Preview

Courtroom work group week 3

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1422 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Courtroom work group week 3
Courtroom Work Group
Alfreda Simmons
CJA/204
12/13/14
Mary Ellen Frias
Courtroom Work Group
There are many parts of the courtroom work group professionals who successfully pursuit justice and the process of convicting a criminal. The courtroom work group has a major role in convicting and finalizing a case. In the courtroom work group, there are three groups of people that hold the entire courtroom together. Without the work group, the courtroom would not flow, and coming to a conclusion to the case would not be as easy. The work group is made up of the Judge, the Defense Attorney, Public Defender, Court Recorders, and the Prosecutor Attorney. Which all are part of the courtroom work group which they work together to reach a decision, in the case by interacting among themselves and who’s involved an implicit recognition and rule of civility, cooperation, and sharing their goals. There are many roles in the work group, and if they are not all followed through with then the results could be different than what they should be. In this paper, we will look at the roles of the prosecutor, how the criminal justice funnel effects the courtroom work group and what will help eliminate the funnel and reduce the backlog of cases.
The courtroom work group is composed of various people who make the court systems work to the best of their ability. Each person has its position, and she/he is responsible for their part. We can start from the top, first we have a Judge, he/she is responsible for imposing the proper judging techniques in the courtroom, and they are to make sure the accused rights are not violated in the courtroom. Then we have a defense attorney, and the defense attorney is to defend his client against any wrongdoing by the court and prove his client is innocent of the charges being brought to him/her.
A defense attorney can either be hired by the client, or the courts can appoint one to the accused. Prosecutors are there to represent the people and that



References: American Bar Association. (2014). Schmalleger, F. (2011). Criminal justice today: An introductory text for the 21st century (11th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall Chapter 9: The Courts: Structure and ParticipantsISBN: 9780135074091 Author: Frank Schmalleger Copyright © Pearson Education (2011)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Courtroom Workgroup

    • 1217 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Courtroom Structure A courtroom work group is made up of a judge, bailiffs, prosecution, defense counsel, court clerks, court reporters, and expert witnesses. In other words, they are “professional” courtroom personnel. Also present in a courtroom for a trial are nonprofessional participants like witnesses and jurors. This team works together to carry out justice. The courtroom work group is guided by statutory requirements and ethical guidelines, and its members are typically dedicated to bringing the trial and other courtroom procedures to a close (Schmalleger, 2011). Fairness must be present in cases handled.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Work Group The courtroom work group is known to keep the courtroom in order, and to successfully help bring the procedure to a close. Courtroom work groups are made up of professionals such as a judge, prosecutor, defense attorneys, public defenders, and others such as bailiff and court reporters. These players work together and help to prosecute those who’ve committed crimes for the overall wellbeing of society. This work group also serves to deter criminals from becoming repeat offenders, or from committing other crimes. The most important function of the courtroom work group is to make sure that the court is responsible for using laws created by the government to help the wellbeing of the citizens within society. In some cases, similar beliefs help the courtroom work group to carry out certain sentencing. Haynes (2010) “In addition, the relationships between individuals involved in sentencing—the judge, prosecutor, and defense attorney—may be important because of shared beliefs about what constitutes appropriate sentencing. These individuals, who together form the courtroom workgroup, share a common task environment and work together to achieve the common goal of disposing of cases.”…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The prosecutor has a very important role as a member of the courtroom workgroup. The prosecutor may also be known as the district attorney, states attorney, or the commonwealth attorney (Schmalleger, 2011). The prosecutor is responsible for making and presenting the case of the state against the accused. In their own way the prosecutor speaks on behalf of the people, for the law or laws broken by the defendant. The…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Professional Ethical Standards in Criminal Justice Careers While researching a growing number of career potentials in the field of criminal justice, one sticks out more than the others. The field of practicing law and being a lawyer certainly created more interest than some of the others. An attorney has an interesting job, and the side of the law he/she chooses to practice proposes different ethical situations that would create potential dilemmas in everyday situations. Attorneys are people that are sometimes charged with the way other people’s lives are affected. With so many different areas of law to study, this paper will address the field of a defense attorney.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper going to be coving the materials we went over in the You make the Call: Discretion in Criminal Justice Courtroom Workgroup simulation. You are the new assistance prosecutor for the DA Office. You are faced with problem solving and what action are taking to the choices you make in your new position as the assistance prosecutor. In this paper it will describe the problem you faced in the simulation. Also this paper will explain the approaches used for resolving the problem. Last it will discuss how critical or creative thinking skills were used or not used in the simulation.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roles in the Courtroom

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Next are the Defense Attorney and the Prosecution whose duties and responsibilities are basically the same. They must gather and present evidence to the jury to discredit or give reasonable doubt that a crime was or wasn’t committed. The Defense is there to advice his client on the right plea to take. He is also there to make sure his client understands what is going on and make sure his client gets a fair and speedy trial. Other than that their duties are the same. They both are there to discredit the other. They both participate in jury selection and establish witnesses that will benefit their case. Both are responsible for presenting their…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First there needs to be some basic knowledge about the courtroom and how it is setup when key personal are present and understanding their roles keeping in mind how a jury is affected in that they are expected to keep an open mind when making an unbiased decision regarding the defendant. A criminal courtroom environment is uniquely different than just your everyday typical courtroom such as small claims, workers’ comp and unemployment appeals; in that attorneys are not present and are not allowed in a small claims courtroom. Bailiffs are not present in most workers’ comp cases or unemployment appeals cases. However across the country upon entering a courtroom right away you feel a presence of some sort of higher archery a sense of a governing of our great land of honor and respect towards the laws of our country. As you walk into a criminal courtroom you notice several immediate things; its quiet there is no talking allowed among one another except by the judge and attorneys and if you need to say something next to the person to you; you are allowed to whisper but cannot hold a conversation whispering you must leave out of the courtroom entirely to hold a…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    role before, during, and after a trial. Prosecutors also handle investigations, plead bargains, questioning both jurors, and witnesses, and being involved through the…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judge is a public officer who hears and decides cases in a court of law. The defendant is the person being accused of a crime and his or attorney (defense attorney) is the person fighting to pursue there innocence in a court of law. The prosecutor represents the state and is responsible for presenting all evidence…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A criminal defense attorney plays the role of defending a person who was accused of committing a crime. They are either hired by the defendant or appointed by the court if the defendant cannot afford one (Dunning). A good defense attorney tries to get their client out on bail, and tries to talk to the district attorney about reducing or dropping charges. The main job for defense attorneys is to protect their client’s rights and to defend them in court ("The Criminal Justice…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prosecution Vs. Defense

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Prosecution versus Defense Within the walls of any courtroom exemplified is the adversarial system of the United States of America between prosecutors and attorneys. In a logical sense, both roles and responsibilities are somewhat similar but contrasting.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Room Particiapants

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Courtroom Participants’ Professional Standards Nidia Allan CJA/224 10/24/12 Most people like to think that the Just system is perfect and does what is best for the people. In some cases it’s true however that is not always the case; Judges, Prosecutors, and Defense Attorneys are held at a high standard and help to determine the futures of people that commit crimes and provide justice for victims. It is important for everyone to understand that Judges, Prosecutors, and Attorneys are human and make mistakes and bad choices as we all do. I will talk about articles I’ve researched that show Prosecutorial misconduct, Ineffective assistance by criminal defense counsel, and Judicial misconduct.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper Eileen Ritter CJA/204 July 7, 2014 Carlos Zuniga Courtroom Workgroup Paper One of the important roles a judge, a criminal prosecutor, and a criminal defense attorney will carry out is called, a “courtroom work group”. The courtroom work group interact on a daily basis by these three entities joining together to converse over matters such as if the case has probable cause to convict the offender or whether or not if there is enough evidence to go forward with a criminal trial. Normally, the prosecutor will try to persuade the defense that they do not have a case or try to talk the defense into a guilty plea or possible bail. In other words, anything they can do to speed up the process with various types of negotiations. The judge has to remain ethical and fair to see both sides of the prosecution and defense to determine if the negotiations are valid enough to go through with. Even though the judge, prosecutor, and defense attorney are the main officials of the courtroom work group, we cannot forget about other members that play a part as well. The minor (respectfully) members or other members that make up a courtroom work group are the court clerk, the bailiff, and the court reporter. The court clerk upholds all the records while the court reporter makes sure he/she transcribes the official proceedings. The bailiff helps to keep court order throughout a trial. Although I can understand how the main officers discuss the case and try to solve it without a trial, I feel that every case should be heard. The major problem with this though is time and money. In order for every offender to have a case without the prosecutor trying to convince the defense into something else, there would have to be a lot more courthouses with a lot more main officers. The only way this would ever happen is to hike up the taxes and no one wants their taxes to increase.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Players

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the United States criminal justice system, a courtroom work group is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officer. This is a foundational concept in the academic discipline of the criminal justice system. Everyone in the courtroom group tries to get along. Often they act as if they are good friends. Although the members of the court group are against each other, at the end of the day justice is being served in the courtroom regardless of the gender, race, or national origin. The role of the prosecutor is to represent the government and prove the defendant is guilty of the crime. Prosecutors participate in, jury selection; opening statements, direct examination, cross-examination, and closing arguments. The prosecutor also makes sure that the jurors can be fair as well. Prosecutors are able to determine which cases to work by confirming if perhaps the case has merit, and sufficient evidence to purse a conviction. If the criteria for taking a case were more or less stringent, it would make the police officers job a lot harder by having to go more in depth then what they have to go through nowadays, and this is due to the prosecutor having to prove even more evidence beyond a reasonable doubt in court. Nonetheless, if the criteria for taking of a case were less stringent I think that the officers and the prosecutors jobs would be too easy to prove if someone is guilty, and it would not give a defendant a fair trail. Perhaps the change that I would make to the courtroom work group would be that, many people believe that the courtroom work group should consider adding more security. Though out the years several cases…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The prosecutor is responsible for presenting the states evidence and preparing the states case against the accused. It is up to the prosecuting attorney to determine which cases should be pursued and which to let the charges drop. The prosecutor makes these decisions based on a variety of criteria. They will look at the evidence against the accused, the crime itself, the history of the accused as well as many other factors.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays