Preview

Why Truman Had the Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1290 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Truman Had the Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb
President Truman Had the Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb
“On the morning of August 6, 1945, the American B-29 Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later another B-29, Bock’s Car, released one over Nagasaki. Both caused enormous casualties and physical destruction.” (Maddox 1). These disastrous events have weighted upon the American conscience ever since that day in history. Even though there are some people that disagree with the dropping of the atomic bomb, President Truman’s decision was very critical because he prevented the loss of many American lives, Japanese soldiers fought with no notion of ever surrendering, and it brought an end to a bloody war.
The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.
President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb saved many American lives during



Cited: Beason, Keith. The Atomic Bomb Controversy. 2011. Web. 7 March 2013. <angelfire.com/ga/wkb/abombframe.html>. Cochran, Bert. Harry Truman and the Crisis Presidency. New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1973. Print. Compton, Karl T. "If the Atomic Bomb Had Not Been Used." Atlantic Monthly 1946: 54-56. Web. 7 Mar. 2013. Maddox, Robert James. “The Biggest Decision: Why We Had To Drop The Atomic Bomb.” American Heritage 46.3 (1995): 70. Academic Search Elite. Web. 4 March 2013. McCullough, David G. Truman. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992. Print. Stimson, Henry L. "The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb." Harper 's Magazine 1947: 96-107. Web. 7 Mar. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Truman Decision

    • 5419 Words
    • 22 Pages

    President Harry S. Truman decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan is perhaps the most controversial act of policy in United States history. One of the many different reasons given for the use of this weapon was the shock effect it would produce in the Japanese foreign policy circle. While the shock of the Japanese will be discussed later, it is important to note that it had a similar effect on the west. This shock effect has caused countless authors to speculate as to the motivation behind, and effects of this revolutionary weapon.…

    • 5419 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    My purpose in writing this essay was to show that while “A letter to the President of the United States” was written by someone who was very knowledgeable and signed or approved by many other scientists was not successful. This essay goes to show that sometimes no matter how much valid evidence is presented to an individual regarding why they should not make a decision, they disregard that and make the decision anyway. I hope that the readers are able to understand that the scientists were truly worried about what long term effects the use of the atomic bomb would have on the United States.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    By the closing stages of the Second World War the Generals and Admirals had very little to do with how the war was to end. Truly the decision to drop the atomic bomb was a precipitous change in the Machiavellian relationship between war and politics. Before the generals and admirals were the experts in how to place their weapons to maximum effect making policies and doctrine based upon their initiative and insight from ‘in the field’ or ‘on the ground’. The employment of Atomic weapons though was new territory and the use and employment of said weapons proved to be political territory. The controversy surrounding this pivotal turning point in American global politics will continue to confuse and confound any and all who would attempt to plumb its depths for the proverbial ‘truth’ surrounding why the United States dropped not only one but two atomic bombs on Japan.…

    • 2492 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have investigated whether the dropping of the atom bomb was necessary and what effect the bombs had on ending the war in the pacific. The government of the United States of America were divided in opinions on how to use this weapon of mass destruction, and its impact on history. However now, the decision for dropping the atom bomb was an extremely complex and connected to a wide array of problems, and many of them simply went beyond the goal of the surrender of japan. Through analysing the many intertwined issues, I personally believe that the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified, as it had saved more lives, not just for the allied forces, but also…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During World War II, the Japanese and Americans were at war. Japan had an advantage over American military troops with a greater number of troops being put out into the war. On the other hand, American troops and military bases had a technological advantage, which ultimately helped the Americans succeed during the war. President Truman made one of the most difficult decisions in American history. Truman’s decision would kill many Japanese soldiers but would save many of the Americans. An atomic bomb would be the last resort, which would wipe out countless miles of land, military bases, and anyone who was close by. As Truman had to think about the pros and cons of this decision, it was ultimately Truman’s say so in whether to proceed and…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In august of 1945, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a questionable decision by Harry Truman, the president of The United States of America. Throughout the years, it has been a heated debate in terms of whether the decision was morally correct and justified. Historians have analyzed and presented many arguments. In this short essay, I will attempt to expand on how historians feel about the decision by Truman to use atomic bombs. The revisionists bring into perspective and question the motivations of Harry Truman claiming he had more on his agenda than just the war. In my opinion, the decision to use atomic bombs was somewhat justified because if looked at statistically, the death toll with an invasion would have been higher and Truman…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hiroshima Historians Ressess

    • 7211 Words
    • 29 Pages

    Careful scholarly treatment of the records and manuscripts opened over the past few years has greatly enhanced our understanding of why the Truman administration used atomic weapons against Japan. Experts continue to disagree on some issues, but critical questions have been answered. The consensus among scholars is that the bomb was not needed to avoid an invasion of Japan and to end the war within a relatively short time. It is clear that alternatives to the bomb existed and that Truman and his advisers knew it. [Emphasis added.]…

    • 7211 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Donovan, Robert J. Conflict and Crisis: The Presidency of Harry S. Truman 1945-1948. Columbia MO: University of Missouri Press, 1996.…

    • 2599 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Weber, Mark. “Was Hiroshima Necessary?: Why the Atomic Bombings Could Have Been Avoided.” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 16, No. 3 (May-June 1997): 4-11, Institute for Historical Review.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6, 1945, the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, however, three days later, August 9, another bomb was released on Nagasaki. President Truman came down to a decision in bombing Japan in hope of swiftly ending the war, essentially saving numerous Americans and Japanese lives. But, because of Japan’s gruesome and barbaric actions in the past, the use of atomic bomb accounted justified. However, his decision is heavily criticized as people have suggested other alternatives; such as implying that the Operation Downfall, another name for invading Japan, would have been a better solution, given how defeated Japan was. Other historians have challenged and argued these justifications by stating that Truman saw only compelling reasons by…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Secondary sources that I utilized were Alperovitz, G., Messer, R. L., & Bernstein, B. J. (1991). Marshall, Truman, and the decision to drop the bomb. International Security, 16(3), 204–221. Walker, J. S. (2005), Recent literature on Truman’s atomic bomb decision: A search for middle ground. Diplomatic History, 29(2), 311–334, and Morton, L. (1957). The decision to use the atomic bomb. Foreign Affairs, 35(2), 334–353.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once the atomic bomb had been tested, President Truman faced the decision as to whether to use it. He did not like the idea, but he was persuaded that it would shorten the war against Japan and save American lives. It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. My own feeling was that in being the first to use it, we had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make wars in that fashion, and that wars cannot be won by destroying women and children. The policy of indiscriminate murder to shorten the war is considered to be a crime. It is not a bomb. It is not an explosive. It is a poisonous thing that killed people by its radioactive…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman, as he saw the attack of okinawa in 1944 witnessed how the Japanese would not surrender, they had to capture all 100,000 Japanese soldiers on the island (peace and war book page 152 by Ben Walsh). This lead to the US dropping almost 2000 tons of incendiary grenade from B 29 planes which ensured the US a victory for Truman. Although the Japanese were losing the pacific war, the fire bombs failed to persuade Japan to surrender which made Harry Truman’s decision to drop the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. From the information given to Harry Truman of how the Japanese were not willing to surrender, dropping of the atomic bomb was justified as he did it in order to shorten the agony of war and to save American lives. Based on the choices given, Truman had to take the least costly option which was to use this bomb. Furthermore, the bomb was an approach to end Japanese brutality on the asian countries they have colonized. In retrospect, many historians have criticized him as the Japanese were rumoured to be ready to surrender prior to the use of the Atomic…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At 8:15 am on August the 6th 1945 an atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Hiroshima in Japan. In this essay I will be presenting my views on whether the Americans should have used the atomic weapons against Japan. I both agree and disagree that dropping the bomb was the right thing to do. Throughout this essay I will explain why I feel that both points and reason are correct. At the end I will put together and summarise my strongest points.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hiroshima and Nagasaki

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The morning of August 6, 1945 was devastating to Japan. The United States B-29 bomber Enola Gay had dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima. Nicknamed “Little Boy”, it was the first nuclear weapon to be used in warfare and packed an explosion equal to that of 20,000 tons of TNT. Just three days later, another bomb, called “Fat Man”, was released on the industrial city of Nagasaki. Combined, the death toll was above 200,000 people. Leading up to these attacks, much research had been done in what was called the Manhattan Project. The program was headed by Leslie R. Groves and was created to research and build an atomic bomb. Secretly located in Los Alamos, New Mexico, the bomb was built and tested by a team of Allied scientists and engineers. The team of scientists on the project, led by J. Robert Oppenheimer, successfully oversaw the first test of the “Fat Man” atomic bomb model in what was called the Trinity test. This trial adequately showed the true power of the bomb and its capability of destruction. With this realization came much controversy over how, where, when, and even if the bomb should be used. Strong opinions from powerful members of the government varied. For example, Fleet Admiral of the United States Navy William Leahy believed that the bomb “killed civilians indiscriminately” and was strongly opposed to using it. On the other hand, Secretary of State James Byrnes believed that the U.S. should drop the bomb on Japan without warning. These mixed emotions over the bomb put much pressure on the president as to whether or not to use it. However, in his own opinion, President Harry S. Truman “regarded the bombs as a military weapon and never had any doubts that it should be used.”…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays