Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Government: Too Big for Its Own Britches

Good Essays
534 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Government: Too Big for Its Own Britches
Government: Too Big for Its Own Britches The government in America has obtained too much power for its own good. Scandals such as wiretapping, the absence of Habeas Corpus in detained "terrorists", and the war on terror are all proof of this fact. There is a public outcry for the government to stop these acts, but their cries fall upon deaf ears. The Bush administration refuses to acknowledge the opinions of the masses, justifying all their actions either under Constitutional powers or executive rights. Wiretapping provides the most extreme example of the U.S. government abuse of its powers. For the U.S. government to spy on its own citizens without any consent goes against any right to privacy given to the public by the Constitution. And acts like the "Protect America Act," proposed by President Bush and his supporters to make wiretapping a warrantless procedure, do little to correct the situation (Peter). The U.S. government needs to take responsibility for more of its actions, instead of trying to justify them by making them laws. Terrorism may be a major concern, but U.S. citizens should not have to trade their freedom for safety. Acts like these that encourage spying on citizens only limit Americans' liberties without their knowledge thereof. Ideas like wiretapping are things that should be brought before the general public or at least members of Congress to gain their consent, instead of allowing one branch of the government to proceed unchecked. Another instance of the executive branch proceeding in their actions without regard for the Constitution is the treatment of prisoners in detainment camps. These prisoners are being deprived of their right to habeas corpus- a fundamental right in the due process of law. The executive branch has overridden that right and the voting majority of congress agreed, citing that "the prisoners are dangerous foreign criminals who don't deserve access to the U.S. court" ("Habeas Corpus"). Over 95 percent of the detainees in camps like Guantanamo Bay have not been charged with anything ("Habeas Corpus"). This presents a serious problem for citizens of the U.S, if prisoners' rights are being denied, how soon will it be until the rights of every citizen are denied? These prisoners are being arrested on American soil, so they should be charged like American citizens. But the government refuses to acknowledge that fact, instead upholding the belief that the possibility of terrorism is more important than one's civil liberties. This goes against the beliefs held by the forefathers. The reason there are enumerated powers is too limit the government so that they could not become over-powerful. The power still, and always will, lie in the hands of the people; not in the hands of the politicians or other government officials. Certain persons recognize that fact, but the current force that powers our government have yet to take responsibility for their actions, and refuses to correct their mistakes.

Works Cited
Peter, Tom A. "Bush Wants Permanent Warrantless Wiretap Law." The CS Monitor. 22 Sept. 2007. 25 Sept. 2007 .
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Editorial Board. "Habeas Corpus: Bring It to a Vote." Seattle Post-Intelligencer. 20 Sept. 2007. 25 Sept. 2007 .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Essay On Government Power

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How much power should the government in general and the President in particular be given in times of national crisis? The powers and duties of the president are defined in Article II of the Constitution making him commander in chief of armed forces, chief diplomat, nominating judges, presenting state of union to congress and having the power to pardon and veto. However, the Constitution grants far less powers to the nation’s president in Article II than it does to congress in Article I. Throughout history the unclear statements have given countless possibilities for presidents to expand their powers. One president who took many drastic steps to keep our nation together was Abraham Lincoln.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Earlier this month, The New York Times reported that since shortly after the 9/11 terror attacks in 2001 the National Security Agency, whose mission is to monitor the communications of foreigners outside our borders, has been focusing its futuristic spy technology on Americans." The spying that should shock everyone all over the US. Now people cannot even talk on the phone or talk online without some government official spying all over the place. The first amendment is only a tool; if no people use it then the government does not have to follow it. The government wants to protect people by listening to everyone trying to catch terrorists, but it should not be at the cost of freedom. "The electronic eavesdropping was conducted under orders from the president…" The president is a major source to this dilemma. He is taking away the rights of people who are not there to stop him. "The president himself even summoned Times officials to the White House to persuade them not to go ahead with the…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government Power

    • 1730 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States government has too much power for its own good. They are in charge of too much. The individual members that comprise the government are generally shady figures with criminal records and personal agendas, though we expect them to lead fairly and impartially. The government has too much power, illustrated by the NSA scandal, the unconstitutional law-making, and the aggressive militarism. The NSA is invading the privacy of the nation, the legislative branch is creating laws that violate the rights of Americans, and the violent military force that the government is always so eager to use is coming more and more often. If there isn’t a shift in authority soon, possibly back to the states, as was originally intended, then nobody can be sure what the future might hold. The most powerful nation in the world might fall to its knees because of incompetence in its government. Or we could inch closer and closer to becoming a communist nation, where citizens’ lives are strictly directed by the all-powerful government.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past seven years the Bush administration, possibly longer the U.S government has been monitoring the internet and telephone activity of American citizens in secrecy. Many of the American citizens being monitored have not been convicted of any crime and have caused no suspicion of wrong doing. Despite these circumstances these private citizens are being unlawfully monitored by the U.S government without consent. This scandal has caused a split decision in the American society; whether the U.S. government is justified for their actions, when the secret surveillance began, why and how long it will last, also is government monitoring really a method to protect U.S. citizens and how do citizens feel about this scandal, lastly where is the line drawn and what can citizens do to ensure their voice is heard.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Government Spying

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Think about back in elementary school when you had pen pals from other countries. How would you feel if the government was able to intrude on your personal life just because you made contact abroad? For us in America, a government spying on its citizens sounds pretty crazy right? In 2006 president Bush did just that by enabling a “Government Phone Tap”. President Bush thought in order to preserve citizen’s freedoms that is was justified to tap into people’s phones and emails. The only people that were supposed to be the recipients of phone tapings where those who were making calls abroad, particularly to suspected al-Qaida connections. Not only is this a complete violation of peoples constitutional rights and privacy, but Bush also neglected the need for a warrant in this instance. To this day many immigrants from other countries come to America seeking asylum from oppressive governments. America is supposed to be a safe haven where people’s rights and privacy are protected under the constitution. Acts of government espionage upon its own citizens like this are completely unacceptable. I believe that the only way from a government…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some of these new procedures interfere with basic human rights, such as our right to privacy. For instance, following the ISIS attack, France made new laws in order to make deporting suspected terrorist easier and launched more air strikes against ISIS. Similarly, Bush implemented the NSA domestic spying program after the crisis of 9/1. Confidential until 2005, the program monitored somewhere between 500-1000 communications over the phone or via email of people inside the US suspected to have connections with Al Qaeda without any warrants. Through major telecommunication companies, the program created a database of every call ever made and continues to monitor everything, searching them for key words. While it may help them find potential threats to the country, there was no warrant for it and violates the constitution. In reaction to terrorists, governments have tried to increase security but have nearly eliminated the security of our privacy in doing…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All we hear about is NSA spying on domestic soil and on foreign nations. Erick Montero said in his article “Road Block” that the “NSA is the National Security Agency created in 1951 in response to the aftermath of World War II and the communist regimes around the world”. He further argues that “Whether its legal or illegal to spy on American soil is debatable, but for a fact violating our Fourth Amendment by government agency for the threat of terrorism and fear is wrong” some might see this as propaganda, but regardless, this is true and is happening. Benjamin Franklin once said “Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one” (Benjamin Franklin). Even the fathers of this country knew that in some point…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    domestic surveillance

    • 842 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When most people think of Domestic Surveillance cameras, spyware, phone tapping, protection as well as invasion of privacy are the things that comes to mind. People know that Domestic Surveillance is one way their country knows what is going on and can use the surveillance for proof of things like terrorism, thieves, etc. But does this means that having Domestic Surveillance in places is right? Does this invades people privacy? Domestic Surveillance can be watchful good for the nation but not everyone approve of this. The harm of NSA domestic surveillance outweighs the benefits. NSA spying is an ineffective tactic for anticipating terrorist attacks, reinforces long term terrorist strategies, and represents a significant violation of freedoms for Americans.…

    • 842 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    English Paper Wiretapping

    • 2159 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Thesis: Wiretapping enables both parties and government agencies to monitor the communications of targeted people to determine if they are doing something wrong. The Government should not have the luxury of imposing on the privacy of Americans without a reasonable doubt as to when they should get a warrant to be able to do so. The Government should not wiretap because it is an abuse of power, distrust, and ethical dilemma, the violation of the Fourth Amendment which involves the collecting and storing information about people who are not criminals to be penalized.…

    • 2159 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Citizen Rights

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I believe that the United States government has a right to increase the power of the federal power to combat terrorism through the U.S. Patriot Act after the 9/11 attacks and this also applies to any terrorist threats, but I more strongly believe that each U.S. citizen has the right to his/her own privacy. There will be always an opportunity cost between personal privacy and security, but both of these must be used in moderation. For example, I don’t believe that the Bush administration had the right to allow the NSA to eavesdrop on U.S. citizens via phone calls or e-mail. I understand the fear of the American government during/after terrorist attacks, and the government deserves every right to want to protect the nation; however, I think…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is an argument whether terrorism is a crime issue; nonetheless, there are numerous terrorist crime groups in the United States. While media portrays a sense of unity within the United States fighting terrorism, there are not many areas committed to these strategies. The problem is the people in America do not feel protected by law enforcement, or the laws put in place to deter terrorism. Implementations such as face scanners and the extra security at airports discourage people to fight against terrorism if it means giving up their personal freedoms. For example, most people want/need protection against terrorist attacks, yet when the Transportation Security Administration applied the body scanners at the airports, there was uproar about the breach of privacy to American citizens. The issue with privacy in America stems from the roots of the government covering up lies consistently. Most often the government fine-tunes laws in order to justify conducting unconstitutional surveillance on Americans. In 2001, George Bush implemented the USA Patriot Act. “The U.S.A. Patriot Act is an acronym for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism." The 320-page act was passed only days after the September 11th attacks. This incredibly short timeframe alone has raised numerous eyebrows. Since the passing of the Patriot Act, over 150 communities denounced it as an…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dear Obama

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Last, but not least, is the eavesdropping on our personal communication devices. The Fisa Law ensures that the US Government needs a warrant to listen in on our calls and read our emails. That means that they have to…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wiretapping can prevent many serious accidents from occurring which could save many lives .According to Leslie Ellis, “The 1,149 court-ordered wiretaps in 2001 produced 3,683 arrests, and 732 conviction-proofs enough that electronic surveillance is a valuable tool in catching the bad guys."With this valuable fact, this clearly proves how effective wiretapping can be. Many say this would be a violation of the U.S constitution, but that is incorrect. The U.S Constitution contains…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2008, Boumediene, a captive at Guantanamo Bay had his habeas corpus rights denied by the D.C. District Court and the Appellate Court based on bills passed by Congress. The founding fathers specifically state in Article 1, Section 9 that congress shall not pass any bill that restricts habeas corpus rights. The detainees at Guantanamo Bay live in cells for twenty-three hours of the day. They are in constant fear of being abused and tortured, mentally and physically by the guards and many have been at the naval base for over five years. Among all the detainees, none have been given access to any type of tribunal board to hear what their being convicted of. The biggest problem is that all of them have been denied habeas corpus rights which effectively allows the Executive Branch of the US government to hold them indefinitely.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bush Administration

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution states, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." Under this provision, persons detained by the government are entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if there is any legal basis for their detention. Some legal commentators refer to the right of habeas corpus as the "great writ of liberty" because it is a prisoner's ultimate recourse to an impartial judge who can review the possibility that he is being held…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays