Pros And Cons Of Truman Decisions

During World War II, the Japanese and Americans were at war. Japan had an advantage over American military troops with a greater number of troops being put out into the war. On the other hand, American troops and military bases had a technological advantage, which ultimately helped the Americans succeed during the war. President Truman made one of the most difficult decisions in American history. Truman’s decision would kill many Japanese soldiers but would save many of the Americans. An atomic bomb would be the last resort, which would wipe out countless miles of land, military bases, and anyone who was close by. As Truman had to think about the pros and cons of this decision, it was ultimately Truman’s say so in whether to proceed and
Many people were in favor of his overall decision. They took into consideration that many more lives from the opposing side would be lost in the war with this deadly weapon. This would ultimately lead to the overall surrender from the Japanese. According to research, Truman and his troops targeted two military bases which included Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Research also identified where the bomb was pulled. In 1945, President Truman decided to take action and proceed with the bombs. The bombs were pulled over Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This caused widespread devastation throughout Hiroshima and surrounding areas. More than 70,000 people were killed instantly and the Japanese military base was wiped out. Why did many individuals support Truman’s decision? According to research, Truman wanted to end the war, so he chose the best available option, which was setting off the atomic bomb. This saved untold lives on both sides in the process. The ultimate responsibility for Hiroshima and Nagasaki lied within the Japanese. Truman sought to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki to avoid an overall invasion of Japan. Truman and many others thought morally throughout the time of questioning. In the end, the use of the atomic bombs was not only necessary, but moral. Truman and his supporters provided evidence that proved why his decision was indeed the best for the Americans.
Although the bomb would indeed wipe out the enemy troops, who's to say that innocent civilians wouldn’t lose their lives. Truman had to think about that in his decision making process. Would more lives have been saved setting off the bomb? As strong as the atomic bomb was, Truman believed it was the way to go. The initial shock was a couple of miles, but the aftershock covered hundreds of miles more. According to the BBC article, estimates suggested that the final toll was about 140,000, of Hiroshima's 350,000 population, including military personnel and those who died later from radiation. Many also suffered long-term sickness and disability. The bomb in Nagasaki killed nearly 74,000 and a similar number were injured. The bombs ended up killing many civilians and military soldiers, because of how far the bomb and radiation reached. The two atomic bombs left no choice for the Japanese. They surrendered to the Allies on 14 August 1945. Out of the two Japanese depots that were targeted, civilians were also involved and killed. Many people condemned Truman and America over the decision. Politically, many did not want Truman to be any more involved and became careful in who they would put into office. A disadvantage towards this decision was that the surrounding cities suffered extensive damage. Also the home islands were subjected to naval blockades that made food and fuel extremely scarce. Research identified