Harlem Renaissance Comparison Essay
To begin with, the The Italian Renaissance and the Harlem Renaissance were differentiated in culture but had the same idea. This essay will show you how similar they really were. In both, everyone wanted to know more about culture and creativity. They were all trying to get more information on part of what they already knew.When you want to learn more, what do you do? You look for it. Back the, most people were strugling finding curiosity so the world almost lost a lot of information during the dark ages, or thee just simply didnt care.
Similarly , both cultures wanted to learn more about themselves. In italy they whent through a "rebirth" to go back to eras and learn more and the Harlem renaissance had talents and such to go back …show more content…
The artists and thinkers of the early Italian Renaissance studied the classical Greek and Roman books. The writers of the Renaissance at first used the styles of classic Greek and Roman writers, especially in poetry, which was written in Latin in both ancient times and in Renaissance Italy. However, even in the beginning of the Renaissance, writers such as Petrarch and Boccaccio wrote books in the vernacular. This means the books were written in the language that people spoke on the street. They were written in Italian, not Latin. Boccaccio's book in this style, The Decameron, became extremely popular. It was the difference between reading a textbook and reading a book for enjoyment. Unfortunately, because every book written could be "published" only by means of individuals copying the text with pens, one book at a time, no book could become terrifically popular.Another female novelist who achieved fame in Harlem was Zora Neale Hurston. Hurston also published short stories and plays during the Harlem Renaissance. She began as an anthropologist, a social scientist. One of her professors in college was a Jewish scientist named Franz Boas, who is now called the father of anthropology. Boas wrote the preface for her first collection of folktales, Mules and Men. Hurston also worked with a woman who would become a leading social scientist of the twentieth century, Margaret Mead.
To conclude, the Italian and
Similarly , both cultures wanted to learn more about themselves. In italy they whent through a "rebirth" to go back to eras and learn more and the Harlem renaissance had talents and such to go back …show more content…
The artists and thinkers of the early Italian Renaissance studied the classical Greek and Roman books. The writers of the Renaissance at first used the styles of classic Greek and Roman writers, especially in poetry, which was written in Latin in both ancient times and in Renaissance Italy. However, even in the beginning of the Renaissance, writers such as Petrarch and Boccaccio wrote books in the vernacular. This means the books were written in the language that people spoke on the street. They were written in Italian, not Latin. Boccaccio's book in this style, The Decameron, became extremely popular. It was the difference between reading a textbook and reading a book for enjoyment. Unfortunately, because every book written could be "published" only by means of individuals copying the text with pens, one book at a time, no book could become terrifically popular.Another female novelist who achieved fame in Harlem was Zora Neale Hurston. Hurston also published short stories and plays during the Harlem Renaissance. She began as an anthropologist, a social scientist. One of her professors in college was a Jewish scientist named Franz Boas, who is now called the father of anthropology. Boas wrote the preface for her first collection of folktales, Mules and Men. Hurston also worked with a woman who would become a leading social scientist of the twentieth century, Margaret Mead.
To conclude, the Italian and