Preview

Case Relevant Evidence Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
120 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Relevant Evidence Analysis
Relevant evidence is evidence has the tendency to make facts foreseeable more then it would be without evidence. Although certain evidence may be relevant in some cases evidence may be excluded from trial for no rational relevance. The reason to exclude important evidence like this is because; it has the likelihood to influence the minds of the jury. An example of evidence that would be excluded during a trial would be gruesome photographs of victims in a homicide case; although it may be relevant to the case it could prejudice the minds of the jury. In some cases relevant evidence may be excluded to prevent confusion or if present it could create more issue, therefore wasting trial time if

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evidence is crucial in forensic science because it can help solve crimes and clues in mysteries. We can find out who killed people in order to establish safety or solve crimes such as burglaries. All the evidence we had found played an important role in…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Analysis

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Derreck Fryar has great work ethic and he is really dedicated to his work. He only missed two team meetings and one missing is because he attended the new employee orientation. He is willing to work late to solve problems with his teammates anytime. An example is that he works hard to solve an emergency damage control for our important client.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Analysis

    • 3109 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Schmidt, a South Carolina citizen, sued Wachovia Bank in a South Carolina state court for fraudulently inducing him to participate in an illegal tax shelter. Wachovia is a national bank with its main office in North Carolina and branch offices in several other states, including South Carolina. Under federal diversity jurisdiction, federal courts can hear cases in which the parties are citizens of different states. Wachovia filed a petition in Federal District Court, seeking to compel arbitration of the dispute. After the petition was denied on the merits, Wachovia appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction. Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1348, national banks are "deemed citizens of the States in which they are respectively located." The Circuit Court interpreted "located" to mean any state where the bank has a branch location. Noting that the statute uses both "located" and "established" to refer to the presence of a bank, the Circuit Court determined that a national bank is "established" in the state where its main office is located, and "located" in every state where it has a branch office. Therefore, under the Fourth Circuit's reasoning, Wachovia was "located" in, and a citizen of, South Carolina (as well as several other states with branch offices). Since both parties, Schmidt and Wachovia, had South Carolina citizenship, the Circuit Court dismissed the case for lack of diversity jurisdiction.…

    • 3109 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Analysis

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jim Donovan has recently accepted a new position as president for the company Famous Products. He has been asked to fly in to Milwaukee to take a look at the facilities and meet with the former president Don Bird. Jim is so excited and confident about his new position that he doesn’t think twice about his meeting with Bird. Upon his arrival Bird welcomed Jim to the building then brought him into a huge conference room where a bunch of other men in business suits sat. Bird made it openly clear he was not pleased that Jim would be taking over in front of everyone; this was obviously a huge shock to Jim. Jim was not prepared at all for Bird to react this way, we will discuss the mistakes Jim made before he got to the appointment, Jim’s reactions and what he should do during and after the meeting.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Analysis

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What about Cal’s point that multiple sclerosis is a progressive disease and that Anna will almost certainly get worse, thus creating potential problems…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Analysis

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This project can be done utilizing the command line or a GUI (the GUI option will get an additional 20pts).…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Analysis

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * “Defendant seeks vacation of a default judgment, contending that the trial lacked jurisdiction over him. We reversed.” (p.199)…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    case analysis

    • 2337 Words
    • 12 Pages

    b.What are the amounts and timing of the acquisition investment’s free cash flow from 2013 through 2022?…

    • 2337 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "All relevant evidence is admissible, except as otherwise provided." The goal of this rule is to allow parties to present all of the evidence that bears on the issue to be decided, and to keep out all evidence that is immaterial or that lacks Probative value. Evidence that is offered to help prove something that is not at issue is immaterial. For example, the fact that a defendant attends church every week is immaterial, and thus irrelevant, to a charge of running a red light. Probative value is a tendency to make the existence of any material fact more or less probable. For instance, evidence that a murder defendant ate spaghetti on the day of the murder would normally be irrelevant because people who eat spaghetti are not more or less likely to commit murder, as compared with other people. However, if spaghetti sauce were found at the murder scene, the fact that the defendant ate spaghetti that day would have probative value and thus would be relevant evidence…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. Evidence is admissible in court if it is relevant, its probative value outweighs any prejudicial effects, and it is trustworthy, meaning that it is subject to examination and cross-examination.…

    • 1958 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Under 46 CFR 201.136 - Evidence admissible, evidence presented to the court must be relevant, material to the case, reliable and probative. In addition, evidence may not be unduly repetitious, cumulative, irrelevant or immaterial. .…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidence is a type of proof. It is usually used to prove someone innocent or guilty. There are many different types of evidence, such as: testimony, direct, circumstantial, and physical evidence. However, according to the article “Forensic: Evidence, Clues, and Investigation” by Andrea Campbell, forensic evidence is the best evidence to present at a court case or trial.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Science

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are many types of ways to present evidence. This way the suspect can either be proven innocent or guilty. It is very important to make sure you have the right evidence because people can be proven guilty when really they are innocent if the wrong type of evidence is presented. That is why in the story “Forensic: Evidence, Clues, and Investigation” by Andrea Campbell, Forensic Science is proven to be the most important evidence to present in a court case.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Relevant evidence could nonetheless be ruled inadmissible if the judge determines it is: all of the above could be cited by a judge to rule relevant evidence nonetheless inadmissible.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Analysis

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Smiley, a buyer from Carrefour Fashions, entered the store of a rival firm, Boulevard Boutique. The reason for his visit was to find out about the latest lines that Boulevard was carrying. Once Smiley entered the store he was recognized by Maldini, the store manager of Boulevard, who immediately called the store detective and told him to keep an eye on Smiley. Maldini then called the police, notifying them that he had a shoplifter in the store. Smiley never tried to leave, believing that Rocco, the store detective, would not permit him to do so. Once the police took Smiley to the station he explained the situation and was released.…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays