Preview

Ten Amendments: The Right To Keep And Bear Arms

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2498 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ten Amendments: The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
The United States Constitution was created on September 17, 1787 as the supreme law of the land. This document outlines the ten amendments which guarantee certain rights that American citizens will always have. One of these freedoms and possibly the most important is the right to keep and bear arms. As written in the Constitution, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution). Whatever the purpose these guns are meant to serve it is clear that the right to own them cannot be impaired. George Washington once said,
Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty, teeth and
…show more content…
In Wilson vs. Arkansas the decision was that, “To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege” (Wang, Scott). This decision by the Arkansas Court system shows that any law that restrict firearms is unconstitutional. Another decision by the Texas court system concludes the same thing,
The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the "high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power. (Wang,
…show more content…
This however is not so due to the fact most people that commit violent crimes do not use a gun that they obtained legally. Of the guns used in violent crimes 39.6% were obtained from a friend or relative, 39.2 % from the street or an illegal source, 0.7% at a gun show, 1.0% from a flea market, and 3.8 % from a pawn shop (Olmstead, J. S.). All of these circumstances do not require the criminal to go through a background check which would most likely not allow them to obtain the weapon. With these numbers it only leaves 8.3% of criminals obtaining their guns legally (Olmstead, J. S.). This shows that by making it harder to obtain weapons it only hurts the law abiding citizens from being able to protect themselves. Another statistic that shows allowing people to have a gun is not bad can be seen in Lott’s book. He reports that only 0.015% of permits for concealed carry weapons have been revoked and of those very few were due to a crime committed with the licensed weapon that resulted in a fatality (Lott

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    For the last few decades having gun in the US has been the most controversial topics in America. While most of the population do oppose on gun control and the government have laws and regulations. As I gather more information on such touchy subject for many of the citizens of the US, most the population are currently carrying illegal firearms. There are three focal points that are very critical to me regarding carrying gun. Why is the 2nd amendment important? why do we need to preserve our 2nd amendment right? Why do we carry firearms?…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The right to bear arms is the the Second Amendment in the United States constitution. What says a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The right to bear arms has been around this country long then it's been a country. Putting more restrictions on guns just goes against what our founding fathers intend the nation to be like and infringes against the right to bear arms.The second amendment supports my claim which is anti-gun control laws and how putting restrictions on gun makes it…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Events did a survey that showed the percent of police officers that were against gun control, that percent was 99 percent. 96 percent of police officers said that putting a limit on the number of rounds a mag can hold would not put any sort of a limit on violent crimes. 68 percent of police officers feel that a handgun ban would negatively affect an officer’s safety. 76 percent of police officers said that armed citizens played a huge role in reducing crime and that training being required would also help the situation. Now today the percent of citizens with carry permits is 29 percent, and decreasing because they are becoming harder to get.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The right to bear arms”, an amendment so prioritized by our founding fathers that it earned the very second spot on the list of birth rights as Americans. However, with constant tragedies striking the United States, such as massacres in public high schools and universities, mall shootings, and attempted assassinations on state representatives, it’s no wonder law makers are constantly debating the topic of gun control.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citizens have been bearing arms since the beginning of time, but in today’s time it is becoming more of a problem. Having the proper gun control would play a major part in decreasing the crime and murder rate in the US. The second amendment states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The government should not be able to enforce strict gun laws. If people do not have firearms, the criminals that do have them will be able to harm people.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the US constitution allows citizens to bear arms, Adults should have the right to concealed carry. This is shown by, the right to concealed carry handguns is guaranteed by the second amendment by the US constitution (Should).This shows that at Dec. 11 a case struck down an illinois state law that broadly prohibited carrying a gun. Then they said the must involve a right to have a concealed gun in public, to have it ready for use and self-defense. Which says why you should have them. In addition to that, the government cannot guarantee the safety of its citizens. This is saying that…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    right to bear arms

    • 277 Words
    • 1 Page

    The statement ‘The Right to Keep and Bear Arms' from the U.S constitution seems like a pretty solid sentence. There is really no way to misinterpret it. Our country gained its freedom with guns, kept its freedom with guns, and guns will play a vital roll in keeping our freedom. So how is it that cities like Chicago can completely ban the right to protect ourselves? Legally they can't. The beauty of the constitution is that it can be changed.…

    • 277 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, gun control doesn’t deter crime. A November 26, 2013 study found that between 1980 and 2009 “assault weapons bans did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level” and “states with restriction on the carrying of concealed weapons had higher gun-related murders”(www.gun-control.procon.org). Weapons didn’t stop crimes or murders, and that states with restrictions on concealed carry weapons had even more crime than…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pro Gun Control Essay

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Most people who own guns, are the legal owners of that weapon (“Kates”1). Other countries and some states in the United States that restrict gun laws have more murders than places that do not have gun laws (“Guns in”3). In the United Kingdom they banned handguns in 1997. Since then, the attack and crime rate went up 77%. This is equivalent to two attacks every two minutes. (“Guns in”3). This is further evidence that guns are not just for killing, guns are for…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Speech On Gun Control

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Infact a shooting happened on April 2007 at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, “in which gunman Seung-Hui Cho killed thirty-two people. Just about any adult can go and buy a gun, without showing identification or passing a background check. As a result, Seung-Hui Cho, with a record of mental health problems, was able to open fire on classrooms at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in April 2007, killing and wounding many students and teachers.” Gunman Seung-Hui Cho bought his gun at a gunshow, with no background checks. If firearms were not available to the american public these 32 innocent victims wouldn't have died. The man who was lucky to have survived the shooting investigated the subject himself. He found out that at gun shows you can buy a gun in five minutes, and at a bit of a higher price you can skip the background checks. Every situation where there are armed civilians there are more chances of people…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right to Bear Arms

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Imagine waking up in the middle of the night to a complete stranger who is in your house, threatening to harm you, and your family, and you cannot do anything about it. Imagine, not being able to go target shooting or hunting, because there are laws passed to prevent you from owning a firearm. The truth is, more and more people in this country are trying to restrict law-abiding people from owning firearms due to the overwhelming rise in gun related crimes. As law abiding Americans, the constituion gives us the right to bear arms. Whether it is for recreation or protection, restrictions should not apply to those who obey the law. We should not be forced into certain gun regulations, due to the criminals who violate the law.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For years gun ownership in America has been an extremely debated topic. Parties on both sides of the spectrum have argued why their beliefs are correct and should be implemented or not in today 's day and age. The Four Fathers of the United States long ago decided that "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." (Constitution) Gun control policies implemented by the U.S. government that affect law abiding citizens’ right to own a gun should be rescinded and terminated. There have been many recent tragic events taking place, causing many people to question current gun control policies.…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun On Campus

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Studies show that people who resist a crime committed against them with a gun are less likely to get hurt (Kleck 3). Gun control has been shown to do only one thing, and that is to take the gun out of the hand of a potential victim. Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz wrote, “if self protection with a gun is commonplace, it means any type of gun control that disarms large numbers of prospective victims … will carry significant social cost in term of lost opportunities for self protection” (Kleck 2). Kleck and Gertz also found that in 1982, when interviewing incarcerated felons, 34% had been scared off, shot at, wounded, or captured by an armed victim (Kleck 19). If that many felons are being affected by people using a gun to defend themselves, not only are people successfully defending themselves, the people not reporting this information are basically helping the criminals by letting people think owning a gun and knowing how to use it does not help a victim. The reason people do not know this is because the government does not find it significant enough to report. The reason it is hard to prove that self protection using a gun works is because nobody reports the incident. The criminal, if not caught, does not report it. Also, victims do not report that they used a gun for fear that the police will harass them for using a gun. The government will not put the use of guns for self protection into its statistical model; because it is unwilling to admit that guns are useful for self defense. Guns are useful in preventing crime and they should be allowed on college…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “By restricting gun ownership only to law enforcement officers and the military, the government violates individuals’ rights to possess firearms that they might need to defend their basic freedoms.” When the Founding Fathers wrote the Bill of Rights they knew that giving the government our guns would be the equivalent of tearing the constitution in half. Guns are the only things that protect our rights. It’s what gives the people power, and it’s also what protects people.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays