Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Government Power

Good Essays
1730 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Government Power
The United States government has too much power for its own good. They are in charge of too much. The individual members that comprise the government are generally shady figures with criminal records and personal agendas, though we expect them to lead fairly and impartially. The government has too much power, illustrated by the NSA scandal, the unconstitutional law-making, and the aggressive militarism. The NSA is invading the privacy of the nation, the legislative branch is creating laws that violate the rights of Americans, and the violent military force that the government is always so eager to use is coming more and more often. If there isn’t a shift in authority soon, possibly back to the states, as was originally intended, then nobody can be sure what the future might hold. The most powerful nation in the world might fall to its knees because of incompetence in its government. Or we could inch closer and closer to becoming a communist nation, where citizens’ lives are strictly directed by the all-powerful government.
The scandal involving the NSA illegally monitoring citizens is a fitting example of how the government has too much power. They were able to use their power of influence to bend the rules around the crimes they were committing. Because nobody could do anything about it, the government could do basically whatever they wanted to. The NSA was established in the year 1952 by President Truman for the purpose of monitoring inward communications, detecting terrorism, and aiding the military. Then, in 1973, the supreme court ruled that it was completely unconstitutional to listen and record citizens’ communications. They decided that a warrant was necessary for any bugging of communications or surveillance. In 1975, it was uncovered that the NSA was still watching the people, even with the new laws restricting it. Because there is no body to enforce laws on the government, as they are the highest power, Congress suggested “reforms”. The NSA “entertained” the reforms, meaning they considered the suggestions and decided they would resume surveillance as usual, excluding some new protocols to make the spying less noticeable. In 1978, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was ordered into law, protecting Americans from domestic spying, outlawing any and all NSA operations at the time. The NSA went along with the laws for almost 25 years, until a turning point in our nation’s history. September 11th, 2001. The day that will ever live in infamy. The first terrorist attack on American soil. Four planes, hijacked by the terrorists, were used to target several integral areas of the nation. The first cite targeted was New York, New York. Two planes crashed into the twin towers of the World Trade Center, causing them to collapse, killing hundreds of innocent civilians inside. The third plane hijacked was used to put a large hole in the side of the Pentagon. The Pentagon is a government building, shaped like a pentagon, that houses our nation’s defense organization. Luckily, the plane struck an area of the building that was being renovated, so nobody important was hurt. The last plane was believed to have been on its way to the Capitol building in Washington D.C. but there is no way of knowing for sure. After this huge breach in national security, the NSA want back to work, double-time. The President signed an agreement with NSA so secret that some of the Presidents top Cabinet Members had no idea about it. The order authorized the search or monitor of any personal information or communication for the purpose of national security. The NSA interpreted it as an act that allowed them to read phone or electronic messages without a warrant from a judge. The NSA could validate any illegal spying by writing it off as an “investigation of a potential terrorist or terrorist organization,” violating constitutional rights as they see fit. What was really happening was they were using their power and resources to record and track everybody in the United States. They put them into systems and programs, like a catalogue, collecting everybody’s information. More and more companies were sending the NSA metadata in compliance with their demands. Since then, they have collected an unmeasurable amount of information. The citizens were almost completely oblivious until Edward Snowden released tons of classified information to the public in regards to the NSA spying situation. After that there was a lot of upheaval about the collection of data and whether or not it can be considered constitutional. The right to privacy is not explicitly stated in the Constitution, though some profess that it is part of ones unenumerated rights, given with the 9th amendment. Even if it was not, FISA would prevent any domestic spying. But because the government is unopposed, there is no power capable of telling the agency that it is breaking the law. Another reason illustrating that the government has too much power is the fact that Congress has somehow gained the authority to create unconstitutional laws without their Constitutionality coming into question. The ninth amendment in the Bill of Rights grants citizens of these United States “unenumerated” rights. The framers of the Constitution did not see rights as privileges given to men by the government. Rather, rights were innate ideals that every man is entitled to from birth, regardless of circumstances. That being said, the Bill of Rights was not created to give rights. It was created to preserve the rights that people already had, and to protect them from being violated by unconstitutional laws. But there is no process in place to check the Constitutionality of laws that are passed. They are simply proposed, voted on, approved, and put into effect. At no point does anybody stop to really think about the new law and how it could be affected by the Constitution (i.e. whether it violates an amendment or not). Because of this, the government is contradicting itself. It is based around the Supremacy clause, meaning the Constitution is the highest power. But then the government makes decisions without consulting or even thinking about the Constitution. It’s a redundancy. But still, the government has the power to create laws that violate the rights of its citizens. A great example of a law that violated the Constitution was prohibition. There were no expressed laws in the Constitution that give the federal government the power to ban alcohol, so they had to create an amendment. But since the tenth amendment states that any item not expressly reserved for federal government is to be given to States to handle. That means that it was, in fact, unconstitutional to create the 18th amendment. The issue of banning alcohol should have been delegated to the state, as that is the highest authority that would actually be able to have a say in the issue. Much like the prohibition issue, in the recent past, government has passed many laws criminalizing drugs. Since the same logic holds true from the prohibition idea, it’s a violation of the ninth amendment to outlaw these substances. Another direct violation of Constitutional rights is the passing of the National Firearms Act(NFA) and the ban on “assault weapons” Essentially, the NFA increased the price of guns, and the ban is a complete block of manufacturing or trade of weapons they see as scary or threatening. It is allegedly to help reduce the threat of gang violence, but it is a direct and blatant violation of the second amendment, the right to bear arms. The final reason that the United States government has too much power is the broad and blatant militarism. In the past 100 years, the US has been involved in over 20 different wars. Why is the nation so willing to blow up other nations? There are certainly no nations in Europe that have been in as many wars as the United States, even though the US is much younger than most of them. Our military is regarded as one of the most powerful and technology-forward in the world. But the military is not used conventionally, for self defense or the like. The government uses the military in acts of aggression, attacking “hostile” areas because they have different views or ideals. The US is obsessed with striving for a world where everybody agrees with their authority and is exactly the same. It’s comparable to the Crusades the way we think that spreading our “democracy” will solve everyone's problems. The problem is that the President has the power to attack or invade anything without any consent at all. he can essentially declare war on any nation at all. The UN is supposed to be able to step in, but with a lack of general armed forces means that nations that are part of the UN have to volunteer to fight. But the US military is so powerful that not many would be willing to stand up and fight against the super power.

In the past, the US government has committed terrible crimes against humanity. The most prominent example would be the atomic bombs dropped to end WWII with Japan. The bomb, named big boy, was dropped on Hiroshima, Japan on August 6th, 1945. Then, on August 9th, 1945, the US dropped another bomb, fat man, on Nagasaki, Japan. In total, the casualty count for both bombings is confirmed at over 150,000. That’s an immense amount of women and children who were massacred for no reason. The cities that were bombed were both civilian cities with no military ties. America killed so many innocent people, it’s a travesty. Because of a conflict of opinion, 150,000 people lost their lives before their time. There are countless other times when America put its personal interest before the value of the lives of foreign civilians.
The government of the United States of America has too much power because of the legislative branch’s incompetence to create constitutional laws, the NSA and its ability to operate beyond the rules that should bind it, and the military, which uses deadly force whenever it sees fit, without considering the mortal or financial cost. A complete reform of government would be the best course of action at this point. It’s only fitting that the government take in to account the Constitution when forming a government this time around. It would probably help to prevent a downfall of epic proportions.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This did nothing to stop the NSA, they continued to work in secret listening in without any restrictions or laws with the idea that it was to better the people. The Electronic Frontier foundation states that in 2005 the NSA was collecting data from major communications companies which violate the privacy safeguards put in by the U.S. congress and constitution. The EFF has been able to collect information through whistle blowers and in 2013 the media articles proving the reports of 2005 showing the government got everything that passed through all domestic fiber optic cables, the excuse once caught was under the Patriot act the government can collect any information they deem necessary for national security. Is it national security or national…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book Fahrenheit 451 gives us a show of what the government can become. They take all the books and burn them so they can tell history how they want. Telling it from the side to make the people think it has always been that way. The first quote from the book, “If you don’t want a house built, hide the nails and wood. If you don’t want a man unhappy politically, don’t give him two sides to worry him; give him one. Better yet, give him none.” (Bradbury 93). This shows that if the government takes away your options, you have nothing to worry about, making you much easier…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of government has been around for centuries. It has changed and expanded so much over the years that certain governments have morphed into a more violent institution, in some cases. Because governments have changed so much over the years, certain governments have slowly evolved to become extreme, and may be considered seriously dangerous in the future.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government shouldn't have too much power and influence nor too little because there will be some bad side effects. For example, in the book Gathering Blue, the government is considered to have too much power which isn't good for many reasons. One reason is it controls the people too much. Also, people didn't want to go in the fields because they feared the beasts, which were made up by the government. This shows they are lying. Lastly, they shouldn't have too little because they wouldn't make many changes. Therefore they should have the right amount of power and influence.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edward Snowden was viewed by the government as a traitor when he blew the lid off of the NSA’s unconstitutional spying program and now may never be able to return to the United States. It is hard to disagree with Snowden’s reasoning for informing a nation, but easy to view his methods as wrong. He has documents to prove they were spying on visiting diplomats and acknowledged what journalists already knew, that they were being targeted. Snowden damaged the surveillance programs that were in place to monitor global terrorists. Recently, an emergency amendment to return the power to that security forces had was tabled by Congress so that the data collections safeguards could be debated.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA leaked

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Eight months later, media outlets around the world have published more than 100 revelations in over a dozen languages. We now know that the NSA has tracked private American citizens’ phone calls, emails and social connections; monitored Internet traffic in and out of the U.S.; and spied on allied countries and foreign companies alike. What we have learned so far suggests that the agency has gone from protecting national security to facilitating the United States’ political and economic advantage on the world stage.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Each of the three branches of government have an incredible amount of power. These branches are the ingredients that make our government what it is today. They all hold powers that work together to keep the government working as a whole. There are many checks placed on each branch to make sure that one doesn’t become too powerful, but that does not mean one is not slightly more powerful than the others. Even though the president and Supreme Court judges hold immense power, the legislative branch is the most powerful because of their ability to declare war, use the power of the purse and most importantly, their power to make laws.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    America's Privacy

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The National Security Agency (NSA) is a federal program under the Department of Defense that has the primarily task of global monitoring, collection, decoding, translation and analysis of information and data for foreign intelligence and counterintelligence purposes, including surveillance of targeted individuals on U.S. soil. In the mid-1970s, the NSA was investigated for the first time by Congress. At that time, the order of the NSA was that is “would never direct it’s surveillance apparatus domestically.” After the investigation was performed, Frank Church, the Democratic senator who was the head of the investigative committee, warned: “The NSA’s capability at any time could be turned around on the American people, and no American would have any privacy left, such is the capability to monitor everything: telephone conversation, telegrams, it doesn’t matter” (Greenwald). Recent leakage of government documents, that shows evidence of immense domestic spying, has many Americans worried that Frank Church’s warning has become a reality. So, what exactly is the NSA collecting and why? How does the United States’ data collection compare to that of other countries? And most importantly, have the government and the NSA put the privacy of US citizens at risk?…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    FISA And Privacy Analysis

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FISA epitomizes the relationship between security and privacy, which has never been more prevalent than it is in this moment. FISA is the metaphor for the relationship between the American government and its people today. Citizens expect their government to protect them from foreign and domestic threats without willingly giving up much of their privacy. FISA has illustrated the government's ability to manipulate the law in order to ensure the continuity of their power. The era post 9/11 has propelled America into a new era where electronic surveillance has moved from individual to mass surveillance. FISA has proven to be immensely effective in respect to the federal government. It is speculated that the FISC has never once denied a warrant. The accompanying House Report to FISA explained the executive's ability to obtain a warrant was described as the “mosaic theory and went on to state:…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States’ government is taking absolute control of its peoples’ lives by the putting others at risk of danger, invasion of privacy and dictating what they can consume. The government is controlling the United States with the use of drones, the internet, and food.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How much power is the right amount of power? “Power can’t be exactly measured. There has been a research that most citizens feel safe with a strong central government, and a government that can provide protection”(The Atlantic). Many people could say that their government has “too much power”. But then at the same time, they don’t even know what would be considered the right amount! There have been many surveys and it seemed to be the majority seem to say that. The right amount of power is having enough power to have control but not owning them. How much power could be identified as too much power? “‘whoever prevails in November will inherit a sweeping power to use lethal force against suspected terrorists and militants, including Americans’ Let me put things more starkly: Under current precedent, the commander in chief can give a secret order to kill an American citizen with a drone strike without charges or trial” (NYT). There are many articles on so, and so “have too much power”. But if the executive branch has enough power to send out a drone to assassinate an innocent person, people are going to say the executive branch has too much power! So in my point, “too much power” could be defined as; someone having enough power to kill someone or maybe even have absolute power over that person, to the point where the person cannot do anything. In all, the right amount of power is enough to power to have control and order but no having to control the person’s life. Too much power like I said is someone having enough power to kill someone or maybe even have absolute power over that person, to the point where the person cannot do anything. Is considered too much…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This started with letters the NSA sent out to only a few private companies asking them for all their data. After most of the companies hiding there clients data and not handing over the information, the adiministatain started secretly approaching Telecom Companies asking them to participate in the NSA’s domestic spying program. Soon after that these companies started sending Internet and Telephone content to the NSA (Office of the Inspector General). Later in the year, a huge proportion of global Internet traffic flows through networks controlled by the United States, simply because eight of 15 global tier 1 telecommunications companies are American -- companies like AT&T, Century Link, XO Communications and, significantly, Verizon and more companies start sharing their telephone and internet Metadata with the…

    • 2151 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    On September 11th of 2001 the United States was attacked. Many people died and through that drama the United States was unified with a singular goal of stopping terrorism. While many people were willing to sacrifice a few freedoms for the greater good, others were asking where is the line between the government fighting terrorism and abusing a situation to expand its dominion over the public. The United States government passed a bill called the PATRIOT Act to simplify procedures, relax rule sets on prosecution and give the government more jurisdiction into the personal lives of the populace by allowing surveillance techniques like roving wire taps and data mining without provocation or court order. While many officials state that this act is a crucial tool in the war on terror, others argue that it is unconstitutional and taking away the freedoms the government is supposed to protect. This difference in opinion has raised the question of how much privacy should the population be willing to give up to support the war on terror. The PATRIOT Act is walking a dangerous line and it would be irresponsible to accept it without research into the pros and cons, which are not equal. Although the act does have a few benefits, it goes too far over that line by giving the far too much power to the government while taking away too many freedoms.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    How ironic it is that the National Security Agency (NSA) would commit a crime such as espionage. Over the past decade, the NSA, FBI, and companies such as Google, Microsoft, and Facebook have been leaking each citizen’s personal information. After Truman established the NSA in 1952, it took twenty years for the Supreme Court to rule that warrants are required for domestic intelligence surveillance. Then in 1975, the Senate discovered illegal domestic spying by the NSA. After this incident, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which specifies the use of surveillance for collecting information on foreign powers, started protecting citizens’ personal information in 1978. After September 11, 2001, Bush began the NSA’s domestic spying program, which allowed the NSA to collect information on citizens. Since then, the NSA has illegally collected metadata, or data about data, from sources varying from phone companies to social websites. Companies such as Dropbox, Sony, Facebook, Microsoft and Google have been caught or admitted to leaking metadata to third party organizations such as NSA. Recently lawsuits against the NSA spying were filed on July 11, 2013 and November 22, 2013. Even with these lawsuits, there was a court-ordered renewal of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, a metadata program to collect American’s phone call’s data, on October 11, 2013 and then again on January 3, 2014. The latest action taken was the hearing held by the Senate Judiciary Committee, in which they recommended the removal of the program collecting phone records of the public. Also recent, was a poll done on American thoughts of NSA surveillance, which revealed that seventy percent of adults polled would rather keep their personal privacy than allow the freedom piercing surveillance of the NSA. Agreeing with the American people is Texas Governor Rick Perry, who has recently…

    • 1672 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Role of Government

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    WHY JAMES MADINSON USES CREDITORS AND DEBTORS AS RICH AND POOR, AND THE ROLE OF THE GOVERNMENT IN REGARDS TO MONEY LENDING…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays