top-rated free essay

guns

By scubastevemorris Mar 25, 2014 1148 Words

Handguns can be easily concealed, so they are the weapon of choice for people who choose to use them for self-defense. Unfortunately, they are also the weapon of choice for criminals. Since handguns are easy for criminals to steal, handguns are readily available on the black market; this makes handguns an attractive choice for criminals. The majority of crimes involving firearms are committed with the use of a handgun; this is a serious problem in America today. Although most would agree that something must be done, no one seems to have the answer at this point. Some gun control supporters believe that completely banning handguns is the best way to protect citizens. However, banning handguns fails to protect people because the laws are ineffective, banning handguns prevents people from an effective means of self-defense, and the laws do not solve the real problem, which is the gun owner.

Simply banning handguns all together is ineffective, and that is the first reason why banning handguns is not an effective way to protect citizens. There are several cities that have employed handgun bans in the past, and the results were not promising. On September 24, 1976, Washington, D.C. placed a ban on all handguns; the ban was later overturned on June 26, 2008. Under the regulations of this law, no one other than a police officer was permitted to own a handgun. Authors Agresti and Smith (2010) state that “during the years in which the D.C. handgun ban and trigger lock law were in effect, the Washington, D.C. murder rate averaged 73% higher than it was at the outset of the law, while the U.S. murder rate averaged 11% lower.” Clearly, banning handguns in D.C. did not reduce the amount of murders and crimes that were committed, and the number of murders actually increased drastically. Gun control supporters would argue this information by saying that the statistics are misleading, and that it is necessary to consider other factors such as the changing of times as well as the rise of drug and gang violence. They may have a point, but as Washington, D.C.’s murder rate increased by 73%, the rest of the United States as a whole experienced an 11% decrease in murders (Agresti & Smith, 2010). This is difficult for them to explain. A second illustration of the ineffectiveness of banning handguns is that of Chicago, Illinois. In 1982, Chicago passed a ban on all handguns, except for those that were pre-registered with the police department prior to the ban. Author David Peterson (2010) describes the situation in Chicago, during the ban:

The percentage of murders committed with handguns in Chicago varied between roughly 40 percent and 55 percent each year during the pre-ban period of 1965-1981. In recent years, while the handgun ban was in place, the percentage committed with handguns has consistently been 70 percent or more.

In regards to the Chicago case, Agresti and Smith (2010) state that “in 2005, 96% of the firearm murder victims were killed with handguns.”Chicago overturned this law in June of 2010. Once again we see how ineffective handgun bans are. These laws made it illegal to own handguns, but that did not stop murders from happening nor did it protect people in any way.

Handgun bans fail to protect people, and in fact, may put people in greater danger because they prevent people from using handguns as an effective means of self-defense. When an individual is responsible and trained properly, handguns are easily the most effective form of self-defense, and a handgun ban takes this option away from them. John Stossel (2008), who is a nationally syndicated newspaper columnist, as well as a journalist and reporter for Fox News Channel, explains that laws against guns are really laws against self-defense, and mandatory gun-free zones are in actuality free crime zones. Handgun bans will not stop criminals from acquiring guns; they will, however, prevent a law abiding citizen from buying a gun for self-defense. While he may be a little extreme in stating that laws against guns are laws against self-defense, he does make a good point. Banning handguns leaves citizens with less self-defense options. When people are stripped of the most effective form of self-defense, they are vulnerable, and this is a serious problem. Stossel (2008) is right about gun bans preventing law abiding citizens from using guns in self-defense, and this gives the advantage to the criminal. A law abiding citizen will not break the law and own a handgun if they are banned, but a criminal will. If an individual desires to rob a bank or murder someone, he or she is not going to be worried about breaking a gun ordinance. Handgun bans remove an extremely valuable self-defense method from citizens, which leaves them even more vulnerable. It is possible that in banning handguns we are missing the real point.

Another reason why handgun bans fail to protect people is because they do not deal with the real issue. The real issue behind handgun crimes and violence is not the handgun itself, but rather the owner of the gun. According to surveys, as of 2010, there were roughly 300 million firearms owned by citizens in the United States. Of those 300 million, approximately 100 million were handguns, and 67% of those gun owners said they had guns for self- defense, 66% said they used their guns for hunting, and 41% for target shooting (Agresti & Smith, 2010). During the year 2008, approximately 436,000 violent crimes were committed by an assailant who was visibly carrying a gun (Agresti & Smith, 2010). A study conducted during the year 2000 showed that U.S. citizens use guns to defend themselves roughly 989,983 times a year (Agresti & Smith, 2010). These statistics show several different uses for guns, and that guns can be used for negative or positive reasons. It is the operator of the handgun who determines whether it will be used as recreation, such as target shooting and hunting or as a murder weapon or as self-defense. It is sad to see the way society views handguns as an awful epidemic, but laws banning handguns are missing the point. Laws cannot make the decision of how the handgun will be used for the owner of a handgun. It still comes down to the person holding the gun, and that is something a ban cannot change.

Most people understand that something is wrong, and that turning a blind eye to the violence involving handguns is not the answer, but neither is banning them. Handgun bans are ineffective, they prevent a citizen from the most effective means of self- defense, and they do not solve the real problem, which is the person who owns the gun. It comes down to responsibility. Each person who chooses to own a handgun must be personally responsible for the ways the gun is used. The government is responsible to protect its citizens; no one has the perfect answer for the handgun violence problem, but the one certain thing is that banning handguns is not the answer.

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • The Relationship between Homicide Rates and Gun Ownership

    ...RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HOMICIDE RATES AND GUN OWNERSHIP 1 The Relationship between Homicide Rates and Gun Ownership JingYu Xiong (ALEX) ELS The relationship between homicide rates and gun ownership 2 ...

    Read More
  • Gun Control

    ...Gun Control in America In the wake of the Connecticut school shooting, gun control has become an intensely debated topic. Many citizens believe that guns should be immediately banned while others feel the best course of action is to equip instructors with guns. However, those on each side of the issue believe that maintaining safety is the ...

    Read More
  • 2023 law enforcment/gun control

    ... 2023 Gun Control In the year 2023 the biggest problem for police officers is going to be gun control. Most officers are against gun control. Gun control poses a big problem for a police officer’s safety. Criminals will be criminals gun control will not prevent that or acts of violence with deadly weapons. There are more lethal...

    Read More
  • Gun Control: Would It Really Help?

    ...Lance Morrison Professor Evans Writing 021 3/6/09 Topic: Gun Control: Would it really help? “If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns,” Edward Abbey argues in his essay, “The Right to Arms.” Many people are familiar with the expression, “Guns don’t kill people. People kill People.” I am a firm believer i...

    Read More
  • Gun Control

    ...Argumentative Essay against Gun Control Since 1980, forty-four states have passed laws allowing gun owners to carry concealed weapons outside their homes for personal protection. (Five additional states had these laws before 1980. Illinois is the sole holdout.) A federal ban on the possession, transfer, or manufacture of semiautomatic assault w...

    Read More
  • gun control

    ...All guns have the potential to be dangerous and should be dealt with precaution. Guns have been a part of American history for as long as people can remember. For most individuals guns are supposed to be very dangerous and unsafe. Though, that is not true. Guns can be hazardous, but only if they are in the wrong hands. Owning a gun is a right th...

    Read More
  • Gun Control

    ...Roxanne Walton Logic Prof. C. Van Youngman September 12, 2012 Gun Control-Affirmative America was founded on basic fundamental rights that are to govern a civilized society. When those rights are challenged by those same citizens, reform is imminent and necessary. As stated in the second amendment of the United States constitutio...

    Read More
  • gun control

    ... 2A:  Gun  Control  in  the  US     Can US gun addiction be controlled? By Mathilde Ahrenkiel, mathildeahrenkiel@gmail.com, Capus News, 20.09.2013 “I will try very hard”1 those are the words of President Obama as he spoke at the National Rifle Association Campaign on gun control in January 2013. His wo...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.