Preview

Courts: Fiction vs. Reality

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1234 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Courts: Fiction vs. Reality
Fiction 2 Americans depend a great deal on entertainment to educate them about life. In several ways Americans live vicariously through the actors and actresses on television and believe themselves to learn many things from those actors and actresses. For example, many people have said they learned medical techniques by watching medical shows on television or believe they would know what to do in a medical emergency because they have seen it done on television. The same goes for Americans’ knowledge about Court hearings and the judicial system. Many things are done on television by actors playing lawyers or judges that are done just for the purpose of entertainment. “Reality-based” Court shows such as Judge Judy, People’s Court and Divorce Court dominate television ratings every day. Because the judicial system is not well understood by most people or learned in school or explained by the media, people often only have television accounts of the judicial process to educate them. This has resulted in the majority of Americans having distorted beliefs about law, courts, and the trial process. One of the major differences between fictional portrayals of the court process and reality is how the trial process is portrayed. In reality, trials are not fast-paced, exciting procedures. They are long and boring procedures. Attorneys debate for hours, present their evidence, and ask questions that only make sense to the judge or other attorneys. Many things are said and many witnesses may be brought in to testify. It is very rare that anything exciting actually happens. Trials portrayed in movies such as A Time to Kill or Runaway Jury, have us believe that shocking facts are discovered and quick thinking attorneys make major differences in trial outcomes. They misrepresent reality by showing crafty defense attorneys suddenly calling a witness or presenting evidence that instantly
Fiction 3 proves the defendant is innocent. In reality, trials do



References: TruTV. Crime Library. 2008. Retrieved February 26, 3009 from http://www.trutv.com/index.html#link=splash History. Bernard Goetz Goes on the Lam. 2008. Retrieved February 27, 2009 from http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&id=1227 Meyer, J. and Grant, D. Pearson Education. The Courts in our Criminal Justice System. Chapters 1-15. 2003.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Court Systems Paper

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Within the U.S. each state has a court system with a lower court, an appellate court and a Supreme Court that functions similar to the Supreme Court of the U.S. Four levels exist within the State Court: The lower court also known as the court of limited Jurisdiction which represents the first level in which minor cases are seen. Citizens whom are accused of not paying parking fines, those accused of prostitution, DUI and those accused of disorderly conduct in public are also tried in this court.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Casey Anthony Case Study

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The phrase “show trial” now means something different – it means a trial that is a show. That’s precisely what O.J. and Casey Anthony were about. The provision of the Constitution that requires a public trial is now used to ensure that trials become media circuses. Should we embrace the European inquisitorial system, in which judges ask the questions and come up with the decisions? Should we hire professional…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone thinks they have it exactly right on TV shows like Law and Order or CSI. Someone commits a crime, is charged and found guilty all in an hour or two. For many crimes this is not the case, the offender may never be found, or someone maybe falsely convicted. It all hinges on a set of people. The judge, the defense attorney and the prosecutor. All of which are not perfect like the US Judicial System, and justice is not always served. Individual rights are violated due to prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance by criminal defense counsel, and judicial misconduct. In some instances, the guilty…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    LS308 Unit 9

    • 1694 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are different models of criminal courts that help society understand how they should work. These models consist of the adversarial and consensual models. The most familiar model is the adversarial model. This is also called the combat model. “In this model, the prosecutor and defense attorney ‘fight it out’ by vigorously contesting the evidence before a judge acting as a neutral referee over the proceedings” (Steven Barkan, Law and Society: An Introduction, 279-280. Pearson Education, Inc. 2009). In most cases, a consensual model is used. This can be done by a good deal of cooperation with the prosecution and the defense. “Fighting it out” is a way to slow down processing of a case, especially when the main goal is to get through most cases as quickly as possible. According to Law and Society, “the adversarial model largely operates for only…

    • 1694 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For fans of courtroom dramas and crime television, these court case movies all revolve around the courtroom. Unlike the orderly process of a real courtroom, the stories are filled with drama, intrigue and corruption. Getting to the truth is seldom as straightforward as it appears within these hit movies.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This same belief extends to Americans’ knowledge about the law and the judicial system of the nation. There are many things that fictional accounts of lawyers, judges, and courts confuse, muddle or simply make-up to meet the needs of their fictional account. Because the intricacies of the legal profession are not well known or explained in school or by the media, people often only have these fantastic accounts of the law to educate them to how it works “in the real world”. Consequently, the result is that the majority of Americans have incorrect beliefs of the law, judges, courts, and the persons that comprise our system. One of the main differences between fictional depictions of the court process and real thing is how a trial is portrayed. In reality, trials are long, boring procedures where attorneys debate, present evidence, and ask questions that have legal value for the judge or jury to arrive at a decision. Many things are said and many witnesses may be brought forth to make statements. It is only rarely during these proceedings that anything exciting actually happens. But, if one were to believe the portrayal in movies and on television, it seems as if every minute is interesting or exciting. Trials presented in movies such as “Sleepers” or “To Kill a Mockingbird”, make it seem as if shocking facts are revealed, surprise witnesses are discovered and quick thinking attorneys make major differences in every trial outcome. This simply…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Neubauer, D.W. (2004). America 's Courts and the Criminal Justice System. Published by Thomson Wadsworth Criminal courts/ United States…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Schmalleger, F. (2011). Criminal Justice Today: An introductory text for the twenty-first century (11th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court History and Purpose

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Siegel, L. J., Schmalleger, F., & Worrall, J. L. (2011). Courts and Criminal Justice in America. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Best Defense Analysis

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Even the guilty have a right to a trial because it is the essence of the American criminal justice system (Dershowitz, 2013). Essentially, the text suggests, by way of actual court cases, that non-lawyers believe courtrooms are unequivocally fair and just, but when Dershowitz wins some of his cases, it is undeniable that a portion of his clients were actually guilty. Subsequently, Dershowitz’s ability to own up to his roles in guilty client cases demonstrates the defense attorney’s reality. Within his chosen court cases, Dershowitz (1983) is able to reveal the judicial system’s corruption and their ability to look the other way, when it suits them, in their inherent need to…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trial Judges are appointed to ensure justice in courtroom proceedings. Judges are also responsible with safeguarding both rights of the accused, and interests of the public. By doing so, this keeps the prosecutor grounded by making sure guilt is established of the accused as required by criminal law. The workgroup interact with each other daily. While the judge oversees the procedure, the prosecutor, defense attorney, and public defenders help to create a visual that is easy for the judge to see what happened. Prosecuting attorneys are the primary representatives of the people, by virtue of belief that the accused violated a criminal law and that the public knows about it. The defense attorney represents the accused by making sure that the defendant’s civil…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Schmalleger, F. (2011). Criminal Justice Today: An introductory text for the twenty-first century (11th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ. Pearson Prentice Hall…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Schmalleger, F. (2011). Criminal justice today: An introductory text for the 21st century (11th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall…

    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American legal system has never experience the magnitude of attention it currently receives. With the prevalence of social media and increased news coverage, the American population has a greater awareness of the decisions made on the most controversial issues in the legal system. As public outcry continues regarding the decisions and failures of the system, there must be a response. The public opinion signifies that the citizens are desperate for a fair and trustworthy legal system. American citizens want the legal system to be a symbol of the justice America stands for as well as a means to help continue the vision that the founders of the United States desired.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court Systems

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The modern dual system of courts incorporates both federal and state or local courts. This system is the product of many years of gradual development. Outside this formally established structure, however, personal relationships between key court participants can guide court proceedings and procedures. This paper will examine the history of the criminal courts, the dual system of the United States and modify the difference between the historical development and the dual court system of the United States.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics