Preview

Essay On Pacifism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
491 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Pacifism
The matter of the pacifism movement plays a lot of controversy, and sometimes it depends on the moral and the ethical point of view. Even though pacifistic views can seem to contradict themselves, the basic pacifist belief itself is multifaceted. Pacifism, however unpopular it may be, has deep-rooted connections with the religious, political, and moral dilemmas that seem to be developing every day. To call oneself a pacifist today does not clearly define the personal beliefs or opinions of the individual. The whole thought of pacifism can range from an absolutist point of view to strictly conditional interpretations. No matter how extreme or flexible the different points of view from these pacifist are violence is never the desired solution. …show more content…
I believe also that there are other nonviolent effective ways to fight an aggressor. Many of the pacifists see it as an immoral act. When oppositions to push violence to its bounds is based on the consideration that such would be morally wrong due to the nature of war. Many of us might opposed to war especially when it is not justified, but if we see it from a pacifist point of view a war even though it is just it is morally wrong because it destroy many individuals lives and might affect the planet as well.
An example of a Just war it would be world war two, which had many of the criteria to be a just war. The world war two was fought by Germany and allies which all of these were legal authorities, this war had good intentions which were to stop Hitler and his Nazi army from invading countries and harming people, it was a war that was fought for the freedom of the oppressed people. This are some of the reason of why I think world war two was a just war, if this war didn’t had been fought, we would all be living under fear for not fitting in a certain stereotype, and many more people could have had been

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In What would you do?, Yoder combines outsider arguments and stories about nonviolence in order to strengthen his argument defending pacifism. In Gladys Aylward's story, You Say You Have the Living God Inside You, she offers a moving account of her time in China, and tells a story from when she was a missionary woman. Aylward explains her immediate fear to get involved in a prison riot, but she knew that she must advocate for peace in order to maintain her claim that she had the living god within her. The juxtaposition of stories and arguments allows for the combination of theoretical advice about pacifism as well as real life examples that prove their ability to work. Pacifists do not claim that nonviolence always works, however the collection…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, pacifism during a war lowers morale. How can one expect to win a war if we do not fight back and try to end it? The only way people can have faith and confidence in defeating the enemy is if they know we will do what it takes to defeat it. George Orwell addresses how ignorant it is to be pacifism during a war that causes many…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Separate Peace Essay

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In essence, a thing is characterized as an object having both physical and physiological components. As cliché as it seems, a picture has a thousand words. Although a person’s eyes tend to produce the same image over and over again, he or she will see things in a different perspective every time. In time, a person’s perspective on certain things will change overtime no matter how set in stone the status-quo is. Personal experiences play a large role in shaping someone’s outlook on things. In John Knowles’ novel, A Separate Peace, Gene states, “So the more things remain the same, the more they change after all” (Knowles 6). This quote is being used as much older and mature Gene returns to Devon and reflects upon his childhood at the school. Although Devon looks physically the same to Gene as it did 15 years ago, he comes to realization that his view of the school and the things inside of it have changed.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pacifism is a commitment to solve problems without the use of violence; in particular it is the belief that war is always wrong. Some people are pacifist because they believe that it is, in principle, wrong to use violence. Other people are pacifist because they believe the damage done by war will be worse than any good it does, and this applies to the Northern Ireland peace wall, that the damage and ill feelings it is causing is worse than the actual good coming out of it. If people in Northern Ireland understood that then things would change. Many of Jesus’ teachings honour this behaviour. For example “When Jesus was arrested he would not let his disciples use violence to prevent his arrest” so therefore Christians who try to follow Jesus’ examples might try to say that because Jesus would not allow people to use violence to defend him, then violence is wrong, no matter what the case, and that peaceful methods should always be…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Just War and Pacifism

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are six conditions that must be satisfied for a war to be considered just:…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Living by this moral principle can cause a greater harm by turning the other cheek than by using force to deminish a greater threat. There is always going to be people seeking out power or people who have different beliefs and morals because it is engraved within ourselves through generation after generation. Jan Narveson directly states a pacifists view, "His belief is not only that violence is evil but also that it is morally wrong to use force to resist, punish, or prevent violence. We are aggressive and greedy people and to change the thinking of the entire world with out the threat of force seems nearly impossible. Hypathetically, if pacifism was put into law, the use of any type of force will be breaking the law and the sentence is life in prison. Now imagine if a man breaks into a house of a young lady and rapes this lady and then pulls a gun out to shoot her. If the woman grabs the gun and shoots the man, she would also be sent to prison for life because any use of force is labelled as unacceptable. In our society today, violence is happening everyday even though we have laws in place to minimize them. Violence is not only a thing of the past but it is a thing of the future and without a proper punishment, violence will increase drastically. Narveson communicates a second version of pacifism where " one might argue that pacifism is desirable as a tactic: that as a matter of fact, some good end, such as the reduction of violence itself , is to be achieved by 'turning the other cheek'. " This again is a good theory, but if it was put into action, the consequences would be great. A human has the right to defend themselves, or help a person that is in need. In war it is the same thing but instead of one person needing help, it is a population worth of needed help. A person claiming they are a pure hearted pacifist by " turning the other cheek" does not necessarily make it the best…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every act of war directed to the indiscriminate destruction of whole cities or vast areas with their inhabitants is a crime against God and man, which merits firm and unequivocal condemnation. A danger of modern warfare is that it provides the opportunity to those who possess modern scientific weapons -- especially atomic, biological, or chemical weapons -- to commit such crimes (CCC 2314). Buddhism possibly has the best record of all religions for non-violence, Buddhism is just as similar as they reject violence and clearly are pacifists from their teachings as Buddhists say ‘it is better to be killed than to kill’. The Buddha has advised everyone not to kill, whereas if a person is threatened, they are not allowed to kill out of self-protection only try to use their words to talk out of it. Some Buddhists are very active in promoting peace, where during the Vietnam War; some Buddhist monks burned themselves to death in self sacrificing protest against the war,…

    • 4029 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Non Violence

    • 1870 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The problem with the use of violent confrontation strategies is that they quickly escalate to the point where the parties only concerns are victory and self-defense. In these cases, the moral arguments of people who are being unjustly treated become irrelevant. What matters is that they have used violent strategies and their opponent is, therefore, justified in a violent response. This problem is complicated by the fact that both sides are usually able to argue that the other side started the violence. Gandhi started this nonviolent approach in India, Martin Luther King learned from Gandhi’s tactics and used them in the 1950’s, and in 1989 the students in Tiananmen Square used the same approach. All of these people had success to some extent.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Non-violence is a concept that people participate in social and political change without violence. It is a form of social and political change between passive acceptances and armed struggle. Non-violence way to participate in the social and political change is including nonviolent civil disobedience against, acts of civil disobedience or other powerful influence uncooperative antagonistic form; it is similar with pacifism, but it is not pacifism. Since the mid-20th century, non-violence and civil disobedience become the main form of social change, and it also is respected political and social philosophy. As the practice of social and political change, non-violent has the essence difference with pacifism, it is contrary to the wishes of the oppressed, and it struggle with any injustice and power political. In my final paper, I will instruction three famous Non-violence movement leader: Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, and Nelson Mandela; and also I will compare the similar and difference between them.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Pacifism

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    People are pacifists for different reasons such as practical belief that war is wasteful and ineffective, their religious faith. Within the Just War Theory people have to take into…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    But if we want to develop non-violence, it is not enough to be conscious merely of the present events. We should be equally conscious of the prime instincts causing the events. Thus it is necessary in the present context to work for disarmament and banning wars. But it is not enough, for it is only like fighting a fire without discovering its causes. We have to do both things-- fight the fire that is raging and, more importantly, find out the factors that have caused it. Likewise, solving the existing problem of violence and discovering the basic cause of violence are equally necessary. People working in the field of non-violence are much less concerned about the latter and this, according to us, is the biggest impediment to the growth of non-violence.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thus, Ghandi 's non-violent individual must never cause harm to others. This person must not kill any living thing or harm it in any way. If we do harm other living things, we will reap the negative karma that comes with it. But this principle of non-violence does no stay in the realm of religion. Gandhi also argued that this principle can be applied to politics as well through non-violent satyagrahas.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This question is something that not to many people think about when it comes to violence. Violence is a horrible thing because of what it does to families but it’s also something that i believe to be somewhat necessary. Worldometers.info reports that the world population is growing at an alarming 80 million per year. While who.int reports that Nearly one third of the 5.8 million deaths from injuries a year are the result of violence. Our population is growing faster than it ever has. The amount of deaths that is caused by violence is almost necessary to have to help stop over population. Looking at population from this point of view is very strange but when thought out and the statistics are presented the whole thing makes sense. One last point is that violence is how we solve a lot of things. People say “violence never solved anything” but truly it has. People who decided that going a pacifist route instead of being violent are really no different. The only thing different is the tools being used to solve these problems. The belief that violence is something that can’t solve things is invalid. Just look at any war in the history of the human race. We solve almost every thing in a violent way in some degree. In the revolutionary war we disagreed with how britain was running our government and how invasive they were. How did we solve this? With a very violent rebellion against them. We solved that problem and gained our freedom with…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gandhi a Way of Life

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nonviolence is the greatest weapon against violence and also protects one’s self-respect and sense of honor. So its important for a human being to know the power of nonviolence, to learn it and to apply it in the life. It is becoming clear that at this dangerous moment in human history, the only hope for mankind is Mahatma Gandhi's principle of non-violence. According to me, Gandhiji’s message of non violence did not mean complete absence of violence, but also loving concern for all life. Gandhiji even developed a method of direct action called satyagarha(truth-force) based on the principle of non violence, truth and courage. Learning non violence is not a child’s play because it requires lots of patience. One who is learning non violence must learn to keep patience because it requires lot of patience in oneself, and it calls for acceptance of intense sufferings when it is being applied. Application of nonviolence means you should be having intense faith in God and yourself. Only then you…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion Essay - Peace

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The only time it is ok for a Muslim to use any sort of violence or aggression is in self-defense. Justice is also of high importance when considering a Muslim’s faith. Allowing aggressors and unjust people to be punished accordingly, unless they repent before they are brought to justice. In saying that, Islam encourages forgiveness, “But if they cease (fighting you), Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful” “To ensure that we always apply justice…” this is reflecting the need for inner sanctuary. If something is unjust, it will be fixed, and if by means of violence or war as a solution, so be it. The Qur’an also mentions that a Muslim should “respond to punishment with the same punishment” yet then it…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays