Preview

Company Law Directors Duties 1 Lecture 5

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1712 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Company Law Directors Duties 1 Lecture 5
Directors Duties 1

Types of directors: Ordinary, de facto, shadow directors and non executive directors.
Table A section 80 is the cornerstone of corporate governance.
Gives the directors powers to act as they see fit for the benefit of the company.

Directors have a FIDUCIARY relationship with the company – trust and confidence. The distinguishing obligation of a fiduciary is the OBLIGATION OF LOYALTY.
Shadow directors – not appointed by the board – have a decisive say in managing from a distance. Other directors do not have to accept their advice – but must be ACCUSTOMED to doing so. It does not count if advice is being provided from a professional capacity.
Case Law: Fyffes plc V DCC – argued Flavin was a shadow director of DCC. HELD: not a shadow director.
A company can be a shadow director of another company.
Fyffes case: HELD that DCC was probably a shadow director of Lotus green.
De Facto directos: Act as directors without having been appointed – may be deemed to be a director and share their duties.
Shareholders cannot interfere with directors functions unless they alter the articles or remove the director. Directors can take decisions against the majority of shareholders. Articles give directors certain powers and shareholders cannot disregard these. But where NO SUCH POWERS ARE GIVEN, then shareholders can direct members to do or refrain from certain acts.
Case Law: Ryanair V aer lingus 2011 – owned 30%. Directors refused to table resolution. Held: Directors had ultimate authority.
Members resume control when: No capable directors can act. (no official directors, directors become deadlocked, refuse to discuss business matters etc.)
When directors exceed their authority: - up to the shareholders to ratify action or take action against director.
Case Law: Bamford V Bamford – Director allots shares for an IMPROPER PURPOSE. Shareholders could ratify the decision or make him pay for the shares.
Leading Irish authority on shadow directors: Case law:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    LP6.2 Lien v. Lien

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    F. What allegations did Bruce Lien assert his complaint in the civil action that he brought against the corporation and the other members of the board of directors in April 2000?…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    of Directors, which was called and held in accordance with the law and the bylaws of the Corporation,…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Outcome. Under Delaware law the plaintiffs had to create a reasonable doubt about the disinterestedness or independence of a majority of the board. The court decided that the shareholder derivative suit could proceed without a demand on the board because the allegations raised a reasonable doubt as to the disinterestedness of six of the ten directors (five members of the Audit Committee plus one board member who was also the CEO).…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Answear

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A) A shareholder could commence an action on behalf of the corporation against the director if he gets the court's permission to do so.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    8. May a director of a proprietary company that has a material personal interest in a matter that relates to the affairs of a company be present at the meeting of the vote on matters that relate to the interest?…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Economics Quiz

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the Delaware Supreme Court, when does the role of a director shift from being a “protector of the corporate bastion” to being an “auctioneer” charged with obtaining the highest realizable short-term value for the shareholders?…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Common Stock

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (d) Stockholders have the right to elect the firm's directors, who in turn select the officers who manage the business. If stockholders are dissatisfied with management's performance, an outside group may ask the stockholders to vote for it in an effort to take control of the business. This action is called a tender offer.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law

    • 3089 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The most general obligation of a director is the duty of acting in good faith. This requires a director to always discharge the responsibilities of the office of director honestly, conscientiously, and fairly. It also requires a director to make decisions for the corporations that are in the best interests of all the corporation's shareholders and not for the advantage or benefit of one group over another.…

    • 3089 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    II. None of the members of such board of directors in this scenario have authority to collect any sort of information from management, resultantly their recommendations could only be based on what management had…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fiduciary and Company

    • 2683 Words
    • 11 Pages

    According to the general law and the Corporations Act ss181 -184, as fiduciaries, the directors must have the fairness, loyalty and good faith when they implement the discretions and powers entitled to them. They cannot use their position of trust to benefit themselves at the expenses of the business without the company’s consent and full knowledge. In other words, we can say since the directors are acting on behalf of their company, they owe the duties of loyalty and good faith due to the fiduciary relationship with the companies. In addition, refer to the Corporation Act ss180, and the case of Percival v Wright 1902, the directors owed duties to the company but not shareholders individually. On the other hand, in depth, the fiduciary obligations of the directors can be divided into four aspects:…

    • 2683 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In general, the board of directors is a group of elected or appointed members to oversee activities of a company or organization. The board of directors has a fiduciary duty to grow the long-term success of the corporation for the benefit of shareholder, and sometimes for debt holders. The basic fiduciary duty includes: 1) duty of care -duty to make/delegate decision in an informed way; 2) duty of loyalty -duty to advance corporate over personal interests; 3) duty of good faith-duty to be faithful and devoted to the interest of the corporation and its shareholders; 4) duty not to “waste” -duty to avoid deliberate destruction of shareholder value. Generally, the board of directors performs major detail functions as below: 1) provide continuity for the organization; 2) select and appoint a chief executive; 3) govern the organization by broad policies and objectives; 4) acquire sufficient resources for the organization’s operations and to finance the products and services adequately; 5) account to the public for the products and services of the organization and expenditures. The board is corporate governance of the company, which is significant for…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law & Ethics

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The board must also consider their duty of care and duty of loyalty. Duty of care requires people involved in the company to make informed and reasonable decisions for the business. Duty of loyalty requires employees to act in good faith and in…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Directors Duty

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Directors’ duties in Australia are designed to promote good governance and ensure that directors act in the interests of the company – including putting the company’s interests ahead of their own (A Guide to Directors’ Duties and Responsibilities, 2008). In the case of OHS Solutions Pty. Ltd. in order to give advice it must first be known what are the duties and responsibilities of a director and officer. There are three sources of law in which directors’ duties are enforced: the common-law (judge made), the Corporations Act 2001 (Commonwealth) (the “Corporations Act”) and a company’s constitution (A Guide to Directors’ Duties and Responsibilities, 2008). There are both general law and statutory law duties that are owed by the director to different persons General law duties are owed by the directors and senior executive officers, which are also regarded to as fiduciaries. Statutory duties apply to directors, but there are some statutory duties that apply to company officers as well (Hanrahan, Ramsay & Stapledon 2011).…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Article Reflection

    • 3620 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Director’s duties can be summarised into four duties: the duty of good faith, the duty to avoid conflict, the duty not to profit from the company and the duty not to misuse the company’s confidential information. In addition, any profits that the director comes into (by use of the company information, resources, or property) are deemed to be that of the company. Directors are given a position of authority and responsibility. They must adhere to the rules of their position and not misuse their power as a director.…

    • 3620 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays