Preview

Racial Disparities and the War on Drugs

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2419 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Racial Disparities and the War on Drugs
Running Head: The War on Drugs

The War on Drugs and Sentencing Disparities

Social Policy Analysis Paper

Janet Gaines

Hood College

Introduction This paper will examine the history of the “War on Drugs” and the racial and sentencing disparities that have resulted because of it. In the House of Representatives a new bill was introduced on January 7, 2009. Policy number H.R.265, was cited as “Drug Sentencing reform and Cocaine Kingpin Trafficking Act of 2009. The never ending drug trade and the policies that try to limit it, have far-reaching impacts in the United States and other countries. Over the last twenty years, U.S. politicians have responded to mounting drug abuse at the local and national levels with increasingly unjustly legislation. Cooperatively, these measures have become known as the ‘War on Drugs’. In the United States, these policies have focused on the link between drug, gang activity, and crime, emphasizing punishment over treatment. Mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses have been put in place, leading to an explosion in the number of people incarcerated nationwide. Racial disparities in drug sentencing, particularly in crack vs. powder cocaine offenses, also stem from the ‘War on Drugs’ policy. The War on Drugs is a prevention campaign that was established by the United States Government with the aid of participating countries, with the intention of reducing illegal drug trade. This initiative includes a set of laws and policies that are intended to discourage the manufacturing and distribution of illegal substances. The term was first used by then President Richard Nixon in 1969. In June of, Nixon officially declares a "war on drugs," identifying drug abuse as public enemy No. 1. Then in October of 1986 President Ronald Reagan signed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of, which appropriated $1.7 billion to fight the drug war. The bill also created mandatory minimum penalties for drug offenses, which are criticized for promoting



Cited:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fbn Vs Anslinger

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A year after the stock market crashed, 1930, and president Hoover is in office, America is in a state of existential crisis and people are looking for answers and distractions. The Treasury Department created the Federal Bureau of Narcotics under Harry J. Anslinger who directed the agency until 1962 “and molded America’s drug policy” (The United States War on Drugs). Anslinger who was also a prohibitionist, who believed progress could only be achieved by controlling each individual’s impulses and thought that if enough people were put in jail that America would rid itself of drugs. Nonetheless, with these same beliefs, Anslinger, used these to fight the war on drugs. Armed with a Depression snug budget, and an uphill battle Anslinger tried and failed to get state governments involved with the war effort.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sirin writes that her article “investigates presidential progress in addressing racial injustices and disparities within the context of the war on drugs” and argues that the possibility for racial justice depends on a progressive president choosing its pursuit as a personal agenda. Sirin examines the drug policies of presidents from Richard Nixon to Barack Obama, and when discussing President Reagan, she gives him responsibility for the “punitive policies that disproportionately affected certain racial/ethnic groups” found in the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. She underscores his advocacy for federal mandatory minimum sentences, which created “the notorious 100 to 1 provision” under which five grams of crack cocaine carried the same prison sentence, five years, as 500 grams of powder cocaine. After explaining that crack cocaine users were typically poor and black, she notes that the resulting racial disparity in sentencing stayed in place until President Obama’s Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. Sirin clarifies that a progressive president will struggle without the legislature, judiciary, or public opinion, but she still holds that “most importantly, the president in office should have a progressive agenda to begin with in order to initiate and work towards key structural changes and policy reforms.” For this reason, according to her estimation, the president defines drug…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Crack Cocaine Disparities

    • 2623 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Coca is a leafed plant that grows in the eastern slopes of the Andes. Cocaine is the world's most powerful stimulant made naturally. This plant has been used be Indians for at least 5000 years. Traditionally, the leaves of the coca plant have been chewed for social, mystical, medicinal and religious purposes. Columbia is the lead producer of cocaine they supply eighty percent of the world's cocaine (Coca and cocaine).…

    • 2623 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Com/220 Final Project

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In all levels of government in the United States, the quest to stop the illegal drug trade and illegal drug usage carries a heavy burden on the American judicial system. However the time spent combating illegal drugs in not the only waste during this campaign. The United States spends billions of dollars trying to stop the flow of drugs into this country ( Nordstrom, 2011). The majority of the money spent to lock up criminals in the United States is spent on locking up nonviolent drug offenders. “In fact about five percent of drug users have used violence to obtain money to purchase drugs” ( Nordstrom, 2011). The United States may not be able to lower their deficit and release the financial burden on its judicial system without at this fact for a reason to have an illegal drug reform.…

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past two years, drug violence has become a fixture of the daily news. Some of this violence pits drug cartels against one another; some involves confrontations between law enforcement and traffickers. Recent estimates suggest that thousands have lost their lives in this “war on drugs.” Prohibition creates violence because it drives the drug market underground. This means buyers and sellers cannot resolve their disputes in orderly ways, so they turn to violence instead. The only way to reduce violence there fore is to legalize drugs. Fortuitously, legalization is the right policy for a slew of other reasons. If drugs were legal, the consequent unemployment could cause economic problems; but in contrast it could reduce violence and produce great opportunities for economic development (Borden 44). The right policy, therefore, is to legalize drugs while using regulation and taxation to dampen irresponsible behavior related to drug use, such as driving under the influence. This makes more sense than prohibition because it avoids creation of a black market. This approach also allows those who believe they benefit from drug use to do so, as long as they do not harm others. Magazine Publisher, David Borden said, “I argued, prohibition fuels violence and disorder, particularly in the inner cities, and these conditions drive away business and make every other method of addressing poverty far more…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rationale that the author presents for reducing the sentences of drug offenders is the racist delineation correlating to the 100:1 cracked cocaine violations. The author delineates the 100:1 punishments are divisive and racially fractured. Two additional data points delineated by Harvey Gee are housing costs correlated to offenders and faulty science.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One important aspect of the U.S. prison system is Drug sentencing Disparities. In “Criminal justice fact sheet (NAACP) the author states about 14 million whites and 2.6 million african americans report using an illicit drug 5 times as many whites are using drugs as african americans, yet african americans are sent to prison for drug offence at 10 times the rate of this the rate of whites. African american represent 12% of the total population of drug users, nut 38%of those arrested for drugs offenses, and 59%of those in state prison for a drug offense. This is critical to understand because it isn’t fair if a white man has the same amount of weed on him as a black man goes for 5 years. How does that make any sense.In conclusion, the U.S. Drug…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Beginning with the war on drugs in the 1980’s, numerous states along with the federal government enacted statues that required judges to carry out lengthy sentences on any individuals caught with various amounts of illegal drugs, no matter the circumstances. This imperative principal stance has only created a prison population on steroids in the United States.…

    • 2180 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Asset Forfeiture

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States Department of Justice 's Asset Forfeiture Program is a nationwide law enforcement program that has become a powerful weapon in the fight against crime. This involves removing the proceeds of crimes used by criminals to continue activity against society. Asset forfeiture has the impact of disrupting criminal activities that would continue to function if the only tool used was conviction and incarceration of certain individuals. While the Department of Justice program applies only to cases developed by enforcement officials in certain agencies of the Federal Government, state and local agencies may have similar programs and are not part of the federal program. (.http://www.usdoj.gov/jmd/afp/)…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New Jim Crow

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In today’s modern world, many people would be surprised to find out that there is still a racial caste system in America. After witnessing the election of a black president, people have started believing that America has entered a post-racial society. This is both a patently false and dangerous mindset. The segregation and stigma of race is still very much alive in our society. Instead of a formalized institution such as slavery or Jim Crow, America has found a new way to continue the marginalization of blacks by using the criminal justice system. In Michelle Alexander’s book “ The New Jim Crow”, she shows how America’s “ War on Drugs “ has become a tool of racial segregation and how the discretionary enforcement of drug laws has resulted in an overwhelmingly negative affect on its black population.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following the start of Nixon’s drug war the incarceration rate has increased up to 700% in 2005, according to Pew researchers. "After a 700-percent increase in the US prison population between 1970 and 2005, you'd think the nation would finally have run out of lawbreakers to put behind bars," said the report by Pew's Public Safety Performance Project. But apparently we haven’t yet. In 2009 alone, 1.66 million Americans were arrested on drug charges, more than were arrested on assault or larceny charges. And 4 of 5 of those arrests were simply for possession.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overcrowded Prisons

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Drug offenders have represented the most substantial source of growth in recent decades, starting with forty thousand inmates in 1980 to four hundred and fifty thousand inmates today. Despite the fact that the number of persons in prison today for drug offenses is more than ten times the number in 1980, drug use rates remain substantial, with data indicating a general increase over the past few years. During a period, when the number of persons in prison for drug law violations was growing at a rate faster than other offense types, the underlying behavior appears to have experienced little impact. Due to todays new consciousness about the unfairness and effectiveness of harsh crack cocaine mandatory sentences has emerged among policy makers and the United States Sentencing Commission. These unfair sentencing laws, have a dramatic effect on the cause of overcrowding in prisons for decades.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The war on drugs has been implemented for more than 30 years. Currently, there are close to a half million persons imprisoned on drug charges in this country. That is a tenfold increase over the 50,000 in 1980. (jrank.org, 2011) In the past few years, close to $40 billion has been spent annually fighting the war on drugs. As a result of the drastic increase in drug-related arrests and convictions, the United States currently has the largest prison system in the world. The majority of these are nonviolent criminals.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As early as the Reagan administration until 1986, there were anti-drug campaign funded by the federal government were their declared $250 million war on drugs. The war on drugs were one of the main reasons for mass incarceration and is responsible for close to over half of the arrest in the United States. According to Lynch (2012), changing of drug laws have caused the increase in the number of prison population and caused the overcrowding of federal penitentiary systems. Alexander (2010) argues that race has an impact on whether or not an individual will be locked up in prison. The new drugs laws have a tendency to target those who are poorer non-white offenders; which subsequently means that more black individuals are being incarcerated…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The increments in sentencing strictness meant that people had less of an incentive to risk abusing drugs. However, the decrease in cocaine abuse rates did not lead to a decrease in overall drug abuse. The nature of drug enforcement and drug policing meant that cocaine abusers were being targetting because the sentencing for those crimes were the harshest. In other words, drug enforcement officals had greater incentive to target cocaine dealers or abusers as opposed to abusers or manufacturers of drugs such as methamphetamine. As such, methamphetamine abuse rates rose, nullifying the decrements in cocaine abuse rates.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays