Preview

Pros And Cons Of Animal Slaughter

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
586 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Animal Slaughter
It is brutal and immoral to kill animals for food while there is a plenty of rich nutritional non-animal food. All animals are warm-blooded beings that have emotion and feeling therefore, they can experience fear, shock, and pain. Animal slaughter is a significant issue. “In the United States about 35 million cows, 115 million pigs, and 9 billion birds are killed for food each year” (Procon.org). How can so many people want to kill animals just because of their tasty meat? For example, bacon is one of the most common foods that every household has in their refrigerator. They usually have a crispy bacons plate for their dinner, and nobody can deny its delectable taste. But how many people actually know where the bacon comes from? First, the pigs will be delivered to the …show more content…
“On Apr. 10, 2001, the Washington Post re-ignited public debate about slaughterhouses with their exposé "They Die Piece by Piece.” The investigation found that animals in slaughterhouses were often cut apart "piece by piece" while still conscious” (Procon.org). There are two methods that usually being used to kill animals. Both methods are cruel and unethical to animals. The first method would be using carbon dioxide gas. The animals will be transferred into the conveyor belt that moves through the tunnel filled with carbon dioxide gas to kill the animals. The second method would be using electricity. The electric current is applied to the animals’ head for making them unconscious. Some animals are still alive during both methods and it would make them even more painful. This is just one aspect of cruelty for animals. Many opponents of vegetarianism say that animals are killed so the other organisms can live, and meats have been in our lives for 2.3 million years so there is nothing wrong with killing animal for foods. But being an animal has been already pitiful; we don’t need to create more suffering for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Our gustatory pleasure is not as important as the lives of animals. The example used in the article to explain this argument was the “Torturing Puppies” argument. Anyone who has compassion and emotions would agree that saving the lives of the puppies is the right thing to do, as opposed to killing them just for a momentary, gustatory experience. This is the same with the meat farms and consumers. Many animals such as chickens are ripped off of their beaks. Baby cows are put in cages to make their meat tender by not allowing their bones and muscles to grow. Pig’s tails are cut off and are subject to enclosed spaces. The living conditions of these animals are poor. Hormones are being injected into animals, negatively affecting the consumer’s overall health. All of this torture, just to kill these animals for gustatory pleasure, seems just as bad as the puppy example mentioned…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Peta website provides information and facts against animal testing. It contains practices that are done on innocent animals for research such as cosmetic, scientific, experimentation, and drug purposes. The animals that are used for unethical research consists of fish, mice, monkeys, dogs, birds and rabbits. The website describes the unethical procedures that they do on innocent animals. Animals are forced to breath in very toxic fumes and have their head drilled before they die. The innocent animals are treated inhumanely since they are treated as lab equipment rather than animals.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The general public as well as animals are put at a severe disadvantage as a result of the rules created by the politically elite. Those who are vulnerable in society: animals deemed useful and people who are economically disadvantaged, experience the most severe injustice, in part due to inadequate representation. There is no perceptible correlation between legislature, and mercy. The social justice movement is as strong as ever, and the discrepancy between laws passed and the need for basic human and animal rights has become more ubiquitous in modern culture. Bryan Stevenson’s Just Mercy, Una Chadhuri and Holly Hughes’s Animal Acts, and multiple articles that identify key issues pertaining to animal and human rights. As illustrated through…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No one likes to suffer. None of us like to feel pain, but factory farmed animals such as cows, pigs, and chickens experience great pain in their short-lived lives. The website factoryfarming.com, states, “a standard beef slaughter house kills 250 cattle every hour.” The method used is “stunning” this is done by using a catapult gun and giving the cows a mechanical blow to the head. It is to render them unconscious, but this procedure is terribly imprecise: “as a result, conscious animals are often hung upside down, kicking and struggling, while a slaughterhouse worker makes another attempt to render them unconscious. Eventually the animals will be ‘stuck’ in the throat with a knife, and blood will gush from their bodies whether or not they are conscious” (factoryfarming.com). An animal has an intrinsic value, and to dismiss that, is morally wrong. How do we kill others that value their life? People may say it’s the cow’s…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There exist many kinds of stunning practiced at this time such as mechanical, gas/chemical and electrical stunning methods (EFSA, 2006; Gregory, 2005; Zivotofsky & Strous, 2012). However, some of these methods have been accepted for halal slaughter. First of all, the penetrating captive bolt (mechanical stunning) is the main stunning used to slaughter cattle in the EU, but this method is not allowed in halal slaughtering. The reason for that is the risk of dissemination of brain tissue via blood circulation to the safe organs and tissues in cattle (Anil, Love, Helps, & Harbour, 2002). The exception for mechanical stunning is Non-penetrative stunners are accepted by Muslim authority to use in the halal slaughtering of cattle and buffalo in a…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Early on, the elimination of animal testing was unfeasible because it was the only available source. However, technology advancements in the late 20th and early 21st centuries have introduced alternative methods that are often cheaper and more relevant to humans. William Russell and Rex Burch first introduced the 3R’s of animal research in 1959. These R’s stand for the reduction, refinement, and replacement of the use of animals in research and testing. Many alternative methods that have come forward follow these ethics. More than 40 alternatives have been validated and approved world-wide with many more under way. There are a variety of cell-based skin tests, called EPISKIN, EpiDerm, and SkinEthic that can be used to assess the safety of drugs, chemicals, and cosmetics on humans. Organs-on-chips contain human cells grown in a system that mimics the structure and function of human organs. Researchers have also developed computer models that predict and show the ways drugs react to the human body. According to the former scientific executive of Huntingdon Life Sciences, animal tests and human tests agree 5-25 percent of the time, while cell culture toxicology, another alternative form of animal testing, agrees 80-85 percent of the time.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While I already knew that I eat a lot of food, what I did not realize was how much of the food I eat is packaged. In the tables 1 and 2, I put everything that was a local food into a bold font. It was only one item for each week, four brats the first week and three the second. They are from a local meet market, but even they are not very sustainable. Meat is very resource intensive to produce. Many more pounds of grain are fed to the animals to fatten them up than we get in return as meat. According to Lester Brown (2011), 35% of the world’s grain harvest each year goes towards making animal protein. Brown (2011, pg. 173) also states, “With cattle in feedlots, it takes roughly 7 pounds of grain to produce a 1-pound gain in live weight. For…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal abuse is defined as the human infliction of suffering or harm upon any nonhuman animal. Why does animal abuse not apply to animal testing? Animal testing has been around for about 40 years, ever since the 1920’s; it had a breakthrough and became well known. The number of animals being used for testing each year continues to increase. Animals’ that are being used for testing is wrong because it is inhumane.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2014, more than 140,000 American horses were slaughtered for human consumption in foreign countries. Over 90% of these horses were young, healthy, and useable horses. There is a false conception that only old, sick, and unusable horses are slaughtered, but sadly many pregnant mares and young foals are also slaughtered. These horses travel, packed into a trailer, with no food, water, or rest for days before reaching their final destination, where they commonly die horrible inhumane deaths in unregulated processing plants. It is not uncommon for horses to die before reaching the slaughter house. The very young and very old are at the most risk of dying in the trailer. If they fall to floor, they will be trampled. It isn’t uncommon for horses…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An issue that many people debate is if animal testing should remain legal or be banned. Did you know that Europe, which is the world’s biggest cosmetic producer, banned animal testing for cosmetics (11 Facts About Animal Testing)? Sure, animal testing has made some great medical breakthroughs like insulin. There are also downfalls to animal testing. One example is that the experimenters are torturing the animals and the test subjects are painfully tested on. These reasons show that animal testing should be banned, it harms animals, there are better options, and animals and humans are very different.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They avoid the sadness and the tragedy that the walls hide, cows are often in most times treated very very badly. According to The Humane Society of U.S.A. cows are slaughtered at the age of only 16-18 weeks and about 30% are kept in “housing-groups” which they are individually confined, which they are kept there till they have reached the slaughtering weight. It is often assumed that they are slaughtered in a humane, clean way however more than 40 million cows die every year, they are beat almost to death, dragged, often forced to starve and dehydrate, electrocuted, poked, branded, and pushed into processing lines terrified of what beholds the end of that line. Most slaughterhouses use the slicing of the neck method or the bolt gun method, although 40% of the time it is ineffective and leaves the animal conscious throughout the process of being dismembered and…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals Vs Vegetarianism

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The processed meat industry is an 800 billion dollar industry killing over 10 billion animals each in the United State alone. Factory farmed livestock account for over 99% of all the meat consumed by Americans even though they are raised in these despicable conditions. Many animals raised on factory farms live in abhorrent conditions where they are unable to turn around in their own cages, live in their own feces, and never even see the light of day.. Peter Singer dives into the idea that all animals are equal in a selection taken out of his book Animal Liberation, found in James and Stuart Rachels’ The Right Thing To Do, and advocates for the humane treatment of animals. Singer lays out the argument that it is morally wrong to make animals…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once a spillover already occurs, mass murdering animals will not likely stop the spread from person to person directly. It could possibly cut down on animal to human, but if many people are already infected from zoonosis, killing animals after the fact will not do much. That is like taking vitamins to boost your immune system after getting sick. In order to effectively prevent as much spillover as possible, the reservoir and most populous hosts must be identified and killed before they are able to pass it over to humans. That, or once there are only a few known cases. The government can murder thousands of animals known to have or carry a disease, but as long as they are not the only animals that are carriers, mass culling a species or two…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So let’s say that you were an orca or a dolphin and you were held in captivity against your will by another human being, How would you feel about this situation? Well, in the case of many unfortunate aquatic mammals in marine parks and zoos around the world, most of these magnificent animals are held captive in tanks with no room to roam around, or have to deal with being alone, which can trigger stress and aggression. Over the years since the 1960s, the first marine mammals were put into display for entertainment shows in Marine Parks like Seaworld or any other marine parks that was on the globe; around the world, people wondered if captivity was a good or bad idea. By the time the 70s came and movies like “Free Willy” and “Blackfish” being…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Day in and day out, vicious and heinous crimes are being committed on factory farmed animals due to the demands of food from this obese generation of people. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, nearly 10.2 billion land animals were brought up and killed for food in the United States throughout 2010. Plus, per person, an American meat-consumer is responsible for the suffering and death of 28 land animals per year (“Number of”). Animals have little to no rights when it comes to protection than that of humans. Therefore, humans often do whatever they want to animals for meat—knowing that they will get away with it. Of the estimated 10.2 billion land animals killed in 2010, roughly 91% were chickens raised for meat; this just goes…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays