Preview

aristole and kant

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
734 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
aristole and kant
Alexander Herrera
Clowney
10/29/13
MidTerm Exam

When it comes to the wide spectrum that is ethical theories, Aristotle and Immanuel Kant are on the far edges of both sides. Where Aristotle believes that happiness is the centerpiece of morality, Kant is the direct opposite and believes that happiness is not the focal point of morality. If these two were both living at the same time, it would quite the debate to have seen unfold. By illustrating a dialogue between Aristotle and Kant, a better understanding of their theories in regards to happiness.
Aristotle’s main argument is that happiness is the ultimate goal for humans., “Happiness depends on ourselves, more than anybody else.” Aristotle states that the end goal for all human activities is happiness. He also states that as happiness is achieved, it occurs over the course of a lifetime; like friends, wealth, and knowledge.
Kant’s belief is the complete opposite of Aristotle. Kant believes that happiness isn’t viable as the basis of morality. If people did whatever it took to be happy, it would prevent others from being happy which would lead to the notion that everyone could not be moral. The duty is what we as moral beings should strive for as Kant believes.
If these two philosophers were alive today and were to debate about the topic of happiness, they would disagree on a number of things. First Kant would disagree with Aristotle’s belief that happiness is the ultimate goal for humans. He would go about refuting by saying that if everyone did whatever they wanted to do and ignored their duty in order to seek happiness; it would lead to some people doing things that would prevent others from being happy. For example, this scenario is about if you were a coach for a little league baseball team and your son’s skill level is much lower then the other child who plays the same starting position. Kant in this situation would say it’s the coach’s duty to do what is best for the team and not what he

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the book Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle summarizes how ethics can be used to determine the best way for an individual to achieve happiness. After reading the text, there were a couple of themes that stood out the most to me. Happiness is a choice and with this happiness, friends are needed most of all.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle believed that we as humans have natural obligations that provide happiness. Happiness consists of pleasure and the capacity to develop reasoning.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle's Moral Beliefs

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    My moral beliefs also correspond to the philosophy that is taught by Aristotle. In my opinion, happiness comes from within ourselves, not from our surroundings. I think this is a very important part of Aristotle’s teaching. I believe that in order to accept others and enjoy life, we must first learn to accept ourselves and be proud of who we are. If we are constantly ashamed with who we are, then we are not free to live a happy life. I think this is the main idea in Aristotle’s teaching. He believed that in order for us to be happy we must build our own character by choosing to live virtuously.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What part does happiness play in determining the morality of an act in a situation? Can a concept that ties morality to the search of happiness truly be rational? What of the opposite? Is it possible to view every situation with objectivity, never taking into account an emotion (like happiness)? The questions above concern themselves with the part of the central tenets of the ethical views of two very important philosophers, respectfully: John Mill and Immanuel Kant. The ethical theories that these two philosophers laid out clash with each other in fundamental ways, from how reason was defined, to the role that “happiness” played in determining the ethical choice in a moral dilemma. In the following pages, I will attempt to present and discuss the theories of Kant and Mill, pointing out what I perceive as weakness in said theories, as well as the possible strengths of each system.…

    • 2194 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophers live and encourage others to live according to the rules of practical wisdom. Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas were three philosophers who sorted out various ethical approaches. They investigated complex human actions and theorized what is the ethical thing to do. For instance, Aristotle contemplated the aim of human life, Kant observed duty and obligation from respect for the law, and Levinas examined one's responsibility to the Other. These unique points of view offer different answers regarding the search for the good. In addition to their differences, these philosophers are bound together by similar ideas. For example, each of the philosophers believed in optimism-- they thought that all humans are naturally ethical. In addition, each of the philosophers believed in using reason to be ethical. They emphasized the concept of living well and acting well by using virtuous habits and good character to reach the "good". Furthermore, they all believed in self actualization-- in other words, ethically being the best one can be. They all thought an ethical person must be rational and responsible for their actions. They proposed that each person has a duty towards others and society.…

    • 880 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle doesn’t think that happiness is something that comes and goes continuously, he sees happiness as a goal in ones life or the ultimate value of ones life so far. “Verbally there is a very general agreement; for both the general run of men and people of superior refinement say that it is happiness, and identify living well and doing well with being happy; but with regard to what happiness is they differ, and the many do not give the same account as the wise” (Nicomachean Ethics, 4). Aristotle finds that only the wise know what true happiness is and it has to do with doing well for oneself, which can be interpreted differently from person to person. There is no exact thing Aristotle is relating to doing well, it’s more like one personally sets a goal or decides whether their life is good which translates into happiness. Maybe what Aristotle is saying isn’t that one will be continually happy with the position they are in in their life, but that one will be content with how their life is going and accept it, as in happiness depends on what a person does to make themselves happy. When a person usually thinks of anyone being happy they probably think of someone smiling or laughing while doing some kind of activity, but who is to say that is what happiness is? Happiness could just be getting out of a tough time in one’s life and being in a…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI2000 The Good Life

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aristotle believes that one’s accomplishments in being happy are the driving force to a “Good Life”. The good life creates a happiness that relates to one functioning well and reason. Aristotle believes that it takes time, hard work and restraint to get to the employ the habits of reasoning and according to him everything has a purpose (Rachels and Rachels, pg 54). Aristotle states that “Good” has rightly been defined as “that at which all things aim” and that people identify happiness with living well or doing well (Sommers & Sommers, 2010).…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle states that everything that a man does is for an end purpose. He defines happiness as actions in accordance with reason. If humans live out their lives to their full potential and live according to reason and with virtues, than they can obtain happiness. In today’s world, many think that happiness is got from money, success, and fame. Many people believe that these things are essential for happiness. Aristotle suggests, it is what we do in our life, not what we gain from our life, like money or success, which gives us happiness. He argues that happiness does not occur instantly. In our world today, we want to feel happiness instantly. However, Aristotle does not rely on this idea. He believes that happiness comes over time and the things that happen in short lived moments do not truly make us happy, but that the activities or virtues, we engage in over time give us happiness in the end. He contends that by achieving certain virtues, it leads to happiness in the long run, not in an instantaneous moment. In our society today, Aristotle’s ideas on happiness would not be useful. In Aristotle’s perfect world, everyone would be virtuous and happy. Unfortunately, that is not how our society works today. Aristotle’s ideas are inaccurate because many people gain happiness out of doing unvirtuous actions. For example, Hitler gained some sort of happiness out of murdering Jews.…

    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    We don’t know what will make us happy. “The reason for this is that all the elements that belong to the concept of happiness are empirical- that is, they must be borrowed from experience” (Kant 174). The fact that an action may lead to happiness cannot be the grounds for moral obligation. Happiness is permissible in duty, however cannot be the reason for out actions. Duty is the necessity of act done out of respect for the law. His claim is all of our emotions react to non-rational passion but respect responds to reason, how we evaluate our projected maxims. Kant notes that “happiness” is too indefinite and too empirical to serve as the reason why we “ought” to do things. It is too indefinite because we all have different meanings of happiness; one person’s happiness can be someone else’s pain. For example for the people of France to ensure they are safe and happy, they banned Muslim women from wearing their burquas. This might please the people of France, however it upsets Muslim women who respect their religion and want to wear their…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phi 160

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle one of a great thinkers left a great philosophical logic that is still being learned today. Born in Stagira, Greece Aristotle started as a student of Plato to become a tutor of Alexander the Great. In Nicomachean Ethics, book written by Aristotle’s, he explains virtues and how happiness is the means by which human beings have moral virtues. The debate whether virtue or vice should determine happiness is what Aristotle simplifies for us. Happiness should be determined by the activities human beings, virtuous or not, do in order to be happy within themselves.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis P. Pojman's Analysis

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle was Plato’s prize pupil who discussed the types of moments where moral correctness may be applied to certain events, nature of virtues involved in the sound morality of humans as well as the ways to achieve happiness in one’s life. The overall question that Aristotle tends to ask himself and try to answer is the question that pertains to human character and personality, what do we as humans need to do, to be considered as a good person. Aristotle explained that every activity has a final cause and purpose at which it aims to achieve and he argued that since there is not an infinite amount of goods, there has to be one type of good that is the highest and most important which humans strive towards. He continues to describe this ultimate good and decided that it could be called happiness, however the only puzzling question left is, what is happiness? Due to its existence in so many forms it is tough to describe happiness as one true thing…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Choosing what morality is determined by, may be the problem in its own-self. Great men have contemplated where morality really lies, though many of them have took another's work to serve as the guide to strive for their own progression. Through the progression of these studies one can conclude that happiness is a focal point in the works of many great men. It seems to be one of the basis of which humanity uses as their definition of morality.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle and Happiness

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. According to the text a full functioning completely happy person will be mentally, physically, spiritually, financially, professionally, creatively, and socially healthy & well rounded individual. Happiness involves being really alive and not just existing. Aristotle believes that a person should work hard doing what they love, they also shouldn’t devote their lives to acquiring riches since riches don’t provide happiness. One should also reject fame and public success to become happy as self sufficiency is believed to provide happiness. Happiness is a process starting from infancy. A happy life is a life where spiritual, physical and social needs are met under reason and moderation. I think Aristotle recipe of happiness involves a person making a conscience decision to do the right thing in all aspects of their life. I think the happiness he refers to is obtained by living a healthy life, being in tune with our psyche, having a career that we enjoy, having friends and family to love, and having enough riches to support ourselves without gloating about them.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Heilbroner Vs Kant

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Seems pretty simple, right? Kant says that happiness is irrelevant to being morally good. So basically, you can be the most depressed person and still be morally good; as long as your intentions are good. Morality is necessary to Kant, and being morally good can make you unhappy. For example, telling the truth can make you morally good, but it can also make you unhappy. Say your friend asks you “does this dress make me look fat?” and you tell them yes, technically it makes you morally good because you told the truth, but you’re unhappy because your friend doesn’t want to be your friend anymore. It seems as if Kant’s view on morality is somewhat a win lose situation. Kant’s Categorical Imperative is how one’s maxims become universal law. An example of a universal law would be murder, I’m 98% positive that it is illegal to kill someone because “you felt like doing it”, on the other hand if say you were in war and you had to sacrifice your life in order to save your comrades, then in Kant’s eyes what you did was morally…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The basic idea behind Aristotle’s book is that the ultimate goal in life is to achieve true happiness. This particular idea makes the most sense to me. “Happiness, then, is found to be something perfect and self-sufficient, being the end to which our actions are directed” (Aristotle, Page 15). This quote states that happiness is the final, the end and all other things will lead up to this. Happiness is stated to direct our actions because people all want to be happy. This idea gives people the feeling of “self-sufficient” because no other person can make another person achieve the ultimate good because it is all dependent on the person. Happiness is a perfect thing because no one truly knows what it is until they reach it themselves. The idea of happiness is subjective around the world given the different cultures so it is impossible to even begin to describe specifically how to reach the ultimate good. He also says "Since happiness is a certain sort of activity of the soul in accord with complete virtue, we must examine virtue; for that will perhaps also be a way to study happiness better" (Aristotle, 16). Happiness is a virtue and in order to know happiness then you need to have an idea of what a virtue is. Virtue is the behavior showing high moral standards. Moral standards are important in all culture and especially in the Geek culture because of the gods who…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics