Preview

Can Machines Think?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1297 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Can Machines Think?
Can Machines Think ?

This paper regards several points of view on the subject of, what is commonly referred to as Artificial Intelligence, or AI. AI is the attempt to make machines, specifically computers, perform intelligently through programming. Already, this definition has a problem in that the word intelligence can have many interpretations. This essay will attempt to put forward some ideas for how to approach this problem.
It could be said that the human brain is nothing more than a machine, and as we know it to be capable of thought it would be fair to surmise that therefore machines can think and it is probably this, or a similar premise that inspired AI. However, within AI there are many schools of thought. Some believe that if a computer can be programmed correctly to emulate certain human processes, then it is to all intense and purposes thinking as we do.
One of the early pioneers in the world of computers, Alan Turing, outlined a test in which participants are asked to interrogate a computer terminal in order to determine whether they are communicating with a human, or a computer program. Examples of programs which were put through the Turing test are ELIZA and SHRDLU both of which attempted to emulate one side of human conversation. But even if these programs did appear to be totally human, could they be said to actually be thinking ?
John Searle(1984) puts forward a scenario in an attempt to devalue this idea. He refers to a program by Roger Schank at Yale university which, after being given a story will be able to answer questions regarding it. It would seem at the outset that this program would therefore be understanding the story. Searle then argues that despite not being able to understand Chinese, he would, under the correct circumstances, be able to answers Chinese questions in Chinese, relating to a story also written in Chinese. The scenario is summarised as follows;
Sitting isolated in a room, Searle is given a wad of Chinese



References:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I strongly disagree with Searle’s concept in “strong Al” which suggests that, indeed a well-programmed computer can function as a brain, due to their artificial intelligence that can even explain and understand what we cannot comprehend. In addition, he believes that computers do possess cognitive states. However, he objects using…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As a novice programmer and a participant in Lego robotics I find the controversy surrounding artificial intelligence very intriguing. Programmers, computer scientists, and researchers alike have debated about the possibility of artificial intelligence becoming more intelligent than humans. Because I do have some knowledge of how computers work I can see why this topic is sparking so much interest. The thought of something that we created having the potential to surpass us is riveting. It’s impossible to fathom the idea that humans may lose their spot as the alphas of the world. In this paper I will break down the arguments surrounding this topic by putting them into simpler terms and prove why one side may be superior to the other.…

    • 2388 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chinese room: A thought experiment, devised by John Searle, to show that computers lack intentionality.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the last century we have seen modern technology grow from almost nothing into a leading power in our everyday lives. Technology aids us humans in so many different ways, and in all imaginable categories, that it would be impossible to list them all. One of the main technological advances that are used in almost every machine today, in some form or another, is a computer. Overtime the processing power of a computer has become immense, which started to beg the question can a computer ever think and or poses human like qualities and behaviors. John Searle does not believe that a computer can ever think because they do not have the intention to do so; however he believes that machines rather, could think.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Chinese Room is a thought experiment created by John Searle to differentiate human intelligence form artificial intelligence. In his experiment, someone who does not speak Chinese sits in a room filled with Chinese characters and a book of instructions. The person in the room receives messages from a Chinese speaker, finds the matching characters in his book, and returns new characters based on the book's instructions. This thought experiment demonstrates that one can appear to have knowledge of something without really having it.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The point he makes is that he may hand out the appropriate and even accurate answers and that those responses may serve to connect with the expectations of those asking the questions. However, it does not indicate that any real understanding has taken place or that any sort of meaning is actually attached to the question and answer process that is taking place. The point is that a person cannot possibly understand Chinese simply on the basis of running a computer program designed for understanding the language itself. It must be remembered that what has taken place is only a manipulation of conventional symbols that they have been designed to act upon.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychology Key Terms

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    artificial intelligence (AI) - a computer or machine that has been created to think like a human.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Searle Functionalism

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It argues that instead of being focused on the person like Searle is, it should focus on the system of the entire experiment. John Searle replies that even the system also does not understand Chinese, it knows the symbols and can apply their usage according to the instructions, but it does not understand Chinese. There is nothing different between the system and John Searle in this case, they are the same thing. Even if it is a robot who does all of the processes as opposed to Searle, there is no difference as it is still just monotonously doing what the book tells it to do to carry on a conversation.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Military Ai

    • 2895 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Artificial intelligence is a complex subject that requires some background information to fully understand. One of the earliest definitions of "true" artificial intelligence was proposed by Alan Turing with the Turing Test. The idea behind this test was to have a human ask both a computer and a human a series of questions and then see if the tester could tell which was the computer. The AI did not necessarily need to answer all the questions correctly, it just had to give an answer similar to that a human would give. The test would also be done via text so that the computer would not have problems with mimicking human speech. Very few AIs have passed the test with the first occurring in 2012 as it was judged to be human 52 percent of the time. The other major factor in determining a true artificial intelligence was the Chinese Room Experiments by John Searle as an expansion of the Turing Test. In this experiment, Searle wanted to test whether an intelligence was actually interpreting language or just…

    • 2895 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Searle

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To differentiate syntactical processes from semantical understanding, Searle uses a thought—experiement. He asks the reader to imagine computer programers have developed a program that can simulate the understanding of Chinese. He further asks the reader to imagine him or herself as the processor, imagining that we are locked in a room, with several baskets full of Chinese…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He is just taking an input, following the instructions that he understands and producing an output using the rules given to him. He himself does not understand the story, the question or even his answers. Therefore, the first claim is false. The second claim, the belief that the program explains the human ability to understand, is also false. Searle argues against this claim because “a human will be able to follow the formal principles without understanding anything,” (Jacobsen, 149). Although it is true that a person following the same procedure as the man in the room will not be able to understand Chinese, I believe the claim to be false due to the fact that there is an entirely different process taking place in our minds. The claim was that the program explains how we understand and our ability to understand. Therefore, the program should explain the thought process that goes on inside our minds or at the very least, result in understanding if we were to go through the same process. Searle focused on the lack of recognition, but I will discuss the difference in the processes we go through to achieve it. Computers and people are different. Our minds are complicated, unique and can vary from person to person. A program cannot explain how people understand by using a completely different method from the one we use in addition to one that results in a lack of grasping the concept itself. Computers solve problems differently than we do and cannot explain the way we think. (Maybe make this paragraph into two…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Turing’s paper, “Computing Machinery and Intelligence,” he presents the Turing test, which examines whether a machine can display intelligent behavior equal to the intelligent behavior of a human. Turing also ponders the question, “can machines think,” as he is an advocate of artificial intelligence. Turing states the nine common objections against artificial intelligence and attempts to disprove them. The most convincing objection to artificial intelligence is objection three, the mathematical objection.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Turing Test

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I do not think the Turing Test is a good way to determine whether a machine is intelligent. I feel this…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As for the thinking machine, it can talk to the human normally for most of the questions. In my opinion, in order to talk to human, the machine has been set up millions of tones and pieces of knowledge. It has the certain response to different questions. The difference between normal machines and thinking machines is that the normal machines only have certain response to certain questions. For example, if you ask a normal machine the same questions for many times, it would give you the same answers. You will find out it is the machine immediately since the boring response. However, the thinking machines are supposed to talking with the mood. It should talk by the tone similar to human talk. The response should be accurate as well as reasonable. Considering last example, a thinking machine should not…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “Can Computers Think,” John Searle makes the claim that computers, while they can simulate understanding or emotions, cannot think in the same way that a human mind can. John Searle objects to what he calls “strong AI,” the claim that the brain is just one type of hardware that can “run” the program that is essentially the human mind, and thus that if computers cannot currently think, they will one day be able to. Searle supports his claim on the basis that while computers run entirely syntactically, viewing information as abstract symbols with no meaning and reacting to them based off of their shape, the human mind has the additional layer of semantics that can not be obtained from syntax alone. Thus, John Searle proves that no matter how advanced technology becomes, a computer will never think in the same way that a human can.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays