Preview

Patriot Act Pros And Cons

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3614 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Patriot Act Pros And Cons
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."- Benjamin Franklin

On October 26th, 2001, just 45 days after September 11th a panicked Congress passed, with little debate, the USA Patriot Act. The 342 page patriot act violates our 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and 14th amendments, thus making it unconstitutional. I don't know why Congress passed this act, or how it got through the Supreme Court, but most people in Congress didn't even read the Patriot Act. I am sure that our founding fathers would not have wanted the Patriot Act. Just look at what Ben Franklin said, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
…show more content…
That seems a little confusing. What it basically means is that a person can not be tried twice for the same crime, they can't be jailed or loose their property except through "proper legal actions", and they can't be forced to testify against themselves. Under the Patriot Act, American citizens suspected of terrorism are being held in military custody without being charged and without access to lawyers. In the text of the Patriot Act, which is really long and takes really long to search, in Section 412 it gives the Attorney General broad powers to detain non-citizens, weather they have done anything or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Does the NSA have a good enough reason to spy on its own citizens along with the other billions of foreigners when there are laws implemented to stop that exact act? Is it necessary to create more terrorists because of the hate towards this program, just to possibly catch the current ones we face now? What is the real end goal? Is it to create a black mail mega-data for the government to have insurance due to the debt? Maybe the U.S.A is planning a global attack themselves, or it really is meant to stop terroristic acts against the United States.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The USA PATRIOT Act is a law ratified by the government under George W Bush on October 26th 2001. This law stood for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. It was put into effect after the terrorist attack of 9/11. At first many supported this act and what it stood for. When voted upon very few people were against it. Both houses of congress and both political parties fully supported the Patriot Act. After the trauma of September 11th people were willing to give up their civil liberties Many including our government believe that this act was put into effect to protect us from terrorism, but in fact this act invaded the privacy of many innocent people. The act gives the government the ability to search telephone calls, emails, financial matters especially one involving foreign individuals, and even medical records for people who are “suspected” of endangering the country. With the act in effect the government is able to detain and deport immigrants suspected of being involved with terrorism. Many immigrants were stereotyped as suspects and treated differently by our government under this act. When looking at the act, there are many similarities to the policies that "Big Brother" encouraged in Orwell’s novel.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The War on Terrorism and Patriot Act are two important acts regarding terrorism. What is the War on Terrorism and Patriot act you may ask? Well the Patriot act was made so that the United States could hold someone in custody if they are connected or could piently be connected to terrorist groups. Now we have the War on Terrorism act. This act was made so that in the case of a terrorist attack they can stop it with military action. Even though they both have their pros they also have cons. Terrorism is horrible and can lead to the death of innocent people but there are ways we can stop it including and not including the patriot act and War on Terrorism.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Patriot Act Case Study

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should Congress have enacted the patriot act to combat terrorism and protect citizens after 9/11/2001, or was it an extreme measure of legislation that violated our civil liberties?…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people believe, when the NSA spies on their own citizens illegally it creates an atmosphere of distrust between the government and its’ citizens; the NSA might believe by doing so, they are saving and preventing certain situations from taking place. Edward Snowden revealed the level of infiltration in his statement about NSA spying. Woodburn stated that "Seven months after the initial Snowden leaks, sixty-three percent of Americans stated that they were dissatisfied with the government's Surveillance of U.S. citizens" (28). U.S citizens disagree at times with their government's choices, and the National Security Agency infiltrating cell phone and computers makes this situation worse. Americans resent the government taking away their right to privacy in order to find terrorists. But, terrorists have found United States citizens, born in the USA, to help them commit terrorist acts and the NSA is wasting time and effort searching into American people while they are allowing real threats happen.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    This first section provides a brief explanation of the history of the Patriot Act. A common misconception about the Patriot Act is that it takes away personal liberty and is an unprecedented power grab by the federal government. What most people do not realize is that the Patriot Act, for the most part, only amends and updates current law, as opposed to creating entirely new laws. In his remarks on the Senate floor while pushing for passage of this act, Senator Patrick Leahy acknowledged that some of the amendments presented for consideration may have been unconstitutional. Leahy said, “After that terrible day of September 11, we began looking at our laws, and what we might do. Fortunately for the country . . . we took time to look at it, we took time to read it, and we took time to remove those parts that were…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout the history of the United States, Americans have always expected a certain level of privacy. This right was granted to them by both the First and Fourth Amendments of the US Constitution. In 2001, then President Georg W. Bush signed into law the US Patriot Act.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ender's Game

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I believe that the government still has a right to perform those actions because it is for the overall safety of the people. Organizations such as The American Civil Liberties Union are protesting and criticizing the Patriot Act. I think that their arguments are not justified. Most of the citizens in the United States are not trying to perform a terrorist attack or break criminal laws. The people that are, are the ones that are affected by this act. If a citizen has nothing to hide, then they have nothing to worry about because they are not being…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research laws and Acts

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the biggest violations to American Civil Rights is the Patriot Act. “The USA PATRIOT Act is an Act of the U.S. Congress that was signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. The act greatly reduced restrictions that were placed on law enforcement agencies and gave them the ability to search telephone, e-mail communications, medical, financial, and other records. It eased restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering within the United States and expanded the Secretary of the Treasury’s authority to regulate financial transactions. The Patriot Act expanded the definition of terrorism to include domestic terrorism, thus enlarging the number of activities to which the powers can be applied. Since its passage, several legal challenges have been brought against the act, and Federal courts have ruled that a number of provisions are unconstitutional. Opponents have criticized the sections that authorize the indefinite detentions of immigrants, searches through which law enforcement officers search a home or business without the owner’s or the occupant’s permission or knowledge, and the expanded use of National Security Letters, which allows the FBI to search telephone, e-mail, and financial records without a court order. The Patriot Act gave law enforcement agencies unprecedented access to business records, including library and financial records. Not all aspects of the Act have been challenged and many Americans have approved the passage. People have promoted the provisions made to the Bank Secrecy Act, which requires financial institutions in the United States to assist U.S. government agencies to detect and prevent money laundering. Title II of the Patriot Act established three very controversial provisions, “sneak and peek” warrants, roving wiretaps and the ability of the FBI to gain access to documents that reveal the patterns of U.S. citizens. The so-called “sneak and peek” law allowed for delayed notification of the execution of search…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Patriot Act was designed to try and eliminate acts of terrorism on the United States. This act was signed in 2001 by president George W. Bush. Just weeks after the terrorist attacks on 9/11(NBCNews). The Patriot Act allows for the government to identify terrorist. “This is done by wiretapping and monitoring text messages and phone calls’’(Diamond).I am not saying that are civil liberty aren't important but when it comes to keeping our citizens safe then this is the only choice. People who have nothing to hid should have no problem with the government monitoring them for the sake of people's lives. The patriot act has allowed for at least 50 terrorist attacks against the United States to be foiled since 9/11.(Johnson) This Act is doing…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    USA Patriot Act

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Many people believe that this grants them a certain feeling of ease and rest because they know that there is something that helps identify and major threats and stop terrorist groups before anything drastic happen. This cause people to worry less and have a strong sense of safety. Others feel that this grants certain agencies to much power to spy and monitor them. People say that this takes away a lot of their own privacy and that it isn’t right. This causes them to feel a breach in their privacy and fear of what the government can do if they don’t have any limits. People against the act will want to get rid of it because they feel that the government will take advantage of this and they won’t know when to stop. Their belief is it breaks some of their own rights and this is wrong. The ACU and the ACLU are prime examples of this belief and this is why they are always fighting against it. The others believe that terrorism is a great threat not only to the United States but also around the world and some action needs to be taken immediately. The USA Patriot Act offers them exactly what they are looking for and they are willing to give up some privacy in order to find the bad people among them. Usually, the people in the United States don’t have to fear because if they don’t do anything suspicious, the government won’t look at them. It is only those certain few…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Patriot Act is a dangerous law. It is completely the opposite of what this country is supposed to be about. It pretty much puts the Constitution on stand-by. It should be known as the Constitution Shredding Act. One of the saddest things about this act is that many Americans do not even know anything about it. The act was also rushed through its process. With very little debate, it was passed. There wasn 't even a report from the Senate regarding the act (Patriot Act). It is wrong of the government to pass…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Laws Are Bad

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Benjemin Franklin. “Any society that will give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA Pros And Cons

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    September 11, 2001 was the deadliest day for New York. Thousands died because of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City. Two planes crashed into the twin towers while a third crashed into the pentagon and a fourth into a field in Pennsylvania. Something this big could not have been decided that morning, it needed to be planned. All the people involved need to know what they were going to do. This meant they had to have some form of communication along the way, whether it was through calls or texts. Imagine if all of this could have been prevented. All those lives that were lost could have been saved. If only the NSA would have known. Even though it violates the privacy act of the constitution, it is better to be safe than sorry, potential terrorist attacks could be stopped, and it will not matter if you are not doing anything wrong.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Etzioni, A. (2004). How patriotic is the Patriot Act?: Freedom versus security in the age of…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays