Preview

Louis P. Pojman's Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1097 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Louis P. Pojman's Analysis
Aristotle was Plato’s prize pupil who discussed the types of moments where moral correctness may be applied to certain events, nature of virtues involved in the sound morality of humans as well as the ways to achieve happiness in one’s life. The overall question that Aristotle tends to ask himself and try to answer is the question that pertains to human character and personality, what do we as humans need to do, to be considered as a good person. Aristotle explained that every activity has a final cause and purpose at which it aims to achieve and he argued that since there is not an infinite amount of goods, there has to be one type of good that is the highest and most important which humans strive towards. He continues to describe this ultimate good and decided that it could be called happiness, however the only puzzling question left is, what is happiness? Due to its existence in so many forms it is tough to describe happiness as one true thing …show more content…
Aristotle’s general ideology is that all things in the universe have a certain characteristic function that they can properly use to perform different types of tasks. Therefore the good that exists at all times must involve the interaction of human life and take it into consideration as a whole which must pertain to the soul and express genuine virtue. In Louis P. Pojman’s Philosophy the Quest for Truth, “The masses and cultured classes agree in calling it happiness and conceive that to live well or to do well is the same thing as to be happy,” meaning that politics and ethics seem to agree on living well and ethically is similar to happiness however they do not agree on what happiness actually is (522). In turn this means that humans should

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Aristotle believed that we as humans have natural obligations that provide happiness. Happiness consists of pleasure and the capacity to develop reasoning.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI2000 The Good Life

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aristotle believes that one’s accomplishments in being happy are the driving force to a “Good Life”. The good life creates a happiness that relates to one functioning well and reason. Aristotle believes that it takes time, hard work and restraint to get to the employ the habits of reasoning and according to him everything has a purpose (Rachels and Rachels, pg 54). Aristotle states that “Good” has rightly been defined as “that at which all things aim” and that people identify happiness with living well or doing well (Sommers & Sommers, 2010).…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle and Happiness

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. According to the text a full functioning completely happy person will be mentally, physically, spiritually, financially, professionally, creatively, and socially healthy & well rounded individual. Happiness involves being really alive and not just existing. Aristotle believes that a person should work hard doing what they love, they also shouldn’t devote their lives to acquiring riches since riches don’t provide happiness. One should also reject fame and public success to become happy as self sufficiency is believed to provide happiness. Happiness is a process starting from infancy. A happy life is a life where spiritual, physical and social needs are met under reason and moderation. I think Aristotle recipe of happiness involves a person making a conscience decision to do the right thing in all aspects of their life. I think the happiness he refers to is obtained by living a healthy life, being in tune with our psyche, having a career that we enjoy, having friends and family to love, and having enough riches to support ourselves without gloating about them.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle believes that people's actions are governed through their desire to achieve happiness. According to Aristotle, the purpose of human life is by happiness through living your life entirely by your actions as an individual on…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nicomachean Ethics, states that Happiness is virtuous activity that fulfills the human’s proper function which brings pleasure. However, our ultimate end isn 't pleasure; if it were, we 'd be no better than the animals. Aristotle believed that physical pleasures tempt us with excesses and lead us away from virtue and happiness (Aristotle, 2009).…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Price Gouging

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The basic philosophy of Aristotle opposed to the contemporary ideas of Immanuel Kant created a good competition for the most intriguing analysis of the human good. Nevertheless, after studying each philosopher 's beliefs, Kant 's view spoke about the good in a collective sense throughout the unconditional imperatives of man, on the other hand Aristotle stated that, "Happiness, then, is something final and self-sufficient, and is the end of action."(Nicomachean Ethics, 1999)…

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The basic idea behind Aristotle’s book is that the ultimate goal in life is to achieve true happiness. This particular idea makes the most sense to me. “Happiness, then, is found to be something perfect and self-sufficient, being the end to which our actions are directed” (Aristotle, Page 15). This quote states that happiness is the final, the end and all other things will lead up to this. Happiness is stated to direct our actions because people all want to be happy. This idea gives people the feeling of “self-sufficient” because no other person can make another person achieve the ultimate good because it is all dependent on the person. Happiness is a perfect thing because no one truly knows what it is until they reach it themselves. The idea of happiness is subjective around the world given the different cultures so it is impossible to even begin to describe specifically how to reach the ultimate good. He also says "Since happiness is a certain sort of activity of the soul in accord with complete virtue, we must examine virtue; for that will perhaps also be a way to study happiness better" (Aristotle, 16). Happiness is a virtue and in order to know happiness then you need to have an idea of what a virtue is. Virtue is the behavior showing high moral standards. Moral standards are important in all culture and especially in the Geek culture because of the gods who…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Book I of Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle states that the ultimate human goal or end is happiness. Aristotle describes the steps required for humans to obtain happiness. Aristotle states that activity is an important requirement of happiness. He states that a happy person cannot be inactive. He then goes on to say that living a life of virtue is something pleasurable in itself. The virtuous person takes pleasure in doing virtuous things. The role of virtue is an important one for Aristotle. Without virtue, it seems one cannot obtain happiness. Virtue acts as a linking factor to happiness.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle believes in that idea of eudemonia through the function argument, the golden mean, and contemplation is the backbone of a good life. He also believes that in order to be content humans should have and know their final end or goal in life. Through this paper, I will explain what Aristotle thinks about approaching a good life and mixing into his argument, of what I personally think. I will do this when a number of examples to give a visual aid of coming from my viewpoint of how I believe it is perceived.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eudaimonia stands for happiness in Greek. Aristotle argues that the highest good for human beings is happiness. He insists that every action performed by humans is to pursue happiness. Aristotle also argues that human action is always aimed at some end or good. This "good" may not be viewed as a good action or any good by others, but for the doer of the action ("good"), the activity will be perceived as good and that it will bring a favorable outcome. Aristotle also said that all of our actions resulting in ends or goods form a hierarchy. This hierarchy, incorporates a ladder of things, and this ladder would categorize things according to their importance. And the most important thing would be on top of the ladder, thus being the ultimate end. This ultimate end is what all the actions aim to reach at or achieve. [This end must be self-sufficient, it must be attainable and it must be what we want]1. Therefore, because happiness includes all these, then it must be the highest good. An example of this ladder could be a person working hard to lose weight or trying to stay in shape. The bottom step of the ladder is the person working out in a gym, but why is the person working out? To lose weight or maintain their shape. Why does the person want to lose weight or maintain their shape? To look good physically and to be healthy. Why does the person want to look good or be healthy? To be attractive and to lead a stress-less and a comfortable life. And why does the person want to be attractive and/or lead a healthy life? To have peace of mind and to be happy. This example shows that every action is aimed at some end and the ultimate end to the action is happiness. Therefore based on the circumstances, the highest good is happiness and happiness alone.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Aristotle have similar perspectives about human function. They also share some of their ideas about how human function is related to other philosophical notions such as virtue, good, justice, and the soul. According to Aristotle the chief good (and the human function, which has its end in itself) is happiness. But his definition of happiness is different from what ordinary people usually think. Happiness is neither pleasure nor wealth, nor is it even a kind of honor (Nicomachean Ethics, Chapter 5). It is rather a final state and all human activities attempt to reach this final state. Plato holds that the human function is justice and that it ensures happiness for both the individual and the society when practiced correctly. But this ideal of justice is not for individuals who have special professions or “crafts.” Justice is rather an ideal that every person should pursue for himself/herself. While their definitions seem to be more or less similar, the two philosophers differ on the relative importance of these notions. That is to say, while according to Plato justice is the most important ideal (and happiness is its derivative), Aristotle holds the opinion that happiness is the most significant good which has its end in itself. A correct definition of happiness however is not simple pleasure, according to Aristotle, but a state of moral well-being (which assumes both justice and virtue.) The two philosophers agree on the issue that in order to be happy, we must exercise our human function (and reach the ideals this function requires). They also seem to agree that the human function (justice for Plato, happiness for Aristotle) is impossible to exercise without being virtuous. All these concepts refer to each other and they sometimes even seem more or less equal. This paper will therefore argue that the two philosophers share similar views on the nature of the human function and how happiness and virtue relate to…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    aristole and kant

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aristotle’s main argument is that happiness is the ultimate goal for humans., “Happiness depends on ourselves, more than anybody else.” Aristotle states that the end goal for all human activities is happiness. He also states that as happiness is achieved, it occurs over the course of a lifetime; like friends, wealth, and knowledge.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle claims that an activity is all happiness and good for someone, what he mean is that happiness are not a position; it is a way that will continue your trough out life. To understand happiness you must also understand the human soul, Aristotle says there are three different parts, part one is the vegetative, which basically means the fact that we are living just like the vegetables. In the second part there are the rational and irrational, which we and the animals have in common and share. The third and last part is the humans, because our ability to think and reasoning. As a result Aristotle says that happiness is near the concept of deliberation which is related to the idea of the virtues, which will be described later in this paper.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In chapter seven of Book One, Aristotle is almost vague as he tries and defines what happiness is, and more importantly, why happiness is crucial to the human function, and in fact states that "nor should we demand to know a casual explanation in all matters alike" (1098b). Comparing it to simple truths that are a priori, like when dealing with fundamental principles, he admits that it cannot be defined so easily nor so quickly. He then struggles, in chapter eight, to define happiness. It is, according to him, a kind of "good life and well-being;" virtue precludes action as well as thought. It is also synonymous with virtue: even though virtuous acts are, in general, "not pleasant by nature … men who love what is noble derive pleasure from what is naturally pleasant" (1099a).…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Virtue Ethics

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aristotle’s ethics emphasizes the value of reason and virtue for good moral character. It also elevated the world of reason to a level where other societies did not have it. Every activity has a final cause, the good at which it aims, and Aristotle argued that since there cannot be an infinite regress of merely extrinsic goods, there must be a highest good at which all human activity ultimately aims. (Nic. Ethics I 2 p124-125) This end of human life could be called happiness but is it really happiness? Neither the common thinking of pleasure, wealth, and honor nor the rational theory of forms provide a satisfactory account of this, since even people who gain the material goods may not be happy.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays