unbalance can affect the trust of our American people as much as the Army’s culture.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays