Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima: Was It Justified?

Better Essays
1125 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima: Was It Justified?
On August 6, 1945, an atomic bomb dubbed “Little Boy” was dropped on Hiroshima and was followed by another, named “Fat Boy” at Nagasaki three days later in an attempt by the United States to end WWII. Germany had been defeated and the allied forces were sure to win the war. The main concern was how to defeat Japan. Japan surrendered unconditionally on August 14th, 1945. President Truman’s decision to use the bombs is often criticized given that the effects of an atomic bomb are so devastating and long lasting. Was the atomic bomb really necessary? There were four major alternatives to dropping the atomic bomb: using the atomic bomb in a non combat demonstration, altering the demand for unconditional surrender, invade Japan with Allied and Soviet assistance, and continuing conventional war techniques.
One of the reasons Truman decided to drop the bomb was pressure from his military advisors, who believed that a full scale military invasion was too expensive. Truman was also under domestic pressure due to the fact that he wanted to please the public because he was up for re-election. America harbored strong feelings of prejudice against the Japanese people for the attack on Pearl Harbor and though it is speculation, it is thought that this had an effect on the decision to use an atomic weapon. Admiral William D. Leaky, Chief of Staff to Truman, said that it was in his opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was one of no material assistance in our war with Japan. The effects of the atomic bomb were overwhelming: The exact number of dead and injured will never be known because of the confusion after the explosions. Persons unaccounted for might have been burned beyond recognition in the falling buildings, disposed of in one of the mass cremations of the first week of recovery, or driven out of the city to die or recover without any record remaining. The Survey believes the dead at Hiroshima to have been between 70,000 and 80,000, with an equal number injured; at Nagasaki over 35,000 dead and somewhat more than that injured.
The first alternative would have been to demonstrate the effects of an atomic bomb by dropping it on an unpopulated area with plenty of observers. This would have shown Japan what they would be facing should they refuse to surrender. This demonstration could have saved numerous lives. The outright killing of so many non-combatants bothered many American officials. Herbert Hoover wrote that the use of the atomic bomb, with is indiscriminate killing of women and children, revolted his soul. Bob Lewis (co-pilot of the Enola Gay) wrote in his log after Little Boy was dropped on Hiroshima, “My God, what have we done?” The reason America did not employ this method was because they wanted a quick resolution and feared that a demonstration of such a powerful weapon could cause Japan to further research nuclear warfare of their own.
A second alternative would have been for America to modify their demand for unconditional surrender. The common belief of the Japanese people was that if they surrendered, their emperor, whom they believed to be a God, would be taken away from them. America could have allowed the Japanese to keep their emperor in exchange for a peaceful surrender. The American government did not use this method because they feared it would result in Japan fighting for better terms. In the end, Japan was allowed to keep their emperor.
The third alternative would have been to wait for the Soviets and other Allied powers to help invade Japan. The combined force of these powers would have strained Japan’s greatly feared military “machine.” Japan could not have held against the mutual effort of the Soviets and Allies. They would have simply been outnumbered and over powered. The reason America didn’t do this is that they couldn’t wait for the other countries to come to their aide and a full scale invasion would have been far too expensive.
A fourth alternative was to continue conventional warfare. America could have continued the naval blockade which would have caused Japan to run low on food, munitions, and other basic necessities and forced them into surrender. There are a few problems with this, the main one being time. America dropped the atomic bomb essentially as a quick end to war. Continuance of conventional techniques would have drug out the war much longer. Another issue would have been that the Japanese are raised in pride, pride for yourself, your family name, but most importantly, pride for your country. They were known to fight to the death and suicide missions were an honor. This pride could have kept Japan from surrendering.
As it has been established, there were many options, from demonstrations to continuing as the war was. The American government was placed in a very delicate situation, the lives of thousands in their hands, lives they chose to take. The decision they made would suffice and ultimately end WWII. They saved countless American lives in the process and that is what mattered. Any argument as to if the alternatives had been a better decision is purely speculative.

Bibliography

"Primary Sources." Redirection to Equivalent @ Cengage. http://college.cengage.com/history/us/resources/students/primary/atomicbomb.htm (accessed May 10, 2012).

Rosenberg, Jennifer. "The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki." 20th Century History. http://history1900s.about.com/od/worldwarii/a/hiroshima.htm (accessed May 11, 2012).

"The Decision to Drop the Bomb [ushistory.org]." ushistory.org. http://www.ushistory.org/us/51g.asp (accessed May 11, 2012).

"Was there an alternative to the Atomic Bomb? « Thoughts on Military History." Thoughts on Military History. http://thoughtsonmilitaryhistory.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/was-there-an-alternative-to-the-atomic-bomb/ (accessed May 10, 2012).

"World War II in the USSR." World War II History Library. http://www.worldwariihistory.info/in/USSR.html (accessed May 11, 2012).

--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. "The Decision to Drop the Bomb [ushistory.org]." ushistory.org. http://www.ushistory.org/us/51g.asp (accessed May 11, 2012).
[ 2 ]. "Primary Sources." Redirection to Equivalent @ Cengage. http://college.cengage.com/history/us/resources/students/primary/atomicbomb.htm (accessed May 10, 2012).
[ 3 ]. "Was there an alternative to the Atomic Bomb? « Thoughts on Military History." Thoughts on Military History. http://thoughtsonmilitaryhistory.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/was-there-an-alternative-to-the-atomic-bomb/ (accessed May 10, 2012).
[ 4 ]. Rosenberg, Jennifer. "The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki." 20th Century History. http://history1900s.about.com/od/worldwarii/a/hiroshima.htm (accessed May 10, 2012).
[ 5 ]. "World War II in the USSR." World War II History Library. http://www.worldwariihistory.info/in/USSR.html (accessed May 11, 2012).

Bibliography: "Primary Sources." Redirection to Equivalent @ Cengage. http://college.cengage.com/history/us/resources/students/primary/atomicbomb.htm (accessed May 10, 2012). Rosenberg, Jennifer. "The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki." 20th Century History. http://history1900s.about.com/od/worldwarii/a/hiroshima.htm (accessed May 11, 2012). "The Decision to Drop the Bomb [ushistory.org]." ushistory.org. http://www.ushistory.org/us/51g.asp (accessed May 11, 2012). "Was there an alternative to the Atomic Bomb? « Thoughts on Military History." Thoughts on Military History. http://thoughtsonmilitaryhistory.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/was-there-an-alternative-to-the-atomic-bomb/ (accessed May 10, 2012). "World War II in the USSR." World War II History Library. http://www.worldwariihistory.info/in/USSR.html (accessed May 11, 2012). [ 2 ]. "Primary Sources." Redirection to Equivalent @ Cengage. http://college.cengage.com/history/us/resources/students/primary/atomicbomb.htm (accessed May 10, 2012). [ 3 ]. "Was there an alternative to the Atomic Bomb? « Thoughts on Military History." Thoughts on Military History. http://thoughtsonmilitaryhistory.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/was-there-an-alternative-to-the-atomic-bomb/ (accessed May 10, 2012). [ 4 ]. Rosenberg, Jennifer. "The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki." 20th Century History. http://history1900s.about.com/od/worldwarii/a/hiroshima.htm (accessed May 10, 2012). [ 5 ]. "World War II in the USSR." World War II History Library. http://www.worldwariihistory.info/in/USSR.html (accessed May 11, 2012).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Truman, as he saw the attack of okinawa in 1944 witnessed how the Japanese would not surrender, they had to capture all 100,000 Japanese soldiers on the island (peace and war book page 152 by Ben Walsh). This lead to the US dropping almost 2000 tons of incendiary grenade from B 29 planes which ensured the US a victory for Truman. Although the Japanese were losing the pacific war, the fire bombs failed to persuade Japan to surrender which made Harry Truman’s decision to drop the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. From the information given to Harry Truman of how the Japanese were not willing to surrender, dropping of the atomic bomb was justified as he did it in order to shorten the agony of war and to save American lives. Based on the choices given, Truman had to take the least costly option which was to use this bomb. Furthermore, the bomb was an approach to end Japanese brutality on the asian countries they have colonized. In retrospect, many historians have criticized him as the Japanese were rumoured to be ready to surrender prior to the use of the Atomic…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During World War II, the Japanese and Americans were at war. Japan had an advantage over American military troops with a greater number of troops being put out into the war. On the other hand, American troops and military bases had a technological advantage, which ultimately helped the Americans succeed during the war. President Truman made one of the most difficult decisions in American history. Truman’s decision would kill many Japanese soldiers but would save many of the Americans. An atomic bomb would be the last resort, which would wipe out countless miles of land, military bases, and anyone who was close by. As Truman had to think about the pros and cons of this decision, it was ultimately Truman’s say so in whether to proceed and…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Truman’s decision of the atomic bombing has undeniably made a huge impact to world’s history events. Throughout decades, many individuals’ have encountered diverse explanations as to why it was necessary for the dropping of the atomic bomb. While others believe it was essential, some may think that it caused an enormous catastrophe, murdering millions of innocent civilians and produced a generation with an atrocious radiation poison. Years has passed by and it continues to be the utmost talked about event. The atomic bombing that took place in Japan can be argued that it was the greatest decision made by president Truman. There are majority of different schools of thought behind President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombing. Readings that have been encountered can conclude that President Truman’s decision was a great one. This event prevented future fatalities amongst the Japanese as well as the Americans, ended the world war II, and it was the only option handed to Truman.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In August of 1945 nuclear weapons were exploded upon the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. Following these atomic bombings, Japan surrendered. But were the atomic bombings necessary to save Allied lives and end Japan's threat to world peace while avoiding a deadly invasion of the Japanese mainland? The following account summarizes the events that led to Japan's surrender in World War II and then considers other means of achieving Japan's surrender. The second half of this article, which also includes the bibliography, can be found in Part 2.…

    • 4102 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: Dixon, Norm. "Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Worst Single Terror Attacks in History | Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal." Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Worst Single Terror Attacks in History | Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Feb. 2013.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A key reason for Truman’s decision to drop the Atomic Bomb was the alternative options were not proper solutions. Dropping the bomb wasn’t the only considered option. The main “runner up” was a mass invasion of Japan. This idea was very dangerous. The casualties for the US were projected to be over 1,000,000 soldiers, and 5,000,000 japanese soldiers. One of the other alternatives was the idea of displaying to true power of the atomic weapon to Japan through a test. Such an idea had way too many flaws to be applicable. There was only enough Plutonium and Uranium available to the US for two bombs, (Little Boy, Fat Man). Also this idea was a risk because if the weapon did not detonate, the US would look even weaker to the Japanese. The idea of barricading the Japanese was also a considered solution, using Naval vessels to trap the Japanese in until the US “starved them out”. The fault in this idea was the unreasonable amount of time and resources it would consume. After weighing the options, and thinking it through carefully, President Truman made the correct choice to drop the bomb.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Compton, Karl T. "If the Atomic Bomb Had Not Been Used." Atlantic Monthly 1946: 54-56. Web. 7 Mar. 2013.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nadesan Satyendra - "Hiroshima and Nagasaki the Worst Terror Attacks in Human History - Tamilnation, January, 1, 2009 http://www.tamilnation.org/humanrights/hiroshima.htm…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: History.com Staff. “Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.” History.com. A+E Networks. 2009. Web. 30 Apr. 2014.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wittner, Lawrence S. "There Is an Ongoing Danger of Nuclear War." Nuclear Armament. Ed. Debra A. Miller. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2011. Current Controversies. Rpt. from "The Ongoing Danger of Nuclear War." hnn.us. 2009. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 21 Oct. 2014.…

    • 946 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6, President Harry Truman plans to drop an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. This bomb is supposed to have a major impact on this city. Tens of thousands of people are estimated to die on impact, and thousands are estimated to die after due to the exposure to radiation. President Truman wants to drop the bomb to end the six year war, however, it has caused a major controversy over the amount of damage it will cause. Some people believe that this amount of destruction is needed to assure the war ends. They believe that Japan is going to attack the United States soon, and because the USA is low on resources, they are more vulnerable for the attack. Others think that we should drop the bomb, Little Man, in a nearby harbor to scare the Japanese. They also think that the atomic bomb is too extreme. The blast of the bomb is supposed to be…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After considering the pros and cons of the use of nuclear weapons I believe that President Truman and the U.S were not justified in the use of the atomic bomb to force Japan’s surrender. First of all there were alternative options to resolve the war than resorting to drop a bomb. Instead of bombing Japan we could’ve cut a deal or create a treaty to end the war with little to no bloodshed or could’ve even waited for the Russians to attack to scare Japan into conditional surrender or at least less casualties if assisted by U.S army. Truman should have assessed…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: /b><ol><li>Claypool, Jane (1984). Turning Points of World War II: Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Toronto: Grolier, 1984.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1988 Dbq

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The atomic bomb is the subject of much controversy. The original desire of the United States government when they dropped Little Boy and Fat Man on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not, in fact, the one more commonly known: that the two nuclear devices dropped upon Hiroshima and Nagasaki were detonated with the intention of bringing an end to the war with Japan, but instead to intimidate the Soviet Union. The fact of Japan's imminent defeat, the undeniable truth that relations with Russia were deteriorating, and competition for the division of Europe prove this without question.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays