Vegetarians do not eat any meat but still consume egg and dairy products. However, the egg and dairy industry may also raise their animals in poor conditions, even organic, free-range, or “certified humane” farms. The male infant laying hens “are invariably killed as soon as they have been sexed” because they have “no commercial value” (Mason and Singer 279). Price could still arise as an issue for many because similar to the free-range and certified humane meat, these types of eggs and dairy products are also generally more expensive. “Veganism is a sure way of completely avoiding participation in the abuse of farm animals” which is what Singer believes is the only sure way of avoiding the unethical implications of eating factory farmed food (Mason 279). Singer gives compelling evidence and asserts that going vegan, despite the other alternatives, is the only sure way to avoid taking part in the abuse of animals. Since vegans do not consume any animal based products at all, they completely ensure that they are not promoting the abuse of farm animals anywhere in the production process. He further maintains that no matter how drastic the change away from supporting the factory farming industry could be on the individual at first, not doing so simply because it is difficult is an unsound moral …show more content…
If the suffering of the animals is taken into account to the level that Singer proposes then a drastic shift away from meat and abuse within the meat industry would occur. There are many alternatives to factory farmed meat such as free-range and certified humane meat, vegetarianism, and veganism. If enough people switched to these other options and stopped supporting the factory farming industry the producers be forced to change their practices to more humane ones. There is no moral justification to supporting the current abusive practices of the factory farming industry and anyone who partakes in it, willingly or not, is supporting the unethical practices that take