Genetic and Environmental Influences on Human Development

Topics: Morality, Jean Piaget, Kohlberg's stages of moral development Pages: 8 (1999 words) Published: September 14, 2009
Human growth and development is an incredibly complex process, influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. At certain times and for certain developments, genetic influences dominate, whereas at other times, environmental influences are more powerful which emphasizes the fact that genetic and environmental forces are always working together (Sigelman and Rider, 2009).

This paper will examine that part of human growth and development which may observed in the early childhood period (preschool years), in particular that area of growth and development termed “morality”.

The complexity of this area and the concepts involved necessitates a rather expansive look at the perspectives on Moral Development in order to develop contextual understanding of the subject matter.

General description of morality according to Freud, Piaget, Kohlberg and Bandura.

Notwithstanding endless debate re the definition of morality (Gibbs 2003; Turiel 2006), arguably it involves at least the distinguishing of right from wrong and acting upon that distinction. Followed by feeling pride or guilt/shame when the right or wrong action is selected.

Developmental science has mainly been concerned with:

a) The affective component, (guilt, concerns, pride, etc) surrounding actions – the emotional feelings motivating thoughts and actions

b) The cognitive component, (recognising the concepts of right and wrong) driving decisions about behaviour, utilising social cognitive skills – role taking, empathy, etc

c) The behavioural component, (our behaviour in given circumstances).

These three major perspectives on moral development each focus on a different aspect of morality –

a) Moral affect is examined by psychoanalytic theory

b) Moral cognition (reasoning) is studied by cognitive developmental theory.

c) Moral behaviour is studied by social cognitive theory (social learning).

This culminates with an evolutionary perspective viewpoint.

The psychoanalytical theory viewpoint on moral affect examines the emotions linked to concepts of right and wrong ie negative feelings such as anxiety/guilt/shame fear of detection acting as a preventative from wrong actions. – Potentially being disgusted or righteously angered upon observing wrongful acts (Tangney, Stuewig and Mashek 2007) – Self satisfaction or pride upon doing the right thing – gratitude or admiration upon observing a moral act. All these are important parts of morality (Turiel 2006). Tangney et al (2007) refer to the necessity of moral emotions requiring the ability to evaluate one’s own level of achievement (or non achievement) of that individuals standards of behaviour.

Freud’s early psychoanalytical theory (1960) offered the irrational selfish id, the rational ego, and moralistic super ego; classifying infants and toddlers as basically lacking super ego - essentially totally id. He attributed their actions to the selfish id, unless parental intervention added a level of control. Freud likened the superego to the “internal parent.” Although Freud’s main themes are taken seriously, his specifics now lack support. Hoffman (2000) states that children form strong consciences when they have a secure attachment to warm responsive parents. Silverman (2003) has observed that females do not appear to have lesser super egos than males, indeed seem more resistant to temptation. These views have overtaken the specifics offered by Freud.

Kochanska and Aksan (2006): Turiel (2006) and others have shown that an important part of morality is moral emotion; early parental relationships contribute to moral development. The internalization of moral standards must somehow be achieved in order for children to behave morally in the absence of the detection/punishment threat of a figure of authority.

Cognitive development theory, in examining moral reasoning, assumes that moral development depends on role-taking or perspective-taking or other social...

References: Bandura, A. (1991) Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behaviour and development: Vol 1. Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bandura, A. (2000). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 101-119.
Colby, A., Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment. Vol. 1: Theoretical foundations and research validation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Freud, S. (1960). A general introduction to psychoanalysis. New York: Washington Square Press. (Original work published 1935)
Fry, D
Gibbs, J. C. (2003). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman. London, England: Sage Publications Ltd.
Hauser, M. D. (2006). Moral ingredients: How we evolved the capacity to do the right thing. In S. C. Levinson & J. Pierre (Eds.), Evolution and culture: A Fryssen Foundation symposium. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kochanska, G., & Aksan, N. (2006) Children’s conscience and self-regulation. Journal of Personality, 74, 1587-1617.
Kohlberg, L. (1963). The development of children’s orientations toward a moral order: 1. Sequence in the development of moral thought. Vita Humana, 6, 11-33.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development: Vol 1. The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Kohlberg, L. (1984) Essays on moral development: Vol. 2. The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Krebs, D. (2005). An evolutionary reconceptualization of Kohlberg’s model of moral development. In R. L. Burgess & K. Macdonald (Eds.), Evolutionary perspective on human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1932).
Sigelman, C. K. & Rider E. A. (2009) Life-span Human Development, (6th Ed), The George Washington University and Elizabethtown College, p123
Silverman, I
Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345-372.
Turiel, E. (2006). The development of morality. In N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), & W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds. in Chief), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional and personality development (6th ed). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Genetic Influences on Personality Development Essay
  • Essay about Environmental Influences on Adolescent Development
  • Factors That Influence Human Development Essay
  • Environmental Causes of Human Migration Essay
  • adolescent development peer influence Essay
  • Essay on Human Resources Development
  • Essay on Human Development,Family and Society
  • Essay on human resource development

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free