Preview

Attributes Of God In Euthyphro's Dilemma

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
399 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Attributes Of God In Euthyphro's Dilemma
Does God command what is good because it is good, or is it good because God commands it? Euthyphro’s Dilemma proposes two options. Either we choose to believe that God dictates what is good and evil, or we choose to down grade God to a glorified messenger. This paper will explore the dilemma and show the effects of choosing either option.
There are three main attributes of God that are reflected upon in this argument. The first one is that God is the creator and could have made any world he chose, so he chose this one. The second being God is rational, everything God does he does for a reason. The third is God is morally good.
Divine Command Theory is the first option. This theory states, what is right or wrong depends on God’s commands
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 1 Assignment
    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nt1310 Unit 1 Assignment

    Devine Command Theory is a theory that makes morality dependently solely on the individuals god and god’s word or teaching establishes a moral obligation to the god’s followers. The morality is determined by the character of the god and his command and this morality is the right action to be taken as required. These morality guidelines can vary depending of the specific religion that…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Analyzing Jane Craig's Euthyphro Dilemma
    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analyzing Jane Craig's Euthyphro Dilemma

    This response to the Euthyphro dilemma seems like an atypical response from Christians on the basis that Christians would reject the first option as they do not believe God’s power is an arbitrary function of morality. And rejects the second option as they believe that God is almighty and omniscient and there is no greater power.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Freedo Paradox Of Omniquate Analysis
    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Freedo Paradox Of Omniquate Analysis

    The proposed solution to be discussed and Mackie’s response to it is the claim that ‘evil is due to human free will’ and as such it cannot be attributed to God. Evil should instead be attributed to the free actions of individuals, the power of which has been endowed upon them by God. While it is acknowledged that there exists evil in the world, as a result of some human free will, it is claimed that freedom of will is a more valuable good than any resultant evil. Through God allowing such freedom, He has satisfied His ‘wholly good’ requirement.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Piety As Depicted In Plato's Euthyphro
    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Piety As Depicted In Plato's Euthyphro

    In the reading Euthyphro, Plato’s end goal is to show that there is no rational relationship between “the pious” and “to be loved by the Gods.” The point of Socrates argument is that he is ultimately asking Euthyphro to explain piety by questioning the characteristics of something that is loved. Is something loved because it is good, is it loved because it is popular, what makes something loved?…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jenny Wiggins's Essay 'My Proof Of Theism'
    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Jenny Wiggins's Essay 'My Proof Of Theism'

    P4: Evil is not due to God but to man’s misuse of the free will that God gave him (McCloskey & Hick, 332 &347).…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Compare Plato's Euthyphro Dilemma
    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Compare Plato's Euthyphro Dilemma

    To consider whether morality depends on God, we must confront objections which question the consistency of the claim. Of these objections, Platos Euthyphro is among the most alarming. Therefore, in the scope of this paper - I will examine the Euthyphro dilemma, and conclude that the dilemma does not necessarily prohibit theological voluntarists from stating that morality depends on God. So first, we should understand exactly the problem that the dilemma presents.…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Euthyphro Essay
    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato's Euthyphro Essay

    In the selection Euthyphro by Plato, Socrates and Euthyphro are having an argument about what the real meaning of being pious and impious is. While standing on the porch of the King Archon, Euthyphro questions Socrates on his reason for being at the court being that he was sure that Socrates wouldn’t be prosecuting anyone and that it was more than likely the other way around. Socrates informs him that a guy by the name of Meletus was charging him with the crime of corrupting the minds of the youth with his poetry and second guessing of the gods. Socrates then questions Euthyphro on him being at the court and Euthyphro informs him that he is there to prosecute his father for the murder of their servant. Socrates, as anyone would be was taken back by the thought of someone prosecuting their father. Euthyphro let him know that he was a firm believer in piety even if that meant prosecuting his own flesh and blood because to the gods relation doesn’t matter when it comes down to right and wrong.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Phi Euthyphro
    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Phi Euthyphro

    Socrates during this conversation with Euthyphro works to grasp the full understaind of this elusive concept and tries with everything he knows to use logic to understand what the meaning of holiness is, where is came from, and why it has benefits. This paper I will try to explain the concept of holiness as it emerges and identify the three different definitions of piety that Euthyphro uses to help get Socrates to understand. In addition this paper will point out what Socrates goal for this discussion was and also create an argument of my definition of holiness.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Euthyphro's Definition Of Piety And Uniety
    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Euthyphro's Definition Of Piety And Uniety

    In Plato's dialog, Euthyphro is trying to prosecute his father for murder also Socrates ask Euthyphro to define piety and impiety. Euthyphro explains that what he is doing now, prosecuting the wrongdoer, is pious, whether it be about murder or robbery whether it be your father, mother or a stranger, to not prosecute would be impious.(9e) This first definition is only an example of an instance of piety and does not actually state what makes pious things pious. Just like this definition the rest of his arguments can be countered and denied. Euthyphro is in the wrong, it is unjust to prosecute your own father. Euthyphro is arrogant and self righteous. He is unwilling to hear others opinions, because he believes he is in the right.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Euthyphro
    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plato's Euthyphro

    Euthyphro's second definition of piety is what is pleasing to the gods. Socrates agrees with this definition because it is expressed in a general form, but criticizes because the gods disagree among themselves as to what is right. This would mean that a particular action, disputed by the gods, would be both pious and impious at the same time and this is a logically impossible situation. Euthyphro tries to argue against Socrates' criticism by pointing out that not even the gods would disagree amongst themselves that someone who kills without justification should be punished but Socrates argues that disputes would still arise over just how much justification there actually was and therefore the same action could still be both pious and impious. Socrates yet again believes Euthyphro's 'definition' cannot possibly be a definition.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics Munson's 5 Ethical Theories
    • 1598 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ethics Munson's 5 Ethical Theories

    The first ethical theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that describes how the moral value or worth of an action is determined by how much benefit is gained from that action. It is measured by not only the amount of benefit gained but also the amount of people with benefits in the process. This theory hopes to provide guidance when choosing a course of action. Utilitarianism is divided into two groups based off of how they apply the theory. A Rule Utilitarian believes that the action is right if it results in happiness of great benefit (Munson, 2009). For example, the commandment, “thou shall not kill” is very straight forward and doesn’t leave room for interpretation. Someone who follows Rule Utilitarianism would strictly follow this rule by never committing murder or killing any living creature. An Act Utilitarian would decipher the commandment according to its greatest benefit. Act utilitarianism is the belief that an action is right if it is better than all of the other options as long as it yields the best results. In other words, there may be situations in which breaking the rules may be the best option. Breaking the commandment, “ thou shall not kill” may seem wrong when looking at it from the surface, but if it is done to save the life’s of others it may yield the best result. The absolute that applies to Utilitarianism is the Bible. 2 Corinthians 9:7 says, “Each one must give as he has decided in his heart; not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves…

    • 1598 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Euthyphro
    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthyphro

    Euthyphro’s third definition has placed itself in a very serious position against the thought that morality somehow dependent upon God which reflects on the…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Question and Socrates
    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Question and Socrates

    The Euthyphro is a tale of Socrates and Euthyphro. They meet by chance and end up discussing what is holy and what is piety. Socrates tries to get answers from Euthyphro but because of his unwillingness to learn, they end back at the beginning of their discussion. In Euthyphro, we see the three distinct definitions of piety and holiness that is given by Euthyphro and how Socrates refutes them. This paper will give those definitions and my own argument as to what Socrate’s goal was in the Euthyphro, as well as my own definitions as to what piety and holiness is.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    A comparison of Augustinian Theodicy and Irenaean Theodicy
    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A comparison of Augustinian Theodicy and Irenaean Theodicy

    The problem of evil is a significant and enduring philosophical and theological debate. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is both all-loving and all-powerful, then how can evils-including natural evil and moral evil---exist in our world? In response to the charge that the evils of the world are incompatible with God's omnipotence and perfect goodness, the word"theodicy" is coined to deal with the problem of evil. Usually it is an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm the omnipotence of God, the love of God, and the reality of evil without contradiction. Two of the most well-known and most frequently discussed theodicies are the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Does God Allow Evil?
    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Does God Allow Evil?

    Many people dispute the true intentions of God, himself, since the beginning of mankind. Opposing and concurring arguments can be just as primitive. Regardless of personal perspective on any indefinite theory, it is undeniable that the controversy between good and evil will inevitably exist. Two dominant philosophers discussed in “The Problem of Evil” are Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and David Hume. Both of these authors discuss interesting motives from both sides of the issue: why and why not God should allow evil.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics