Topics: Critical thinking, Logic, Fallacy Pages: 5 (1118 words) Published: January 4, 2015

Regarding to the notes, Common beliefs may treats as the same the way to support some evaluative statement, that never be used to argue the accuracy of most statements of verification. Those fallacies are called to opinion, to belief, and to popular beliefs also the feeling of people. Such as the faith or the religion what they belief, or some “facts” that we see as common sense. For example, The world is round, or thermal expansion and contraction. Moreover, some slogan may become common belief too. Just like “Never Give Up” or “treasure our life”. Since humans behave by following their personal beliefs and common sense. No matter what cultural background people came from, common sense will be very similar between people and person. Also the common sense what people beliefs are often wrong. Maybe it as supported by everyone, so that no one will believe it’s wrong.

Common sense, as defined by the some website, is innate rational thinking that occurs organically in rational humans. Common sense involves thinking and problem-solving skills developed from intuition, natural logic and the human ability to observe events and absorb information and lessons from them. These observations allow you to learn from experience and thus to hone and implement sound judgment. You use common sense to approach and attempt to solve problems in day-to-day life. Every human being gains and uses common sense to apply impartial, unbiased and responsible logical decisions. Common sense is something that comes to you naturally, its like and instinct, critical thinking is when you take a question or a problem and analyze every aspect of it. Common sense is dependent of the culture and tradition.

Critical thinking occurs when a person deliberately examines a situation based on his own knowledge and philosophies. Critical thinking involves judging a situation based on studied reasoning, where the person intentionally and consciously focuses on a subject. The quality of critical thinking is based on how sound the eventual judgment of a situation is. Critical thinking allows for planning, calculating, investigating and explaining; you use it for situations that require a larger degree of concentration and deliberation. Critical Thinking is 'rational optimization' of 'rational' aspects. It provides a 'rational' optimum, for instance not considering most emotional aspects. And it often ignores most cultural differences. Albert Einstein famously said "Common Sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen." The purpose of Common Sense is to enable one to function "well" inside the society - that is, its purpose is to provide a framework for making the "proper" decision when faced with a commonly occurring problem or issue.

As I mentioned before, common sense is, by definition, a sound conclusion. Critical thinking, on the other hand, can be either sound or unsound. Mistakes in logic can be made through critical thinking. Critics are not always right, and their conclusions can be colored by their own prejudices. The differences between common sense and critical thinking are lies in the levels of awareness at which both consciousness and critical thinking operate. Critical thinking always occurs at a conscious level, whereas common sense occurs on a liminal level of thought, which the Plus Roots website calls "a workaday consciousness." Although critical thinking and common sense require different levels of awareness and consciousness to operate, both methods are rational in their arguments. Both must adhere to some logical form and logical requirements.

How about common beliefs? Actually is quite easy to explain. Give as example, When we are uncertain about something, we turn to other people and assume they know what they are doing. We do the same with beliefs. The more other people believe something, the more likely we will be to accept that it is true. The point is that using popular opinions to...

Bibliography: Micheal LaBossiere (2012)[ 76 Fallacies ] Kindle Edition
S. Morris Engel (1994)[ With Good Reason- An Introduction to Informal Fallacies] Kindle Edition
Link: Studymode -

Logical fallacies -
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Can We Have Beliefs or Knowledge Which Are Independent of Our Culture Essay
  • Philosophy. Theories of Knowledge. What Is Wrong the Claim That Knowledge Is True Judgment (or Belief)? Essay
  • Belief Has Been Described as “Certainty About What Cannot Be Seen”. Does This Statement Hold True Any, Some or All Areas of Knowledge?...
  • Knowledge and Belief Essay
  • Wittgenstein on Religious Belief Essay
  • Knowledge & Justified belief (pre-spell check) Essay
  • Religious Beliefs Essay
  • The Ethics of Belief Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free