Compare the Process of Indpendance in at Least Two Latin American Countries, What Was Different and Why?
Compare the process of indpendance in at least two latin American countries, what was different and why?
Without a doubt the catalyst for all polictiacal and economics change in south America in the niteenth and eighteenth century was the weakening and finaly destruction of the spansih colonial rule. The insavasion of napoleon created a crisis of crowns legitanacy, this subsequently resulted in the start or revolutions all over south America. Society in both argentian and mexico reacted in similar ways, society divided creating different political functions which douted the legitimacy of the junta. In Argentina an invasion of the british weaken crowns authority, the currenty viceroy Rafael de sobremonte appointed by the king fled during the conflict. After the conflict and the retreatment of the british Rafael de sobremonte was not allow to regain power. An open cabildo appointed a no viceroy Santiago de liniers this was the first time a viceroy had been appointed by local insistuation and not by the king. However he was latter approved by the king. The capture of in 1808 trigered the start large amounts of political opposition to liniers, mostly down to him creating the supreme and governing junta of the kingdom. This divided the viceroyalty in to factions with different political views. On the one hand the conservatives who believed that Spanish rule should remain, and liberals who supported liniers actions. The first person to take his oppositions into action was Franciso Javier de elio who appointed himself head of junta in Montevideo. Along with Martin de alzagar they organised a mutiny again Liniers. The mutiny was however deafeated by Liniers as he had backing from the military who initially had approved the appointment of the liniers as the viceroy. On the other hand in mexico the viceroy jose de inturrigarray was appointed directly from the king, when he and oppostunity to strenghthen his authority because of the collapse of the monarch. He
Without a doubt the catalyst for all polictiacal and economics change in south America in the niteenth and eighteenth century was the weakening and finaly destruction of the spansih colonial rule. The insavasion of napoleon created a crisis of crowns legitanacy, this subsequently resulted in the start or revolutions all over south America. Society in both argentian and mexico reacted in similar ways, society divided creating different political functions which douted the legitimacy of the junta. In Argentina an invasion of the british weaken crowns authority, the currenty viceroy Rafael de sobremonte appointed by the king fled during the conflict. After the conflict and the retreatment of the british Rafael de sobremonte was not allow to regain power. An open cabildo appointed a no viceroy Santiago de liniers this was the first time a viceroy had been appointed by local insistuation and not by the king. However he was latter approved by the king. The capture of in 1808 trigered the start large amounts of political opposition to liniers, mostly down to him creating the supreme and governing junta of the kingdom. This divided the viceroyalty in to factions with different political views. On the one hand the conservatives who believed that Spanish rule should remain, and liberals who supported liniers actions. The first person to take his oppositions into action was Franciso Javier de elio who appointed himself head of junta in Montevideo. Along with Martin de alzagar they organised a mutiny again Liniers. The mutiny was however deafeated by Liniers as he had backing from the military who initially had approved the appointment of the liniers as the viceroy. On the other hand in mexico the viceroy jose de inturrigarray was appointed directly from the king, when he and oppostunity to strenghthen his authority because of the collapse of the monarch. He