Preview

Case Brief R Vs Sparrow

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
258 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Brief R Vs Sparrow
James Donalds – Case Brief Practice

R. v. Sparrow, [1990] 1 SCR 1075

Facts:
Sparrow was charged under s. 61(1) of the Fisheries Act with the offence of fishing with a drift net longer than permitted by the terms of the Indian Food Fishing License. Sparrow admitted to committing the act, but claimed that he has the aboriginal right to fish under s. 31(1) of the Fisheries Act. Therefore, the Act is inconsistent with s. 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982 and is invalid. He was unsuccessful in the lower courts and appealed to the Supreme Court.

Issue:
How are aboriginal rights recognized under s. 35(1)?
What is the test to for the extinguishment of aboriginal rights?

Held:
The appeal and cross-appealed was dismissed and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hello and welcome to ST Leo’s justice group my name is charbel saliba and I will be talking to you about aboriginal dreaming and land rights. The quote I said earlier was a spiritual view of life based on the dreaming which cannot be separated from the land; that is why the aboriginal people’s connection towards the land is inexorable. The two are intertwined; to separate them would be impossible, one would not work without the other thus they are just as important. The land is used as a physical link between human beings and all that is unseen and eternal. It creates a place for the aboriginal people to express themselves through ceremonies and rituals; this helps the aboriginal people connect to their spiritual core beliefs. We must remember that the dreaming is past, present and goes on onto the future, dreaming is continues and never ending. Dreaming stories contain vital information containing different things such as gathering food, the making of tools, where clays and ochres can be found, landscape and how it evolved, reasons for ceremonies and how ceremonies are to carried out and the reasons for laws and morals.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    R V. Shankar Case Summary

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: The accused was driving his car without the required laminated taillights when officers pulled him over late October 2004. The police asked Shankar for his licence, registration, and insurance. The accused handed over a licence in the name of Jason Singh, the insurance information handwritten on an informal yellow sticky note, and a photocopy of the vehicle registration. When inquired about the spelling of name, Shankar misspelled Singh as ‘Sing’ and gave the wrong unit number for the home address. Based on these wrong answers, officers arrested Shankar on the basis of misleading them; officers physically removed Shankar from the vehicle and searched him. The officers discovered bulletproof vests on Shankar’s person, Shankar justified these on the basis of self defence and protection. When searching the vehicle police found numerous weapons including two guns, a hunting knife, and ammunition. Shankar did not testify in court, and was charged and convicted of two counts of possession of loaded, prohibited firearms and public mischief. Shankar appealed his conviction to the Ontario Court of…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Birdgeton Case

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Our team of financial analysts has taken an in depth look at the consultant’s recommendation to potentially outsource the manifold production line. Through our analysis you will see that the consultants have not considered the full financial impact that this outsourcing would have on the company. This is likely because the recommendation has not taken into consideration the range of costs affecting Bridgeton industries. Through our analysis it becomes clear that the decision to retain the manifold production line will be more financially beneficial to the company. We will begin with some of the assumptions of our analysis, and the conclusions from our various analyses of Bridgeton Industries Costs. Please refer to the attached excel file for detailed analysis of the numbers.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The hearing of this case was held in the Court of Appeal of the New South Wales Supreme Court.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Usyd Claw1001 Paper

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    'Appellants were employed by the respondent as baggage handler at Sydney Airport, they were dismissed from their employment' for stealing funds. 'Appellants sought an order for imposition of penalty and payment of penalty to them.' Trial judge found out respondents in 'terminating the appellants’ employment was not harsh, unjust or unreasonable and dismissed the claims.' 'The Full Court held that it was contrary however appellants were still not entitled to damages for breach of contract.'…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Case of Donald Marshall where he was charged for fishing offseason, which went against new regulations that the government has been trying to put into place. Marshall had claimed that “the right to fish on a Treaty of Peace and Friendship signed in 1760-1761 between the British Crown and the Mi’kmaq of what are now the provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, and Quebec” (McGaw, 1), Marshall had the right to fish and hunt offseason due to the fact that his ancestors had fought and signed for him to have that right. The court viewed the Treaty as having no power do to the fact that the policies have changed within Canada, many of the things that were promised in the treaty no longer applied to the current times.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief I

    • 352 Words
    • 1 Page

    Procedural History: Federal District Court of Arkansas denied Defendants motion to dismiss, but also ordered stay until end of Defendant’s term. The court of Appeals affirmed the denial of the motion to dismiss and reversed the stay (delay proceedings until end of term of office).…

    • 352 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this journal article Mercer, discusses the on-going debate surrounding Indigenous Australians land rights claims from the mid-1980s onwards. He then goes on to discuss that the law surrounding land always adhered to the principles of Governor Bourke’s’ Proclamation, until the landmark decision handed down in the Mabo case. However, he concludes that in regard to political climate little else has been done in the advancement of land rights’ legislation in regard to the Indigenous Australian population. He also provides a comparison between how Australia and Canada have responded to Indigenous claims of land, saying that Canada has acted far…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case List S2 2014

    • 1206 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hide & Skin Trading Pty Ltd v Oceanic Meat Traders Ltd (1990) 20 NSWLR 310…

    • 1206 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case 5.2 R Vs. Sally Clark

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    .2 R v Sally Clark (1999) 5.2.a Danger of multiplying probabilities together One of the laws of probabilities states that when the events are independent of each other their probabilities can be multiplied together. This is called the product rule.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    This paper aims to prove whether the given impugned law is valid or invalid. In doing so it follows a three step process in order to determine the validity of the Commonwealth legislation as set out in Grain pool of Western Australia V Commonwealth.…

    • 2525 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Topic Topics 1 and 2 Introduction and Legal skills Seminar question given to students In 1998 the Federal Parliament appointed a special committee to look into the magpie problem. After months of serious investigation, the committee presented its report to Parliament. The following is an extract from the report We have heard a great deal of evidence and we are satisfied that there is a need for strong legislation to protect the Australian public from magpies during the breeding season ... None of the provisions of the proposed new Act will apply to magpies kept by members of the public as pets .... In August 1998 Parliament passes the Magpie (Protection of Public) Act. The Act receives Royal assent on 15 August 1998. Section 3 of the Act provides that Any householder, flat occupier or other person who permits a magpie to remain on his property at any time during the months of August, September or October without reporting the matter to the Department of Environment and Conservation shall be guilty of an offence. There is no reference in the Act to magpies kept as pets. During October 1998 Jerry owned a pet magpie which he kept in a cage at his Brisbane home. He has not notified the Department of Environment and Conservation that he owns a magpie. Has Jerry breached the Act Apply (a) the literal rule, and (b) the purposive approach. Issue 1 Has Jerry breached the Act according to the literal rule Law According to the literal rule of statutory interpretation, we should always begin by reading a legal text literally, with words and phrases given their ordinary and natural meanings Fisher v Bell 1961 1 QB 394 Application Did Jerry permit a magpie to remain on his property (explain your reasons based on the facts of the problem) Does the natural and ordinary meaning of a magpie include a pet magpie as the one in Jerrys house Has Jerry breached s 3 of the Act Conclusion Include the consequences of the conclusion. Issue 2 Has Jerry breached the Act according to the…

    • 545 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    hundreds of years before Captain Cook was born. They are now trying to say I…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. Mohamed Haneef Case. 2014. Mohamed Haneef Case. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.lawcouncil.asn.au/lawcouncil/ [Accessed 21 August 2014].…

    • 1077 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tax Case

    • 3084 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The case dealt with the constitutionality of a certain pattern of sales tax legislation, calculated to counter consumer victimization by dealers. The provisions Sections 37(1) (a) and 46(2) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 was the impugned section which were challenged in the Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat. The main question that was raised before the High Court was whether Sections 37(1) (a) and 46(2) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 are beyond the legislative power conferred by Entry 54, List II in Schedule VII of the Constitution. The High Court held that the impugned sections are beyond the power of the State legislature and therefore ultra vires. Aggrieved by the decision, the State has preferred these appeals.…

    • 3084 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics