Preview

Habeas Corpus Research Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1657 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Habeas Corpus Research Paper
Habeas Corpus
POL 201 American National Government
Instructor Lee Davis
January 20, 2014

In the Judiciary Act of 1789, the courts granted the power to issue habeas corpus to prisoners in federal custody. What does the United States do with enemy combatants? Should they be protected under habeas corpus? In this paper, I will discuss the role of habeas corpus and if it should be used on enemy combatants of war on terror. In English habeas corpus was passed by King Charles II in 1679. The Habeas Corpus Act of 1679 became known as the Habeas Corpus Parliament of England. This Parliament helped explain the old habeas corpus from 1640. The Habeas Corpus Act of 1679 came from an earlier Act of 1640. The Habeas Corpus
…show more content…
The Bush administration thought just because the enemies and the prison were on foreign grounds that the Constitution wouldn’t reach them. In January 2002, six men were transported from Bosnia to Guantanamo Bay by United States forces, ignoring orders from the Human Rights Chamber and the Supreme Court of Federalism by Bosnia and Herzegovina. These six prisoners were held in Guantanamo Bay until 2008. They were cut off from their families and were kept in the dark on the reasons as to why they were being imprisoned. In June 2008, the Supreme Court voted 5-4 that prisoners at Guantanamo Bay are allowed to habeas corpus under the U.S Constitution. The ruling allowed the prisoners in Cuba to dispute their imprisonment before a judge and be in a real courtroom for the first time. Senator Benjamin Cardin is against the Military Commissions Act. He believed that “They should bring terror suspects to justice quickly” (Senator Benjamin Cardin). There are approximately 270 detainees still at Guantanamo Bay and have been there for more than six …show more content…
He is also the Commander in Chief of the civil population in an army emergency. The President as Commander in Chief can give direction for military attacks. While the President is President of the Armed Services, the Constitution only grants Congress the power to declare war. According to the Suspension Clause of the Constitution, it states, “The Privileges of the Writ of Habeas Corpus should not be suspended unless when in cases of rebellion of invasion the public safety may require it”. Congress has the only power to suspend habeas corpus. There are two ways for habeas corpus to be suspended, either by its own actions or going through a delegation to the Executive. The Executive doesn’t have the authority to suspend habeas corpus

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror. Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating prisoners captured during the conflict. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at “GITMO.” Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments.…

    • 6132 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamdi vs Rumsfeld

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Yaser Esam Hamdi, an American citizen, was captured in Afghanistan shortly after the terrorist attacks of September 11th. Hamdi was classified as an “enemy combatant” by the United States. His father filed a petition of Habeas Corpus that his fifth and fourteenth amendments were in violation. Although the petition did not specify on the actual circumstances of Hamdi’s capture and detention, the record indicated that Hamdi went to Afghanistan to do “relief work” less than two months before September 11th and could have not received military training. The Special Advisor to the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, Michael Mobbs, issued a response, outlining the Government’s position. The district court found the “Mobbs Declaration” insufficient in supporting the Government’s case. The Mobbs Declaration provided details regarding Hamdi’s trip to Afghanistan, his affiliation with the Taliban during a time when the Taliban was battling U.S. allies, and lastly his surrender of an assault rifle. The District Court found that the Mobbs Declaration, standing alone, did not support Hamdi’s detention and ordered the Government to turn over numerous materials. The Fourth Circuit reversed, stressing that it was undisputed that Hamdi was captured in an active combat zone, no factual inquiry or evidentiary hearing allowed Hamdi to be heard or to rebut the Government’s claims were necessary or proper. If the Mobbs Declaration was accurate, it provided a sufficient basis upon which to conclude that the President had constitutionally detained Hamdi, the court ordered the habeas petition dismissed. The appeals court held that, “no citizen shall be imprisoned or otherwise detained by the United States except pursuant to an Act of Congress”. This provides that The AUMF’s “necessary and appropriate force” language provided the authorization for Hamdi’s detention. Also that Hamdi is entitled only to a limited judicial inquiry into his detention’s rationality under…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 201 Entire Course

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page

    POL 201 Week 5 Final Paper Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Throughout history, the motivation of man's self interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power in the absence of the rule of law. The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States whereas terrorists are apprehended and deprived of due process. The right of Habeas corpus overrules man's interpretation, in which allows those accused federal and state court representation before judge, or jury. It asserts that accusers deemed innocent until proven guilty, accusers possessed the right to representation, appear in person, and charges brought forth. This essay will concentrate on the evolution of habeas corpus, and its suspension by the United States, its relevance during the war on terror, and the United States Supreme Court's interpretation. Nevertheless, these laws are in place to protect every one, moreover to avoid unlawful apprehension, and ensure that habeas corpus works as intended by the Constitution.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.(Article II, section 2)…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the government leased that portion of the land from Cuba, for most of its time there was a lack of government oversight (Ryan 14). Some were U.S. citizens and others not (Hoffer 2017). It was possible for the U.S. to have their. In Allan A. Ryan’s book, “The 9/11 Terror Cases: Constitutional Challenges in the War Against Al Qaeda” he explored the 9/11 cases with both historical and legal context. The Unitary Code of Military Justice (1950) established military law and within outlined military commissions (Ryan 88-89). The four detainees in the 9/11 cases were subjected to the UCMJ standards although, a military commission rarely occurs in the United States (Ryan 89). One possible reason for having the cases held in a military court as opposed to the U.S. federal court was that the standards were lower, though similar. Another reason is that the government feared having court cases heard in U.S. federal courts. They could be set free due to insufficient evidence (Hoffer 2017). Plus, the voluntary acceptance of the Geneva Conventions code for treating prisoners during wartime could be ignored since member of Al Qaeda were not included (Ryan…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Section 2, Article 2, “The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States” This reserves the President the right to make military decisions without the knowledge of Congress as long as Congress has approved the war.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be deliberate on the history of Habeas Corpus and how it has matured over the years. I will describe the beginning of the Habeas Corpus and the position it takes part in the U.S. and what recent act is being used. The United States Constitution must be more effectively unified into the Guantanamo methods to give equal civil rights to inmates despite what their nationality maybe, but to also have more cordial ways of reviewing obstructive servicemen to absolutely verify if they really should be treated as extremists that we should fear.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self-interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power. Habeas Corpus is written in the constitution as a right of the people and should be a safeguard to protect all accused persons, but many presidents have found ways not to enforce the right. In history the writ of habeas corpus has been challenged by many president from Lincoln to most recently Bush with abuse of power by the president. I will exam whether the president goes against the constitution to protect the safety of its citizens in a time of war or is it an abuse of power because the president is the commander and chief. Is the president acting on behalf of the people or is it a personal agenda.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    War is a very scary and dangerous monster. It brings the worst in people; it divides families and friends. It makes us question everything we know and with the media we get too much information that we don’t know what to do with it. However, by learning our history, everybody’s role in the government, learning how the system works and learning simple terms like enemy combatant and habeas corpus you can learn that there is more than just our laws and Constitution. We are not alone in this war.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will prove that civil liberties, in America, during times of war, should not be suspended. This paper will prove this point by discussing the impact of the Japanese internment camps in the 1940’s, after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, and more contemporary examples such as the Patriot Act that occurred after the 9/11 attacks. However, the main case examined will be the Japanese internment camps.…

    • 4012 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Have you ever felt like a piece of cheese on a mouse trap just waiting for that mouse to come by and eat you; maybe even a fly stuck in a spider’s web hoping that you can get away? Well I am sure if I had been one of those people in the mist of the chaos on September 11, 2001 that had changed the life of all Americans’ across the country. I would have felt no bigger than that piece of cheese or that fly caught in the web. We were victims of a horrific terrorist attack that shook the very core of our foundation as a country. Twelve years later we are still recovering from this horrendous act. We have been fighting the war on terror for ten years. This is one of the longest wars that the United States has ever fought. While the war rages on the boundaries between national security and civil liberties are blurred. “The big threat to America is the way we react to terrorism by throwing away what everybody values about our country—a commitment to human rights” (Kennedy, 2007). Individual liberties and freedoms are important since without them one can be held indefinitely. Habeas corpus does not infringe upon a person’s civil liberties. In addition, habeas corpus allows an individual to question why they are being detained and ensures that detainees have a right to a fair trial; it is considered to be one of the foundations of constitutional democracy.…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will explain civil liberties, habeas corpus, and the war on terror. It will show how…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4. The War and the Writ Habeas corpus and security in an age of terrorism…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Habeas Corpus is known as the Great Writ because it ensures that a person detained by the government is entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if there is any legal basis for their detention. The modern form of Habeas Corpus has evolved over the years, from it beginnings in England, to its addition to the US constitution. While Habeas Corpus pertains to every citizen that is tried in a US court, there is an argument as to weather habeas also applies to alien prisoners that are being held by the US government, on foreign land. In 2002, The Supreme Court began to get involved in this argument, considering the level of the war on terror was high and the Bush Administration had just developed GITMO prison. The argument between the President and the Supreme Court continue today. The question that needs to be answered is: should aliens that are under U.S. detainment on foreign land be entitled the right of habeas corpus?…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays