Preview

Counterargument and Peaceful Species

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
721 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Counterargument and Peaceful Species
IGCSE English as a First Language – The Winchester School, Dubai

Ishita Sharma – 11G
Argumentative writing: “Humans are a peaceful species at heart” How far do you agree?

Are humans a peaceful species at heart? It’s a difficult task to pick a clear side but many people have many opinions. There are various people who will say yes, humans are a peaceful species at heart but there are equally many people who would say no. After all, it is a broad topic concerning an unpredictable species. One strong argument in support of this statement would be that if we weren’t a peaceful species how would we co-exist in such a large population in places like mega cities. Furthermore, criminals exist in a minority, how can that tip the scales and make us think that we are a violent species. Also, if we were so violent, why would we organize charities for people we don’t even know? Why would donations exist? If we were not cooperative how would generations of scientists from all over the world discover things such as the atom, medicines etc. The counter-argument to that would be that we could just be cooperating for selfish reasons or from fear of justice. There are many who are against this statement and have just as many points to justify their opinion. The most important point is that if we were so peaceful, why are there such things as wars? A minority of criminals, which is slowly rising, have the ability to kill innocent people, are they not humans too? Why is it that weapons such as guns which were invented to protect the innocent, are now being used to kill them? Terrorism and racism, in other words hatred, have consumed many defenceless beings. It is in human nature in fact, to be aggressive. In our history, there have been massive blood baths for selfish reasons such as a quest for power and even natural resources. We are the reason that the Earth may suffer another Ice Age as we are destroying it on a daily basis. Could it not be that it is a fear of being

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The movie started in a flashback to the fake trial. The boys were all playing a game after Gene found his room. Finny came up with all the rules in both the book and the movie. Leper came up with the name of Blitzball in the movie, but in the book Finny did. After Finny’s accident when Gene was in visiting him, the doc came in and cut the visit short in the book and the movie. The doctor also sends Finny home in both meaning the Summer Session is almost over anyways.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We are living in a time of violence and hatred toward other races instead of taking the time to learn about the uniqueness and diversity of their cultures. Political greed of some of our modern leaders has taken priority over helping their nations people and economies. What could possibly have influenced us so greatly as to generate this anger and hostility amongst our own kind? Are we willing to cause the suffering of others to establish our own nations supremacy? When did we stop caring who or how our governments are run? Do we even care what is happening in the broken world around us or are we too focused on our own greed? Adolf Hitler convinced a whole nation that his intentions were good. Consider where that led Germany. Our world is not…

    • 3432 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While it doesn't reflect badly on individual peoples and society, on human nature as a whole, it does. When cut down to our core, is humankind this violent and hateful? Are we inertly good of bad? This is a question that fueled philosophers for ages and will be continued to be done…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Large Ant

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 2012, 16259 people in the United States were murdered and another 1.8 million people were sent to the hospital due to assault. Humans resorting to violence and harming others is a daily occurrence, but why? Is it in our nature, are we instinctively violent, and why is it that these acts are not only happening in the United States but worldwide. Although the average person does not leave their home planning on harming somebody that day, under the right circumstances almost every single person in this world will commit an act of violence. Sometimes these acts are justified, such as when we are trying to protect ourselves or a loved one, but what about the smaller acts that we all do every day. Whether it is killing the spider you see crawling on the wall, or the bee flying around simply trying to do its job. We do not see these as acts of violence but in there essence they are. Why is it that our first instinct is to kill them when they are not causing us any harm? Howard Fast builds on this idea within the theme of his short story The Large Ant, where the narrator kills a creature that resembles an ant, purely out of instinct.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We have stepped away from being our animal-like selves. We don't kill someone if they come and take our pencil or something like that. Instead we learned to communicate and trust each other to not kill us. For example, when I walk down the street the I trust the…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The central idea of the poem “The Peace of Wild Things”, by Wendell Berry, is that you should live in the present and don’t stress about the future. Wendell Berry describes how people shouldn’t stress about the future by saying, “I come into peace of wild things who do not tax their lives with forethought…” The author is explaining how he feels peace when he goes out in nature, and in times of injustice or worry, when he needing to feel free. The theme of this quote is that he feels peace when he goes out into the nature with the wild things who do not have forethought about the future, which comforts and relaxes him. When Berry wrote this poem, the message he was trying to get across is that it is important to live in the present, and no…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since Huxley feels that war is not a natural state, then war can be avoided all together. Huxley states that there are a couple biological reasons that war is not natural. Firstly, he dismisses the claim that since man is a descendent from aggressive ancestors like the gorilla, therefore war is inevitable (250). Huxley dismisses this claim by stating, “Most zoologists are now of the opinion that man’s ancestor was not a gorilla-like ape, but a gentle, sensitive creature, something like a tarsier” (250). Since humans are descendants of a peaceful creature then when and where did they develop to be violent? The answer to this question is unknown using Huxley’s opinion of ancestry. With that said, he is using this claim to argue that humans did…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From the beginning of time conflict has always existed. When conflict is confronted, majority of the time it is answered with violence. The definition of violence from The Oxford Dictionary is "the use of force to cause injury, damage, or death." Violence can come in all forms and may or may not be intended. World history teaches that violence influences wars the most. A simple act of violence can have a big impact on people and how they react to it. Almost always when a violent act is committed it is answered with even more violence. From person to person the reason for violence will be different. Commonly it is because of revenge or anger. However that might not be true for everyone or every war. In "A People 's History of the United…

    • 4023 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the millennia, wars have defined nations and society, carving the very history of humanity. Even today, in particular conditions, we found ourselves susceptible to the innate nature of war. It was not uncommon that much of these involved the brutal and unrelenting slaughter of man, much of which went ultimately unpunished. This would imply that during war, there is a void of our previously held value for human life, finding our justification for war a greater cause. If so then, what is a just war? How can we justify hypocritically killing human life in war if we denounce it so much?…

    • 401 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think that humans are essentially good because of our common peaceful human nature. There are several circumstances in which we can prove that both of these sides are correct. In any culture and society, developed or undeveloped, civilized or uncivilized, there are sick and brutal crimes committed everyday, along with good acts also being done.. This includes countries that don’t even have laws, some people do evil just to do it, and some people do it unwillingly. Humans have two sides and if I had to guess, I would say that a majority are good compared to the bad, but we still have bad. Terrorism and brutal acts done to innocents show that there is bad in our world, but I would say we are essentially good and I am going to explain why I feel this way.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Mankind Evil?

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mankind is evil. The basic notation of this sentence is no one can be trusted completely, even though someone seems nice everyone has a streak of evil inside, even if they don't want to admit it. I agree with this statement based on a couple of things. First, if mankind wasn't evil why hasn't crime stopped? Everyday theres a new shooting and murder that gains national coverage, but not all stories get much if at all coverage. Last year in the United States there were 4.7 homicides per 100,000 people. A truly “nice” society would have had crime stopped or at least down sized and less violent by now, and obviously ours has not. Second, if the world were so great why don't we (mankind) not trust other humans? if the we as a society were a better place we wouldn't be cautious,non trusting or even blatantly scared of other human beings based on their looks, clothes, or other features. In conclusion, I do agree with the fact that mankind as a whole is evil, and hopefully someday we will be able to overcome it. The views of human nature have changed throughout the centuries. In the Middle Ages man was thought to have many flaws, and when the black plague came it was considered to be a punishment for all of man’s evil doings or that is what many believed. This was during a time period with a very basic understanding of the world, and yet these peoples conscious told them that by taking the lives of others they could save themselves. The poor treatment of people during the Industrial revolution as well as during World War I showed that people would never change their selfish ways. It was the realities of the Industrial Revolution that started to etch away the fantasies that were born during the Enlightenment. Historians mark the beginning of World War I the end official end of the Enlightenment because if is the time when all philosophers gave up hope in any good in humanity. How could anyone allow for such a catastrophe? Throughout…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Are humans naturally evil

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Are humans moral or immoral? This is a tough question seeing that what is thought as immoral to one person can be seen as ethical to another, and vice versa. This is because of the difference in the way humans perceive things, which is part of the complexity of mankind. “During the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition called war; and such a war as is of every man, against every man.” (Hobbes) In this quote Hobbes states that humans are naturally evil and need a powerful government to control them. In an analysis of transcendentalist literature, it is proven that humans are not naturally evil.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    War's Evolution

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    We have fought millions of wars between ourselves and no war has ended all wars. We fight it for millions of reasons and can only be justifiable by ourselves. The million times we fought have really brought the worst of humanity. In every war there is no rule book, no proper rules of engagement, no rules that could contain the bloodiness of war. For these reason war is an uncontrollable fire that engulfs anything in its path with no slight twitch of remorse. We have killed billions of our kind, men, women and children were shown no mercy as they were shot, stabbed, burned, gas chambered and left to bleed or rot…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Race

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Is the human race cruel or just selfish? The human race is one of many distinct species in the world. Human beings share most of their traits and behaviors with other animals. The act of cruelty and violence to one another is one of the behaviors that humans differ from animals. In the essay “The Lowest Animal” (1896), Mark Twain claims that man can be cruel and wasteful in his lifetime. Although his statement does not imply to all humans, the moral sense enables us to do wrong. With the proof of news reports and media it is evident that man is cruel to animals, the society and to their household.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Man Good or Evil?

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Is Man inherently good or evil? This is a question that many philosophers, psychologists, and scientists have questioned for centuries. According to Thomas Hobbes men are created so alike that there difference in their strengths and weaknesses are no significant. For example if two men desire a thing they wouldn’t be able to attain it simultaneously, hence they become enemies. The pleasures to achieve the thing sometimes lead their actions to suppress one another in order for him to become satisfied. Man continues to look for power until no other being can overpower him, until he feels safe and contented. According to him the three primary causes of clashes between men are competition, diffidence, and glory. For that reason during the time when men have unequal authority or power they are at a time of conflict. According to another philosopher Nina Rosenstand man is fundamentally selfish. Man has the ability to do acts of greed and generosity. But according to Rosenstand these acts of generosity are done to delight and for us to feel good of ourselves. On the other hand it is stated by Peter Kropotkin that man is basically good because how would primitive mankind survive and develop without any mutual support and unity among the early man. Assistance and cooperation are essential characteristics of the human nature that lead to our survival. In different religions around the world the virtue of compassion is taught. Mencius said that man is born good it is just because of life and the environment that we become bad. He believes that we are good because of our conscience, the human nature, and intuition or instinct. Socrates believes that our ignorance/lack of knowledge leads us to wrongdoing; no person does bad things intentionally.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays