Australia Policy Analysis Essay

In the following paper I examine the policies of The Coalition, The Labor Party and The Greens with respect to unauthorised boat arrivals. I find that the The Greens have the greatest difference in policy compared to the other two when evaluated against the Australian Policy Cycle. I then compare the three policies against the national interest of Australia, which I claim include the attributes of financial cost, moral behaviour, international citizenship and social cohesion. I find The Coalition policy to be the cheapest policy of the three. Splitting the moral evaluation into two, I find The Coalition wins the utilitarian moral argument while The Greens win the deontological moral case, with Labor contributing to both. I also split the question of international citizenship into two, claiming that stopping people smugglers is part of good international citizenship as is complying with international laws and agreements. I find Labor and the Coalition policy to be best at the former, and The Greens best at the latter, with Labor once again contributing to both. Finally with regard to social cohesion I find the policy of Labor and The Coalition to provide the most support based on current Australian community attitudes. Combining all the aspects of national
They reject the ‘identified issue’ of security, provided by The Coalition, and instead claim the issue is a humanitarian one. The ‘policy analysis’ is therefore different, so too the ‘policy instruments’ as they will not use offshore facilities, for example, and the consultation is with a different subset of groups within the Australian community. The ‘decision’ is demonstrably different, ‘implementation’ vastly different and ‘evaluation’ would be conducted against the different standard of humanitarian outcome, rather than border security. Based on the Australian Policy Cycle, The Greens policy stands out as the most different of the