Preview

Essay On The Tough On Crime Movement

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
673 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On The Tough On Crime Movement
The war on drugs started with the need to stop the movement of drugs into the United States. President Nixon was the first president to understand the severity of the impact drugs had on society. He proclaimed the need to interfere on the number of drugs coming into the United States. With his necessity to intervene he supported the creation of the Drug Enforcement Agency in 1973. With this agency, the war against the drug trade was initiated. His efforts were reinforced by President Reagan in the 1980s when he enforced and declared the war on drugs. President Reagan influence, resulted in more individuals incarcerated for drug offenses. This began to take an effect on correctional institutions because they began to experience an increase in …show more content…
The tough on crime movement was the necessity to be tougher on crime and convictions. With the tough on crime mentality, the increase of offenders within the correctional institutions increased thus making for an issue of overcrowding within corrections. The tough on crime movement came about after President Reagan began imposing several laws such as the Anti-Drug Abuse Act that imposed mandatory sentencing even for first time offenders who were charged for drug offenses. The mentality in the 1980s was to be tough on crime and convictions rather than rehabilitation. The increase of offenders began to rise and making an impact within corrections. The tough on crime mentality stayed strong through the 1990s where eventually it solidified when more laws came about stating mandatory sentencing for offenders and providing more federal aid to states that were willing to adopt these laws. Today the tough on crime mentality remains strong and the rise of offenders is continuing to rise. Within the court system, “Judges do not want to put potentially dangerous offenders back on the streets and are more likely to set higher bail amounts and less likely to grant release without bond requirement” (Seiter, 2016). This mentality tends to incarcerate more offenders that cannot afford to grant bail resulting in more offenders in correctional facilities thus increasing population

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mass incarceration started in the 1980s, when the war on drugs arose. The U.S. prison system is a failure on every level. There are a total of 2,418,352 federal and state prisons in the United States and 2.3 million people occupy them. According to California prison focus “no other society in human history has imprisoned so many of its own citizens”. The U.S. has more prisons than colleges. America also has private prisons owned by greedy corporate millionaires and billionaires.The more people in prison, the more money private prisons make. Tom Beasley, co-founder of the Corrections Corporation of America(CCA) stated that “you just sell prisons like you were selling cars or real estate or hamburgers”. According to CCA they have nearly 5,500 acres of land, and 2,500 acres are undeveloped for future growth projects. That means they want to keep putting people in jail. There are 4,575 private prisons in the United States. According to NYU School of Law “ since 2000, the effect on the crime rate of increasing incarceration has been zero. Even though the crime rate has not gone down, the government continues to put people in jail. Private prisons have continued because they make millions of dollars off of owning private prisons, and putting people in jail. War on drugs was the beginning of mass incarceration. In the 1990’s state and federal prisons started exploding at the seams because of the increase in drug use and possession of it. The drug that made the huge impact on society was Cocaine, known as “crack”. Cocaine was a powder, which was known to be more sophisticated than crack. Crack was used in poor black communities. The biggest surge in the use of crack was between 1980s and 1990s. Black and latino communities were hit the hardest in the drug epidemic. There was a high…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most dramatic developments in the Criminal Justice system during the late 20th Century were the revolution of the sentencing system. Prior to the sentencing reforms of 1984, most of the 20th century federal sentencing was largely based on rehabilitative model where sentencing was indeterminate. By the 1970s, the traditional sentencing system came under increasing attack as public interest in the criminal justice system prompted “crime research boom time” (Nagel, 1990; Wilkins, 1987). The concerns manifested to a policy reform focusing on retribution, deterrence and incapacitation as means of getting tough on crime and.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most recently, President Obama signed into law the federal Fair Sentencing Act that significantly reduced the amount of times served for some drug offenses. Today, many jurisdictions have mandatory minimum and three strikes sentencing models (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.). With all these different types of sentencing models, our prisons across the country remain overcrowded and the recidivism rates are far too high. Something will have to change, but until there is a political will to make those changes, our employees at correctional facilities and the inmates will suffer the…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the past 3 years it shows from studies done around the country that 67% of inmates have gotten released and 57%of inmates have gotten arrested again either for the same crime they committed or for a new crime. In the past 30 years it has shown that sentencing has become more of longer sentences for punishment then for rehabilitation to help. Due to that a lot of prisons and jails have become over crowded. And less and less inmates have received the attention that they need to stop them from committing crimes. Honestly who wouldn’t want 3 free meals a day and roof over their head and not have to pay for anything? A lot of people don’t have places to go or things to eat so committing a crime and getting caught gives them…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Courts Case Study

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Early efforts to meet the nation’s growing drug problem began in the 1970s. The U.S imposed stricter penalties for drug-related crimes, but was met with…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1970's Drug Abuse

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages

    and U.S. Customs Service took their attention from cocaine and marijuana focused on heroin trafficking, cocaine was largely ignored during the 1970s allowing it and marijuana cultivation to proliferate quietly in Latin America while the rest of the United States was unaware the doom they would have to face. During the start of the 1970s The D.E.A. had cracked down of many cases of heroin throughout the world, since it is considered the most trafficked narcotic in the world. Mexico was one of the major sources of both heroin and marijuana to the United States. Through 1972 to 1976 a shift in the market structures of drug smuggling had mad Mexico dominator of the heroin trade and a steady supplier of marijuana to the United States. Marijuana was also being supplied by the infamous country, Colombia. Back home, in the United States many drug criminals were being put to trail, as was Leroy “Nicky” Barnes, an addict who became a multi-millionaire drug lord. Not many policies in the United States targeted much of the problem that was starting to grow out of hand, which was the problem with drug abuse. It was until the 1980s, after President Nixon and President Jimmy Carter had been out of office, and President Ronald Reagan was appointed as new commander in chief of this drug war. President Reagan began mass incarcerations illicit drug users. The number of people in jail for non-violent drug crimes had escalated by 800 percent. By this time the…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Increased penalties and incarceration are the main solutions of crime prevention for advocates who believe that drugs should be prohibited. Two main reasons for this are its deterrent effects and social harm factors (Levitt, 1996, Weatherburn, 2014). Levitt (1996), at the height of rapidly increasing speeds of incarceration writes that increased prison population is a threat to deter people from engaging in criminal acts due to an increased threat of imprisonment. Also, incapacitation will be a benefit to society as criminals are unable to commit crimes while incarcerated (1996). His study argues that for each prisoner released as a result of prison overcrowding, it is associated with an increase of fifteen crimes per year (1996). Conversely,…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the past several decades, the mass incarcerated population has more than doubled since 1970’s (DuVernay, 13th). Mass incarceration is the act of placing a bunch of people in prisons, detention centers, and correction facilities. Usually, the people affected are people of color, the reasoning behind placing people in these situations is because of misdemeanors, for the sake of putting people in prison or because of their status. Because of these conducts by law enforcers, the population of the imprisoned is growing exponentially that the prison systems and detention centers are not giving proper amenity and placing people wherever they want. The era of mass incarceration began when the government started the goal getting criminals off the street.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will examine the history of the “War on Drugs” and the racial and sentencing disparities that have resulted because of it. In the House of Representatives a new bill was introduced on January 7, 2009. Policy number H.R.265, was cited as “Drug Sentencing reform and Cocaine Kingpin Trafficking Act of 2009. The never ending drug trade and the policies that try to limit it, have far-reaching impacts in the United States and other countries. Over the last twenty years, U.S. politicians have responded to mounting drug abuse at the local and national levels with increasingly unjustly legislation. Cooperatively, these measures have become known as the ‘War on Drugs’. In the United States, these policies have focused on the link between drug, gang activity, and crime, emphasizing punishment over treatment. Mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses have been put in place, leading to an explosion in the number of people incarcerated nationwide. Racial disparities in drug sentencing, particularly in crack vs. powder cocaine offenses, also stem from the ‘War on Drugs’ policy. The War on Drugs is a prevention campaign that was established by the United States Government with the aid of participating countries, with the intention of reducing illegal drug trade. This initiative includes a set of laws and policies that are intended to discourage the manufacturing and distribution of illegal substances. The term was first used by then President Richard Nixon in 1969. In June of, Nixon officially declares a "war on drugs," identifying drug abuse as public enemy No. 1. Then in October of 1986 President Ronald Reagan signed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of, which appropriated $1.7 billion to fight the drug war. The bill also created mandatory minimum penalties for drug offenses, which are criticized for promoting…

    • 2419 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Race And Crime Essay

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As I wrap up my blog we have seen that crime is not race specific. All races commit crime, furthermore all races participate in gang activity, it is just not reserved for Black and Latinos. All of the examples used in the previous blogs are not exclusive to certain races. What makes the difference is how society views who is a criminal and who commits crimes. Added to this, is the disproportion of how crime is handled. With the exception of heinous and violent crimes, many people who commit crimes will most likely get away with it. How the criminal justice system handles cases can affect who goes to prison and who doesn’t. Furthermore criminals that are more culpable may get away with lighter sentences, than those that are only accessories to the crime, simply because of their race, or because they can afford better attorneys.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    University of Phoenix Criminal Justice Administration CJA 453 Juan Campos February 5, 2009War on Drugs and Prison Overcrowding Prison overcrowding is a major problem1in our criminal justice system and it continues to bea hotly debated topic as to how we should address the problem. One of the main reasons our prison systems have a problem with overcrowding is drugs. More specifically, the "war on drugs" started by President Reagan in 1982 brought a dramatic increase1to the number of people put behind barsfor drug offenses.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As early as the Reagan administration until 1986, there were anti-drug campaign funded by the federal government were their declared $250 million war on drugs. The war on drugs were one of the main reasons for mass incarceration and is responsible for close to over half of the arrest in the United States. According to Lynch (2012), changing of drug laws have caused the increase in the number of prison population and caused the overcrowding of federal penitentiary systems. Alexander (2010) argues that race has an impact on whether or not an individual will be locked up in prison. The new drugs laws have a tendency to target those who are poorer non-white offenders; which subsequently means that more black individuals are being incarcerated…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Drug Trafficking

    • 5118 Words
    • 21 Pages

    The War on Drugs is a campaign of prohibition and foreign military aid and military intervention undertaken by the United States government, with the assistance of participating countries, and the stated aim to define and reduce the illegal drug trade. This initiative includes a set of drug policies of the United States that are…

    • 5118 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perspectives on Crime

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Crime control may be expensive, but reducing the pain inflicted by criminal activity is well worth the price. If punishment were swift, certain, and severe, few would be tempted to break the law. Crime control advocates do not want legal technicalities to help the guilty go free and tie the hands of justice. They are angry at judges who let obviously guilty people go free because a law enforcement officer made an unintentional procedural error. The public is out raged by violent crimes it demands an efficient justice system that hands out tough sanctions to those who choose to violate the law. The key positions of the crime control perspective are: the purpose of the justice is to deter crime through the application of the. The more efficient the system, the greater is effectiveness. The justice system is not equipped to treat people but rather to…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The presidency of Ronald Reagan marked the start of a long period of skyrocketing rates of incarceration, largely thanks to his unprecedented expansion of the drug war. The number of people behind bars for nonviolent drug law offenses increased from 50,000 in 1980 to over 400,000 by 1997.…

    • 288 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays