Preview

Does Fascism Take Issue With Marxian Socialism (Or Marxism?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
254 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Does Fascism Take Issue With Marxian Socialism (Or Marxism?
Ashlee Harris
Henderson/ HIST 1020
Mussolini on Fascism
October 14, 2016

1. What is the Fascist attitude toward pacifism, and why?
Fascists refuse to be apart of pacifism because they do not believe in the possibility of unity of everlasting peace, unlike the pacifists. Fascists feel that those who believe in war and will fight at war are much more honorable than those who do not.
2. In what specific respects does Fascism take issue with Marxism (or “Marxian Socialism”)?
Fascism takes issue with Marxism by saying that fascists deny the idea that separate classes or war between classes is the main reason society can’t transform. However, Marxian Socialists are against the idea of separate classes.
3. Why do Fascists not embrace democracy?
Fascists
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Dear Doug Research Paper
    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dear Doug Research Paper

    The difference in Marxism is the ideology of dialectical materialism, which says you have a thesis which is met with and antithesis to form a synthesis, which becomes the new thesis and it is met with another antithesis, and this process continues until a utopia is reached. A utopia is a state of life in which everything is perfect. Regular atheistic materialism is that matter is the sole reality and all things, beings and processes can be explained through science. Marxism’s basis for morality is anything for the prosper of the state and that might sound like an absolute because it is the overall goal the worldview, but each government that implements communism has different rules and regulations based upon the leader. Marxists tend to learn toward aggression, force, and lying for promotion of the…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes
    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    Karl Marx’s class conflict theory states that the bourgeoisie (or the capitalists) are locked in conflict with the proletariat (the exploited workers). Marx believed that this conflict could only end when the working class united and violently broke free of the “bondage”. Once this happens, society will be classless and people will work according to their abilities, while receiving goods and services according to their needs. Although Marxism does propose revolution, it should not be confused with communism.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Compatible Are Just War and Pacifism?
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Compatible Are Just War and Pacifism?

    Pacifists are people who oppose to any war and violence, they believe that killing and harming people is wrong and therefore all wars must be wrong too. They think war is unjust and that all conflicts should be settled in a peaceful manner.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pacifism Durring World War Ii
    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pacifism Durring World War Ii

    During the World War II battle some people believed that pacifism was the answer toward stopping it. George Orwell, one of the most important controversial writers during the twentieth century, was stunned and enraged at the people who believed pacifism would help end the war. How can someone expect to win by being pacifist when the enemy cannot be reasoned with? Orwell’s passionate antifascism during War World II led him into conflict with the liberal pacifist movement. This led him to attack back against active pacifist with his writings in the “London Letter”, a column in the American magazine Partisan Review .This addressed how pacifism during a war does nothing to stop the enemy but instead gives them the upper hand. Orwell’s assertion that pacifism during World War II aids the enemy is correct.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Communism And Fascism Similarities
    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Communism And Fascism Similarities

    Some people can have different opinions on communism and fascism. Communism is the proletariat. You have no social classes, no political movements, no economic ideology,and you don't even have any money. Also in communism there is no clear leader. Fascism often has one military leader. They are also head of government and could become a dictator. Also they tend to put the state ahead of the individual. Communism and Fascism are similar in a way because the leaders that were communist and the leaders that were fascist were basically doing the same thing just in a different way.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fascism vs. Communism
    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Fascism vs. Communism

    During the late 1920’s and 1930’s, Hitler and Stalin were leaders of Germany and the Soviet Union respectively. These states were under fascist and communist rule, which essentially were very similar. It was due to their full run of government that resulted in a dictatorial rule, also known as totalitarianism. Civilians’ lives were regulated in every aspect, some of which were their property and the military forces. Both parties used propaganda to bring awareness of their movement’s ideologies to their states in hopes that they would influence a large number of civilians, or if anything, all of them. The most comparable and recognizable aspect of fascism and communism was the fact that both Hitler and Stalin wanted a radical change for their states. In order to attain the transformation, violence was used on both their parts, which offended and anguished peoples lives. There are minor differences in relation to all of these examples; however, fascism and communism were essentially the same.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    ww2 vocab
    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ww2 vocab

    Fascists seek to forge a type of national unity, usually based on (but not limited to) ethnic, racial, cultural or religious groups.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Things They Carried
    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Things They Carried

    There are many people who instead of staying in the middle, gravitate to either end of the spectrum. Some who fall on the far right believe that war is extremely necessary and disregard the negative aspects all together. Pacifists say that war understand the cons of war but fail to realize the good that can come from the…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Russian Revolution's Response To World War I
    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Russian Revolution's Response To World War I

    In other words, fascists, being nationalist, were appalled by the communist desire for international unity among workers. In the fascist opinion, people were citizens of their own countries above all else, not citizens of an international community. When communism achieved its international goal after the Russian Revolution by spreading to countries like Spain, fascism emerged to counter communism’s international goals with violent nationalism. Not all dissidents to Russia’s communism chose violence,…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Assess the contribution of Marxism to our understanding of families and households
    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess the contribution of Marxism to our understanding of families and households

    Marxists are all in agreement that there are several functions of the family that are fulfilling for capitalism. Marxism is a believer in the separation of classes and the oppression of the lower working class. Marxists would argue that capitalist society is separated in to two social classes.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Communism And Fascism
    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Communism And Fascism

    In communism the government has all the power. It takes everything people own and shares it evenly with everyone. The idea is that everyone is equal and social classes do not exist. The government owns all land and industries, people work for the government and the end result is collected and shared between everyone. Meanwhile Fascism is the agreement of the business and the state. The state tells the business what to produce or sell, but the owner still privately owns everything. Another difference is that in a Communist society everyone is equal therefore the government is ruled by people, on the other hand in Fascism a leader has all the…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Populism Important To Economic Grievances?
    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Is Populism Important To Economic Grievances?

    The root of their difference is their economic power. Just like Norris and Inglehart mention, “ Stimulated by fears of downward mobility and loss of social status, fascist parties and extremist movements were thought to tap fears and insecurities…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Fascism In America
    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fascism In America

    Fascism resembles communism. But unlike communism, which calls for the government to own all industry, fascism allows industry to remain in private ownership, though under government control. Other important features of fascism include extreme patriotism, warlike policies, and…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxist and functionalist perspectives on social scales and structure
    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Marxist and functionalist perspectives on social scales and structure

    Marxism, the structural conflict sociological theory is a very significant chapter in sociology. It was founded by Karl Marx who believed strongly in communism. Marxism is understood as the theory and practice of working class self-emancipation. This theoretical and political tradition is radically different from the way Marxism is generally described by both critics and many 'adherents' who identify Marxism with the repressive state capitalist regimes that used to dominate Russia and eastern Europe and still hold sway in China, North Korea, Vietnam and Cuba.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Compare and Contrast Any Two Sociological Theories and Briefly Evaluate Them.
    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Any Two Sociological Theories and Briefly Evaluate Them.

    Marxism shares in common with functionalism the macro structural approach to society, looking at it as a whole, however a key difference between the two theories is that marxism is a conflict perspective, that is the conflict of class between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat also known as the ruling and working classes. The work of Karl Marx in the mid 1800s constitutes the main body of this conflict theory, he wrote that the central institution of capitalist society is private property, the system by which capital (money, machines, factories and other material objects) is controlled by a small minority of the population, leading to opposed classes i.e. the bourgeoisie and the proletariat (Cohen 1978). Marxists believe that society is based on ascribed status which is given by birth or family background, therefore the bourgeoisie pass down their land and properties to their children, keeping the wealth in the…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics