Preview

George Orwell Imperialism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
800 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
George Orwell Imperialism
In “Shooting an Elephant,” George Orwell presents a story in which he reluctantly kills

an elephant. Orwell is a British police officer who is always teased by the Burmese, who see

him as a representative of the British Empire but fail to realize that Orwell also opposes English

occupation of Burma. One day, Orwell is called to investigate an accident in the marketplace

involving a rampant elephant. Orwell borrows a rifle, which could bring down the elephant,

from his friend. He hopes that he would not have to kill the beast, because he thinks that killing

a working elephant is a hideous shame; however, forced by the crowd and fearing ridicule, he

eventually kills it.

Generally, an elephant represents prosperity and
…show more content…
At the beginning, Orwell clearly demonstrates that “No one had the guts to raise

a riot” (Orwell 313), which shows that the locals have no ability to resist such a horrible reign

of imperialism. As a police officer, Orwell presents his dislike for colonial Britain by saying

that “imperialism was an evil thing” (313). He sees that imperialism is only going to worsen the

relationships between the occupiers and occupied. Thus, when an elephant demolishes the

marketplace, Orwell uses it to symbolize the British Empire pillaging the economy of Burma.

Watching as a rampant elephant attacks the marketplace, fights an animal, and raids some

shops, the Burmese are powerless to do anything although they wish to stop the mad elephant.

Similarly, by implementing strict laws, the British exploits the freedom of the Burmese, which

the locals cannot withstand.

Imperialism oppresses occupied people by lowering their social status within their

own country. In the story, the owner of the dead elephant is angry because the police officer

has killed his working partner. Yet, the owner could do nothing but grumble, as he is only

Indian. From this, it can be seen that the locals do not have the right to complain
…show more content…
However, due to the crowd’s expectation, he realizes that he must do so.

Furthermore, the death of the coolie by the elephant makes Orwell feel relaxed, because it

provides the right for the author to kill the elephant. Orwell wonders if anyone will sense his

motive for killing the elephant: to save his pride. The author wants to enhance his image in

front of the Burmese. Although he is forced to impose strict laws, he demonstrates his feelings

against them, because he knows he is forfeiting his freedom while oppressing the Burmese.

Moreover, imperialism enables an inner conflict of Orwell, which he struggles to stay at

his own job or against the British. Orwell claims that he is "all for the Burmese and all against

the British. (317)" He is trapped between the "hatred of the empire [he] served" (317) and the

responsibilities if his job. As a police officer, Orwell is responsible for implementing strict British

rule. Therefore, he is ignored and hated by the Burmese people. He is often a target of mockery

by the Burmese. The natives sneer at the British from a distance and tease them whenever

there is an opportunity. Orwell indicates that he is “momentarily worth watching” (316)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    George Orwell writes of his experience in British–ruled India in the early Twentieth Century. He was all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British. There were three groups of prisoner’s short timers, long timers, beaten. The British cruelty was that prisoners had to strip in front of others prisoners, public humiliate was taken away from human, padding strap tight to a metal barrier, and his buttocks a target so the prisoner is unable to resist impact. They hired a martial artist who brings his own bamboo sword and was trained by kendo. He takes 30 to 40 ft. running start so impact is double or triple swinging baseball style horizontal. But as the impact become more powerful tissue is growing vertical impact results in an implosion tissue. Then, nearly death of the prisoner is effect skin, fat layer, nerves, bones, and circulation results he will be unable to walk or have sex for 6 months. That an empire is evil and anyone connected to it becomes cruel The British, the Burmese or anyone caught in the middle.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the short text we see Orwell as a character torn between two completely juxtaposed…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orwell, as a police officer felt the pressure of the Barman's Indians who were crowded around him, whether to make the decision of shooting or not the elephant that killed the Indian. In this situation the British man need to take a fast decision shooting or not the…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell is well known, even though he died in 1950. He was British and an ex-cop. George Orwell is a very prominent author. He is known for a few of his books, written for a variety of purposes. However, this specific essay, “Shooting an Elephant”, is written to inform of us. He phrases this essay more as a narrative, which makes it not rhetorically effective. George Orwell uses great imagery and his syntax makes it simple for even high schoolers to read through his works.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yup This is IT

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Orwell responds to the call, taking his rifle, “an old 44 Winchester and much too small to kill an elephant” (2845 Orwell) in hopes of frightening it with the noise. This elephant was not wild, but normally tame and broke loose due to sexual desire. This first action is just an exercise of authority in maintaining order; however, in seeing a dead native victim he requests an elephant rifle and five cartridges. This is when the Burmese become quite excited and an “immense crowd of two thousand” (2846 Orwell) follow him. They believe that the imperial police officer is going to shoot the elephant when, in actuality, he just wanted to defend himself from becoming another devilish corpse.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1)George Orwell has an extremely scornful attitude towards imperialism. He views it as a corrupt form of government. He has a strong disgust for the native people, as they continually harass him on a daily basis. They attempt to trip him on the soccer field, laugh and make fun of him. Orwell dislikes his position in Burma, as he frequently states that he does not like having power and ruling over a foreign people. Many times the masses of people tend to go around what Orwell is attempting to enforce, rather than obey what he decides.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1936, author George Orwell wrote an essay titled “Shooting an Elephant”. In the essay Orwell describes a scene of a British police officer who is stuck between having to shoot an elephant. The story takes place in Burma, India where then, they were under British imperialism. Imperialism is a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force. It humiliates the occupied people, reducing them to an inferior status in their own country. Analyzing Orwell’s work, I realize that Orwell feels Imperialism is not good for both the people subject to and the people of the imperial power. The fact that the main character of the story is an officer of the imperial government, but also in opposition to imperialism…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell's "Shooting an Elephant" is an essay about a British police officer living in Lower Burma who goes through the trial and error process of making the right decisions while still trying to maintain an image and position of authority. The officer is hated by the Burmese people, which is clearly shown when he would play football. The Burmese were extremely unfair to the officer due to the fact he was part of the Imperialist group which was oppressing Burma. (para. 1) Although the officer is hated he feels "Imperialism, [is] an evil thing" and he "[is] all for the Burmese and against their oppressors, the British," his own kind. (para. 2)…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even although he has very conflicting views towards the native population, there is also times we see him appearing deeply sympathetic towards the Burmese and their suffering, ‘all these oppressed me with an intolerable sense of guilt.’ The interesting use of the word ‘oppression’ suggests he is feeling the same way as the natives and in some way shares their pain. His sympathy…

    • 865 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He felt comfort in knowing that because a man had died due to the elephant's rage, that he was legally in the right. However, he stated did not stand for imperialism, and that it was “evil”, yet he displayed the very thing he despised. The Burmese people were treated terribly by the Empire. Orwell even says, “The wretched prisoners huddling in the stinking cages of the lock-ups, the grey, cowed faces of long-term convicts, the scarred buttocks of the men who had been flogged with bamboos—all these oppressed me with an intolerable sense of guilt.” By that, it reflects exactly what the elephants living conditions were. And with all of the rage pent up from being confined and living in deplorable conditions, once the elephant was freed, it had every reason to go rogue. Just like the elephant, the people of Lower Burman had a reason to be rebellious and filled with hate. Orwell was in a position to simply wait for the elephant's to mahout come back, as it harmlessly fed itself in the distance. Instead, he gave in to the pressure, let his ego take over, and took the life of an…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nevertheless, Orwell was deeply disturbed, as he was in a postion he did not like, and was caught in the middle where he ought to make the decision of killing the mad elephant. He was indirectly force to do this in front thousands who hated him not knowing or care that he did not want to kill the elphant but the imperialism was evil. He seem to have become a hypocrite to himself, not liking treatment of his prisoners or the smelly cages, he was uneducated felt he could do nothing even in the position he held.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Burmese wanted Orwell to kill this elephant since it destroyed a bamboo hut, eaten the stock at the fruit stand, killed a cow, and had turned over a van. The elephant had basically torn part of the town apart and the Burmese people were not happy with it and wanted it dead.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Being a sub-divisional police officer, he needs to keep Burma safe from all violence and danger. After describing how much he hates the imperialism, the raging elephant incident occurs. “It was a tiny incident in itself, but it gave me a better glimpse than I had had before of the real nature of imperialism-the real motives for which despotic governments act” (852). He was called in to see what was wrong with the elephant; the problem was that it was a tamed elephant gone “must”, meaning gone into sexual heat. Orwell states that it was enlightening. I assume he is referring to the work of the elephant was something interesting that…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Imperialism

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Imperialism has caused many different outcomes in the world; some of which were positive, and some were negative. In this particular source, Ludwig von Mises is stating that imperialism has caused a trail of damaging events, and that these events have been so harmful that they must never be forgotten nor justified. As a result of this, the question being raised is whether the acts that came from imperialism were beneficial and important to society or not. Imperialism to Mises was a negative form of globalization. He is explaining the detrimental effects on groups, all the prosperous land that went to waste, and senseless fighting that occurred between groups. Based on this, Ludwig's perspective on imperialism is that it caused many futile circumstances,…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I am writing an essay about imperialism, it affected our government in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s and there was mixed opinions about it.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays