Preview

Gun Control Philosophy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
510 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control Philosophy
Gun Control
Philosophy 310
1/14/2016
Kelsey Reinholt

Gun Control

The view on this paper will be from a pro-gun stand point providing valid points of view from the individual’s right to own guns to protect themselves and how instilling strict gun laws actually do not lessen gun crimes as anti-gun advocates proclaim. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The United States has the highest total and per capita of gun owners in the world which is clearly with inside the United States Constitution. As far back as 1792 a federal law was signed by President
…show more content…
The individual right theory is primarily based on the right of the people to keep and bear arms. Over time anti-gun advocates tried to break down the meaning of the second amendment on the premise of the “collective rights theory”. The collective right theory is primarily based on the individual does not have the right to possess guns and the local, state or federal level. The initial meaning and application of the Second Amendment drew far less attention compared to the current court cases of modern times.
Stiffer gun laws don’t equal less violent crimes. Mexico has some of the strictest gun control laws in the world but yet Mexico has over 3 times as many violent gun crimes as the United States. Recent studies have shown as high as 75 percent of mass killers have used legally purchased firearms. So in theory, regardless of stricter gun controls concerning legally purchased firearms will not prevent violent criminals from acquiring firearms or breaking laws whatever means possible.
The Second Amendment was passed almost 225 years ago and our current world is much different than back then. So the original theory regarding the Second Amendment needs to make current to adapt to our current laws in fighting against crime. Nothing can be effective or relevant over 225

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The second amendment under the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution has protected the right of the people to keep and bear arms since 1791 (Head). It protects an individual’s right…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States is the only one country that allows people to keep and bear arms. Because they have the second amendment, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”(Bill of Right) But this law causes a lot of controversy, some people think keep and bear arms is the majority reason lead to rise of violent crime. Through good and evil repute, the second amendment is protect to people’ right, and this right is fundamental to the nation’s scheme of ordered liberty. (U.S. Constitution) There have two views to understand the second amendment.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This however is not so due to the fact most people that commit violent crimes do not use a gun that they obtained legally. Of the guns used in violent crimes 39.6% were obtained from a friend or relative, 39.2 % from the street or an illegal source, 0.7% at a gun show, 1.0% from a flea market, and 3.8 % from a pawn shop (Olmstead, J. S.). All of these circumstances do not require the criminal to go through a background check which would most likely not allow them to obtain the weapon. With these numbers it only leaves 8.3% of criminals obtaining their guns legally (Olmstead, J. S.). This shows that by making it harder to obtain weapons it only hurts the law abiding citizens from being able to protect themselves.…

    • 2498 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has been one of the most controversial topics that America faces today. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (LII). Under the constitution, you are able to own guns but there has been many restrictions and Acts that control your rights to a minimum. Gun rights reforms are how the Acts and certain limitations are made. These reforms are made to help lower the dangers of these weapons and allow for higher protection. The Second Amendment and Gun Rights should be adapted to today’s society along with certain past events to allow citizens to bear arms publicly. In multiple scenarios, these past event may have been avoided if gun control was open to more eligible citizens.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2nd Amendment Rights APA

    • 3553 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that a well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The exact wording of the amendment has been changed twice before the U.S. Senate finally approved it in its present form.…

    • 3553 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nra Gun Reform

    • 3265 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Our Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights had created a virtual war over guns and gun ownership in the United States for more than two centuries. It reads The Second Amendment provides: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." It is the only amendment written with a purported purpose. The only one with a preamble or perhaps an observation that; a well-regulated militia is a necessity for the security of a free state, and an objective or a legality that: the right…

    • 3265 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to US Constitution, the 2nd amendment allows citizen to bear firearms and was adopted on December 15,1791. On the early 50’s the Supreme Court of the US has ruled that the right belongs to individuals. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#cite_note Due to the fact that the 2nd amendment allows those who want to protect…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Lost Amendment Essay

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Another point one of the debaters points out is the language used that plainly states that individuals can have guns. On the other hand some of the debaters say the Second Amendment was referring to only people who had an intention of forming a militia for common self-defense and permitting them to have guns. They argue that the whole purpose was to prevent tyranny and to allow the states to create militias to fight the gov’t with if…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The interpretation of the “Standard Model” of the Second Amendment guarantees the right of individual Americans to own and carry firearms. This interpretation represents a part of American history that is foundational to the Second Amendment and that many collective rights theorists would prefer to erase. The collective rights theory is that arms are only to be used in connection with a militia. The history of America and its creation of the Constitution, as well as its Bill of Rights, is so fundamentally important to us today in preserving our civil liberties, that it is paramount we resist the temptation to avoid or eradicate any part of this important history with all of its milestones. If there were one message on the Second Amendment that should be conveyed, it would be to learn of our American Constitutional history in the…

    • 5294 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The second Amendment is an Individual right. Individual rights are rights that are guaranteed to American citizens, or these are the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights are the first ten Amendments. In the court case District of Columbia v. Heller, a man, Dick Heller worked as a security guard and was able to carry a concealed…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Bear Arms

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gun control and the Second Amendment have been in the new and at the forefront of American conversation in the last several months. The largest topic in this discussion is, what does the Second Amendment say, what does it mean, and does it still apply today. The main viewpoints of this argument really come from each group’s interpretation of the verbiage that makes up the Second Amendment. One group takes a universal human right to bear arms approach, while another group takes an approach that makes the Second Amendment a propositional statement.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The wording in the Bill of Rights supports citizens in having the individual right to bear arms. The Second Amendment includes the term “the right of the people” which is used frequently throughout the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, and most commonly indirectly refers to individual rights. The Second Amendment also references pre-existing individual rights with the statement of “shall not be infringed” which is a possible reference to the 1689 English Bill of Rights in which English citizens were allowed to bear arms (French 2-3). Individual liberties granted to citizens are directly stated in neither the Bill of Rights nor the Constitution. The controversy on whether the Second Amendment was meant to be a collective right is eliminated with the analyzation of the wording presented in the Bill of Rights, thus, stripping the Second Amendment would be a violation of individual…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Pros And Cons

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    They claim that other countries, with less crime because of strict regulations, are examples the U.S. could follow (Gun Control: Update). This is highly unreasonable because expanding upon gun ownership, in the U.S., has actually decreased violent crime. A 2010 article published by the NRA and the ILA notes, "Forty states have Right-to-Carry, and 48 states prohibit cities from imposing gun laws more restrictive than state law. And, since 1991, the total violent crime rate has declined over 40% to a 35-year low, and the murder rate has declined by half to a 45-year low” (Gun Control Reform) Therefore, the evidence proves that many of the states that allow citizens to carry concealed weapons have lower crime rates than those that do not. One example of broadening gun ownership would be the concealed carry law. In 1987, Florida enacted a concealed carry law. Before the law, Florida’s homicide rate was 11.7 per 100,000. By 1991, it dropped 20% to 9.4 per 100,000. Since adopting a concealed carry law, Florida’s total violent crime rate has dropped 32% and its homicide rate has dropped 58% (Stearns). Besides Criminals, Floridians are safer due to this law and Florida isn’t the only one. Texas’ violent crime rate has dropped 20% and homicide rate has dropped 31%, since enactment of its 1996 carry law (Stearns). A report by John Lott, Jr. and David Mustard of the University of Chicago released in 1996…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Research

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Second Amendment states “"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" (Bill of Rights). It was adopted on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. Americans felt that the right to arms was important for different reasons such as stopping invasions, participating in law enforcement, enabling the people to organize a militia system, preventing an undemocratic government, etc. Later into the twentieth century, a debate had grown about. The question most frequently being asked in many different words are, is the amendment that was created to ensure the continuation and successful of the state militias as a means of defense, or was it created to ensure an individual’s right to own a firearm. People, gun control advocates, began to read the second amendment concerned with rising violence in society and the role firearms play in that violence. While on the other side, firearm enthusiasts saw the attacks on gun ownership as attacks on freedom and defended their interpretation of the second amendment just as aggressively. Much of the debate that is going on today is centered on how the amendment was phrased and no…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    is the use of a Militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing…

    • 2355 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays