Preview

Assignment 4: Australian Corporate Law

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
484 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assignment 4: Australian Corporate Law
Lecture Four – Topic 9

Directors’ Duties 2 Preparation:

Read: Jason Harris, Anil Hargovan and Michael Adams, Australian Corporate Law (LexisNexis, 4th ed, 2013) Chapters 15, 16

Questions/Activities:

1. What is meant by good faith?
2. What are the company’s interests?
3. What are proper purposes?
4. How does a court resolve the purpose for which a power has been exercised where a director has more than one purpose?
5. (Seminar Problem) A tsunami hits the west coast of Java. The board of directors of a large mining company decide that the company should donate $5 million to the relief appeal. Has there been a breach of duty? Should this be a breach of duty?
6. Jack Black was the governing director of White Pty Ltd. He allotted shares in the company to his two
…show more content…
7. When must a director of a company who has a material personal interest in a matter that relates to the affairs of the company give the other directors notice of the interest? What are the requirements of the notice?
8. May a director of a proprietary company that has a material personal interest in a matter that relates to the affairs of a company be present at the meeting of the vote on matters that relate to the interest?
9. Martin is one of the directors of Betta-Tea Ltd. He is also a large shareholder in AIC Packaging Pty Ltd, the sole supplier of tea packets to Betta-Tea. Martin has been receiving secret commissions from AIC Packaging in return for arranging the sale of tea packets at high prices and refusing to accept contracts from AIC's competitors (on the grounds that the competitors' products are of inferior quality).

i. Advise the other directors of Betta-Tea Ltd as to whether Martin is in breach of any common law duties or statutory duties as a director. ii. If the Betta-Tea shareholders or directors found out about Martin's dealings what action could they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Whether the Municipal Corporation failed to provide reasonable protection to the decedent despite the existence of an order of protection under the Family Court Act section 842, knowledge by the municipality's agents that inaction could lead to harm, extensive direct contact involving the municipality's agents and the decedent, and the decedent's justifiable reliance on the municipality's agents affirmative under taking on her behalf, and whether these elements established a "special relationship" between the decedent and the municipality? (Page 2 first full paragraph, Page 5 second full paragraph)…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    5. Has Patricia acted recklessly, dishonestly, and failed to exercise and discharge her duties for a proper purpose and in the best interests of SEPL?…

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Courtroom Matrix/ Cja491

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Responsibilities Ensures the trial follows legal procedures, interprets the law and finds resolutions (Michaels, 2013)…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • Partial exception: As to mergers, sales of substantially all assets, and charter amendment, shareholders must vote, but board is a gatekeeper as to which deals go forward to shareholders.…

    • 6066 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Directors’duties(dd): I.Duties of care and diligence:1whether is a director(d)?s9definesas:(a)appointed:(i)executive director(ii)alternative director(iii)non-executive director(iv)nominee director.(b) not validly appointed (i)they act in the position of a d (de facto d);(ii)d of coy or body are accustomed to act in accordance with the person’s instructions or wishes. (shadow d).2.duty of care and diligence:Assessing whether a breach has occurred:(i)were a reasonable d in the corp’s circumstances and(ii)has the position of d had the same responsibilities within the corp(1)must possess degree skill. Form a view as to coy's financial state; dependent on knowledge and experience.(2)exercise powers with care: take into account knowledge, experience and size of co; basic duty: guide and monitor management; be familiar and understand coy's activities and financial status(commonwealth bank of Australia v Friedrich(1991)).(3)be diligent in performance of functions:attend meetings unless exceptional circumstances(Vrisakis v Australian Securities Commission(1993));conduct periodic review of coy's financial statements(Daniels v Anderson(1995)). s180(1)(A director or other officer of a corporation must exercise their powers and discharge their duties with the degree of care and diligence that a reasonable person would exercise if they:(a)were a director or officer of a corporation in the corporation’s circumstances; and(b)occupied the office held by, and had the same responsibilities within the corporation as, the director or officer.(i)care.InDaniels v AWA Ltd, the court proposed the minimum standards of care, skill and diligence expected of all directors:(a) obtain a basic understanding of their coy's business (b) keep informed about and monitor the coy's activities and regularly attend board meetings (c) monitor the coy's financial position.All coy d owe the basic duty of sufficiently monitoring the coy’s affairs by maintaining an awareness of the coy’s activities and…

    • 7058 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Playschool Questions

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Would it be possible for Thomas Koltun to take actions that could benefit his company? If so, what actions might he take?…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Complete ACL Final Exam Notes

    • 10856 Words
    • 44 Pages

    All directors and officers of a corporation are bound by a number of general law and statutory duties. All directors owe the company equitable duties of loyalty and good faith…

    • 10856 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. To what extent is utmost good faith required in a Close Corporation and how might this influence the success of this form of ownership?…

    • 4099 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law Assignment

    • 1402 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Whether ABC Bhd can persue their claim against any other party related to ABC Bhd.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Referring to the definition of director in the Companies Act 1993, when the banks or creditors provide advice or…

    • 3214 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Notes- Shareholder Remedies

    • 2599 Words
    • 11 Pages

    - directors acted in affairs of company in own interest, not interest of members a whole, or any other manner that appears to be unfair/unjust to other members s461(e)…

    • 2599 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Question Paper of Mba

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages

    (B) A who is a member of PQR Ltd. Wants to inspect the register of directors share holding? When can he do so?…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Revision

    • 1657 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Director’s fiduciary duties are owed only to the company, not to the individual share holders. Case: Percival v Wright 1902…

    • 1657 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Company Law

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hicks, A. and Goo, H. S. (2004), Cases and Materials on Company Law, 5th Edition, OUP.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    miinasae

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Roman Tomasic, E.L.G. Tyler, Vanessa Stott Butterworths Hong Kong company law handbook, Hong Kong : LexisNexis, 2010.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays