Preview

In R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, the court held that the harm principle is not a principle of fundamental justice for the purposes of Section 7 of the Charter..

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2441 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
In R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, the court held that the harm principle is not a principle of fundamental justice for the purposes of Section 7 of the Charter..
In R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, the court held that the harm principle is not a principle of fundamental justice for the purposes of Section 7 of the Charter. Explain the harm principle and the court 's reasons for rejecting it. Did the court reach the right decision in holding that the authority of the Canadian state is not limited by the harm principle? Why or why not?In his essay "On Liberty", John Stuart Mill explains the importance of one 's liberty and gives his opinion on how society and individuals should be governed. According to Mill 's ideas, the individual is accountable for his or her own actions and the government has no right to interfere unless the individual 's actions threaten to harm others. This concept is known as the "harm principle". The cases of R. v. Malmo-Levine and R. v. Caine deal with the possession of marihuana and the appellants argue that criminalization and punishment of possession of marihuana goes against their rights as stated by section 7 in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The appellants rely on the harm principle as a principle of fundamental justice and suggest that such criminalization is a violation towards that fundamental principle. The court reached a decision that the authority of the Canadian state is not limited by the harm principle which is not found to be a principle of fundamental justice. This paper will examine in depth the two cases, as well as the different positions that were taken and will also present my argumentation as to why the court reached the right decision in rejecting the appellant 's claims.

Mill begins his essay by expressing a concern with the amount of control that society can exert over an individual 's liberty. Mill is afraid of the "the tyranny of the majority"1 and suggests that one should protect himself not only from the tyranny of the state itself, but also from the prevailing opinions of the majority. He says that the opinions of the majority become the rules and laws


References: 1.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. On Liberty (1859). pg. 309. University of Toronto Press. 20072. Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. On Liberty (1859). pg. 314. University of Toronto Press. 20073.Judgements of the Supreme Court of Canada. http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 2003 SCC 74. Retrieved June 16th, 20084.Judgements of the Supreme Court of Canada. http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 2003 SCC 74. pg 34. Retrieved June 16th, 20085.United Nations: Office on Drugs and Crime. http://www.unodc.org/enl/showDocument.do?lng=fr&language=FRE&cmd=add&country=THA&node=docs&documentUid=699&pageNum=2 . Narcotics Control Act. Retrived June 16th, 20086.Judgements of the Supreme Court of Canada. http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 2003 SCC 74. pg 28. Retrieved June 16th, 20087.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571. pg. 327. University of Toronto Press. 20078.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571. pg. 327. University of Toronto Press. 20079.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. Constitution Act. pg. 1057. University of Toronto Press. 200710.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571. pg. 332. University of Toronto Press. 200711.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571. pg. 333-334. University of Toronto Press. 200712.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571. pg. 333. University of Toronto Press. 200713.Judgements of the Supreme Court of Canada. http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 2003 SCC 74. pg 77. Retrieved June 16th, 200814.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571. pg. 334. University of Toronto Press. 200715.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571. pg. 334. University of Toronto Press. 200716.Judgements of the Supreme Court of Canada. http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 2003 SCC 74. pg 79. Retrieved June 16th, 200817.Judgements of the Supreme Court of Canada. http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 2003 SCC 74. pg 11. Retrieved June 16th, 2008
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Institutional Delay In Canada
    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Institutional Delay In Canada

    A new role was thrust on the Supreme Court of Canada after the entrenchment of the Charter Rights and Freedoms in our Constitution in 1982. In order to promote and protect human rights in Canada, the Supreme Court had to passed several landmark decisions. It became a requirement for the Supreme Court to resolve issues that were previously thought as matters of policy for the legislative bodies. The policy making power of the Supreme Court of Canada has carried over into non-charter fields, such as administrative law, private law, and family law. However, an enormous impact of the Supreme Court and the Charter has been made in the field of Criminal Law, such as establishing and strengthening the rights of an accused individual.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Examination of Mills and Dworkin
    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Examination of Mills and Dworkin

    Mill's argues for the Harm Principle based on liberty. He says that liberty must be protected and that is why we must follow the Harm Principle. He argues for the Harm Principle based on freedom of speech. Basically, what I got out of it, he says that no matter how badly the speech may seem immoral, it should be allowed regardless. It might help to add that we learned that Mills is a libertarian. Overall, Mills thinks that the government should not coerce people in to not doing…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill Diffusion Of Knowledge Analysis
    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Stuart Mill Diffusion Of Knowledge Analysis

    Mill’s first argument is that suppressed opinion has the possibility of being true, which is why no idea can be dismissed. Mill’s second argument is that people will not fully understand their own opinion if it is not debated. He claims in paragraph 21 that even if popular opinion is true, if it is not debated, it becomes “dead dogma.” This is because a person needs to be able to respond appropriately to objections about their…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    John Stuart Mill's On Liberty Analysis
    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's On Liberty Analysis

    John Stuart Mill once said, “The amount of eccentricity in a society has generally been proportional to the amount of genius, mental vigor, and moral courage it contained. That so few now dare to be eccentric marks the chief danger of the time.” John Stuart Mill is one of the most prominent English-speaking philosophers during the 19th century. His works incorporated a huge range of topics in his articles and papers he has written, in which a few of them include A System of Logic, On Liberty, and Utilitarianism. Mill’s main goal when composing On Liberty was best seen by taking a gander at how he talked about his work in his Autobiography. Mill composed that he accepted On Liberty to show the significance to man and to the society, of an extensive variety on sorts of character, and the opportunity given to human instinct to extend itself in…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mill vs Dworkin
    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mill vs Dworkin

    "I forego any advantage which could be derived to my argument from the idea of abstract right as a thing independent of utility. I regard utility as the ultimate appeal on all ethical questions; but it must be utility in the largest sense, grounded on the permanent interests of man as a progressive being". Mill does not argue that liberty is a right but rather that giving people liberty has beneficial consequences. Mill thinks that paternalism does not serve the utilitarian purpose (to provide the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people) because the extent that “the most ordinary man or woman” knows about him or herself “immeasurably surpassing” anyone else. Any effort from the state to interfere, even from good intention, tends to lead to “evil” rather than good, since no one knows or cares more about his own interest than himself. As a result, “Mankind are greater gainers by suffering each other to live as seems good to themselves, than by compelling each to live as seems good to the rest”. The state should not interfere at all, except for when the act can harm others (Mill’s Harm Principle).…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    R. V. Martineau Case Brief
    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    R. V. Martineau Case Brief

    Cited: Blair, Annice, Kathleen Ryan Elliott, Bonnie Manning, and Marcus Mossuto. "A Legal Handbook: Methods of Legal Inquiry." Canadian and International Law. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2004. 16, 39. Print.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism
    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism

    Mill’s essay shows how much he valued all people of society and his view that all people deserve equal freedom and rights. Women giving the chance to have equality would not relinquish their roles as wives and mothers besides a select few, but they would have the freedom to choose their lives and more of a sense of control over their own destinies. He believed that to have a happy and functional society there must be equality for all. He was an advocate for all who were oppressed in life.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A fear of democracy runs throughout liberalism
    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A fear of democracy runs throughout liberalism

    Plato and Aristotle viewed democracy as a “chaotic rule of masses at the expense of wisdom and property”. Nineteenth century liberals agreed with this idea as they saw democracy as dangerous and feared it. They were concerned that democracy could threaten individual liberty. Democracy is necessarily collectivist, in that it places political authority in the hands of the people who are not a single entity but are turned into a collection of individuals or groups. This contradicts the liberal principle of individuality and atomistic society. Therefore this might lead in the interests of individual citizens being ignored. In society people have different opinions and opposing interests often resulting to political instability and conflict. The democratic solution to this conflict is the application of the majority rule; the principle that the will of the majority should prevail over that of the minority. Mill feared the unintended consequences of the rule of masses. Therefore nineteenth century liberals feared the negative repercussions of democracy such as the tyranny of the majority as the principle of the majority rule can result into the suppression of individual freedom and minority rights. Majoritarianism can not only ignore the interests of the minority but it can also create a culture of dull conformism, where people according to Mill become “transformed into mere industrious sheep as they defer to the judgments of the majority based on the unfounded assumption that the…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Does the rule of law protect out liberty?
    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page

    Does the rule of law protect out liberty?

    Does the rule of law protect our liberty? Discuss with at least two of the topics considered in this module.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Is ‘Plea-Bargaining’ the Way Forward in the Criminal Justice System of England and Wales?
    • 2527 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Is ‘Plea-Bargaining’ the Way Forward in the Criminal Justice System of England and Wales?

    Historically, ‘plea bargaining’ has been understood as an agreement between the prosecution and defence counsels which ultimately results in the defendant being in a position to receive a judgment which is less severe, if he or she changes his plea from ‘not guilty’ to ‘guilty’. There is also the possibility that the accused might accept a lesser charge in return for a guilty plea, as opposed to the original higher charge that the accused is initially charged with; this is more commonly known as ‘charge bargaining.’…

    • 2527 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill's Concept Of The Harm Principle
    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's Concept Of The Harm Principle

    Within Of Liberty by John Stuart Mill, the concept of the Harm Principle is explained clearly as, “The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.” The concept is essentially that an individual should not have their liberties restricted unless those liberties cause harm to others. If an individual's action only affects themselves then there is nothing that society or the state should do to prevent that action. The concept places so much value on the freedom of people to pursue their own desires that it is believed to be better to allow a person to live in a perceived wrongful way than to force that person to change their way of life. For example,…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Liberty of Thought and Discussion
    • 2269 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Liberty of Thought and Discussion

    Mill's most famous work in social and political philosophy, and still one of the most influential works on human rights and freedom, is his book-length essay entitled On Liberty, which we will now summarize, using Mill's own section headings.…

    • 2269 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Difference Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism
    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Difference Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism

    Bibliography: Books Lloyd, Dennis, The Idea Of Law(1967) Raz, Joseph, The Authority Of Law: Essays on Law And Morality(1979) Doherty, Michael, Jurispudence: The Philosophy Of Law(Third Edition)(2003,2004) Internet Sources www.iep.utm.edu/legalpos/ [April 17 2001][accessed 4th November 2012] Plato.standford.edu/entries/legal-positivism/ [2003][accessed 4th November 2012] http://users.ugent.be/frvandun/Texts [no date][accessed 4th November 2012] Users.ox.ac.uk/~all.s0079/positivism2.pdf [no date][accessed 4th November 2012]…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy of law
    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Philosophy of law

    As we look into the topic of legal realism and skepticism we realize that there are basically three basic concepts to understand in this subject. These three tenets are as follows; law is whatever a judge decides it is, law and morality are independent of each other, and rights are conferred. This is in opposition to the theories of natural law and legal positivism. During this chapter we will examine three separate works from three different authors. The first article is "Legal Realism" by Jerome Frank, the second is "The Path of the Law" by O.W. Holmes Jr. and the third selection is "Ships and Shoes and Sealing Wax" by K.N. Llewellyn. Although these three men are all part of the movement of legal realism, they have differences in their arguments and examples. The differences in their articles help to cover all the bases of legal realism.…

    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    On Liberty of Thought and Discussion
    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    On Liberty of Thought and Discussion

    Mill (1869), in On Liberty and Discussion, argues that freedom of thought and speech are essential in keeping the majority from silencing the minority because "we can never be sure that the opinion we are endeavoring to stifle is a false opinion." Consequently, since majority opinion can be wrong for such has no true authority and no absolute certainty, Mill further asserts that government should not act at the beckon call of the majority. In addition, whether the majority opinion is right or wrong, Mill believes that the public should not have the power of coercion over their elected governing body. He argues that the government is much more ineffective and even…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics