Preview

Hard Paternalism Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
748 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hard Paternalism Analysis
Mill relies largely on the idea of ‘consent’ to establish where State control must step in. He is not averse to the idea of the State’s parental role in the safeguarding of minors, or those of unsound mind. He feels that in cases like this the minor/person of unsound mind does not truly exercise their own consent. However where an individual consents to a harm to herself, it is illegitimate for the State to apply any coercion to prevent harm to this person. Therefore, for Mill, a phenomenon like suicide is not liable to be punished by the State’s coercive powers.
He strongly emphasises the idea, that this decision that the subject makes must not sacrifice some future freedom. He uses this to defend paternalism to prevent slavery. When a labourer
…show more content…
Joel Feinberg says that hard paternalism has all the characteristics of soft paternalism, and the point where it differs is when the consent of the subject ceases to have any significance. Where soft paternalism would say that the State must control only ‘impaired’ choices, hard paternalism would eliminate the question of choice. For Hard Paternalism to be exercised, roughly four requisites must be satisfied. Firstly, the paternalism must restrict the liberty of the individual; secondly, it must somehow be for the welfare of the subject; thirdly, this motive of welfare must be different from what the subject desired to do; and most importantly, the paternalism must completely disregard any notion of consent or voluntariness on part of the subject. Further, for the autonomy of a subject to be truly impaired, as hard paternalism does, three conditions must be satisfied: she must be capable of exercise voluntariness, she must not be under any coercion, she must be completely aware of the consequences of her conduct. It is these conditions that distinguish soft paternalism from hard paternalism. In fact, Soft paternalism may or may not be paternalism at all, but hard paternalism undoubtedly is paternalism as it intervenes even in the area of voluntary

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Slavery Is Not Always A Bad Thing In the passage “Cannibals All, or, Slaves Without Masters”, George Fitzhugh presents a pro slavery argument that attempts to persuade abolitionists to be pro-slavery, and in doing so uses effective rhetorical devices to conclude his view on the subject at hand. Fitzhugh opens up the topic stating that slavery is what most individuals think it is, wrong. He then argues how slavery is superior to free labor because slaves are treated pleasant. Slavery is extremely vital to the survival of lives because without it, individuals would starve.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill begins his essay by expressing a concern with the amount of control that society can exert over an individual 's liberty. Mill is afraid of the "the tyranny of the majority"1 and suggests that one should protect himself not only from the tyranny of the state itself, but also from the prevailing opinions of the majority. He says that the opinions of the majority become the rules and laws…

    • 2441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ’s essay “Locke, Natural Law, and New World Slavery” and discuss how John Locke’s works as a whole would disagree with the Southerners who so often looked to his words…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “They Live Well in the Time of Their Service”: George Alsop Writes of Servants in Maryland, 1663…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mill's argues for the Harm Principle based on liberty. He says that liberty must be protected and that is why we must follow the Harm Principle. He argues for the Harm Principle based on freedom of speech. Basically, what I got out of it, he says that no matter how badly the speech may seem immoral, it should be allowed regardless. It might help to add that we learned that Mills is a libertarian. Overall, Mills thinks that the government should not coerce people in to not doing…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once again, the passage that resonated with me was Wheelan's discussion of behavioral economics. At the end of the chapter, Wheelan explains the notion of "libertarian paternalism," which generally means that although you may make mistakes, society won't force you to adapt your behavior to fit their ideals, but will instead point you in the right direction. I found this discussion interesting because it described the passive acceptance of decisions that is becoming more and more common when enacting change requires proactive effort. Some of Wheelman's examples included insurance coverage, retirement savings, and presumed consent for organ donations. When I feel that I don't grasp a situation or concept completely I'm prone to fall into this…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Britain and the United States preferred indirect control whereas most other European countries and France wanted to have direct control. Indirect control has a couple of different ideas which included: the user of local government officials, there was limited self-rule, the main goal was to develop future leaders, and the government institutions were based on many European styles. There was a legislative council which included colonial officials and professionals nominated by the governor for each individual colony(s). Direct control on the other hand consisted of the opposite ideas of indirect control. The French and Europeans much rather wanted direct control which led this country to the idea of a policy called paternalism. Women in Africa…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    audience’s outlook on slavery. In addition, the passage on page 380 also shows how Auld’s…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Mill's perspective, oppression of the dominant part is more regrettable than oppression of government in light of the fact that it is not constrained to a political capacity. The predominant feelings inside of society will be the premise of all tenets of behavior inside of society. In this manner there can be no protection in law against the oppression of the larger part. The greater part assessment may not be the right supposition. The main avocation for a man's inclination is the individual’s inclination itself whenever a specific good conviction is the situation. Individuals will adjust themselves either for or against this issue. To analyze the examination of past governments, Mill recommends a solitary standard for which a man's freedom may be limited and that the main reason for which authority can be legitimately practiced over any individual from an civilized group, without wanting to, will be to prevent harms to others. Consequently, when it is not helpful, it may be…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The opinion piece “Tough love and the age of entitlement” published on the third of January 2016 in the “Sunday Age” and written by Cosima Marriner and Rachel Browne argues that parents are overindulging their children. Marriner reveals the fact that some parents sacrifice almost everything to keep their child happy and when they cannot support their needs, it results in an outburst of aggression. Marriner and Browne use a cautionary and appalled tone to persuade a target audience of concerned parents and average “Sunday Age” readers. Using numerous persuasive techniques such as expert evidence, graphics to depict an image of a disgruntled child, anecdotal evidence and also the appeal to family values, they the writers persuade the audience…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paternalism V Autonomy

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Paternalism is the practice of acting as the “parent,” which is taking it upon oneself to make decisions for the patient. Years ago the “doctor knows best” approach regarding treatment was common. The doctor merely picked a course of treatment he or she thought was best for the patient. Of course, paternalism is not acceptable today because it eliminates patients’ right to choose the treatment they feel is right for them, even if their choice is not what the doctor feels is best.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paternalism is the prevention of a persons right to choose what is best for themselves and an outside actor makes the decision based on what they believe is right.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The authoritative parenting style is about setting limits, reasoning with kids, and being responsive to their emotional needs. This style is common in middle class parenting throughout the world, and it’s connected with the most successful child outcomes. While authoritative parents are very sincere, nurturing, and open towards their children, they also expect high levels of independence and maturity. Rather than running to their child’s assistance every time they are in need of something, authoritative parenting suggests letting the child work out their problems on their own. Children raised by authoritative parents are more likely to become independent, self-confident, socially accepted, educationally successful, and obedient. Teens are less…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autonomy vs Paternalism

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Decision-making would be so much easier if we all maintained our autonomy in making the decision, however, because our decisions do not always abide by autonomistic values paternalistic intervention must occur. The purpose of autonomy is to allow us to choose to do things that affect only ourselves and does not negatively affect those around us. Unfortunately, many choices do, whether we know it or not, involve those in our environment. Paternalism is in place to protect the rights that are in our best interest and that will benefit us in the long run. Paternalistic intervention occurs when decisions are no longer in our best interests. If the decision is like to be regretted and irreversible in the future, paternalism is again justified. Autonomy is a fleeting concept, for as soon as someone chooses to do something that will later cause an addiction, his or her autonomy is lost. They no longer have the decision to do or not to do the action; it becomes a need.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through out “Utilitarianism” Mill, argues that happiness is the only basis of morality, and that mankind only desires happiness. His argument is supported by the declaration that all people need is either means to happiness or what is included in the meaning of happiness. Which is defined as “Good fortune, pleasure, contentment and joy” Mill believes that the only reason justice exists is because of utility and that our free will/rights only exist because it is necessary to human happiness. This…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays