Preview

Are Slaughterhouses Morally Wrong

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
112 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Are Slaughterhouses Morally Wrong
Lastly, slaughterhouses are morally wrong because people do not take into account the animals emotions or capacity to feel pain. In a deontological view, we as humans should have an obligation to treat these animals with respect, as they are living breathing beings. One’s consciousness should be filled with guilt and shame while hurting or killing the animals at the slaughterhouse. Of course, the shame and guilt create a conflict of interest to the workers because, although some of them may feel these emotions, the workers still allow themselves to act against them. Wether it be for the money, work, or even human nature, workers still end the lives of countless beings.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The topic of horse slaughter doesn’t usually come up very often in everyday conversation. Horse slaughter is more of an implicit subject, which your everyday person doesn’t know much about. Because it is highly controversial, it has gone through the cycle of being banded and then reinstated twice in the last 5 years. With being involved in the horse industry my entire life, I have witnessed the effects first hand. Some people see it as killing pets, animal cruelty, and morally wrong. However, I see it as a source of income, a way to stop the starvation and abuse of horses, an export industry for the United States, as well as a quality meal for in times of despair.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    SUBJECT: In this chapter of The Omnivore’s Dilemma, titled “The Feedlot: Making Meat”, Michael Pollan discusses the use of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO), and the factories where countless cattle are being mistreated day in and day out.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Slaughterhouse Cases: originated in 1873 with a lawsuit regarding butchers which excluded state monopoly of a violation under the fourteenth amendment. Before, the Slaughterhouse Cases, a majority of laws and decisions were dictated under the jurisdiction of states rather than the federal government. Soon after, the butches held a court hearing to proclaim rights which were deliberately ignored led to lasting effects on the black slaves and the outcome of the Fourteenth Amendment of the American Constitution leading to the ruling of the Jim Crow laws, and changing society.…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Industrial Revolution in Louisiana the state legislature claimed that the Mississippi River had become polluted because butchers dumped garbage into it. The solution to this problem was made by the legislature who created a slaughter house company, but because the butchers were forced into these facilities and it was such an expense to run the butchers banded together. The butchers created the Butchers Benevolent Association and argued that they were deprived of the right to purse their business which is a violation of the fourteenth amendment. However, after appealed opt the Supreme Court the justices ruled in favor of the corporation. The slaughterhouse cases made an impact on future cases because this was the first interpretation…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Humans have been hunting and consuming animals for more than a millennia. The methods they used to kill the animals, though, have been completely different through the ages. For a good portion of that time, humans killed the animals by simply shooting them or stabbing them, quick and easy. Now, we have created factories known as slaughterhouses. Many people that have seen what goes on in these factories consider what some of the workers do to be very inhumane.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    PHL 292 - Exam 1 Study Guide

    • 2595 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Understanding what the wrong-making feature of killing is helps to understand why it is also wrong to kill animals.…

    • 2595 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin 's article, “A Change of Heart About Animals” argues that animals are more like humans than we imagine and as a result should be treated with the care that they deserve. Rifkin develops and supports his argument using facts about the animals and these facts end up touching hearts. In order for Rifkin to get his point across he uses a smart technique by using pathos and plays with the emotions of his audience. Rifkin loves animals and his passion and love evokes emotions that the audience can feel. Animals can feel and have emotions similar to ours. in agreement with Rifkin, I argue that it is wrong and inhumane to kill or abuse animals because they feel, they deserve to have space and should be valued as much as humans are It is wrong no animal should be killed due to abuse or testing, it is wrong and inhumane.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “On Apr. 10, 2001, the Washington Post re-ignited public debate about slaughterhouses with their exposé "They Die Piece by Piece.” The investigation found that animals in slaughterhouses were often cut apart "piece by piece" while still conscious” (Procon.org). There are two methods that usually being used to kill animals. Both methods are cruel and unethical to animals. The first method would be using carbon dioxide gas. The animals will be transferred into the conveyor belt that moves through the tunnel filled with carbon dioxide gas to kill the animals. The second method would be using electricity. The electric current is applied to the animals’ head for making them unconscious. Some animals are still alive during both methods and it would make them even more painful. This is just one aspect of cruelty for animals. Many opponents of vegetarianism say that animals are killed so the other organisms can live, and meats have been in our lives for 2.3 million years so there is nothing wrong with killing animal for foods. But being an animal has been already pitiful; we don’t need to create more suffering for…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prac Essay

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The poem “Meatworks” reflects on the experience of an individual’s initial discovery and deals with perceptions of inhumane treatment of animals that are butchered for human consumption. The persona explores the harsh realities of living in the regional area “The only work was at this works”, the syntactical repetition highlighting the characters desperate need for employment. However the disgusting and visceral imagery utilized throughout the text “sticky stench of blood”, compounded by the sibilance describes the inherent inhumanity of the true nature of the slaughterhouse.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer’s “Down on the Factory Farm” and E.B. White’s “Death of a Pig” illustrate practices of raising animals for human consumption. The care and environment provided for the animals by both White and the factory farmer’s that Singer discusses can be labelled as ‘animal husbandry’. White and the factory farm worker’s animal husbandry methods can be deemed as ethical, or unethical. Bernard E. Rollin defines good animal husbandry as “keeping the animals under conditions to which their natures [are] biologically adapted, and augmenting these natural abilities by providing additional food, protection, care, or shelter” (6). Through this definition of ethics and the criteria established by the “Principles” found in James P. Sterba’s “Reconciling Anthropocentric and Nonanthropocentric…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author argues inherent value. Regan points out animals should be able to experience life with inherent value of their own. Addressing commercial animal agriculture, the author declares "The fundamental moral wrong here is not that animals are kept in stressful close confinement or in isolation, or that their pain and suffering, their needs and preferences are ignored or discounted." Regan continues the only way to right the wrong would be to stop…

    • 684 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this squib, I defend Norcross’s claim that being unable to stop factory farms’ abuse of animals does not make it morally acceptable for one to eat meat that comes from that practice. The objection that Fred is able to stop the suffering of puppies if he personally stops the eating of cocoamone is irrelevant to someone consuming factory-farmed meat even if refusing to eat it would not end production. It is morally wrong to participate in the practice of factory-farmed animals. (Norcross, pg.232)…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trust is one of the most essential feeling that anyone would want in themselves, and in other. Trust gives us the confident to support one’s point of view, and believes. There is no doubt that we can perfectly relate this to Michael Pollan’s essay “An Animal Place”. Pollan addresses the animal rightist claim that animals should be giving more rights, while other think that animals do disserve to have right since they are less intelligent than us humans. Pollan’s main objective is not to persuade his audience to stop eating meat, but rather to study the ethics of eating animals and to find out the way meat is processed by building a sense of trust with his audience. He effectively abutment his main opinion about the problem in the industrialized…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals Vs Vegetarianism

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The processed meat industry is an 800 billion dollar industry killing over 10 billion animals each in the United State alone. Factory farmed livestock account for over 99% of all the meat consumed by Americans even though they are raised in these despicable conditions. Many animals raised on factory farms live in abhorrent conditions where they are unable to turn around in their own cages, live in their own feces, and never even see the light of day.. Peter Singer dives into the idea that all animals are equal in a selection taken out of his book Animal Liberation, found in James and Stuart Rachels’ The Right Thing To Do, and advocates for the humane treatment of animals. Singer lays out the argument that it is morally wrong to make animals…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is no doubt that Veganism is a complex and highly controversial issue. Veganism is primarily known as a type of diet; one that excludes all animal products and byproducts as dairy, eggs, and honey. Basically, there are two groups of vegans. One of them lives the vegan lifestyle for ethical reasons the other for health reasons. Non-vegans claim that it is a logistical challenge to organize and cook vegan food. Another argument against the vegan diet is that vegan food does not fully supply the body with all essential nutrients. In the last years Veganism is running rampant more and more. This is for sure to a large group a temporary fashion, but with elucidation of facts about the cruelty meat-eating involves, more people decide to abstain from animal products. It is a fact, that mass production of animal products implies torment of animals. Many organizations for animal rights, e.g. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), Vier Pfoten, Pro Animale, etcetera, are joined by Vegans, because they want to fight for better conditions for animals. The productive livestock, which is kept in mass stocks, suffers from bad terms such as little space, no natural habitat and social distance. Often animals are stuffed with medicine, for example antibiotics or anti-invectives to keep them alive. Also growth hormones are used to get more profit in shorter time. Generally, factory farming made it possible to raise more animals for less money than ever before. With abstinence from eating animal products Vegans want to actively reduce the demand on animal goods. Today’s slaughter implicates rough and deadhearted methods on the assembly line, which brings me to the next argument pro Veganism. Animals in fear of death distribute stress hormones, which are resorbed by their muscles and organs. All the collected stress hormones and the medicine, which was given to the animals during their lifetime, affects the…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays