Preview

Admissible Evidence: Unreliable Evidence In A Civil Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
864 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Admissible Evidence: Unreliable Evidence In A Civil Case
Character evidence is generally less useful in a civil case than in a criminal case. True
Original copies of documents should be carefully preserved for court. Photocopies should be used during interviews and elsewhere in the investigation. True
Character evidence might be admissible in a criminal case if entered to prove motive, opportunity, or ability. True
Statements made by the witnesses about what defendants said are hearsay and therefore not admissible. False
Which one of the following privileges is not recognized in federal courts? Accountant – client privilege
Please match each item in the left-hand column with the appropriate type of evidence from the right-hand column.
Surveillance Personal oberservation
Tire marks
…show more content…
Relevance; competence
Anything that is perceptible by the five senses legally presented at trial to prove a contention and induce a belief in the mind of the jury is called: Evidence
Increasingly evidence is in digital form and rules of evidence are evolving to accommodate this change. A company's computerized accounting records are generally admissible if they were kept in the normal course of business and can be authenticated (i.e., shown that they have not been tampered with).True
Well known facts, such as how many feet there are in a mile, are readily accepted into evidence based upon what concept? Judicial Notice
Relevant evidence could nonetheless be ruled inadmissible if the judge determines it is: all of the above could be cited by a judge to rule relevant evidence nonetheless inadmissible.
21.) This privilege may only be waived by the prosecutor/government. Law Enforcement Officer/Informant
The most important thing about admissibility is relevance. True
Photocopies are always preferable to original documents as evidence.
…show more content…
Hearsay evidence.
The legal term that refers to the area where I can have a reasonable expectation of privacy for my trash. Curtilage
Which one of the following would be privileged under the husband - wife privilege? Confidential communications between the couple while they were married
31.) Which of the following represents the highest standard of proof? Preponderance of evidence
32.) Evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable that it would be without the evidence is called: Relevant evidence?
All of the following are exceptions to the general hearsay rule except: Witness Bob recounts his ex-girlfriend Mary told him that the defendant was making false journal entries to conceal a fraud.
The process of marking, identifying, and preserving evidence is called the: chain of custody
Which of the following is not generally a useful way to impeach the credibility, or competence, of witness testimony? Witness has been

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Evidence must be gathered lawfully or else the prosecution is at risk of it not being able to rely upon in any consecutive hearing or trial as a judge could rule that the evidence is unreasonable.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    01

    • 285 Words
    • 1 Page

    Evidence is important because it gives you clues as to what happened in the crime and who committed that crime. The evidence that was important in the episode was the beer can. It was important because it gave clues to how the accident happened and/or who drinks it.…

    • 285 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic evidence has been used since the beginning of investigating. It could be anything from ammunition, to a handprint on the door, to the drops of blood on the crime scene. As seen in “Forensic Evidence” by Andrea Campbell, the indisputable forensic evidence is the best kind to use in a trial.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Regina Knight Case

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order for a trial to be brought, the police and prosecutors might be able to prove that the elements of the particular offence are present. In this criminal case both Actus reus, Mens rea as well causation was clearly shown through the behavior of Katherine Knight.…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jay's testimony being everything that the State has on Adnan Syed, which, is a testimony…

    • 1477 Words
    • 1 Page
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Evidence can be as diverse as people; however, when looking to collect any type of evidence, it will typically be separated into one of two categories: real evidence or testimonial. Real evidence is considered to be tangible, such as, it will be anything that the five senses can perceive (Worral, Hemmens, & Nored, 2012, p. 71). Articles of clothing, weapons, contracts or legal documentation, and photographs are all examples of tangible / real evidence. Additionally, within this same category of real evidence, “demonstrative” evidence will also be included. This type of evidence would be anything that can actually demonstrate the crime and/or scene. For example, a technician…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    2nd exam review

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Preponderance of the evidence – the party with the burden of proof must convince the jury that the facts reveal a greater weight of evidence supporting the position of the plaintiff more so than against it…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "All relevant evidence is admissible, except as otherwise provided." The goal of this rule is to allow parties to present all of the evidence that bears on the issue to be decided, and to keep out all evidence that is immaterial or that lacks Probative value. Evidence that is offered to help prove something that is not at issue is immaterial. For example, the fact that a defendant attends church every week is immaterial, and thus irrelevant, to a charge of running a red light. Probative value is a tendency to make the existence of any material fact more or less probable. For instance, evidence that a murder defendant ate spaghetti on the day of the murder would normally be irrelevant because people who eat spaghetti are not more or less likely to commit murder, as compared with other people. However, if spaghetti sauce were found at the murder scene, the fact that the defendant ate spaghetti that day would have probative value and thus would be relevant evidence…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. What are the most persuasive pieces of evidence in favor of the defense or the prosecution?…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    as to which evidence to disregard and which to hold as important. In extreme cases, the judge…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federal Rule of Evidence 403 says, “The court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence” (2015). A defense attorney could utilize Motion in limine to request that the judge rule that certain testimony be excluded. The motion is always discussed outside the presence of the jury and is always decided by a judge. For example, after examining police reports and other documents it is detected that the crime scene was contaminated which could be argued that any DNA evidence taken from the scene is compromised and therefore any scientific evidence or expert opinions relating to this would be prejudicial. Another example could be that law enforcement did not procure proper search warrants before a search and seizure; therefore, all evidence gathered resulted in an improper discovery and should be excluded since it violates…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    each side in a criminal or civil case will present evidence to support their position…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Evidence builds the basis of any criminal trial. The judge regulates the evidence that is introduced into court. Evidence can be deemed inadmissible if it was illegally obtained under the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), for example, police forcefully acquired the confession out of the suspect. Most evidence is in the form of oral statements – witnesses that are competent, compellable and non-privileged are called to testify. There are many issues regarding the reliability of evidence. Most trials take place a few months after the crime and witnesses are asked to recall information after this substantial amount of time. The witnesses may not remember all the information correctly or forgetting details as to what had occurred.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Angier, Natalie. "Two Pre-decision Articles on the Daubert Case (rules forscientific evidence)." Free Legal Information & Forms | The 'Lectric Law Library. The New York Times, 2 Jan. 1993. Web. 24 Oct. 2012. <http://www.lectlaw.com/files/lit03.htm>.…

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the years civil and criminal cases have impacted our world. They have determine whether the suspects of cases and have narrowed down to the offender. But the process that it takes to establish a final conclusion to present to a court is a long and delicate process. A process in which the integrity of the evidence is to be maintained untampered. Unfortunately this has not been simple for criminal investigators. As a society we have witnessed several cases that have had an unjust outcome because of tampered evidence or evidence that was gathered without a warrant.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics